Brianna Wu / John Flynt - Original Thread

What are you opinions on GamerGate and Brianna Wu / John Flynt?

  • I am of no opinion towards either.

    Votes: 104 8.6%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, but think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 631 52.1%
  • I am neutral on GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, but still think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 112 9.2%
  • I am ANTI-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 37 3.1%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, and think that Brianna Wu is a bad person.

    Votes: 309 25.5%
  • I am PRO-GamerGate, but still think that and think that Brianna Wu is just trying to get by.

    Votes: 9 0.7%

  • Total voters
    1,211
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wonder if Wu's mad that Radi Harpers Peatron is now bigger then his?

The race for the most oppressed is heating up!

1st place: Saint Anita @ 6.2k/month
2nd place Randi "whale of a time" Harper @ 3.7k/month
And bringing up the rear we have the crowd favorite: Brianna "legitimately who?" Wu with 3.1k/month

You have to wonder where all this money comes from really. That's a whole lot of kopels over the course of a year.
 
I wonder if Wu's mad that Radi Harpers Peatron is now bigger then his?

The race for the most oppressed is heating up!

1st place: Saint Anita @ 6.2k/month
2nd place Randi "whale of a time" Harper @ 3.7k/month
And bringing up the rear we have the crowd favorite: Brianna "legitimately who?" Wu with 3.1k/month

You have to wonder where all this money comes from really. That's a whole lot of kopels over the course of a year.

Are there any stats regarding how their numbers have changed over time? I'd love to see some line graphs charting the rise and falls of their patreons, possibly cross-referenced with relevant "events."
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChuckSlaughter
Are there any stats regarding how their numbers have changed over time? I'd love to see some line graphs charting the rise and falls of their patreons, possibly cross-referenced with relevant "events."

The biggest one I know of is Wu's. For like 2 months she had $10,000+/Month, which she claimed was from a 1-time donation. She's been on a steady downward slant for months since.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWCissey
I will never understand white liberal guilt.

Who would pay good money to have some ugly hypocrital tranny tell them they are terrible people for being born white and middle class. Even among religion original sin is a discredited theory but it's apparently alive and well in SJW hands.

If a person came upto me and said "your a terrible man, being born white, male and upper class. You really need to go around and apologies to those who weren't born as lucky as you. ask thier forgiveness then give them your money to make amends " I'd respond with a four letter word.

But yet I see soooo many people going to these events, there is never a shortage of audience when the topic is liberal guilt. What drives these people to want to abase themselves and try to appease some mythical demographic for the actions thier long dead ancestors took.

I just don't get it...

I understand what people like Wu get out of it of course. It's the same deal as Billy Ghram in the 80s. SJWism is just another name for a fundamentalist sect, just not try to preach and convert in gods name but in the name of the holy minority...you know while taking in 90% of the donations and basking in the glow of a righteous cause. This kind of hyprocrisy never last thankfully as sooner or later the leaders are shown as the corrupt opportunist they really are but still; tens of thousands will donate, listen and believe before it's over.

I just dont get it...
 
It's a weird kind of self-hate. Social awareness is a good thing but it can obviously be taken too far.

That said, they don't just shit on white straight guys, they shit on anyone who disagrees with their cancerous ideologies. My opinions on racial, gender or other such issues have been dismissed many times by SJW's who were under the impression that I'm just a white straight privileged guy. When I informed them how privileged I am not, I got blocked and most of them made some kind of tweet about internal hate or some such nonsense.
 
1. Lack of employer support

2. :roll: Not sure if sarcasm, or retarded
 
Here's the chart I keep tracking Brianna's Patreon:

dec 22nd: 2548/month (399)
january 7th: 13041 13K/month (549)
january 9th 13082 554
feb 13th: $3,334 (618)
feb 15th: $3,359 (622)
feb 18th: $3,452 (642)
mar 5th: $3,449 (654)
mar 14th: $3,447 (660)
mar 30th: $3,400 (667)

apr 1st: $3,401 (668)
apr 9th: $3,412 (667)

april 10th: 3409 (667)
April 11th: 3406 (664)
April 16th: 3384 (658)
April 18th: 3380 (658)
April 19th: 3378 (656)
April 21st: 3377 (655)
April 24th: 3353 (652)
April 25th: 3356 (654)
April 27th: 3359 (654)
April 28th: 3352 (653)
April 29th: "
April 30th: 3348 (653)


I haven't updated this morning, when she's lost 8 more bucks.
 
Well of course people get less interested in Women with kids.
Unless she's got someone to leave them with that's an employee that won't work nearly as long but probably still demanding the same payment (good reasons to but still) and a position that can't just be filled by someone who will be available to work the full hours without making an extra paycheck. It's harsh but it's business.

