Conrad Aaron Collins / Diginée / Digibro / Digibrony / Otaku Gonzo Journalism & the Pro Crastinators Podcast - Pedophile, Two-Faced Weeaboo Ponyfag Youtube Analyst Who Wants to be a Loli + Drama, Friends & Enemies

Judging by his other tweets today, Digi seems to consider itself a "second-wave" tranny and is already accusing other trannies of spreading "anti-anime" propaganda and being "fucking insane".

So much for pivoting into the tranny drug addict audience. I'm sure they will take kindly to being called insane and rush to associate with Digi's pedo movement.

The whole thing is straight up the "student at-ho-lete" southpark skit irl. Just replace cartman thinking the school also owns slaves with digi thinking trannies are his pedophile brethren.
How he didn't know about the bitter hatred between weebs and rainbow people is beyond me. They fight all day every day on twitter and he's had to of seen plenty of both sides being as unlikable as possible.
 
Here's some screenshots of the "loli debate" that made Digi leave the server and post those tweets if anyone is curious. It went on a really long time though so I didn't get all of it, this is just a taste.

1.jpg

111.jpg
2.jpg

3.jpg
4.jpg
5.jpg
9c369c8e4f.png
ss222.jpg

11.jpg

12.jpg

22228.jpg
ss+(2020-07-20+at+09.25.55).png
ss+(2020-07-20+at+09.26.25).png
222999.jpg
2222910.jpg
22229999112.jpg
222229999911233.jpg

Edit: updated with a couple I forgot.
 
Last edited:
Why is it anytime weebs attempt self policing they fail miserably? It's kind of fascinating really. Most of the fandom's problems really could be solved if they could actually self police worth a fuck. But nope, they fuck up almost every time.
 
Why is it anytime weebs attempt self policing they fail miserably? It's kind of fascinating really. Most of the fandom's problems really could be solved if they could actually self police worth a fuck. But nope, they fuck up almost every time.

I mostly just caught screenshots of the pro-loli side to be honest, most of the anti-pedo argument is missing in those. The debate went on for hours across a span of two or three days. It was only one anti-pedo person vs. the entire server though.
 
Here's some screenshots of the "loli debate" that made Digi leave the server and post those tweets if anyone is curious. It went on a really long time though so I didn't get all of it, this is just a taste.


Edit: updated with a couple I forgot.
While I do believe that loli/shota art shouldn't be illegal, the arguements they are making are retarded.
There's evidence that well known loli artists have used real pedophilic content as reference, so it does harm people. Saying looking at porn isn't the same crime as pedophilia, while true, is highly reductive on the role that acting as a demand has on the output of the supply of the material. I.E. It actively encourages more pedophilic pornography to be produced. Comparing homosexuality (and even transexuality) to pedophilia is fucked up due to one of the participants of pedophilic acts being unable to consent due to being too young to fully understand the situation.
 
While I do believe that loli/shota art shouldn't be illegal, the arguements they are making are retarded.
There's evidence that well known loli artists have used real pedophilic content as reference, so it does harm people. Saying looking at porn isn't the same crime as pedophilia, while true, is highly reductive on the role that acting as a demand has on the output of the supply of the material. I.E. It actively encourages more pedophilic pornography to be produced. Comparing homosexuality (and even transexuality) to pedophilia is fucked up due to one of the participants of pedophilic acts being unable to consent due to being too young to fully understand the situation.
The only comparison Digi would truly try to make would be that liking lolicon, much as being trans, gay, bi w/e isn't by choice. Though there is genuine difference between a kink and revving yourself up on your own fetishes. I'm beyond the point of wishing him the best. He is done and is actively not killing but NUKING his career. He's gone full nutty and is all his worst character traits are taking center stage.

I agree with making a big list of everyone who fits into this category. maybe not for the same reasons as digi.
I agree. If anyone wants to go ahead and brand themselves that'd be great. Only idiots publicly defend this stuff.

