Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

[Inflatable Julay]

@Inflatable Julay why was I notified I was tagged in your post when my name is nowhere in it? Is that a glitch?

I accidentally had your post quoted before I edited it out

 

[Kenobi]

r/LatinoPeopleTwitter - Now this is something I can agree with.

13,826 votes and 1,067 comments so far on Reddit

www.reddit.com

What partnership is there to work on? Mexico is literally run by the cartels.

Here are some amazing comments from that very reddit post
Just look at those uppvotes. These people seriously believe that Bernie Sanders was some kind of super politician, nay scratch that a hero! That were gonna make all of their dreams come true even tough there is nothing realistic about them. As retarded as trump supporters can be they at least had realistic expectations of ziondon.
1. Close the border
2. Bring back jobs
3. Stop sending men to die in the middle east

Reddit at this point is literately controlled by communists that spread their filthy propaganda everywhere on the site.
#Mccarthy did nothing wrong.

 

[Meat Target]

View attachment 1438332

What a shocker, a white liberal advocating for the economic ruin of a business that's owned an operated by Hispanics, purely because they have the wrong opinion. Minorities matter and diversity is our strength, but if you disagree with me I want you destitute and cleaning my toilets, apparently.

Igor Volsky is another rat I can't stand
>"I was bullied growing up in the USSR for being a Jew"
>"so you need to give up your guns"
I'm not joking, he actually wrote an article (and someone like WaPo published it) following that exact non sequitur.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

r/LatinoPeopleTwitter - Now this is something I can agree with.

13,826 votes and 1,067 comments so far on Reddit

www.reddit.com

View attachment 1438721
What partnership is there to work on? Mexico is literally run by the cartels.

Here are some amazing comments from that very reddit post
Just look at those uppvotes. These people seriously believe that Bernie Sanders was some kind of super politician, nay scratch that a hero! That were gonna make all of their dreams come true even tough there is nothing realistic about them. As retarded as trump supporters can be they at least had realistic expectations of ziondon.
1. Close the border
2. Bring back jobs
3. Stop sending men to die in the middle east
View attachment 1438724

Reddit at this point is literately controlled by communists that spread their filthy propaganda everywhere on the site.
#Mccarthy did nothing wrong.
View attachment 1438726

The funny thing about these redditors is, you know barely 10% of them (if even that) who say they'll come out to vote for Biden will actually do so. They're so depressed about Big Brother's hamfisted nominee, but act like the obvious enthusiasm gap will have no effect. Even Hill-dawg had the "It's time for a WOMAN to bomb brown people now!" people foaming at the mouth.

Maybe I'm wrong and the boomers and suburban wine moms will make enough of an impact to get Biden over the edge, but it's laughable to say that Biden has a solid base of support. Trump, for how terrible he is at actually politicking as a president, still will get nearly every single voter who came out in 2016 to come out again for him.

 

[Shaka Brah]

Maybe I'm wrong and the boomers and suburban wine moms will make enough of an impact to get Biden over the edge, but it's laughable to say that Biden has a solid base of support. Trump, for how terrible he is at actually politicking as a president, still will get nearly every single voter who came out in 2016 to come out again for him.

No matter how much Trump has failed to live up to the hopes of the whites who voted for him, they will not vote for Biden or whatever shrilly hateful black woman the DNC picks to be the real President. They know there's only one railroad out of this shitty town and the GOP is the train, like it or not.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

No matter how much Trump has failed to live up to the hopes of the whites who voted for him, they will not vote for Biden or whatever shrilly hateful black woman the DNC picks to be the real President. They know there's only one railroad out of this shitty town and the GOP is the train, like it or not.

I would also argue there's a segment of people the media/pollsters won't focus on, who didn't vote Trump in 2016 because "he's going to start a nuclear war! The country is going to fall apart!" I mean, if you're in a dem-controlled city, maybe your world is falling apart, but there have been no wars and the country is still standing. I wonder how many people who didn't vote last time will see the situation now and think "Oh, well, we just had four years, and these other people are the party of societal chaos. Can't hurt to have another four and then see him out."

