Science Baby born holding mum’s contraceptive IUD that failed to stop her getting pregnant


The baby boy can be apparently be seen clasping his mother's yellow and black intrauterine device in his hand at Hai Phong International Hospital in the city of Hai Phong in northern Vietnam.

image-4-2.png


Obstetrician Tran Viet Phuong said the device had come out when the baby was born.
The infant had it held firmly in his hands when the picture was taken, it is claimed.
Dr Phuong told local media: “After delivery, I thought him holding the device was interesting, so I took a picture.
“I never thought it would receive so much attention.”

205c5139-82a2-4837-8964-5d8c4622505b.jpg


The baby's 34-year-old mother claims she had the coil inserted two years earlier but it did not work because she later discovered she was pregnant.
Dr Phuong said the device may have been moved from its original position, becoming an ineffective form of contraception and allowing the mother to become pregnant.

The baby was healthy when born, weighing 7lbs, and both mother and child were under observation in the hospital after the birth, it's reported.

34de2f71-2e1e-49dd-b15e-c4529d5a8a1d.jpg

The mother had previously had two other children, according to reports.
The coil is supposed to stop sperm fertilising a woman's eggs and can work by either releasing copper or hormones after being inserted into a woman's uterus.
 
That kid's pretty lucky since if you conceive it risks growing inside afaik you're supposed to get them ripped out asap (the iud not the kid)
Not going to lie, I feel bad for the mother. She didn't want another kid, and actively tried to make it happen. This wasn't just a lazy attempt to not have one either. I hope she sees the baby more as a blessing than a curse.
Drag the kid into the gyno, "99% effectivity my ass!"
 
This isn't this first time it's happened, I remember seeing pictures back in the 80s of newborns holding mom's IUD.
Funny picture to embarrass him with when he gets older.
To be fair the contraceptive technology back then sucked ass and was barely starting to get modern, it still kinda is because of the social stigma towards preventing pregnancies. but as i said if you don't want them, cut them tubes, don't try work around it because there's always a risk
 
To be fair the contraceptive technology back then sucked ass and was barely starting to get modern, it still kinda is because of the social stigma towards preventing pregnancies. but as i said if you don't want them, cut them tubes, don't try work around it because there's always a risk
I remember the horror stories about the Dalkon Shield, my ex-MIL had to get a hysterectomy because of the damage it did to her.
 
To be fair the contraceptive technology back then sucked ass and was barely starting to get modern, it still kinda is because of the social stigma towards preventing pregnancies. but as i said if you don't want them, cut them tubes, don't try work around it because there's always a risk

Cutting the tubes is still risky. Many women have conceived in inappropriate places because the egg is still released. It certainly cuts down the possibility immensely but As far as I'm aware your best bet is the coils/screws, a fairly recent development, which cause scar tissue to build up in the tubes preventing the egg from going anywhere.

IMO. Given she had two children already she would have had a fairly easy time getting her tubes cut or w/e if she wanted too. She chose an IUD vs. getting a surgical option which makes me think she was just intending to post-pone more children for a while vs. never having any more.
 
Cutting the tubes is still risky. Many women have conceived in inappropriate places because the egg is still released. It certainly cuts down the possibility immensely but As far as I'm aware your best bet is the coils/screws, a fairly recent development, which cause scar tissue to build up in the tubes preventing the egg from going anywhere.

IMO. Given she had two children already she would have had a fairly easy time getting her tubes cut or w/e if she wanted too. She chose an IUD vs. getting a surgical option which makes me think she was just intending to post-pone more children for a while vs. never having any more.
Fair assessment, i didn't consider she would want to stop having children just for a bit before having another one again, but given the economy we live in she prolly wanted to make sure she could feed the other two before having another
 
Cutting the tubes is still risky. Many women have conceived in inappropriate places because the egg is still released. It certainly cuts down the possibility immensely but As far as I'm aware your best bet is the coils/screws, a fairly recent development, which cause scar tissue to build up in the tubes preventing the egg from going anywhere.

IMO. Given she had two children already she would have had a fairly easy time getting her tubes cut or w/e if she wanted too. She chose an IUD vs. getting a surgical option which makes me think she was just intending to post-pone more children for a while vs. never having any more.
There are two different 'cutting' surgeries. One just effectively seals the ends, the other one removes the tubes completely. The former is the one that has problems.
 
Back