- Joined
- Mar 24, 2017
For me it was the catboys. How can anyone claim to be a traditional fascist after that?
Orbiter 🏳️🌈🐱 Nick Fuentes / Nicholas Joseph Fuentes / der America First Pürrer / "Nick the Knife" - CatboyKami's ex. Flipped fed asset after January 6th. Groypers are pardoned for January 6th, still a fag. Kept Ali Akbar, brown muslim boy-hungry pedophile, around groypers knowing what he was. Hates white women more than blacks and jews.
- Thread starter Puck
- Start date
BigSt@nkD!ckDad
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2020
Nick has no right to cry about "muh degenerates " when he wears a floral printed shirt that screams "my ass is open at all hours" and willingly associates with somebody who drinks simulated cum from a horse dildo and calls himself "lolisocks" .
Nick never outwardly claimed to be a fascist other than his occasional praise of Francisco Franco (who was ironically friends with Cuban dictator Fidel Castro). I think doing so would probably be something the optics king would deem as "cringe" or "wignat" behaviour.
Also, anybody who preaches about the importance of optics like it's their religion and isnt an astronomer or telescope technician is a giant bundle of sticks used for the purposes of fueling a fire.
In layman's terms
A gigantic fucking faggot.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Mar 24, 2017
I saw a video clip where he praised Franco and Mussolini, saying he'd join Mussolini's movement if it existed. He's at least very sympathetic to fascism.
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2020
- Joined
- Jun 6, 2020
Jesus Christ. I was expecting it to be a joke or something and for me to go "You didn't read it all the way through, huh?" What the fuck... the shit is so embarrassing.
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2020
Cringe and bluepilled. At least the movement fizzled out before this subversion happened.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2020
Wait what? All because Ben and Walsh retweeted a couple of certain people and made some statements? That doesn't always mean they endorse everything about the person who said it though.
Those statements are certainly not unique to Nick or his 'movement' at all.
Not really related to Nick.
But I sure bet he salivates at this.
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2019
If Nick had kept a Young Republican facade up, he could be working for Sen Graham or his pals, basically endless cat boys.
BigSt@nkD!ckDad
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2020
I mean , he IS a catholic (allegedly, even though I think his devout religiousness begins and ends with crucifix emojis) the degeneracy isnt a suprise.
Nick would blow his load so hard that catboi kami would die from a shotgun blast force decapitation if this were to actually happen.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
Not only did he double post, but this gay sex scenario had nothing to do with the thing quoted. C'est magnifique.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2020
Yeah not gonna lie it's been 7 months and even I'm getting sick of the gay jokes. And I'm not even a fan of Nick.
Although speaking about CatboyKami anyone know what happened to him post-date? I think he tried to participate on that Tiktok raid with Nick and friends earlier but I may be wrong, and I think his Twitter account has been deleted too.
I haven't seen the two interact much after besides Kami tweeting about Nick back in Feb defending him during that time he got banned off of YouTube.
Also Nick recently went Moot-mode on Australia. Wonder what our favorite Aussie Feline thinks of this?
Last edited:
BigSt@nkD!ckDad
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2020
I WISH I KNEW HOW TO QUIT YOU KAMI!
Jokes aside, even I'm tired of political talking heads/drama. However I am simply an observer who enjoys laughing at tards too much to simply disengage with the proverbial trash fire.
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2020
Nick "catboy" fuentes pulled a sargon last night being muted for 15 minutes. He eventually saw his chat spamming "muted" he then proceeded to call them lying faggots.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2020
Also sorry for the late reply but it seems like BAP and Nick haven't been on good terms since December of last year. Although I don't know if they ever reconciled after. But I think BAP is far from a plan-truster irony bro considering the fact that Nick is somewhat of a 'leader' of that sphere and if Nick called BAP out alongside his fans calling him out, then I'm sure he's more or less against Nick at this point than with him. He may not be part of TRS but he certainly wouldn't be a friend of Nick either.
Not too long ago he also burned his bridges with Milo. Pretty much shitting on him but that wasn't too big of a surprise considering that it is Milo after all. But Nick still seems to be on okayish terms with Gavin McInnes for some reason, although I guess he wants to be nice to him in case he ever gets cornered and could join his platforms. Which would pretty humiliating if he had to join Censored(dot)TV...
Last edited:
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2016
Censored.tv is where alt lite and AmNat/CatNat careers go to die. As we saw with the Proud Boys, McInnes will throw you under the bus for the off chance it will save himself and the same is going to happen here. A perfect place for Nick to babble about optics and irony until McInnes inevitably pulls the plug.
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2020
If you saw the videos I've linked, he can go all-out on Milo but when it comes to talking shit about Gavin he'll constantly back peddle because he knows he can't piss off Gavin too much or else he won't have someone to crawl to when he gets deplatformed again. Every time he brings up something about Gavin to critique, it's followed up by "well, he was a big inspiration to me", "we talked at this one conference", "amicable person", etc.
If Nick ever joins Censored.TV as his last resort, it would spell a disaster for him from a PR point of view (from the perspective of RW internet). A lot of the reason why Nick rose to the upper echelons of RW internet always came from how he's viewed by other right wingers: Tough and strong, especially on his beliefs. While there was that CatboyKami fiasco from a while back, generally the people he hangs out with are 70% aligned with his views. People like Michelle Malkin and such probably do agree with a lot of his views on immigration and Israel, but I highly doubt she buys into the Catholic LARP and especially the view of women in politics.
However, a lot of the Censored.TV people would be considered cuckservatives and degenerates to him and his fanbase. A lot of Censored.TV are more like edgy libertarians who'd probably only agree on at best 40-50% of what Nick believes in. So Nick having to join a platform that has those people running the show would almost be humiliation for him and it would be seen as a betrayal of what Nick is supposed to fight against. Nick working under a guy who kissed Milo, what a world if that happened. Plus, there would be yet another shitstorm in his fanbase on whether or not it was a good idea for him to join.
Ironically, the most closest person to Nick's ideology in Censored.TV would probably Soph. Soph being an edgy zoomer as well (although I don't know how Christian is Soph herself) mostly since IIRC, she does name the Jews every now and then. But again, it's another female he'd have to work with, much like Malkin, despite him constantly railing on them, lol.
Last edited:
Kenobi
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2020
AF where grifters come to grift one last time?
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2020
Now they are pro Matt Walsh, just because he his recent contrarian to the acceptable narrative views, even though Fuentes has been attacking him for years and the Groypers did so in person during the Groyper events? What happened to being a traitor for being Catholic and working for Shapiro? So now it doesn't matter and isn't a betrayal because of muh based takes? At this point, what, if anything, are their actual views except for being edgy?
Kenobi
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2020
I guess that AF just like the weeb wars people are so desperate for validation of society at large, that they will suck up to anyone that even shows the slightest interest in their views.
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2020
So no principles, even though they were going to be the real principled ones. Anyone who has contrary to the acceptable societal narrative is ok. What was the point then? Then they are just like any Republican or Conservative group - 'We love anyone who pretends to be on our side and will alter our views accordingly'.