As we saw in the midwest last time around, all it takes is a few thousand votes here and there to make or break the election. But I guess that's not good enough for the narrative?

 

[Consenticles]

We should just replace the public school system with online classes and home schooling, tbh.

Gonna chime in here, as I have relevant information.

Online schooling has been going on for over a decade now. And I don't mean Skype bullshit, I mean a full blown public school system exists, and has existed in many counties in ththe US. The degree you recieve is equal in the eyes of any college you apply for; I know of a specific person who got into one of the largest schools in the country, and had acceptance letters from several prestigious institutions, of which similar scoring graduates of "regular" school struggled to be admitted.

Online schooling, in its earliest days within the mid-2000s, was mostly meant for trouble makers. Kids who got kicked out of their respective schools, yet there remained an alternative route. Also not uncommon were the teen-mom types.

On the other end of the spectrum, online schooling was utilized by kids who traveled by necessity. I know of a specific case where the kid was a tennis savant, and in order to attend the necessary tournaments to break into the pro circuit, the parents utilized online curriculum. Other cases are those with illnesses that would leave them otherwise truant. Think extended periods of hospitalization.

The thing is, the infrastructure for online classes is there already, and while it does have its flaws, there are also some serious advantages.

Students can learn at their own pace, completing assignments by a certain due date. If completed earlier than requested. they are able to go at a faster pace, sometimes resulting in graduating a year or two early.

On the other hand, online schooling can prove detrimental to children and teens who already have trouble being motivated to do their work in person. There is not anyone telling them in their ear, that certain tasks must be completed by the end of the week. It is up to them to maintain their schedules and keep themselves from being distracted by all the other frivolities that remain a simple click away.

Additionally, if a student is struggling with a concept, more often than not it is going to be more difficult for them to grasp it. Most of these schools provide tutors or in house sessions with the actual instructors. But there is going to be a delay in response since you're communicating through email, phone, or scheduled time, rather than having assistance at the very moment you raise your hand.

A lot of online schools don't have completely fleshed out classes, sometimes defaulting to the parents and child themselves documenting their participation via an honor system. Think gym classes (which could be completed at your local YMCA) and art classes (which could consist of public courses at a community center). Suffice to say, the curriculum in a lot of cases is not as high of quality as you would get with an instructor face-to-face. Not to mention all tests, unless made to be taken at a specific testing center, are going to be open note/honor system. So predictably there are a whole lot of kids who simply google questions online for answers, thus learning very little.

My final words on this subject are more of a remote observation and opinion, rather than blanketed fact. Speaking from second hand experience, the transition from online schooling to college is very difficult. There is a distinct difference between charting your own course and waking up when it pleases you, and adjusting to a rigid schedule that moves at a single pace of which you no longer have control over. This is not to say that online schooling will always give this result. It just depends on the student.

Additionally I find it necessary to note that there have probably been some improvements and changes since I last looked.

The bottom line is that the inrastructure is already there, and it can be easily translated and duplicated over an entire public school system with a little effort. The main issues will stem from the human side of things; teachers will drag their feet, as it drastically changes their occupational duties. Parents will hate that they no longer have a day care for their teenager. Students will either thrive or absolutely take advantage of the lax nature of the current system.

I find it quite interesting that the liberal public school teacher types are pushing for this, as it will expose the lack of importance and need to have individual home rooms. The structure of the online school is more similar to that of a college, where the individual instructors teach a specific subject, spanning multiple grades. It reduces the demand for teachers dramatically when you dont need to pair off every 25 students with a different teacher, because they no longer need a certain level of supervision.

Public schools will find that they don't have to spend anywhere near the amount they currently do, especially when you are no longer paying for facilities/upkeep. And when you only need 1/4 ofthe teachers you currently have on salary.