But I 'spose you'd know all about business running with your... one remaining employee and lack of any work.
 
I will never understand white liberal guilt.

Who would pay good money to have some ugly hypocrital tranny tell them they are terrible people for being born white and middle class. Even among religion original sin is a discredited theory but it's apparently alive and well in SJW hands.

If a person came upto me and said "your a terrible man, being born white, male and upper class. You really need to go around and apologies to those who weren't born as lucky as you. ask thier forgiveness then give them your money to make amends " I'd respond with a four letter word.

But yet I see soooo many people going to these events, there is never a shortage of audience when the topic is liberal guilt. What drives these people to want to abase themselves and try to appease some mythical demographic for the actions thier long dead ancestors took.

I just don't get it...

I understand what people like Wu get out of it of course. It's the same deal as Billy Ghram in the 80s. SJWism is just another name for a fundamentalist sect, just not try to preach and convert in gods name but in the name of the holy minority...you know while taking in 90% of the donations and basking in the glow of a righteous cause. This kind of hyprocrisy never last thankfully as sooner or later the leaders are shown as the corrupt opportunist they really are but still; tens of thousands will donate, listen and believe before it's over.

I just dont get it...

I'll shine some light on this. It's not unique to liberals though. It's seen on both sides.

There's a certain mindset involved where people who are aware of misdeeds committed in the past, but didn't have a direct connection to them wind up feeling responsible. Usually, this is because of ingrained things taught when an individual is still very young, and has parents or guardians who rely on personal shaming and reinforced guilt (wherein a child suspected of wrongdoing is "wrong" by default automatically, and essentially guilty until proven innocent) as a disciplinary feature. This fosters someone viewing their own accomplishments in a negative, often making them wind up unable to see their own abilities because they have had it enforced for some time that they are deeply flawed and thus automatically responsible for everything wrong in the world due to their own parents/guardians using automatic guilt and blame-and-shame. This eventually results in a situation where someone feels guilty even if they did nothing wrong. All it takes is a minor even tangential link, and the subject feels genuinely responsible. "You're automatically wrong, so shut the fuck up."

You can see, given this, the obvious starting to come into focus: It's a trap all too many parents fall into.

These mindsets are then siezed upon by opportunists on both sides.

On the extremist left, the "WHITE PEOPLE AND MALES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PROBLEMS" angle is the quintessential nadir of this mindset given wings. Since there's a big number of white people and a big number of males, they're essentially applying the same tactics of automatic guilt and shame-and-blame on a bigger scale, tapping into individuals who've already been victimized. And so, they come to believe that they're actually responsible and go to these out of a misplaced feeling of guilt despite having done nothing wrong.

The objective is to get you to surrender to authoritarianism by subjugating your own worth as a human being.

On the extremist right, this is taken in a different direction. Rather than internalized blame-and-shame, it's externalized. Someone else is wrong, but you are the problem because you tolerated their wrong-doing. The actual bogeyman used in the extremist right version tends to vary, with gays, other religions, and immigrants being the most common and exploitable targets. As the country as a whole has gotten more diverse and more accepting and intelligent, however, you might assume this mindset would be left to wither on the vine. You'd be wrong. Instead it simply finds new targets and the cycle repeats. They'll happily lock onto the actions of their extremist left counterparts to provide a description of THE ENEMY, whilst at the same time guiding people towards an almost identical result.

The objective is to get you to surrender to authoritarianism by exploiting a desire to expel "undesirable" individuals from the stage.

Horseshoe Theory is quite real, as they say.
 
fyi wu.
tumblr_naz7bpUtuZ1qijphto1_1280.jpg
 
I'll shine some light on this. It's not unique to liberals though. It's seen on both sides.

There's a certain mindset involved where people who are aware of misdeeds committed in the past, but didn't have a direct connection to them wind up feeling responsible. Usually, this is because of ingrained things taught when an individual is still very young, and has parents or guardians who rely on personal shaming and reinforced guilt (wherein a child suspected of wrongdoing is "wrong" by default automatically, and essentially guilty until proven innocent) as a disciplinary feature. This fosters someone viewing their own accomplishments in a negative, often making them wind up unable to see their own abilities because they have had it enforced for some time that they are deeply flawed and thus automatically responsible for everything wrong in the world due to their own parents/guardians using automatic guilt and blame-and-shame. This eventually results in a situation where someone feels guilty even if they did nothing wrong. All it takes is a minor even tangential link, and the subject feels genuinely responsible. "You're automatically wrong, so shut the fuck up."

