- Joined
- Apr 25, 2019
Cant wait for them to ass rape L Neil Smith's work even more than when they replaced my boi Vuffi with the worst Star Wars character ever.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Cant wait for them to ass rape L Neil Smith's work even more than when they replaced my boi Vuffi with the worst Star Wars character ever.
That's one Disney ride that will never end.
No word yet, but most nufans seem to be demanding it in bulk, especially for him to end up with his protege.With how much he serves as a non-entity for the sake of not stealing the spotlight from nuThrawn's new fuccboi, he might as well not even exist.
Only thing I disliked more than the film's plot and replacing Vuffi was his stupid triangle hairdo.
Those were all padawans though and the Republic forces were completely fucked by Jabiims shitty environmental conditions.(if this all 'legends' then does Quinlon Vos' kid and goth wife not exist anymore?)Kind of reminds me of another under-appreciated product of The Clone Wars Multimedia Project, Alto Stratus:
![]()
The leader of the local Separatist forces on the planet Jabiim, Stratus personally killed six Jedi knights in close combat, and he did it without enhanced reflexes, precognition, special armor or weapons or lifelong warrior training, relying instead on just an ordinary steel sword and a whole lotta righteous indignation.
I actually talked about this once with @Cactuar King. Disney recanonized Vos' survival of Order 66 and that he is apparently still alive by the time of Plan IX, however his wife and kid are not, with his name being among the names in nuLuke's "sacred texts" which have a list of all the jedi said to have survived Order 66 but for some reason Luke never contacted any of these jedi to help run his New Order or help them unlike his old canon counterpart, and the fact that Ahsoka is also alive makes The Last Jedi as a title all the more ridiculous, as well as a need to search for Luke when there are many other jedi available, or why Assoka or any other jedi didn't bother to do anything to help the Galaxy when the Empire was defeated or when the FO came on the scene while in old canon a few old jedi survivors actually bothered to come out of hiding and help when Palpatine returned in Dark Empire or entered the Alliance disguised as civilians.
Trebor was also more of a master diplomat rather than a fighter who only won fights by sneaking up on droids with Force Stealth. But even as a diplomat he lost much credibility after his poor defense during the baby Ludi case which honestly made him look really dumb in the public eye, so he failed in everything. A Master Failure if anything.Those were all padawans though and the Republic forces were completely fucked by Jabiims shitty environmental conditions.(if this all 'legends' then does Quinlon Vos' kid and goth wife not exist anymore?)
I actually talked about this once with @Cactuar King. Disney recanonized Vos' survival of Order 66 and that he is apparently still alive by the time of Plan IX, however his wife and kid are not, with his name being among the names in nuLuke's "sacred texts" which have a list of all the jedi said to have survived Order 66 but for some reason Luke never contacted any of these jedi to help run his New Order or help them unlike his old canon counterpart, and the fact that Ahsoka is also alive makes The Last Jedi as a title all the more ridiculous, as well as a need to search for Luke when there are many other jedi available, or why Assoka or any other jedi didn't bother to do anything to help the Galaxy when the Empire was defeated or when the FO came on the scene while in old canon a few old jedi survivors actually bothered to come out of hiding and help when Palpatine returned in Dark Empire or entered the Alliance disguised as civilians.does Quinlon Vos' kid and goth wife not exist anymore?
I don't know why anyone takes the mongoloids at RLM seriously when it comes to their views about Star Wars. If you hear their absolutely retarded takes on their podcast, some of the retardation they spew is as bad or worse than the moronic takes about "tHe jEdI aRe pAcIfIsT!!!1!" echoed by the new wave of Disney Drones that have entered the fandom. When TFA came out, they called Rey a charismatic and fleshed out character who was unfairly lambasted for being a Mary Sue, they praised the film for ditching the Jedi Temple system of training multiple apprentices (which they claim is a "stupid Lucas idea" from the prequels) in favor of the one master and one apprentice format in isolation "just like Empire Strikes Back, which is how it ALWAYS NEEDS to be", and they actively advocate the belief that building a fictional universe of supplementary novels, comics and shows around Star Wars is "as stupid as making an Expanded Universe around Back To The Future", because the story apparently "doesn't lend itself to anything more than the Rebels vs Empire conflict".I think that a lot of people who claim to hate the Prequels blindly believed Mike Stoklasa's bullshit. The Plinkett "reviews" are funny but it's a bunch of crap with bits of behind the scenes taken out of context. What Stoklasa did was the movie critic equivalent of Michael Moore's Farenheit 9/11. He pulled the same stunt with the Indy 4 review, blaming Lucas and forgetting the guy who was actually behind the camera, the same guy who made Tintin and Reddit Player One.