 

[MrJokerRager]

But remember that at the same time as the "alphabet people" are pushing non-standard relationships, they're openly and actively hostile to anything that is beneficial or enjoyable to straight men. Men with multiple wives will be vilified even moreso than they are today, decried as scum deserving of execution, automatically abusive cads who must be raping their wives constantly every hour of every day. Women with multiple husbands, however, will be Stunning And Brave, simply exercising their healthy sexuality and their right to be taken care of and choose how to live their lives.

You can already see this dynamic at work in the sex industry, at least on the alternate days where Sex Work Is Real Work. Female prostitutes are lauded and held up as paragons of humanity, while the men who patron them are denounced as the lowest, most vile slime. The doublethink is always active and the double standard is always assumed and embraced.

Besides, even if the woke movement wasn't misandrist by default, Mormon polygamy is still based in religion, which is always going to make it evil to them by default. There can be only one religion, the Party, so if the government didn't assign that dude his wives they're not gonna stand for it.

And yet they love Islam, which is even more patriarchal, traditional and more set in stone due to the Koran being unalterable.

 

[Flexo]

Furries have been a thing since the 70s. They're an offshoot of anthropomorphic animals. I would say you'd have to get rid of Walt Disney to fix furries, but anthropomorphic animals were a thing all the way back to Aesop's Fables in ancient Greece. Hell, Disney loved the uncle Remus stories and they had tons of anthropomorphic animals. That's why Song of the South was made, because Disney loved those stories.

If you mean the current crop of sexual degenerate furries, then maybe. But these guys were popping up in 80s and early 90s, before Pokemon was even released. Its really the old guard's fault since they weren't hard enough on these degenerates. Most of the old guard weren't into anthropomorphic animals sexually. Just as a art form.

Never forget that Furries have been degenerate fucks since the start. And if you are in the furry community and mention it, they'll fucking DESTROY you to protect the zoophiles and pedophiles that make up 90% of the big name furries.

(Edit: Hm. Attached images have stopped working?)

There are at least half a dozen verses in the OT of the Bible condemning animal loving. So it appears furries have been around for a long, long time in humanity.

 

[HumanHive]

There are at least half a dozen verses in the OT of the Bible condemning animal loving. So it appears furries have been around for a long, long time in humanity.

Of course the Jews invented furries.
;^)

 

[Ghostse]

Gonna chime in here, as I have relevant information.

Online schooling has been going on for over a decade now. And I don't mean Skype bullshit, I mean a full blown public school system exists, and has existed in many counties in ththe US. The degree you recieve is equal in the eyes of any college you apply for; I know of a specific person who got into one of the largest schools in the country, and had acceptance letters from several prestigious institutions, of which similar scoring graduates of "regular" school struggled to be admitted.

Online schooling, in its earliest days within the mid-2000s, was mostly meant for trouble makers. Kids who got kicked out of their respective schools, yet there remained an alternative route. Also not uncommon were the teen-mom types.

On the other end of the spectrum, online schooling was utilized by kids who traveled by necessity. I know of a specific case where the kid was a tennis savant, and in order to attend the necessary tournaments to break into the pro circuit, the parents utilized online curriculum. Other cases are those with illnesses that would leave them otherwise truant. Think extended periods of hospitalization.

The thing is, the infrastructure for online classes is there already, and while it does have its flaws, there are also some serious advantages.

Students can learn at their own pace, completing assignments by a certain due date. If completed earlier than requested. they are able to go at a faster pace, sometimes resulting in graduating a year or two early.

On the other hand, online schooling can prove detrimental to children and teens who already have trouble being motivated to do their work in person. There is not anyone telling them in their ear, that certain tasks must be completed by the end of the week. It is up to them to maintain their schedules and keep themselves from being distracted by all the other frivolities that remain a simple click away.

Additionally, if a student is struggling with a concept, more often than not it is going to be more difficult for them to grasp it. Most of these schools provide tutors or in house sessions with the actual instructors. But there is going to be a delay in response since you're communicating through email, phone, or scheduled time, rather than having assistance at the very moment you raise your hand.

