- Joined
- Sep 18, 2018
Damn son I need some shades for how much that glows.
U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers
- Thread starter snailslime
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2016
In reference to Sam Tyler, self styled "journalist" and Antifa Faggot - his Twitter feed is pretty "interesting".
"undeniable PPB/Proud Boys Collusion". LOL. Fucking LOL.
Antifa doesn't "Steal". They "liberate".
They comin' for Joey Joestar Rogan now, for real
. Please note - Zero Engagement.
MrJokerRager
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2019
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2020
Do the Proud Boys even exist anymore? I thought Gavin McGinnes left them or was booted. I haven't heard anything about them for at least 2 years.In reference to Sam Tyler, self styled "journalist" and Antifa Faggot - his Twitter feed is pretty "interesting".
View attachment 1468900
"undeniable PPB/Proud Boys Collusion". LOL. Fucking LOL.
View attachment 1468904
Antifa doesn't "Steal". They "liberate".
View attachment 1468909
They comin' for Joey Joestar Rogan now, for real
Who the hell so they think they're fooling? After 2 months of demonizing literally EVERYTHING about America, they're suddenly flag-wavers? Eat shit.
To quote my favorite Bond villain: "It's insulting you think I haven't predicted your every move'".
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2019
And of course, lurking in the comments of one of his tweets:
Some asshole sending up the Fat Signal.
Last edited:
Garm
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2019
It would be "too aggressive." Throwing a "firework" conjures up images of firecrackers to normal people only catching bits and pieces of this. It would also alienate any progressive who believes in "peace."
AntiFa's strategy is to be just annoying enough for people to snap and then cry victim when they get smacked down. Gluing ball bearings to the outside sounds too premeditated for their optics.
AntiFa doesn't want a war, they want enough sympathy that everyone shuts their brains off and does whatever they say.
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
They are still trying to get some idiot patriot types who hadn't been paying attention to show up and shoot a Fed.
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2018
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2018
They've been doing this from the beginning.
>Why don't you support our peaceful riots? The founding fathers destroyed things too!
>BTW FUCK the evil racist slaveowning colonizing founding fathers and the racist country they built, we're going to tear down their statues and replace them with memorials for drug addicted criminals!
A marxist variation of the smug atheist sneering at christians for not being his conception of 'compassionate'. Most of those flags they're bringing are probably going to get burned anyway when the more extreme soys get filled with even more frothing, mindless rage at the sight of the stars and stripes.
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2015
Yeah, 2 members were wrongfully jailed for fighting in a mutual combat state with antifa. He's been de-platformed, he's lost payment processors. He's around, they're around, they aren't falling for anything going on right now. His show on censored.tv today he played spot the feds on riot footage, and hes extremely right about the boog boys all being feds. I have a clip of him breaking it down, what they wear, how they operate, but its over 200mb. Suffice to say, the boog boys have similiar footwear to the 2017 Berkeley rioters(gore tex combat boots) and only trigger violence when they are around cops to bail them out.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2019
I literally heard this kind of argument from cousins of mine and when I pointed the contradictions out they became npc_angry.jpg.
Then I pointed out that Minneapolis getting half a billion worth of damage from the """peaceful protesters""" meaning that businesses won't come back to the city because they feel that their interests won't be protected made me persona non grata to them.
edit: They're the kind of people who read White Fragility and thought it was spot on and read shitty YA books too.
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2020
See thats how i know people have not read marx, marx meant private property as areas used for manufacture plants for the development of items and owned by the bourgeoise. Not peoples things. Fucking idiots.
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2019
In reference to Sam Tyler, self styled "journalist" and Antifa Faggot - his Twitter feed is pretty "interesting".
View attachment 1468900
"undeniable PPB/Proud Boys Collusion". LOL. Fucking LOL.
View attachment 1468904
Antifa doesn't "Steal". They "liberate".
View attachment 1468909
They comin' for Joey Joestar Rogan now, for real
Oh yes, he is a personal political lolcow of mine and a known anarchist in the Minneapolis area.
