Ron Toye AMA - Sheepdog avoids answering your questions

If you think that you are just as dumb as Nick and it is hilarious. You still don't get the basics but I have insurance. I am out of pocket 50-60K but I get all my money back. They have been paying my legal team. So, when this is over, I get to get paid. :) Not just the amount we paid in the beginning but the entire judgement plus that sweet interest. But you go on ahead and keep listening to Nick and I will keep coming back on here to laugh at you when We are right, every time. :) Have a great day, Just wanted to remind you of one last thing 17-0 soon to be 34-0 ;) maybe 36-0 we shall see. :)
Here's the thing: I don't care who wins. Vic loses? well he is talented and it will be a loss but oh well. The pond is large and others can replace him. You lose? I'll laugh as you meltdown but the fun will be over quick enough and I'll move on... maybe I'll finally finish Persona 5 Royal.

However, don't think you can fool me. You are trying to ignore and deflect. I suspect you only didn't respond because I hit a nerve. In fact, the breakdown of speech at the beginning suggests anger.... Ron. Are you upset that I pointed out how close to failure you are? Or perhaps that I called your integrity into question?

I will not deny that I am a layman when it comes to law, but it isn't hard to compare texts and pick out how there is a lie of omission. unless you don't consider lies of omission to be lies? In fact, i'm going to actually look up the cases and post links to them myself so you can puruse them yourself. Unless you truly are aware of the lies?

Edit: Link the 1st, McGibney v Rauhauser: https://www.leagle.com/decision/intxco20180420612

Link the 2nd, https://casetext.com/case/hoelscher-v-kilman

There. peruse the cases your own laywers cited. It will be... revealing what a precarious position you're actually in.
 
Last edited:
If you think that you are just as dumb as Nick and it is hilarious. You still don't get the basics but I have insurance. I am out of pocket 50-60K but I get all my money back. They have been paying my legal team. So, when this is over, I get to get paid. :) Not just the amount we paid in the beginning but the entire judgement plus that sweet interest. But you go on ahead and keep listening to Nick and I will keep coming back on here to laugh at you when We are right, every time. :) Have a great day, Just wanted to remind you of one last thing 17-0 soon to be 34-0 ;) maybe 36-0 we shall see. :)


Sorry, did i post a pic of Vig, whoops my bad. But you would be correct in your assessment of him and it would also be an accurate depiction of his legal teams strategy.
Man, you are soooo much soy. I'd fuck your fat girlfriend and film myself blowing fat loads on her face and you'd thank me. She'd actually get the taste of soy out of her mouth too. I got a few more pics to throttle her water jets, I know you'd want because you are desperate for real men.
 
Are you that mad about your idol being a creep or the other idol being a complete moron (Nickless Reek) that you resort to this level of boring death plan? Why don't you go ask Nick and Ty to show you evidence, what did they do with the GFM money LOL.
Hey Ron, I'm not actually mad at you or anyone else, I was just shitposting, and neither Vic or Nick are my idols, learn to take a joke, friendo.

Now, let's get serious again: would you rather fight a horse-sized duck or 100 duck-sized horses?
 
Ok, we've seen this clip a dozen times before and you have referred to it two dozen more.
He apologized because maybe not everyone wants a hug or a kiss on the cheek.
Is that sexual assault? No...
Is that a criminal offense at all? No...
Is that a reason to destroy a career or life? No...

He's not apologizing for doing it in the past, he's apologizing because there is a chance a few unknown people might not have wanted it and never said anything about it, and he's apologizing because a few assholes came out of nowhere and blew everything out of proportion (based initially on a misidentification).

You have nothing real to show that this man has actually sexually assaulted anyone.
You don't know anyone real that has anything to show that this man has actually sexually assaulted anyone.
You have lied every step of the way and deflected every other.
It's bad enough that you have to lie in an attempt to destroy a man, but it is a miserable situation when you start successfully lying to yourself.

And, honestly, the most stupid and frustrating thing about this post is I have no idea what reposting that apology video again is supposed to accomplish (if it was just to get attention, you win), or what it has to do at all with Vic's level of importance or sandwiches...

Edit: At the time, posts were flying, I didn't realize that he was actually spamming the video.
 