Fair enough. I wasn't aware of most of the narrative threads that Traviss was wrapping up...that's actually a pretty decent effort on her part when it comes to attempting symmetry across continuity, especially for something as labyrinthine as the Expanded Universe (though I would venture a guess that passion for the character and his culture was a motivation as well).View attachment 1460911
As a dyed-in-the-wool Fandalorian going back to...oh, the age of about seven, I was quite delighted that Traviss was weaving these obscure bits of Boba's scattered backstory into the narrative, because, (I'm assuming) like many other fans, I'd been snapping up every little bit of Boba Fett/Mandalorian content that I could get my hands on, and not all of it was what you'd call mainstream EU content. In full, they constituted a crazy-quilt patchwork of novels, short stories, one-shots and mini-series in the comics and the odd Star Wars Insider article, the latter of which were often necessary to keep track of whether an appearance by Fett in a given story was actually Fett himself or an impersonator trading on the bounty hunter's name and reputation for various reasons (these could and did include not just Jodo Kast, but also Fett's daughter Ailyn, according to an Insider retcon of the Young Jedi Knights series' "Diversity Alliance" arc, and even Grand Admiral Thrawn on at least one occasion). That Traviss actually wove so many of these tangled skeins into the Boba Fett sub-plot in LOTF actually felt like a reward for keeping up to speed on Fett's exploits over the years.
As much as I adore NJO, that was one of the few things that bugged me about the way they presented the Yuuzhan Vong's influence on the galaxy. On one hand, the writers for very astute in their decision to address things like how the Vong dealt with galactic superpowers like the Hutts and the Imperial Remnant, but when it came time to reference elements from the Bantam Publishing era in later books like Enemy Lines or Force Heretic for instance, the writers inexplicably chose shit from the Callista Trilogy or The Black Fleet Crisis of all things. It's like, fucking really? We're going to address what happened to Roganda Ismaren's freak experiment son and the Yevethans, but not Boba fucking Fett?Right. It probably didn't help that the Mandalorians were completely MIA throughout the NJO series until The Unifying Force, when James Luceno had to belatedly remind everyone that they were still alive and kicking (and to his further credit, he did give them a very kickass appearance in that book, with a Mandalorian strike-force punching through the Yuuzhan Vong like 7.62 FMJ hitting sheet-metal).
I read A Practical Man, actually, in my scouring of all official media relating to NJO (still gotta get my hands on that RPG source book). Personally, I liked it just to see the Vong interact with the Mando's, and see how much of their culture even manage to freak out the Mandalorians of all people.Traviss would later try to explain what the Mandos had been up to during the Vong War in the 2006 short story "A Practical Man" which proposed that Boba Fett, in his capacity as the newly-minted Mandalore following the death of Fenn Shysa, decided on a tactic of appearing to cooperate with the Yuuzhan Vong invasion of the Galaxy (while passing intelligence gained in the process to the New Republic) until such time as the ruse would inevitably become untenable and open hostilities between the Mandos and the Vong would commence. The story engendered a certain amount of controversy amongst Traviss's detractors for having Vergere describe the Mandalorians as the third party in a sort of trinity of galactic conflict with the Jedi and Sith, but considering that according to the EU timeline pre-Disney, the Mandalorians had been affecting the course of Galactic history since before the foundation of the Republic itself, it's not an unreasonable position.
Personally, I thought that the whole story was kind of unnecessary, and that it would have been better to just have someone mention that the Mandos had been fighting the Vong all along out in the far reaches of the Galaxy, away from the New Republic's main area of influence.
Back in the day, I got fed up with the LOTF series pretty quickly and ended up going into a bit of a self-imposed exile from all things Star Wars for quite some time (largely because I was frustrated by the idea that the Galaxy was going to pieces in another major war so soon after the Vong invasion) so I never really thought about real-world parallels and inspirations for the events of the series.
Thinking about it now, I can absolutely see where you're coming from, especially concerning the Corellians, who, in hindsight, really do have some pretty noteworthy parallels with American Southerners.