I guess there was a protest for the looting jogger in Minneapolis today.
Nobody cares because he was looting. When the looting starts, the shooting starts, as wise men once said.
Based White Minnesotans.
His Facebook cover photo:
Other profile pictures:
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2019
'member summer taylor
wasn't she ran over by an ethiopian immigrant
wasn't she ran over by an ethiopian immigrant
benutz
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2020
We are truly entering in to worldwide chaos. Before, you had to get touched up by sheboons that gave your junk a good ol' tug, and would call the 'real' cops on you if you dared to display your huwhite privilege. Now, those very same sheboons are rioting in the airports themselves, emboldened by their new found powers. Weeves, weeves everywhere...
Brawl erupts at San Juan airport after drunk passenger refuses to leave flight
archive.vn
That woman's name?
Blawer Diskson More, 33, of Philadelphia.
Mmm... I wonder....
Pure savagery. I wonder how many of them work for the TSA?
Lol.
A single white woman is just a statistic, anything else, in large enough numbers that couldn't be ignored, would indeed be a tragedy. One day, her death will be avenged. But there's more screaming and shouting to go before that.
Many parallels between what happened back then in the 60's (no expert myself, but I've read up on it a bit the last few years - race relations being a side-gig of mine). But maybe the biggest difference between now and then is the mass media/internet phenomenon. Back then, you did shit to get in the news, to make it wideknown, now you do shit that stays out the news, lest it go global and you get bad optics.
That young mother's death was the perfect killing. Too heinous to even be reported on. Easily swept under the rug. But a real demoralising blow to the other side to make them feel even more impotent. Almost like the perfect murder. And impotency is the worst thing anyone can feel after burning anger. It fucks with your whole body's internal systems. That's why it's good not to devour this shit in anything but bite-sized chunks. When you get too MATI, it's time to SAFTI. If only for a few days to recallibrate.
Another point I'll reply to (that was maybe in another quote of yours), is that this really is all about asymmetric warfare. I've said this before. So have many others. But asymmetric warfare is not just when a smaller and less-well-equipped enemy fights a bigger one (as antifa and blm are really compared to the might of the US state), and they choose to do so by skirmishes and raids where they can safely (and cowardly) regroup to safe ground, to live to fight another day... No, it's about the time domain as well. Another phrase I have heard and like is - the slow burn of attrition - it's about the constant, never ever let up, wear them down by one cut at a time if you can't blast them to high hell and back, type of MO. I'm sure Sun Tzu said something about this.
Choose your battles well, and never enter a battle you can not win.
Pick your fights, and even if it takes a thousand small battles, you can still win the war, where as to fight one big battle and lose all you have means certain defeat. Kind of thing.
That is what these shitheads are doing. They aren't fighting, they are skirmishing, raiding...
And all the better for the world wide optics. Because to win one battle too convincingly, the supposed mass attack where they cause mass casualties, would be far too bad optics for them. So slowly slowly catchee monkey.
So they don't go in hard. They won't go in hard. It's not because they can't knock up a pipe-bomb or two. They can. But they have people advising against that kind of tactic. For now. This is their strategy. Long term vs. short term. They are winning. They are achieving their objectives. You or I may not like it, but to deny it is to underestimate your enemy. Sun Tzu had something to say about that as well.
A few deaths on the ground that are so grave and heinous as to go unreported, should they start a real race war, are a victory everytime. Bombing a children's concert like the muzzies did here in the UK with mass deaths and casualties is another tactic. And that worked for the muzzies. Horses for courses. What works for one doesn't work for another. Of course they have let up on that for now, having the upper hand, why stir the hornet's nest? But they have not gone away either. They are waiting. Ready to strike.
This is my 3 rules of asymmetric warfare, if I was going to fight a superior enemy:
1: Choose your battles well. Fight only when you can win. Skirmish and Raid and Retreat, to fight another day.
2: Keep doing that. Don't stop until you have won the war. Even if it takes a hundred years.
3: Wait. Even if it takes a thousand years to action this plan, your day will come. Never lose site of your goal.