A lot of online schools don't have completely fleshed out classes, sometimes defaulting to the parents and child themselves documenting their participation via an honor system. Think gym classes (which could be completed at your local YMCA) and art classes (which could consist of public courses at a community center). Suffice to say, the curriculum in a lot of cases is not as high of quality as you would get with an instructor face-to-face. Not to mention all tests, unless made to be taken at a specific testing center, are going to be open note/honor system. So predictably there are a whole lot of kids who simply google questions online for answers, thus learning very little.

My final words on this subject are more of a remote observation and opinion, rather than blanketed fact. Speaking from second hand experience, the transition from online schooling to college is very difficult. There is a distinct difference between charting your own course and waking up when it pleases you, and adjusting to a rigid schedule that moves at a single pace of which you no longer have control over. This is not to say that online schooling will always give this result. It just depends on the student.

Additionally I find it necessary to note that there have probably been some improvements and changes since I last looked.

The bottom line is that the inrastructure is already there, and it can be easily translated and duplicated over an entire public school system with a little effort. The main issues will stem from the human side of things; teachers will drag their feet, as it drastically changes their occupational duties. Parents will hate that they no longer have a day care for their teenager. Students will either thrive or absolutely take advantage of the lax nature of the current system.

I find it quite interesting that the liberal public school teacher types are pushing for this, as it will expose the lack of importance and need to have individual home rooms. The structure of the online school is more similar to that of a college, where the individual instructors teach a specific subject, spanning multiple grades. It reduces the demand for teachers dramatically when you dont need to pair off every 25 students with a different teacher, because they no longer need a certain level of supervision.

Public schools will find that they don't have to spend anywhere near the amount they currently do, especially when you are no longer paying for facilities/upkeep. And when you only need 1/4 ofthe teachers you currently have on salary.

I'm also going to say that the infrastructure for "school by mail" has existed since like the 1800s.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

I'm also going to say that the infrastructure for "school by mail" has existed since like the 1800s.

If correspondence courses by mail were good enough for Seneca to use while teaching, they're good enough for us.

 

[HumanHive]

Half the problem with school by mail and virtual classrooms is that the majority of children do not wish to be educated voluntarily. We have a contrarian youth culture which has to be coerced and bribed.

 

[verissimus]

I know this is derailing from the thread, but it would be somewhat interesting if this "virtual classroom" phenomenon sort of becomes at least a permanent viable alternative to learning that could lead to lower costs. Very optimistic scenario, I know, but that would be an amusing outcome of all this.

 

[Dante Alighieri]

I know this is derailing from the thread, but it would be somewhat interesting if this "virtual classroom" phenomenon sort of becomes at least a permanent viable alternative to learning that could lead to lower costs. Very optimistic scenario, I know, but that would be an amusing outcome of all this.

Which is why it won't ever happen. Teachers unions have way too much power and decreasing the dependency on teachers and administrations will have the Democrats throwing fits.

 

[Jigglyjogglers]

Which is why it won't ever happen. Teachers unions have way too much power and decreasing the dependency on teachers and administrations will have the Democrats throwing fits.

See I see the opposite approach. The virtual classrooms have led to much less work for teachers, and plenty of them have admitted they're using the virtual classrooms as an excuse to just give every student a pass so they're not even grading papers. The unions would love it because not only would it be just as easy to demand hiring more teachers since you can hire them from anywhere in the country that has decent internet coverage, the union doesn't have to spend so much money on the inevitable legal cases when teachers fuck students. (I imagine sexting cases would be much lower profile and cost less, since those would become the norm.)

The ones who would hate the idea would be the administrators who get money for having asses in seats at the physical school buildings, and get to process and redirect all the money that's supposed to go to maintenance and bills for keeping said buildings open. The challenge would be for the unions and administrators to get together and convince those holding the purse strings to not only keep funding the physical buildings as offices the teachers can use to host the meetings under the excuse of stable internet connection and access to teaching aids, but to increase funding because obviously they'd need a complete fiber-optic overhaul and better cameras/computers and more visual aids to engage students in a virtual environment!

