Nice theory-crafting but this is 100% not true.
1. It's impossible to build a system based on axioms that works 100% of the time. This is why the Romans had the "dictator" and why even in America we can declare "Marshall Law" which removes many protections.
I think you mean "martial law", and I never said that the system I advocate works "100% of the time", it doesn't need to; it just has to be sufficiently better than the alternative of having no accountability at all. Tyranny is a very low bar, I set my standards much higher, as do most people.
2. If the politicians are untrustworthy then they can simply refuse to enforce the laws like we saw during these BLM/ANTIFA riots where the police were told to stand-down and allow the rioting & looting & arson to occur. Or how the politicans and judges refused to enforce Prop 187 or do a "hard" Brexit.
I imagine that police were told to stand down so as to not escalate the situation, a move which seems pretty smart to me, given how bad the situation got some weeks ago. Remember that damaged property can be replaced once the chaos dies down; human lives cannot be.
It's also worth pointing out that rioting and looting didn't suddenly become lawful just because the laws weren't strictly enforced during the middle of the riots. Anyone found to have been involved in such activities is still legally accountable to this day, and anyone found to have stolen or damaged property can still face trial. Many have already been arrested.
As for Brexit, I think you'll find that the 2016 referendum was legally non-binding. It was an advisory referendum that the government had no legal obligation to follow, and there was absolutely nothing on the ballot which said "hard Brexit". That the government is honoring the will of the people at all is a testament to the very democratic accountability that you say doesn't exist.
3. Even after BLM and the democrats burned down the black communities, they'll still vote democrat in November. The Black DA/prosecutor that is pressing charges against the white police officer in George will have no accountability and neither will the black DA/prosecutor in St. Louis that took away the guns from the "Mansion kKen and Karen." So our "democracy" has very little accountability.
Very little accountability is still better than no accountability at all, and I'm pretty sure that the problems you list are problems which run much deeper than government. It's a moot point that democratically elected officials can be complicit in things which their voters would prefer they be complicit in. The intelligent thing to do is to address the underlying causes, and work to change it. If you think the Democrats are failing black people, then why not come up with a persuasive alternative?
Your ideas are garbage I would expect from the skeptic community in 2014. Our politicians can do just above whatever they like irrespective of whether it's legal, ethical, beneficial or even sane. If you
read Hermann Göring you would have already realized this.
They can't do whatever they like. If a politician went out and murdered someone, they would be arrested and face trial for murder. If a dictator goes out and murders someone, then nobody gets any justice. It's trivially easy to point out how democracy is preferable to the alternative you propose.
No you cannot seek redress in western style liberal democracies. We saw that at Cville when the police were told to stand-down and pushed the alt-right into ANTIFA so they would be attacked. Jared Taylor is refused the right to assembly on any private property and is forced to use govt property to hold meetings but because ANTIFA disrupts those events, he has to pay $$$ just to hold events. Milo needed over 1M USD to do his college campus tour and even Richard Spencer who managed to get a campus tour was eventually shut-down by ANTIFA. Anyone that doesn't toe the liberal party line is blacklisted from payment processors and/or fired from their jobs. It's incredibly difficult to actually seek redress in USA and redress has very high costs. The most outrageous example of how broken the 1A is in practice was that
Congress had a hearing on white nationalism/extremist/supremacy and they had Candice Owens speak for us. Clearly people want to see redress and Congress refuses to even listen to 1 pro-white figure.
Redress of grievances only works when the media and elements within the govt already agree with your message. That's why BLM and ANTIFA are descrbed as "peaceful protesters." Their violence is speech while our speech is violence.
The Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville was instigated by the far-right, and it resulted in a woman's death. That's hardly non-violent. As for Antifa: both President Trump and Attorney General William Barr have expressed their desire to designate Antifa as a terrorist group, and so far, the only thing that seems to be stopping them is the technicality that Antifa lacks a centralized leadership. They are certainly not unaccountable, Antifa protesters are arrested all the time.
SCOTUS makes laws based on the culture of the ruling elites. They don't follow the US cons.
I don't think you understand the role of the Supreme Court if you think they "make laws". Who do you think writes the legislation?
. That should warrant a response.
