Yes, but that is based upon the assumption that asymptomatic transmission is high, contact-to-symptom conversion rate is high, and that the mortality rate is also high.
Let's assume that the rates of each event is 10%. If so, the probability of junior "killing grandma" is (0.1 x 0.1 x 0.1) x 100 = 0.1%
If that is the case, you're justifying VirusRegime on the basis that junior has a one-in-a-thousand chance of killing grandma.
But depending on what agenda the WHO and CDC want to push this very second, the rates increase or decrease. We therefore cannot have any confidence in the numbers because the so called airtight peer review process has been run around, yet the base assumption of the entire medical establishment is "act like a hypochondriac on crystal meth." This is literal feels over reals enabled by the technocrats.