I think you will find that the playbook they have been given has some similar kind of outlook.
...
I looked in to buying a laser pen a couple of years back. Always been fascinated by them. Studied them quite a bit. Was taught by a Laser Meister.
Lasers are scary things. In our classes we had to pump the room full of smoke to see, or rather better see some of the beams of light. We also had to wear those welder's goggles kind of thing. No one was going to go blind in that class. Especially when you have them triggering off mirrors to display certain effects.
The lasers we used were visible and non-visible. Some are Blue, some are Red, Some are Green, some are combinations. You can get a pretty good idea of a laser's power by its colour. Red ones tend to be weaker than Green ones, Blue ones tend to be stronger again. I might have got that wrong. You can look this up yourself. It's not important to the point I'm trying to make.
What I found was that some lasers that you could buy off ebay from China were at a range that was great enough to cause blindness. Sometimes temporary, sometimes permanent. It's just a few mW variation iirc, between living a normal life and being crippled until you die. This was around the time a few years ago when lasers were becoming a thing and there weren't so many controls on them. There are more now. But you can probably still get something vicious enough to blind a human if you shop around. And these will fit in your pocket and be powered by batteries. You might need massive power packs to create enough kinetic energy to blow up a tank or airplane by laser, but to burn the retina of a human - a simple focused beam at the correct wavelength (blue, red, green, wtf) will do the job.
There's a reason why you see Green lasers at disco shows. And Blue ones not so much. It's the same reason why blue LED's on computer stuff tend to annoy people more than the older red LEDs. I've sperged out enough about this. Sorry.
Suffice it to say, it doesn't surprise me if some serious eye damage has already been caused. And don't forget these can be invisible beams and when left on for long enough can cause fires. I don't want to give any ideas here so I'll STFU. But I bet there's a few of those older 5mW or wtf they were pen-lasers floating around. You can still buy them if you are determined enough. One of those lasers will cause irreparable eye damage, if not outright blindness. I won't say anymore on this. Except. Anyone found carrying a laser, any laser, should be prosecuted as if they had a knife. No reason to bring one to a protest/riot, other than to cause bodily injury.
...
Firing bean bag or tear gas rounds at head height to blind protesters is the oldest trick in the book.
It's a particular favorite of the security services in Bahrain where the largest naval deployment in history is stationed (the US 5th Fleet). There are many skirmishes and raids around there, shutting down roads, flash mobs. And the 'security services' (usually from outside country and from places like Baluchistan in Pakistan) happily fire their UK bought 'riot-control' weapons at children's faces. Many of the kids 'protesting' aren't even teenagers yet. Such is the rage and anger of the natives, not just at the Americans, but their ruling Sunni class (30 percent to their 70 percent Shia). Just wait until they get tortured by the UK bought cattle prods and whatnot. Manufacturing the enemy. Making sure enough people hate you to keep the machine nicely rolling along.
It doesn't always achieve the desired objective. It just angers people and makes them more militant, for the most part. It's one thing to kill someone when you have to, but to blind someone just for fun or to just prove a point is seen as also quite egregious.
Don't get me wrong.
I think the left needs some of those martyrs they are so desperate and eager to provide. But nothing short of Kent-State levels of bravado will achieve the desired outcome to win the war, by starting to finally win a few battles.
Antifa/blm are emboldened by inaction. Inaction on the front of not being confronted when they kick off, and inaction on the front of when they are caught they get slapped wrists. It's easy to see why they want to play this game. No real consequences for them.
Now they are finally starting to see some kind of kick-back, it's all guns whaling like spoilt toddlers who just got told NO, for the first time in their little lives.
I'm not personally for targetting the heads and eyes with these munitions. Use your baton, or shoot to kill. That way your enemy will respect you more. Most combatants would rather have a few cracked bones than lose an eye. And just about every single combatant ever would choose either one of those options in preference to being terminated with extreme prejudice. No middle ground.
Start.
Teaching.
Them.
Lessons.