EDIT:
1595640453365.png

Appearantly Nate and Digi are going to continue KHANTANT!. I can't wait, but not for the same reasons I watched it before.
 
Last edited:
While I do believe that loli/shota art shouldn't be illegal, the arguements they are making are retarded.
There's evidence that well known loli artists have used real pedophilic content as reference, so it does harm people. Saying looking at porn isn't the same crime as pedophilia, while true, is highly reductive on the role that acting as a demand has on the output of the supply of the material. I.E. It actively encourages more pedophilic pornography to be produced. Comparing homosexuality (and even transexuality) to pedophilia is fucked up due to one of the participants of pedophilic acts being unable to consent due to being too young to fully understand the situation.
If you are adamant that lolicon harms children, they why don't you think it should be illegal? Comparing homosexuality to pedophilia is not absurd as homosexuals (not all) commit child sex crimes at a disproportionately high rate. One can also look at loli hentai without paying for it, in this way they would not be encouraging the production of more pornography. Also, even if an artist may use CP as a reference, the impact of this is less than simply producing CP.
 

Wait, I thought this was a debate about loli porn that got digi heated enough to abandon his own discord. This seems more like a debate about pedophilia than anything. This makes his getting heated over it much weirder—well, weirder than getting heated over loli debates, I guess.
 
Wait, I thought this was a debate about loli porn that got digi heated enough to abandon his own discord. This seems more like a debate about pedophilia than anything. This makes his getting heated over it much weirder—well, weirder than getting heated over loli debates, I guess.
True and it being archived is a good thing. Defending drawings is one thing (and even that has it's unavoidable detractors such as mentioned in above replies) but this seems to escalate the subject. I fear him making his wish to be a "big loli" crossed the line between anime and reality.

I don't know if this is part of his trend to escalate subjects or that he now just coming out as a pedo. I didn't think the bearded trash hobo talking about anime would turn out to be such a scary presence to his "following", but from what I've seen read and seen now, the FBI might want to add someone.
 
If you are adamant that lolicon harms children, they why don't you think it should be illegal? Comparing homosexuality to pedophilia is not absurd as homosexuals (not all) commit child sex crimes at a disproportionately high rate. One can also look at loli hentai without paying for it, in this way they would not be encouraging the production of more pornography. Also, even if an artist may use CP as a reference, the impact of this is less than simply producing CP.
I was pointing out flaws within their arguements as they were poorly constructed. I will admit that I went a bit too hard on loli artists and a lot of my arguements were extreme cases.
However:
Homosexuality is different from pedophilia due to the mere act of engaging in pedophilic desires is illegal whereas it isn't for homosexuals.
Piracy still contributes to the market as it shows that there is a demand for the material. Thus the provider of the pirated material will still try to source new material, and thus causing a need for a supply to be made.
While true that loli artists that use CP as reference material are pess harmful than producers of the illegal content, they still cause an increase in the demand in the amount of CP needed which could lead to an increase in the supply of CP material.
All this to say, while I used extreme examples in my points, loli hentai has a harmful side to it. Now not all loli artists are as extreme as this, hell I bet most aren't, but these points still need to be considered as they are the views of anti lolicons.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: What has to be done
Well I do have to ask. If you know how harmful it can be why even want it to be legal?

I slowly over time turned my position on it because I bumped into just enough Lolicons and Shotacons that hinted at liking real kids or outright said it over the years that I accepted it does indeed feed into the abuse of children and isn't worth it.
 
Well I do have to ask. If you know how harmful it can be why even want it to be legal?

I slowly over time turned my position on it because I bumped into just enough Lolicons and Shotacons that hinted at liking real kids or outright said it over the years that I accepted it does indeed feed into the abuse of children and isn't worth it.
Partially because I'm into fucked up shit.
The main reason is however, I feel like 99.9% of the artists implementing it are on the level. I feel like loli art is the same as furry art where most people don't use illegal material for their reference material. It is just a few bad actors that ruin it for everyone.
 
Back