Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

BoxerShorts47 said:
1. Yes. Women contribute to the advancement of society by having kids and raising them. The fact that you don't value motherhood and you think the best society is one where the k-12 education system raises your kid is 100% feminized. To make sure we're on the same page, a feminist is a women that hates being a women, doesn't identify with the gender she was assigned as birth and wants to act like a man and be treated like a man, Today we could call a feminist a pre-op transgender. So "women's rights" is a lie, Cisgendered women don't like or want feminism because they want to get married and raise kids. They get enjoyment from kids not work.

3a. "underage" is a social construct. There is a big difference between marrying a 15 yr old and an 8 yr old. You're using dishonest terms like underage or minor as conflation fallacy.
3b. Age of consent at 18 makes normies think it's immoral for a 19 yr old to date a 15 yr old. Not even necessarily about "sex." AoC gets normalized to prevent all relationships. I don't have a problem with parents choosing 18 but I don't think most would if AoC was lowered to ~14.
Click to expand...
Ohhhhhhhh... my poor braincells, I'm so sorry for what happens to you every time I read some of this loser's drivel...

1. Is this how you """win""" all of your """debates""", @BoxerShorts47? By putting words into your opponents' mouths? When did I ever say that I do not value motherhood?
Now let me enlighten you on something, buddy. Read carefully and maybe, just maybe, something will *click* in that marble-smooth brain of yours.
The "nuclear family" ideal as you know it, this model where the husband works while the wife stays home and watches the kids, cannot be financially sustained. Well, it can, but only if the husband's job is particularly well paying. (Note that I'm highlighting certain parts here because I'm afraid you'll just skim right over my words otherwise). And that automatically crosses out a large percentage of families across the world. Now is it really such a nice model when only the upper classes can make it work?
No, my dear Boxie, it's not. Both parents will have to work in order to sustain their family. It doesn't matter how many children your 15-year old wife can pump out when each and every one of those children requires a fortune to properly raise.
To make sure we're on the same page, a feminist is a women that hates being a women, doesn't identify with the gender she was assigned as birth and wants to act like a man and be treated like a man, Today we could call a feminist a pre-op transgender.
Click to expand...
I honestly don't know what you're talking about here. Did you perhaps confuse butch lesbians and/or tomboys with contemporary feminists? If so, it just goes to show how little you know about the world.
So "women's rights" is a lie, Cisgendered women don't like or want feminism because they want to get married and raise kids. They get enjoyment from kids not work.
Click to expand...
How the fuck would you know? You've never approached a woman, let alone talked to one. I said this once and I'll say it again - do not speak for the rest of the world, sea monkey. Your grasp on our reality is about as weak as your body, that is to say, weaker than a beached jellyfish.

3a.
"underage" is a social construct.
Click to expand...
Yeah, a social construct. Just like gender, race... right? Do you not even realize how you sound? There was a point where you had a chance to look back and see just how much like a SJW you sound, and perhaps even repent, but you clearly passed it a long, long time ago.
There is a big difference between marrying a 15 yr old and an 8 yr old.
Click to expand...
There really isn't. I, along with countless other users, have already explained why, but you simply waved it off as "shitlib garbage", so I'm not gonna bother again.
You're using dishonest terms like underage or minor as conflation fallacy.
Click to expand...
Aaaaand here we go again with the "poopoo-peepee fallacy" meme. Listen, jackass, just because I worded my argument in a way that you don't like, doesn't mean I'm wrong.

3b.
Age of consent at 18 makes normies think it's immoral for a 19 yr old to date a 15 yr old. Not even necessarily about "sex."
Click to expand...
Yes, it's absolutely immoral. You are taking advantage of an underage person, buddy pal. No wiggling past it.
AoC gets normalized to prevent all relationships.
Click to expand...
Have you even been to the United States? No, let me rephrase that: have you ever left the confines of your home? If you did, you'd be able to see that people form meaningful and long-lasting relationships just fine, despite the AoC being 18. Or have you trained your senses to just filter all that out to suit your narrative?
I don't have a problem with parents choosing 18 but I don't think most would if AoC was lowered to ~14.
Click to expand...
If you don't have a problem with it, then why are you even bitching about lowering the AoC?

Whew, that took a while. I eagerly await your response of "lol shitlib garbage", "you're committing a poopoo-peepee fallacy", "you're not addressing my points" and/or any combination thereof.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Balanced Boomer, Daughter of Cernunnos, HIVidaBoheme and 3 others
SIGSEGV said:
It would appear that I've won the debate again.
Click to expand...
Being blocked by BoxO'Shit is a badge of honour, because he still reads our posts anyway; if he thinks this will stop him getting pinksocked by anyone who feels like it, he's as sorely mistaken about that as he is about everything else. What a special little faggot he is, bless him.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: 6thRanger, Balanced Boomer, HIVidaBoheme and 6 others
SIGSEGV said:
It would appear that I've won the debate again.
Click to expand...
It just gets easier every time. Ol Boxy keeps getting more and more cucked and blocking people quicker and quicker.
@BoxerShorts47 If you can't handle people telling you that you are a gross pedo sea beaner pretending to be white, then I guess you won't be able to become the leader of your glorious misogynistic/ pedo/ "white" revolution after all. Your revolution is stillborn, much like your mom wishes you were.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Balanced Boomer, Daughter of Cernunnos, Stardust and 4 others
Heckler1 said:
It just gets easier every time. Ol Boxy keeps getting more and more cucked and blocking people quicker and quicker.
@BoxerShorts47 If you can't handle people telling you that you are a gross pedo sea beaner pretending to be white, then I guess you won't be able to become the leader of your glorious misogynistic/ pedo/ "white" revolution after all. Your revolution is stillborn, much like your mom wishes you were.
Click to expand...
The only role Boxyboo will have in the white ethnostate is as a judas goat-type figure, leading the non-white masses into extermination chambers and being the only one to walk out the other side. Like a retarded pet of sorts.
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Balanced Boomer, Heckler1 and SIGSEGV
Troon Draugur said:
The only role Boxyboo will have in the white ethnostate is as a judas goat-type figure, leading the non-white masses into extermination chambers and being the only one to walk out the other side. Like a retarded pet of sorts.
Click to expand...
Nah, he'd fuck that up by trying to fuck one of their kids almost immediately or alerting the pocs to the danger by spilling his spaghetti everywhere.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: 6thRanger, Balanced Boomer, Daughter of Cernunnos and 1 other person
Heckler1 said:
Nah, he'd fuck that up by trying to fuck one of their kids almost immediately or alerting the pocs to the danger by spilling his spaghetti everywhere.
Click to expand...
Valid point; even walking and keeping schtum at the same time is probably beyond our resident pedotard. Well, in that case, they'll probably just use him as a convenient place to park a couple of dicks. It'd be a "busman's holiday" for him.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: SIGSEGV
The Last Stand said:
@BoxerShorts47 I'm curious of your serious face. See how you present yourself in the world.
Click to expand...
Business Formal.