Last edited:
Hey Ron, I'm not actually mad at you or anyone else, I was just shitposting, and neither Vic or Nick are my idols, learn to take a joke, friendo.

Now, let's get serious again: would you rather fight a horse-sized duck or 100 duck-sized horses?
@Ron Toye left because he couldn't keep up with the mogging. I'm going to chalk it up to his sexuality and status being threatened by real men like me.

@Ron Toye, how many cocks did you suck before you thought it was gay? 4000, 7000? Nah, Ron's a champ, so i'll guess 10,000 cocks passed through his lips before he even thought of being gay, I don't mind being a total fag. I could never suck as many cocks as Ron sucks.
 
Not gonna lie, that sounds pretty gay.
Being a man and sucking a man's penis makes you gay? When did that happen? Let's get the expert cock sucker back in, I think this will interest him.

@Ron Toye, how many cocks did you suck before you thought it was gay? 4000, 7000? Nah, Ron's a champ, so i'll guess 10,000 cocks passed through his lips before he even thought of being gay, I don't mind being a total fag. I could never suck as many cocks as Ron sucks.

Dudes - gross. Enough already, take it to DMs and stop shitting up the board with your off-topic torrid love affair.

LOL. It is clear you get your info from Nick. He was dunked on for being stupid trying to push that bs LOL. Go back, listen to the lawyers who have been right every step of the way vs Nick who has been historically bad at predicting the slightest thing concerning this case. LOL When Nick is mad it shows me he knows his boy is about to get taxed LOL.

But Ron, sweetie, I did listen to the lawyers from the threadnaught... Dunford said he was too lazy to look up the citation and T. Greg has been too busy posting on his anti-cop tangent to add his two cents to your thread. Have you been assuming that since you lost your Twitter account, they are still providing actual analysis? Oops...

I notice that since you failed to address the substance of the question and immediately resorted to an appeal to authority, it's clear you're relying on that authority yourself rather than doing your own reading. And, dearheart, since your lawyers haven't been straight with you, you can read the full decision in McGibney here: https://www.leagle.com/decision/intxco20180420612 . It's free, it's not a particularly long decision, and the words are all pretty short. The relevant sections are all right up front: Section 1 is Attorney's Fees Incurred in Defending the Suit (spoiler: "We agree that the amount of attorney's fees awarded was not reasonable." ), Section 2 is Reasonableness of Attorney's Fees Awarded (spoiler: "In the proper exercise of its discretion, a trial judge is obliged to do more than simply act as a rubber-stamp, accepting carte blanche the amount appearing on the bill.") and Section 3 is The 18.001 Affidavit (spoiler: "According to Appellee, because he proved his attorney's fees in an "18.001" affidavit, Appellants were precluded at the trial court level and now on appeal from challenging reasonableness. We Disagree.")

Hope this helps!
 
@Ron Toye really is a pathetic loser...
I'm not scared, lol, here is a long list of lies I keep telling myself again and again to prove you all how not scared I am. Coping smiley face.

Do you think that this dumbass will ever get that no one here is stupid enough to buy his poorly crafted narrative?
This is not Twitter, Ron, people here have a mind of their own...

By the way, why is one of your favorite anime of all time the story of a power crazed facist psychopath?
Doesn't sound very progressive to me, Ron... Are your "friends" aware that you like a nazi magical loli?

PS: At this point, I've seen more allegation about you being a pedo than Vic... so when will you apologize Ron?
 
Last edited:
Hey @Ron Toye , I found a really nasty pic of you fisting Monica. Wow, what a feminist you are. Such a pig.

Graphic_Disgusting_RonMon_Fiting.jpg
 
@Ron Toye you really do talk a ton without saying much at all. Maybe you should learn how to put your mouth and hands to better use. I'm surprised Monica hasn't taught you how to considering the fact she's got a list of dudes she's had her hole blown out by from Funi plus people Tyrone introduced her to that's longer than Lemoine's inflated and grossly exaggerated billing statements and almost as long as Armzgurl's reach.

Must be like entering the Mall of the Americas. You should try the food court, I heard that's where you guys left the receipts.
 
