- Joined
- Jun 27, 2014
So, fed up with the whole due process thing, the Prosecutor in the McCloskey case is just resorting to straight-up evidence tampering:
@AnOminous can probably give a better idea as to what we're looking at, but as I see it:
1. The charge is that the gun was readily usable.
2. It fucking wasn't.
3. The prosecutor's office fucking made it usable to try to make the charge stick.
Fucking miserable.
St. Louis prosecutor ordered crime lab to reassemble Patricia McCloskey's gun
ST. LOUIS — The gun Patricia McCloskey waved at protesters was inoperable when it arrived at the St. Louis police crime lab, but a member of Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner's staff ordered crime lab experts to disassemble and reassemble it and wrote that it was “readily capable of lethal use” in charging documents filed Monday, 5 On Your Side has learned.
In Missouri, police and prosecutors must prove that a weapon is “readily” capable of lethal use when it is used in the type of crime with which the McCloskeys have been charged.
Assistant Circuit Attorney Chris Hinckley ordered crime lab staff members to field strip the handgun and found it had been assembled incorrectly. Specifically, the firing pin spring was put in front of the firing pin, which was backward, and made the gun incapable of firing, according to documents obtained by 5 On Your Side.
Firearms experts then put the gun back together in the correct order and test-fired it, finding that it worked, according to the documents.
@AnOminous can probably give a better idea as to what we're looking at, but as I see it:
1. The charge is that the gun was readily usable.
2. It fucking wasn't.
3. The prosecutor's office fucking made it usable to try to make the charge stick.
Fucking miserable.