Dude....the scenes that get me the most are the one where Han and Leia emotionally collapse in the confines of their Coruscant apartment from the news of Anakin's death, and the bit where a traumatized and heartbroken Tahiri is talking to Anakin's corpse.I've never been able to read [Star By Star] dry-eyed. It hits you, hard, but in a way that I think enhances the verisimilitude of the story rather than coming off like cheap shock tactics.
One of my favorite scenes is Han giving a very in-character response to the question of what he would have done in Anakin's shoes during the Tusken Massacre.Tatooine Ghost is, oddly, one of the very few EU books that I've never actually read, possibly because the premise of "Han and Leia hunt down a famous Alderaanian painting" didn't really grab my interest at the time. I've heard good things about it, though. Have to get a hold of a copy sometime soon...
And people still credit Filoni Wars for being the media that first worked to give the Clones a sense of individuality and character.I would definitely agree that Traviss is very good at getting inside the heads of the characters that she's writing, Mandalorian or not, and presenting their respective and differing points of view in a way that feels very organic to the characters in question. For example, ever since I started reading the Republic Commando series again, I've been quite fascinated by her depiction of the Clones' psychology. I'm gonna power-level a little bit here, but I have a lot of brothers. A lot of brothers whom I grew up in very close quarters with. A lot of brothers whom everyone we met was always commenting on how alike we all looked. As such, a lot of little details that Traviss throws in, like Clones not appearing identical to other Clones because they've spent their entire lives focusing on the minute individual differences that set them all apart from their brothers, hit me in a really profound and visceral way.
I still have to finish LOTF in its entirety before I can properly assess whether or not Traviss fangirling over the Mandalorians is detrimental to the story or not, because so far it hasn't been. It also helps that for whatever fangirl tendencies or biases that she happens to have, she still writes exceptionally well, and doesn't shortchange the characters I care about when it comes to effort and narrative focus.Of course, I'm not saying that Traviss is Teh Gratest Autor Evar. As you've sort of pointed out, she does have a tendency to occasionally descend into fan-girling, which is most clearly demonstrated, I think, in her Gears of War books, where it seems pretty obvious that she really likes the character of resident Cool Old Guy Col. Victor Hoffman, to the point of developing a romantic interest for him in the form of resident Cool Old Lady Bernadette "Bernie" Mataki, whom I'm tempted to think of as a fantasy author-insert for Traviss (I don't have much evidence for that beyond both of them being somewhat temperamental middle-aged women with a military background, though). It's somewhat leavened by the fact that Bernie is a fairly engaging character, and written with a generally-believable set of limitations within the Gears universe (there's one memorable incident where she decides to assert herself by knocking down the series' resident smartass Damon Baird, but she accomplishes this by hitting him on the pressure-point behind the ear, while acknowledging that the whole thing is a bit of a gamble, because if Baird, who despite being one of the smaller Gears is still built like a linebacker fed a steady diet of horse steroids, decides to press the issue, then he could easily snap her in half; much to her relief, he just laughs at her audacity when he gets back on his feet).
Context seems to be something a lot of the scathing branches of the EU Community tend to ignore whenever they go after something. I could buy the Star Wars brand from Disney if I got a dime for every mischaracterization of the Vong I've seen from people who claim to have read the books:This was, as I recall, a source of much contention with the Republic Commando series back in the day, with many people feeling that everyone in the books was unrealistically idealizing the Mandalorians, but...it makes sense in context.
I can't speak for anyone outside of myself, and I certainly wasn't browsing forums or really in the trenches with the fandom to witness the All-Jedi, All-The-Time preference you refer to. But I can say that while I enjoy Jedi/Sith stories more than any other in Star Wars fiction (largely due to my fixation with high fantasy parallels within both groups), but I will be the first to admit that the franchise would be incredibly dull if they were the sole focus.I have somewhat complicated feelings on that point. While I abhor virtually everything that Disney has brought into the fandom, I started working my way through the EU somewhat chronologically, starting with Brian Daley's Han Solo Trilogy and moving on to Splinter of the Mind's Eye and other older books. As such, even though I was very young at the time, I did have a sense of how the fandom started to change after 1999, going from what I saw as a more balanced mix of Force-user vs non-Force-user characters and expressed preferences for the same on the part of fans to something resembling the All-Jedi, All-the-Time Show after the Prequels hit. Of course, Jedi are a foundational aspect of the Star Wars, but I remember a lot of people at that time becoming (in some cases) obnoxiously attached to the Jedi as shown in the Prequels, even to the point of arguing that Luke was running his new Jedi Order the "wrong" way in the EU because he wasn't doing things like they saw in the movies. This always frustrated me, because even then, I had the awareness that Lucas was deliberately setting up the PT Jedi Order to fail and thus vindicate/emphasize the rightness of Luke's choosing to embrace his emotional attachment to his father to try and redeem him.