LOL. It is clear you get your info from Nick. He was dunked on for being stupid trying to push that bs LOL. Go back, listen to the lawyers who have been right every step of the way vs Nick who has been historically bad at predicting the slightest thing concerning this case. LOL When Nick is mad it shows me he knows his boy is about to get taxed LOL.
You listened to Nick who is the least qualified to speak on the law than almost anyone else I have seen on this site. The ole Ken Jennings is a better lawyer than Nick and he is a therapist. Go look at what real lawyers said about Nick's stupidity.

If you wont listen to nick why not listen to this guy instead

Since McGibney is the basis for MoRon's argument that they get everything, and since LawTwitter is too lazy to do anything other than take MoRon's word as the gospel truth, I went ahead and looked up the full decision in the case. Here's what I found:




Granted, MoRon's counsel did provide an unredacted copy to the court at the trial, but it turns out there are other problems...



So, if you didn't need depositions or 14 affidavits to do your TCPA motion, you shouldn't expect to get paid for them. Or for prepping your case against Nick...


In that case, the lawyers spent hours reading entire case histories that weren't authoritative to their court, and that was considered excessive and not proper to pass on to the plaintiff. I'm going to guess that the appeals court is going to look at some intern at Wick's Phillip spending eight hours looking at TCPA deadlines when they had a TCPA expert on the case as something that Toye's going to get to pay for.


The trial court isn't supposed to believe that everything is reasonable just because the lawyer who came up with the bill says it is. The trial court is supposed to go through it 'in a thorough manner and apply guiding rules.'


The appeals court did indeed say in the middle of their section on whether an affidavit is required, but Lemoine clearly missed the opening paragraph of the section where they said, and then after stating that a controverting affidavit was required, when they went on to say,

So, shocker to everyone I know, the court case actually says exactly opposite of what MoRon says it does. This is why people hate lawyers.
 
Hey Ron,

since Lawtwitter was right about everything, then were they wrong about Chupp giving you all of your fees you asked for, and not dropping your request for $280,000 down to $100,000.

so Chupp was right about one thing and not the other?
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: 5t3n0g0ph3r
What's with the "vig" name? It's an attempt at a joke, I get that, but it's lame instead of funny. With "hundreds of people" against him, as you say, how come there is such a drought of humor? Why such a lack of wit?

It’s a lefty Twitter meme to intentionally misspell things they don’t like. I first remember it from the GamerGate days, when they would write “goobergrape” and “Sarg’n” and seven thousand absolutely hilarious variations on Milo Yiannopoulis, but it might predate that too.

Boring. Go look at Vic's key witness and who they said uses their position to get sex LOL

Any truth to the rumor that at the time you met Monica, you were an employee at her apartment’s property management company?

You still don't get the basics but I have insurance. I am out of pocket 50-60K but I get all my money back. They have been paying my legal team. So, when this is over, I get to get paid. :) Not just the amount we paid in the beginning but the entire judgement plus that sweet interest.

You’re right; I’m not getting this “basic.” The money that the judge awarded you was for payment of your legal fees. Your attorneys testified under oath that the amount of money they were asking for was equivalent to what you were being billed. How do you figure you are due any money from the payout? As far as I can tell, barring fraud at some level, all that money is due to your attorneys and your insurance company.
 
It’s a lefty Twitter meme to intentionally misspell things they don’t like. I first remember it from the GamerGate days, when they would write “goobergrape” and “Sarg’n” and seven thousand absolutely hilarious variations on Milo Yiannopoulis, but it might predate that too.
So like every single thing lefty twitter does, it's cringe.
 
