Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

The majority do. That's all MOST men and women do until their mid 20s or early 30s. Again of consent is part of the problem, it traps teenagers in these casual sex-only relationships and normalized this behavior until biological clock kicks-in.


For the sake of this question, let us toss the age of consent out the Overton Window. All under-18 girls are pairing off with 30 year old men, what about the under-18 boys? Do they have to wait 10 years before pairing off, or can older women be afforded the same luxury as their male counterparts?


then people end up 30 and they cannot find anyone, partly because people are too old.


No, it is because they are a fag who brings no benefit to another's life, who blames 1996 feminism, 2013 liberalism, scarecrows, and Sailor Moon for their shortcomings.
 
1. You're preventing relationships that lead to marriage
2. People often break age of consent laws (same way they break drug laws or alcohol laws).
3. You're brainwashing yourself into believing teenagers are kids instead of young adults and treating them as such which is stunting their maturity. (20s are the new teens syndrome).

I already went over these reasons.
Holy fuck, you really are an autistic closet flip retard if you didn’t get that piece of wit.

There is precisely zero proof that relationships of this nature within Western society (as delineated by the Industrial Revolution where social reform really took off) led to the kind of marriage you would expect in the present day.

In fact, relationships that were imposed upon “eligible” females were often self-regulated by the wider community - the proto-feminists that advocated the first raising of the age of consent to 16 in the 1860s did it for totally erroneous reasons that did not align with how the working class saw the issue. Such relationships were already actively discouraged and the underaged girls of the time were noted to actively resist such relationships even without the backing of statute!
 
1. You're preventing relationships that lead to marriage
2. People often break age of consent laws (same way they break drug laws or alcohol laws).
3. You're brainwashing yourself into believing teenagers are kids instead of young adults and treating them as such which is stunting their maturity. (20s are the new teens syndrome).

I already went over these reasons.
Listen here, negro.
1. Teenagers' brains aren't fully developed yet, they must still have their parents watch over them. I don't give a shit if the 15-year old girl already has breasts or whatever, that doesn't mean she's ready for a fucking relationship. And her body sure as shit isn't ready to go through the stress of giving birth.
2. People break all kinds of laws, all the time. Does that mean we shouldn't have laws at all, by your logic?
3. Teenagers are NOT fucking mature. I don't know how I can spell this out for you so you can actually understand the letters on the screen and give an actual response instead of "LOL shitlib garbage", "you're committing a poopoo-peepee fallacy" or whatever other buzzword-ridden drivel you vomit out, too afraid to actually engage your opponent because you know they're gonna run circles around you.
 
He wants a live-in cook and thinks if you’re married that means you get sex just whenever. Cause baby factory.
Probably because his daddy ran out on Momma Boxy before they could tie the knot. The shotgun wedding was postponed by the premature arrival of a seriously handicapped baby. Poppa Boxy took one look at it's deformed, water-filled pumpkin of a head and thought "Fuck this, I'm out..." and promptly had it away on his toes, leaving behind only his copy of The Misogynist's Handbook.
As Boxyboo weeps himself to sleep after weakly thrashing away at his micropeen each night, fat ol' Momma Boxy creeps into his basement room, deftly avoiding the empty Doritos packs and gently pries the well-worn, dog eared Handbook out of his sweaty paws and puts it back on the shrine to his faceless father that is the only clean part of his room. It's a Flip tragedy, I tell you.
 
also "adult mind" is 1 step away from transgenderism. "female brain" in a male body.
What? That's the hill you're going to die on? You're so scared of a normal adult sentient woman that you think it's an equivalent to transgenderism? You are truly are frightened of a woman talking back to you, aren't you sport? Pretty sure your whole spiel is to get back at a girl that rejected you in junior high. What a bizarre creature you are.
 
For the sake of this question, let us toss the age of consent out the Overton Window. All under-18 girls are pairing off with 30 year old men, what about the under-18 boys? Do they have to wait 10 years before pairing off, or can older women be afforded the same luxury as their male counterparts?





No, it is because they are a fag who brings no benefit to another's life, who blames 1996 feminism, 2013 liberalism, scarecrows, and Sailor Moon for their shortcomings.
Again that's a gross misrepresenation of what will occur. more like 19 yr old dating 15 yr old. getting married a few years later. @ idk 19-23

historically age of consent only applied to older man younger women. I actually agree with that. If an older women (24) wants a younger man (15), that's fine.
 
Again that's a gross misrepresenation of what will occur. more like 19 yr old dating 15 yr old. getting married a few years later. @ idk 19-23

historically age of consent only applied to older man younger women. I actually agree with that. If an older women (24) wants a younger man (15), that's fine.
And you honestly can't see an issue with any of this? The wild incompatibility between people at 24 and 15? Hell, for that matter, a 19 and 15 pairing will have different interests and worldviews... lol, incels.
 
Again that's a gross misrepresenation of what will occur. more like 19 yr old dating 15 yr old. getting married a few years later. @ idk 19-23

historically age of consent only applied to older man younger women. I actually agree with that. If an older women (24) wants a younger man (15), that's fine.
Gross misrepresentation, you say? How the fuck would you know, you greasy Flip bastard? You're not fit to comment on the rest of the world's food, let alone their age of consent laws.
Historically, you have been proven to be, at all times, full of shit. The age of consent applies to both genders, retard. If you had even 1 more point of IQ, you'd be able to look that up and understand.
 
Back