Culture Roosevelt Statue to Be Removed From Museum of Natural History - Sorry Indie your Wrong

Theodore Roosevelt's statue will be removed from the Museum of Natural History

Roosevelt Statue to Be Removed From Museum of Natural History
The equestrian memorial to Theodore Roosevelt has long prompted objections as a symbol of colonialism and racism.
1592781189805.png




The statue of Theodore Roosevelt outside the Museum of Natural History, under police watch, will be coming down. It has drawn many protests in recent years.Credit...Caitlin Ochs for The New York Times

By Robin Pogrebin
  • June 21, 2020Updated 6:33 p.m. ET
The bronze statue of Theodore Roosevelt, on horseback and flanked by a Native American man and an African man, which has presided over the entrance to the American Museum of Natural History in New York since 1940, is coming down.
The decision, proposed by the museum and agreed to by New York City, which owns the building and property, came after years of objections from activists and at a time when the killing of George Floyd has initiated an urgent nationwide conversation about racism.
For many, the “Equestrian” statue at the museum’s Central Park West entrance had come to symbolize a painful legacy of colonial expansion and racial discrimination.
“Over the last few weeks, our museum community has been profoundly moved by the ever-widening movement for racial justice that has emerged after the killing of George Floyd,” the museum’s president, Ellen V. Futter, said in an interview. “We have watched as the attention of the world and the country has increasingly turned to statues as powerful and hurtful symbols of systemic racism.
“Simply put,” she added, “the time has come to move it.”
The museum took action amid a heated national debate over the appropriateness of statues or monuments that first focused on Confederate symbols like Robert E. Lee and has now moved on to a wider arc of figures, from Christopher Columbus to Thomas Jefferson.
Last week alone, a crowd set fire to a statue of George Washington in Portland, Ore., before pulling it to the ground. Gunfire broke out during a protest in Albuquerque to demand the removal of a statue of Juan de Oñate, the despotic conquistador of New Mexico. And New York City Council members demanded that a statue of Thomas Jefferson be removed from City Hall.

1592781217620.png


  • Thanks for reading The Times.
Subscribe to The Times

In many of those cases, the calls for removal were made by protesters who say the images are too offensive to stand as monuments to American history. The decision about the Roosevelt statue is different, made by a museum that, like others, had previously defended — and preserved — such portraits as relics of their time and that however objectionable, could perhaps serve to educate. It was then seconded by the city, which had the final say.
“The American Museum of Natural History has asked to remove the Theodore Roosevelt statue because it explicitly depicts Black and Indigenous people as subjugated and racially inferior,” Mayor Bill de Blasio said in a statement. “The City supports the Museum’s request. It is the right decision and the right time to remove this problematic statue.”
When the monument will be taken down, where it will go and what, if anything, will replace it, remain undetermined, officials said.
A Roosevelt family member, who is a trustee of the museum, released a statement approving of the removal.
“The world does not need statues, relics of another age, that reflect neither the values of the person they intend to honor nor the values of equality and justice,” said Theodore Roosevelt IV, a great-grandson of the 26th president and a member of the museum’s board of trustees. “The composition of the Equestrian Statue does not reflect Theodore Roosevelt’s legacy. It is time to move the statue and move forward.”