You can see, given this, the obvious starting to come into focus: It's a trap all too many parents fall into.

These mindsets are then siezed upon by opportunists on both sides.

On the extremist left, the "WHITE PEOPLE AND MALES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL PROBLEMS" angle is the quintessential nadir of this mindset given wings. Since there's a big number of white people and a big number of males, they're essentially applying the same tactics of automatic guilt and shame-and-blame on a bigger scale, tapping into individuals who've already been victimized. And so, they come to believe that they're actually responsible and go to these out of a misplaced feeling of guilt despite having done nothing wrong.

The objective is to get you to surrender to authoritarianism by subjugating your own worth as a human being.

On the extremist right, this is taken in a different direction. Rather than internalized blame-and-shame, it's externalized. Someone else is wrong, but you are the problem because you tolerated their wrong-doing. The actual bogeyman used in the extremist right version tends to vary, with gays, other religions, and immigrants being the most common and exploitable targets. As the country as a whole has gotten more diverse and more accepting and intelligent, however, you might assume this mindset would be left to wither on the vine. You'd be wrong. Instead it simply finds new targets and the cycle repeats. They'll happily lock onto the actions of their extremist left counterparts to provide a description of THE ENEMY, whilst at the same time guiding people towards an almost identical result.

The objective is to get you to surrender to authoritarianism by exploiting a desire to expel "undesirable" individuals from the stage.

Horseshoe Theory is quite real, as they say.

It's probably also noticeable that both sides are rabid fans of playing the victim in order to get people on their side.

Of course, the more privileged the "victim" is like, say, someone who makes an extremely comfortable living off of patreon for doing fuck all and treated as some sort of authority worthy of public speeches despite having fuck all to say of any value, the more balls out ridiculous their victim stories get. Kinda like how right-wing fundies will claim they're being oppressed by gay people forcing them to marry men and convert to satanism.
 
It's a weird kind of self-hate. Social awareness is a good thing but it can obviously be taken too far.

That said, they don't just shit on white straight guys, they shit on anyone who disagrees with their cancerous ideologies. My opinions on racial, gender or other such issues have been dismissed many times by SJW's who were under the impression that I'm just a white straight privileged guy. When I informed them how privileged I am not, I got blocked and most of them made some kind of tweet about internal hate or some such nonsense.

Well really, how else can you explain PoC (Not sure if that's your case, just using the example here) disagreeing with middle to upper middle class white people being paid tens of thousands of dollars to tell them how society works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trombonista
Ugh. I can't even watch videos involving Wu. When she was on the David Pacman Show, I figured I'd watch and see what was up, but as soon as she opened her mouth I had to shut the browser down. Her voice sounded so gross and grating on my ears, and her "looks" of a hobo that hasn't washed in over a week didn't help either. She's pretty much in the same camp I put PandaLee in with that jacked up Kermit the Frog voice.

The irony of a trans that lived as a privileged white man for most of her life giving guilt lectures is not lost on me. It's the same feeling of eye-rolling I got when I went to a work conference and one of the speakers was trying to guilt everyone in the same manner, except the speaker was an actual minority. After that, the people in my work group treated me differently, but it wasn't genuine. It was out of white guilt, and that made me irritated and I felt like I was being patronized.
 
The irony of a trans that lived as a privileged white man for most of her life giving guilt lectures is not lost on me. It's the same feeling of eye-rolling I got when I went to a work conference and one of the speakers was trying to guilt everyone in the same manner, except the speaker was an actual minority. After that, the people in my work group treated me differently, but it wasn't genuine. It was out of white guilt, and that made me irritated and I felt like I was being patronized.

Of course you felt irritated. None of them even contributed to your Patreon account. That's some high tier oppression right there.
 
Ugh. I can't even watch videos involving Wu. When she was on the David Pacman Show, I figured I'd watch and see what was up, but as soon as she opened her mouth I had to shut the browser down. Her voice sounded so gross and grating on my ears, and her "looks" of a hobo that hasn't washed in over a week didn't help either. She's pretty much in the same camp I put PandaLee in with that jacked up Kermit the Frog voice.

The irony of a trans that lived as a privileged white man for most of her life giving guilt lectures is not lost on me. It's the same feeling of eye-rolling I got when I went to a work conference and one of the speakers was trying to guilt everyone in the same manner, except the speaker was an actual minority. After that, the people in my work group treated me differently, but it wasn't genuine. It was out of white guilt, and that made me irritated and I felt like I was being patronized.
I've made it a point to never hear her voice. I don't care what kind of hilarity I may be missing, I just feel it's definitely for the best for me not to know.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back