Brawl erupts at San Juan airport after drunk passenger refuses to leave flight
San Juan airport brawl erupts after drunk woman refuses to leave flig…
archived 23 Jul 2020 23:06:46 UTC
That woman's name?
Blawer Diskson More, 33, of Philadelphia.
Mmm... I wonder....
Pure savagery. I wonder how many of them work for the TSA?
Lol.
A single white woman is just a statistic, anything else, in large enough numbers that couldn't be ignored, would indeed be a tragedy. One day, her death will be avenged. But there's more screaming and shouting to go before that.
Many parallels between what happened back then in the 60's (no expert myself, but I've read up on it a bit the last few years - race relations being a side-gig of mine). But maybe the biggest difference between now and then is the mass media/internet phenomenon. Back then, you did shit to get in the news, to make it wideknown, now you do shit that stays out the news, lest it go global and you get bad optics.
That young mother's death was the perfect killing. Too heinous to even be reported on. Easily swept under the rug. But a real demoralising blow to the other side to make them feel even more impotent. Almost like the perfect murder. And impotency is the worst thing anyone can feel after burning anger. It fucks with your whole body's internal systems. That's why it's good not to devour this shit in anything but bite-sized chunks. When you get too MATI, it's time to SAFTI. If only for a few days to recallibrate.
Another point I'll reply to (that was maybe in another quote of yours), is that this really is all about asymmetric warfare. I've said this before. So have many others. But asymmetric warfare is not just when a smaller and less-well-equipped enemy fights a bigger one (as antifa and blm are really compared to the might of the US state), and they choose to do so by skirmishes and raids where they can safely (and cowardly) regroup to safe ground, to live to fight another day... No, it's about the time domain as well. Another phrase I have heard and like is - the slow burn of attrition - it's about the constant, never ever let up, wear them down by one cut at a time if you can't blast them to high hell and back, type of MO. I'm sure Sun Tzu said something about this.
Choose your battles well, and never enter a battle you can not win.
Pick your fights, and even if it takes a thousand small battles, you can still win the war, where as to fight one big battle and lose all you have means certain defeat. Kind of thing.
That is what these shitheads are doing. They aren't fighting, they are skirmishing, raiding...
And all the better for the world wide optics. Because to win one battle too convincingly, the supposed mass attack where they cause mass casualties, would be far too bad optics for them. So slowly slowly catchee monkey.
So they don't go in hard. They won't go in hard. It's not because they can't knock up a pipe-bomb or two. They can. But they have people advising against that kind of tactic. For now. This is their strategy. Long term vs. short term. They are winning. They are achieving their objectives. You or I may not like it, but to deny it is to underestimate your enemy. Sun Tzu had something to say about that as well.
A few deaths on the ground that are so grave and heinous as to go unreported, should they start a real race war, are a victory everytime. Bombing a children's concert like the muzzies did here in the UK with mass deaths and casualties is another tactic. And that worked for the muzzies. Horses for courses. What works for one doesn't work for another. Of course they have let up on that for now, having the upper hand, why stir the hornet's nest? But they have not gone away either. They are waiting. Ready to strike.
This is my 3 rules of asymmetric warfare, if I was going to fight a superior enemy:
1: Choose your battles well. Fight only when you can win. Skirmish and Raid and Retreat, to fight another day.
2: Keep doing that. Don't stop until you have won the war. Even if it takes a hundred years.
3: Wait. Even if it takes a thousand years to action this plan, your day will come. Never lose site of your goal.
I think you will find that the playbook they have been given has some similar kind of outlook.
...
I looked in to buying a laser pen a couple of years back. Always been fascinated by them. Studied them quite a bit. Was taught by a Laser Meister.
Lasers are scary things. In our classes we had to pump the room full of smoke to see, or rather better see some of the beams of light. We also had to wear those welder's goggles kind of thing. No one was going to go blind in that class. Especially when you have them triggering off mirrors to display certain effects.
The lasers we used were visible and non-visible. Some are Blue, some are Red, Some are Green, some are combinations. You can get a pretty good idea of a laser's power by its colour. Red ones tend to be weaker than Green ones, Blue ones tend to be stronger again. I might have got that wrong. You can look this up yourself. It's not important to the point I'm trying to make.