Image
“The world does not need statues, relics of another age, that reflect neither the values of the person they intend to honor nor the values of equality and justice,” said Theodore Roosevelt IV, a great-grandson of the 26th president, said in a statement approving the removal.Credit...Caitlin Ochs for The New York Times
To be sure, the Roosevelt family did get something in return; the museum is naming its Hall of Biodiversity for Roosevelt “in recognition of his conservation legacy,” Ms. Futter said.
Ms. Futter also made a point of saying that the museum was only taking issue with the statue itself, not with Roosevelt overall, with whom the institution has a long history.
His father was a founding member of the institution; its charter was signed in his home. Roosevelt’s childhood excavations were among the museum’s first artifacts. The museum was chosen by New York’s state legislature for Roosevelt’s memorial in 1920.
The museum already has several spaces named after Roosevelt, including Theodore Roosevelt Memorial Hall, the Theodore Roosevelt Rotunda and Theodore Roosevelt Park outside.
“It’s very important to note that our request is based on the statue, that is the hierarchical composition that’s depicted in it,” Ms. Futter said. “It is not about Theodore Roosevelt who served as Governor of New York before becoming the 26th president of the United States and was a pioneering conservationist.”
Critics, though, have pointed to President Roosevelt’s opinions about racial hierarchy and eugenics and his pivotal role in the Spanish-American War.
The statue — created by James Earle Fraser — was one of four memorials in New York that a city commission reconsidered in 2017, ultimately deciding after a split decision to leave the statue in place and to add context.
The museum tried to add that context with an exhibition last year, “Addressing the Statue,” which explored its design and installation, the inclusion of the figures walking beside Roosevelt and Roosevelt’s racism. The museum also examined its own potential complicity, in particular its exhibitions on eugenics in the early 20th century.
The exhibition was partly a response to the defacing of the statue by protesters, who in 2017 splashed red liquid representing blood over the statue’s base. The protesters, who identified themselves as members of the Monument Removal Brigade, later published a statement on the internet calling for its removal as an emblem of “patriarchy, white supremacy and settler-colonialism.”
“Now the statue is bleeding,” the statement said. “We did not make it bleed. It is bloody at its very foundation.”
The group also said the museum should “rethink its cultural halls regarding the colonial mentality behind them.”
At the time, the museum said complaints should be channeled through Mayor de Blasio’s commission to review city monuments and that the museum was planning to update its exhibits. The institution has since undertaken a renovation of its North West Coast Hall in consultation with native nations from the North West Coast of Canada and Alaska.
In January, the museum also moved the Northwest Coast Great Canoe from its 77th Street entrance into that hall, to better contextualize it. The museum’s Old New York diorama, which includes a stereotypical depiction of Lenape leaders, now has captions explaining why the display is offensive.
Mayor de Blasio has made a point of rethinking public monuments to honor more women and people of color — an undertaking led largely by his wife, Chirlane McCray, and the She Built NYC commission. But these efforts have also been controversial, given complaints about the transparency of the process and the public figures who have been excluded, namely Mother Cabrini, a patron saint of immigrants who had drawn the most nominations in a survey of New Yorkers.
On Friday, the Mayor announced that Ms. McCray would lead a Racial Justice and Reconciliation Commission whose brief would include reviewing the city’s potentially racist monuments.
Though the debates over many of these statues have been marked by rancor, the Natural History Museum seems unconflicted about removing the Roosevelt monument that has greeted its visitors for so long.
“We believe that moving the statue can be a symbol of progress in our commitment to build and sustain an inclusive and equitable society,” Ms. Futter said. “Our view has been evolving. This moment crystallized our thinking and galvanized us to action.”


...............................................................................
I Agree with JIm FFS. So just give it to buyers or cold storage like ARK of Covenant
1592781094301.png
 
My guess is that most of these are either:

-Because it's there. That was most likely the case when someone spray-painted the Mario Lemieux statue outside of PPG Arena a few weeks ago.

-They're trolls. Agent provocateurs have always been common in times like these. It happened during the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution, the womens' suffrage movement, the Civil Rights movement, etc. It's nothing new.

-They're just people who are bored and decided to go out and riot and for the hell of it. (Probably young kids)

-And finally -- they're stupid.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AMERICA
Loudoun County's Confederate monument removed overnight
Loudoun County's Confederate monument removed overnight
By Nathaniel Cline, ncline@loudountimes.com Jul 21, 2020 Updated 10 hrs ago 237
1595380883625.png


1595380906334.png


Overnight on Monday, the Confederate statue, also known as the “Silent Sentinel,” was removed from the courthouse grounds in downtown Leesburg.

The Times-Mirror on Tuesday morning received images of the statue taken during its removal.

The Loudoun County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously earlier this summer to return the statue to the Loudoun Chapter of the United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC). The statue, which the board affirmed belonged to UDC, sat at the corner of North King and East Market streets since 1908.

UDC had until Sept. 7 to remove the statue. The organization had not publicized when it planned to remove the monument.

As previously reported, the action comes as more counties and cities across the country are taking steps to remove the statues in the wake of nationwide protests for racial equity and reform. While some say the statues are honoring their heritage and ancestry, many others believe the statues stand for white supremacy and institutional racism.