Absolute Brainlet said:
Ohhhhhhhh... my poor braincells, I'm so sorry for what happens to you every time I read some of this loser's drivel...

1. Is this how you """win""" all of your """debates""", @BoxerShorts47? By putting words into your opponents' mouths? When did I ever say that I do not value motherhood?
Now let me enlighten you on something, buddy. Read carefully and maybe, just maybe, something will *click* in that marble-smooth brain of yours.
The "nuclear family" ideal as you know it, this model where the husband works while the wife stays home and watches the kids, cannot be financially sustained. Well, it can, but only if the husband's job is particularly well paying. (Note that I'm highlighting certain parts here because I'm afraid you'll just skim right over my words otherwise). And that automatically crosses out a large percentage of families across the world. Now is it really such a nice model when only the upper classes can make it work?
No, my dear Boxie, it's not. Both parents will have to work in order to sustain their family. It doesn't matter how many children your 15-year old wife can pump out when each and every one of those children requires a fortune to properly raise.

I honestly don't know what you're talking about here. Did you perhaps confuse butch lesbians and/or tomboys with contemporary feminists? If so, it just goes to show how little you know about the world.

How the fuck would you know? You've never approached a woman, let alone talked to one. I said this once and I'll say it again - do not speak for the rest of the world, sea monkey. Your grasp on our reality is about as weak as your body, that is to say, weaker than a beached jellyfish.

3a.
Yeah, a social construct. Just like gender, race... right? Do you not even realize how you sound? There was a point where you had a chance to look back and see just how much like a SJW you sound, and perhaps even repent, but you clearly passed it a long, long time ago.

There really isn't. I, along with countless other users, have already explained why, but you simply waved it off as "shitlib garbage", so I'm not gonna bother again.

Aaaaand here we go again with the "poopoo-peepee fallacy" meme. Listen, jackass, just because I worded my argument in a way that you don't like, doesn't mean I'm wrong.

3b.
Yes, it's absolutely immoral. You are taking advantage of an underage person, buddy pal. No wiggling past it.

Have you even been to the United States? No, let me rephrase that: have you ever left the confines of your home? If you did, you'd be able to see that people form meaningful and long-lasting relationships just fine, despite the AoC being 18. Or have you trained your senses to just filter all that out to suit your narrative?

If you don't have a problem with it, then why are you even bitching about lowering the AoC?

Whew, that took a while. I eagerly await your response of "lol shitlib garbage", "you're committing a poopoo-peepee fallacy", "you're not addressing my points" and/or any combination thereof.
Click to expand...
1. "putting words in your opponent's mouth" is how you win debates. It's not about the words you say, it's about the meaning other people get from your jobs. I heard "fuck motherhood, work sets you free."
2. If we had UNEQUAL pay, a man earned 2,3,4x his wife for the SAME job then we could get male provider, female mother dynamic people. "equal pay" takes away the right of the man to be the provider.
3. Feminists have always been women that hate being women and want to act like a man, I don't mean a "tomboy" but full-out complete with men in the workforce for the same leadership positions or in politics for the same position. Real women aka cisgendered women don't want their husbands losing a promotion or an election to another women. The idea that feminism empowers "women" is the biggest lie, even bigger than diversity (ethnic cleansing of whites).
4. I internalized SJW ideology to defeat them. BTW did you know gay marriage is cultural appropriation. Marriage is a social construct created by the straight community for the straight community, We're 100% banning gay marriage and lynching any homosexual that wants to culturally appropriate hetro-normativity including getting married or adopting kids. No cultural appropriation. Never. not even one, Not on my watch, 0 pride sticking pee-pee in the poo-poo, only shame, total cope.
5. "take advantage of underage person" again total non-sense. A 14 yr old has MORE power in a relationship than a 28 yr old because she has MORE options. SMV theory. You're clearly feminized.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: Balanced Boomer, Daughter of Cernunnos, HIVidaBoheme and 7 others
BoxerShorts47 said:
I am a retarded pedophile faggot nigger and @SIGSEGV has won the debate again. Please continue to rape my prolapsed asshole until I finally bleed to death.
Click to expand...
Is that a fair interpretation of your post, yes or no? If you say no, it means you want to destroy the white race.
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Balanced Boomer, Daughter of Cernunnos, HIVidaBoheme and 6 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back