Christ Mr. Toye went on an absolute tear of manic posts today. Hope all that news coming back from Wick Phillips is good stuff
. Go look at Vic's key witness and who they said uses their position to get sex LOL
Key witness as in Chuck Huber? The guy who wrote that in a statement that Vic didn't approve as a means of attempting to mediate so Vic wouldn't sue you? That key witness?
Cool, Since you have her height, I will post a photo next to her, so you can see, but as it is clear on the bottom photo, look at our shoulders, I am taller than her by 2-3 inches. Not that it matters, how tall a person is usually is only an issue for people who worry about that stuff. Manlet is a silly term to use considering the guy you think is a chad gets his tips frosted, Botox, plastic surgery, and hair plugs LOL. Or Nick who can't handle a slight change in the weather. His fee fees get hurt and he starts to swell and itch :(
Again the men you're insulting aren't here and the fact that you're insulting their looks and, in Nick's case, medical conditions says to me that being mocked for your stature is a sore spot Mr. Toye.
LOL. go back and watch the video that the creator had to call out comegleeksome for misrepresenting. You all have been trying for 2 years to make me look bad and the best you can do is bring up my old divorce stuff that everyone knew already or I had no issue talking about. It is nice not having skeletons. Have you all read the main witness for Vig, Chuck, his full divorce info? Use your detective skills ;)
No one here digs up people's divorce records for fun, they dig up someone's divorce records when they claim to be a "defender of women" and we can learn that they were actually a wife-beater who threatened to kill their exs dog.

You also do seem to have an issue talking about it since every time it comes up you minimize "hitting my wife and threatening her well being" to "being an asshole"
:) Have a great day, Just wanted to remind you of one last thing 17-0 soon to be 34-0 ;) maybe 36-0 we shall see. :)
That's. Not. How. It. Works.

If the appeals come back (and I know you think they won't but work with me here) will it become 0-17?
Edit to add:
He justified not knowing if he was fired for being inappropriate with students. He said, well, it was 30 years ago, Vs what a normal person who didn't hurt people. NO, without question NO i was not fired for X,Y,Z. He couldn't say that because he knew his past
Mr. @Ron Toye really loves to misrepresent this and I'll correct him as many times as necessary.
Vic is asked why he left to which he says he didn't want to work in teaching, is asked if he was terminated or quit and says he doesn't remember as it was 30 years ago, and when asked if he would remember if he were accused if sexual misconduct with a student he says "yes" and when asked if he ever was he said "no"

I understand it's you're MO to misrepresent every word ever said by Vic and your plan was to use the case to further slander him but please stop assuming that the members of this forum aren't familiar with your case and worse aren't reading the images you post to try (and fail) to prove your point
 
Last edited:
You’re right; I’m not getting this “basic.” The money that the judge awarded you was for payment of your legal fees. Your attorneys testified under oath that the amount of money they were asking for was equivalent to what you were being billed. How do you figure you are due any money from the payout? As far as I can tell, barring fraud at some level, all that money is due to your attorneys and your insurance company.

Given that Ron's job is literally to calculate numbers, it's really scary how much he doesn't understand the basic math here.

Since I'm feeling generous, I'll help out.

If Total Fees (F) = 280,000, and Ron's Share of the Payment (R) = 50,000, then 'his insurance' 'paid' (I) = $230,000.

So F=R+I.

Now, if the court orders Vic to pay the entire amount of attorney's fees (V), then Vic's payment will be equal to the total fees.

V=F, or spelled out fully, V=R+I.

In the case that V gets substituted for F, the value of the R remains constant. So after receiving the fees, Ron would be given $50,000.

Now, let's put this in context of Ron's finances, since he's saying he's going to be rolling around in dough once he gets his share. Originally, before the lawsuit, Ron had whatever amount of loose cash and assets that made up his total monetary worth (O). Ron claims that he used money from his own pocket to pay that $50,000, so his current worth (C), would look like:

O-50,000=C.

Now, if he gets $50,000 back from Vic, then his finances will look like this:

C+50,000=O.

So he will be right back to where he was before all this went down. Granted, there is the issue of the interest, but if Ron had $50,000 sitting around and he wasn't earning any interest off of it, he was an idiot. Therefore, the interest paid by Vic would still only offset the lost opportunity to earn interest on the $50,000 and Ron remains no better off than he was before. Of course, we haven't factored in the $5,000 in sanctions, and that would be a straight-up increase in Ron's finances, unless he had to spend any incidental money because of the lawsuit (gas, time off of work, a transcriber to record every one of Nick's streams, you know, random extra charges...). So it's a good thing that Ron has been enjoying this whole process, because if it were so awfully stressful that it was driving him prematurely gray, then even winning would look like a pretty shallow victory.

tl;dr - Ron Toye doesn't seem to know basic math or finances, so never use his professional services in any capacity that involves math or your own finances...
 
Back