I liked the new Thrawn books with the caveat that Zahn is playing ball to save his characters.
Sorry, but no. That doesn't work as an excuse for the kind of stupid shit that Zahn has been pulling in his new novels. I don't care how badly Filoni is screwing up the character in his cartoons...that's not an excuse for doing autistic pet character crap like having his species be the origin for the Skywalker surname. That's as bad, if not worse, than Han getting an eye-rolling and completely arbitrary explanation for his surname in his garbage origin film.Even so, it isn't the same Thrawn. OG Thrawn was an a villain who by the Dark Force era had embraced the New Order minus its racism and was willing to do what was necessary to win. NuThrawn is being made into a hero because Zahn understands that there can be no nuance in Kennedy/Filoni Star Wars and he doesn't want Thrawn to get Greviousd.
Some bullshit news:
View attachment 1467146
Filoni's new Bad Batch+Ahsoka show is supposedly set in an "unexplored part of the galaxy" which sounds like the same bullshit they claimed for TFA as to why it had no familiar aliens or locations despite info pointing out that it did take place right nextdoor to Tatooine. So I expect to see nothing familiar in this shit. They're trying to spin this as "somewhere no SW media has ever gone before" despite Disney canon being less than 10 years old, mostly only visiting familiar movie locations and hardly exploring or explaining much of anything about their broken new setting other than cheap rehashes and vague references.
Wait, are they seriously out of ideas that they're now ripping-off Marvel stuff with the Infinity stones?The Dr.AidsAphra comic is back and it features tie-in bullshit to High Republic to try and give you a reason to care. Also Black Chewbacca and Black 3PO are back with her because OT simulacrums are the only way to get nostalgiafags interested.
Do they realize that if they set all their shows/books in the "Unknown Regions" then it won't be unknown for long?Filoni's new Bad Batch+Ahsoka show is supposedly set in an "unexplored part of the galaxy" which sounds like the same bullshit they claimed for TFA as to why it had no familiar aliens or locations despite info pointing out that it did take place right nextdoor to Tatooine.
I think there's a name for that but I forget what its called. Essentially a company releases bullshit rumors to try and see how audiences will react as a method of checking whether or not the idea is worth considering for approval or not. A typical manipulative maneuver on their part.I haven't kept my finger anywhere near any pulses but my usual caveats remain:
Don't believe shit is actually happening until checks have been cut.
Its entirely possible whoever did the rogue "Oh Disney is dropping song of the south from splash mountain" is trying to do the same (or someone inspired by them is trying) to leak information to get try to stir public opinion.
Reminder that you're arguing with a person who tried to claim how one of the main creators behind Halo's lore (and who actually worked with the team as they made the game given his book came out before Combat Evolved did) is wrong compared to the author he's been crushing on since he was seven years old.Those were all padawans though and the Republic forces were completely fucked by Jabiims shitty environmental conditions.(if this all 'legends' then does Quinlon Vos' kid and goth wife not exist anymore?)
This is another standard Kennedy and Iger ploy. This is more vaporware they're not intending to make given how Disney has no funds whatsoever to plan anything out beyond what they already have in the can. This is their desperate go-to to pretend that the IP isn't a corpse that has nothing being made for it.Ugh, why? Solo sucked. Everything in Solo that was not Woody Harrelson sucked ass, including his Lando.
I didn't think the Clone troopers being practically expiration date slaves was a matter of contention, honestly. They were pretty much bred for the single purpose of being disposable shock troops. They're basically living droids.
This might sound stupid but do you think Grievous is one of the weakest characters to ever pick a lightsaber?