What I found was that some lasers that you could buy off ebay from China were at a range that was great enough to cause blindness. Sometimes temporary, sometimes permanent. It's just a few mW variation iirc, between living a normal life and being crippled until you die. This was around the time a few years ago when lasers were becoming a thing and there weren't so many controls on them. There are more now. But you can probably still get something vicious enough to blind a human if you shop around. And these will fit in your pocket and be powered by batteries. You might need massive power packs to create enough kinetic energy to blow up a tank or airplane by laser, but to burn the retina of a human - a simple focused beam at the correct wavelength (blue, red, green, wtf) will do the job.
There's a reason why you see Green lasers at disco shows. And Blue ones not so much. It's the same reason why blue LED's on computer stuff tend to annoy people more than the older red LEDs. I've sperged out enough about this. Sorry.
Suffice it to say, it doesn't surprise me if some serious eye damage has already been caused. And don't forget these can be invisible beams and when left on for long enough can cause fires. I don't want to give any ideas here so I'll STFU. But I bet there's a few of those older 5mW or wtf they were pen-lasers floating around. You can still buy them if you are determined enough. One of those lasers will cause irreparable eye damage, if not outright blindness. I won't say anymore on this. Except. Anyone found carrying a laser, any laser, should be prosecuted as if they had a knife. No reason to bring one to a protest/riot, other than to cause bodily injury.
...
Firing bean bag or tear gas rounds at head height to blind protesters is the oldest trick in the book.
It's a particular favorite of the security services in Bahrain where the largest naval deployment in history is stationed (the US 5th Fleet). There are many skirmishes and raids around there, shutting down roads, flash mobs. And the 'security services' (usually from outside country and from places like Baluchistan in Pakistan) happily fire their UK bought 'riot-control' weapons at children's faces. Many of the kids 'protesting' aren't even teenagers yet. Such is the rage and anger of the natives, not just at the Americans, but their ruling Sunni class (30 percent to their 70 percent Shia). Just wait until they get tortured by the UK bought cattle prods and whatnot. Manufacturing the enemy. Making sure enough people hate you to keep the machine nicely rolling along.
It doesn't always achieve the desired objective. It just angers people and makes them more militant, for the most part. It's one thing to kill someone when you have to, but to blind someone just for fun or to just prove a point is seen as also quite egregious.
Don't get me wrong.
I think the left needs some of those martyrs they are so desperate and eager to provide. But nothing short of Kent-State levels of bravado will achieve the desired outcome to win the war, by starting to finally win a few battles.
Antifa/blm are emboldened by inaction. Inaction on the front of not being confronted when they kick off, and inaction on the front of when they are caught they get slapped wrists. It's easy to see why they want to play this game. No real consequences for them.
Now they are finally starting to see some kind of kick-back, it's all guns whaling like spoilt toddlers who just got told NO, for the first time in their little lives.
I'm not personally for targetting the heads and eyes with these munitions. Use your baton, or shoot to kill. That way your enemy will respect you more. Most combatants would rather have a few cracked bones than lose an eye. And just about every single combatant ever would choose either one of those options in preference to being terminated with extreme prejudice. No middle ground.
Start.
Teaching.
Them.
Lessons.
Jarolleon
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2019
Imagine what someone from the 19th century would think.
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2018
link
Blacks, Picnics and Lynchings - 2004 - Question of the Month - Jim Cr…
archived 7 Mar 2019 01:38:59 UTC
archive.is
Sam couldn't even get a source that supported their claim.
Idiot.
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2014
These orcs are more fitting than 40k's too manly ones.
Front page of the Minas Tirith Times: "What Uruk-Hai Diversity Can Do For Rohan: Progress For a New Age of Middle-Earth"
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
There is no source for the word "picnic" so that whole article is just shit-stirring. Literally no one alive knows where that word came from, except there's a sort of agreement that it may have started in France. It was probably some inside joke within a family that stuck.
- Status