Which will never happen under the current administration, which is telling them "Use it or lose it." That's why they're desperately going to hold out hoping Trump loses in November... a Dem administration would let them run wild again and get away with all that shit on the principle of "undoing the damage wrought by Trump and DeVos".

 

[Dante Alighieri]

See I see the opposite approach. The virtual classrooms have led to much less work for teachers, and plenty of them have admitted they're using the virtual classrooms as an excuse to just give every student a pass so they're not even grading papers. The unions would love it because not only would it be just as easy to demand hiring more teachers since you can hire them from anywhere in the country that has decent internet coverage, the union doesn't have to spend so much money on the inevitable legal cases when teachers fuck students. (I imagine sexting cases would be much lower profile and cost less, since those would become the norm.)

The ones who would hate the idea would be the administrators who get money for having asses in seats at the physical school buildings, and get to process and redirect all the money that's supposed to go to maintenance and bills for keeping said buildings open. The challenge would be for the unions and administrators to get together and convince those holding the purse strings to not only keep funding the physical buildings as offices the teachers can use to host the meetings under the excuse of stable internet connection and access to teaching aids, but to increase funding because obviously they'd need a complete fiber-optic overhaul and better cameras/computers and more visual aids to engage students in a virtual environment!

Which will never happen under the current administration, which is telling them "Use it or lose it." That's why they're desperately going to hold out hoping Trump loses in November... a Dem administration would let them run wild again and get away with all that shit on the principle of "undoing the damage wrought by Trump and DeVos".

With regards to the teachers part, as I agree with how the administrations would react, I think the teachers could easily be replaced with khan academy like videos and interactive learning "games" and all that's required is an industry to create the material and grade said material. Most of that already exists though it has many flaws.

 

[Jigglyjogglers]

With regards to the teachers part, as I agree with how the administrations would react, I think the teachers could easily be replaced with khan academy like videos and interactive learning "games" and all that's required is an industry to create the material and grade said material. Most of that already exists though it has many flaws.

Yeah but with a Dem in charge of the department of education, they'd simply argue that they still need the teachers to "curate" and play the videos, turning them into the educational equivalent of George Jetson (whose only job was to push a button but which apparently paid him handsomely).

 

[JohnDoe]

Furries have been a thing since the 70s. They're an offshoot of anthropomorphic animals. I would say you'd have to get rid of Walt Disney to fix furries, but anthropomorphic animals were a thing all the way back to Aesop's Fables in ancient Greece. Hell, Disney loved the uncle Remus stories and they had tons of anthropomorphic animals. That's why Song of the South was made, because Disney loved those stories.

The 1970s? I think not.

The Löwenmensch figurine or Lion-man of the Hohlenstein-Stadel is a prehistoric ivory sculpture discovered in the Hohlenstein-Stadel, a German cave in 1939. The German name, Löwenmensch, meaning "lion-human", is used most frequently because it was discovered and is exhibited in Germany.

The lion-headed figurine is the oldest-known zoomorphic (animal-shaped) sculpture in the world, and the oldest-known uncontested example of figurative art. It has been determined by carbon dating of the layer in which it was found to be between 35,000 and 40,000 years old, and therefore is associated with the archaeological Aurignacian culture of the Upper Paleolithic. It was carved out of mammoth ivory using a flint stone knife. Seven parallel, transverse, carved gouges are on the left arm.

The oldest piece of representative art is some Stone Age Shaman's fursona. Furries have always existed ever since proto-humans were able to recognize themselves versus other animals in an abstract way.

 

[SBG]

Half the problem with school by mail and virtual classrooms is that the majority of children do not wish to be educated voluntarily. We have a contrarian youth culture which has to be coerced and bribed.

Also have a ton of lazy parents that would never pressure their kids to actually do their online classwork. Plus you of course have all the kids who get the free breakfasts and lunches, essentially turning the school system into their caretakers, and there's not much of a replacement system for that.


You have some attempts at fixes like doing prepaid credit cards or extra food stamps. But the school system that's acting as kid's caretakers is likely familiar with how many kids parents misuse that money.