It like this post right here
View attachment 1464369
Cause fans love using Filoni version of Grievous for example like having the lowest kills but at least he has killed six Jedi including killing three Jedi Master on that list even able to defeat a on-screen Jedi Master like Adi Gallia, Depa Billaba twice and off-screen knocking Shaak Ti unconscious with the electric cable. Even a Jedi Knight name Pablo-Jill in a intense duel over Duro in a satellite city that left him injured. But of course they'll say these aren't proof.
It's not a strawman. I had frequent on-line interactions with such people myself, back then. People who for whatever reason were willfully blind to the fact that the Prequel Jedi were meant by Lucas to be in a very bad place, institutionally, rather than exemplars of the Jedi way. Very confused people.
Right, every single one of them volunteered to die for the Republic the moment that he came of age.
For someone so apparently eager to shame the use of supposed strawmen you certainly are eager to make use of them yourself.
Traviss doesn't claim there that the Jedi own anyone. What she says, specifically, is that the Jedi accepted the use of a slave-army for the prosecution of a war, that this was wrong, and that many fans become testy and defensive about it, refusing to countenance that Jedi could make mistakes or do wrong, apparently under the belief that since the Jedi are the main point-of-view faction, and because of their ostensibly serving the Will of the Force, that means that everything that they do is good/justified (never mind the fact that C-Can and G-Canon both are replete with numerous examples of questionable behavior by Jedi).
You may not be claiming that bioethics don't exist, but you're certainly making a mockery of them by trying to argue like this. You do realize that one of the go-to defenses of black slavery in the United States prior to the 1861-63 war was that the slaves were happy and content in their bondage, don't you?
According to IG-88 (or the dumb SJW droid in Solo), yes they are.You raise another issue, ie droids. Are C-3PO and R2D2 slaves?
Sorry, but no. That doesn't work as an excuse for the kind of stupid shit that Zahn has been pulling in his new novels. I don't care how badly Filoni is screwing up the character in his cartoons...that's not an excuse for doing autistic pet character crap like having his species be the origin for the Skywalker surname. That's as bad, if not worse, than Han getting an eye-rolling and completely arbitrary explanation for his surname in his garbage origin film.
Zahn's also proven that he's quite protective of his own characters and concepts, but has no problem openly lambasting other people's in his own work, with the subtelty of a brick to the face. Like in Vision Of The Future, where Zahn decided to incorporate his vocal disdain for Dark Empire by having Mara Jade quip that she didn't believe that Palpatine had actually resurrected through cloning. Y'know, just fuck continuity and the stakes established in that prior story arc, and the professional obligation to adhere to previously established continuity even if you don't like it...just validate your opinion loudly and clumsily by having the characters scream it to the world in-universe.
Fucking petty shit-goblin. Even Karen Traviss isn't that exceptional.
iirc this also comes up in NJO that time 3p0 accidentally leads a droid uprising or somethingAccording to IG-88 (or the dumb SJW droid in Solo), yes they are.
Ah. you see this. This is what Star Wars used to be. Fandom. Arguing over complex issues. Passion.
For purposes of slavery, a slave is both the property of someone and is forced unwillingly to serve them. The Clones aren't usually portrayed as unwilling, which is my issue with that. The second issue I take with Traviss description is that they aren't the property of the Jedi, if they are at all. The movies don't deal with the nuance and so in order to leap to 'slave army' you have to make certain gap filling assumptions.
Also there was an episode of Filoni's Clone Wars where a clone deserted the army and raised a family with his Twi'lek wife.They're the property of the Republic, via Taun We's own dialogue in AOTC. They are property. As for being unwilling? That's obviously been genetically bred out of them. They have no choice, they're biologically programmed to be what they are. You do see a few clones in the EU escape to be something more than just disposable shock troops.
I would agree, but the Jedi certainly weren't their slave masters. At the end of the day, the clones were ordered to serve the Republic and fight its wars and the Jedi hesitantly agreed to serve in that war. It's natural that they were then given command of the Republic's troops: the clones. If anything, the Jedi (at least most of the time) tried to treat the clones humanely. It was almost always Jedi that gave clones the idea that they were humans with their own perspectives and feelings, and as mentioned in several places the Jedi pretty much never ordered the clones to do something they weren't willing to do themselves.I didn't think the Clone troopers being practically expiration date slaves was a matter of contention, honestly. They were pretty much bred for the single purpose of being disposable shock troops. They're basically living droids.