The Virginia General Assembly voted earlier this year to give localities the ability to remove, relocate or contextualize the monuments in their communities. The law went into effect July 1.

Virginia is home to more than 200 public memorials to the Confederacy, according to state officials.





Pensacola attorneys say there are no legal grounds to stop Confederate monument removal
Kevin Robinson
Pensacola News Journal

Pensacola attorneys say there are no legal grounds to stop Confederate monument removal

City of Pensacola attorneys believe there are no state or federal laws that prohibit the removal of the Confederate monument in Lee Square.
Last week, the Sons of Confederate Veterans, Save Southern Heritage and other groups sought and obtained an emergency temporary restraining order to prevent the city from removing the controversial monument. They argued that, among other concerns, taking down the monument would violate Pensacola's own historic preservation and archaeological review ordinances, as well Florida statutes against disturbing tombs with "possible historical human remains."
In a regular press conference Monday morning, Pensacola Mayor Grover Robinson said city attorney Susan Woolf had thoroughly reviewed applicable laws before the City Council voted to remove the monument last week.

"We don't have any remains of any soldiers that were buried there," Robinson said. "There are no remains associated with the monument, (it) is simply a monument that's there. ... Susan put it in (her report), state and federal statutes don't apply to this particular monument."
Council vote:Pensacola City Council votes to remove Confederate monument, change name of Lee Square
Suit filed:Lawsuit filed to stop removal of Pensacola Confederate monument
Order granted:Judge orders Pensacola to not remove Confederate monument — for now
Robinson said local attorney Bruce Partington of the Clark Partington law firm offered to assist the city at a "very reduced rate," and the city had accepted his assistance.
The city is facing a joint lawsuit by the Ladies Memorial Association, the Stephen Mallory Camp 1315 Sons of Confederate Veterans, Save Our Southern Heritage Florida Chapter and Veterans Monuments of America. They argue the monument is a protected public memorial "commemorating soldiers who died fighting for their homes and family and state."

The monument includes dedications to Confederate dead and to Jefferson Davis, the president of the Confederacy; Stephen Mallory, secretary of the Confederate Navy; and Edward Perry, a Confederate officer and later governor of Florida. Historians have said that the monument was also used as a means to promote white supremacy and that Perry reportedly used his influence to remove Black elected officials from public office and replace them with white politicians sympathetic to the cause.

"For a number of reasons, it is not viewed as simply a veterans statue," Robinson said. "There's other baggage along with it in some of the comments that are on the statue. I think when we became cognizant of that, we felt we've either got to figure out a way to include everybody, and if we can't do that, then we need to look at removal."
Deep dive into the monument's history:A 'coup' led by white supremacists led to placement of Pensacola's Confederate monument
The mayor said the city initially considered adding other monuments to the square that were reflective of other people's experiences and perspectives, but that path had ultimately been too expensive.
Many cities around the country have removed symbols and monuments tied to the Confederacy, particularly amid national discussions of police brutality and systemic racism following the death of George Floyd at the hands of a Minnesota police officer.

Get the Coronavirus Watch newsletter in your inbox.
Updates on how the coronavirus is affecting your community and the nation
Delivery: Varies

Robinson said while the litigation on the Pensacola monument is pending, the city will continue to move forward with finding a contractor to perform the removal.
"It could be some time because there are only a handful of people that specialize in historically valuable monuments of the size," Robinson said. "They're kind of all over the Southeast right now. There are a lot of other cities, and Pensacola is probably is one of the last to make the decision on their Confederate monument, so that's kind of put us a little bit behind curve. But we are working to make that happen, and we think that that can be in parallel with the lawsuit."
The mayor added that the city would comply with whatever order ultimately comes from the court system.
Robinson also said that while some people have argued he was a "prisoner of the moment" bowing to the current political winds, he said there have been groundswells of support for removing the stature at least five times over the past 20 years.
"It's not the intent to erase history," Robinson said. "It's just the intention to relocate history, because we haven't done a good job of telling the whole story."
 
I'm fed up with these overly sensitive SJW children tearing down history because someone might have their feelings hurt. There is nothing in the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, nor is there any law that says it's illegal for one to be offended or have their feelings hurt. If they want these statues and monuments to be removed then submit it for a vote and let the people decide. But this "bitch and tantrum until we get what we want" needs to end, and people need to stop allowing it to happen. It doesnt fix or change anything.
 
The ride never ends as we finding out a lot of middle and upper middle class white people really don't care about their history and heritage.



Statues of Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin have been removed from the Washburn University campus after protests against racial injustice elsewhere led to statues honoring slaveholders being vandalized, pulled down or moved, the school said Thursday.

The two bronze statues that had stood outside the university's law school in Topeka for two decades were removed in July after Washburn President Jerry Farley discussed the concerns with the family of the donor, who has since died, school spokesman Patrick Early said.

Early said the decision was prompted in part by a disagreement over a Jefferson statue at the University of Missouri's Columbia campus in June. Some Missouri students petitioned to have the statue removed but university officials decided to leave it in place.

Some Washburn students have questioned the propriety of the statutes but the decision to remove them from campus was not in response to a protest or request from students, Early said.

"It was the donor's decision to have the statues returned," he said. "They didn't want the statues to become a source of embarrassment so they asked that they be returned."

Few people noticed the statues were gone and the decision has not prompted much discussion since classes began two weeks ago, Early said.

A representative for the school's Black Student Union did not immediately return messages seeking reaction.

Washburn, a public school with about 7,000 students, had planned a rally and march to support the Black Lives Matter movement but it was postponed because of the coronavirus pandemic, Early said.

The school's other statues are mostly modern art, except of a recently installed statue of Ichabod Washburn, an early benefactor and namesake of the school.
 
I Thank mr.metkour & Tim Pool for the additional harvest:optimistic::sadwaifu:

1599004446338.png

1599004514346.png

1599004588190.png


Diversity is Our Strength :story: :story:
1599004622321.png


I guess we have to remove every Preseent label: insert Property Here :stress: Guess more Taxes :story:
1599004550785.png



We our to the Point of Full Islam & Communist revolution :popcorn::popcorn:
 

Attachments

  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Exterminatus
Did these people seriously list the fucking Washington Monument and that big badass statue? You know, our first President, our primary general during the Revolutionary War, and rightly regarded as the father of the country? Oh, I guess I answered my own question. Since America is a racist nation and always has been, of course the person most responsible for its existence is the world's biggest racist. You know, despite 1619 being our founding year according to these smoothbrains...
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Trilby
Holy shit why?!?!?! Like what in the actual fuck is going on?!?!?
Its called the Slippery slope.

I have told retarded Centrists that if you allow the Confederate statues to be torn down, they will use it as precedent to tear down the statues of everyone else. But centrists, the ever helpful lefty but in denial said that it would never happen, said "Muh Slavery" and "Muh POCs feelings" which is why Confederate statues need to go. And now here we are.

All the things people say about confederate statues can be said of the US founders too and now that they have won with the Confederate statues, they will take down the US founders.
 
Last edited:
The state of white people and this is Oklahoma, full blown red state. Looks Alaska is the only based state left.



The University of Oklahoma recently removed a tribute wall that was dedicated to retired faculty in the political science department over concerns that it was not sufficiently diverse. According to an open letter, the tribute was removed because it “exclusively includes white male faces.”

According to a report by Campus Reform, the University of Oklahoma announced this week that it will be removing a tribute wall that was dedicated to retired members of the political science department. The decision came as part of a larger push to implement changes designed to enhance diversity and inclusion within the department.

In an open letter published recently, the department announced that it would remove the tribute to retired faculty members because it exclusively featured “white male faces.” The university claims that the tribute wall will be preserved if adequate funding is secured.

We will transform the entryway to our department on the second floor of Dale Hall Tower. One of the walls of this entry includes the images of retired members of our department, a set that exclusively includes white male faces. This will be replaced with a space in which our current students can express themselves and represent their own voices. When funding permits, the historical pictures will be moved to a setting more appropriate for the protection and expression of this history. The second phase of this plan (the permanent removal and movement of the photos) will likely require the cooperation of the college and central administration.

The tribute wall will be replaced with a display where students will be able to express their political perspectives on certain issues. It is not clear at this point of the university will limit the range of perspectives that students will be permitted to share on the wall.

Breitbart News reported in February that a professor at the University of Oklahoma has allegedly claimed that the popular phrase “okay, Boomer” is akin to a racial slur.
 
Back