Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

80729CEC-BCB2-4BD1-9678-B386E1FC056A.jpegD576B81F-95A1-4079-8C3A-055F2F1C7655.jpeg
 
  • Lunacy
Reactions: ExciteDyke, The Lawgiver, madethistocomment and 7 others
Shaka Brah said:
We're talking about American Blacks, not Africans coming to America. As far as I know, no transracial adoption study was ever done on foreign children. Besides, the studies usually follow White children put up for adoption, who grow up to have an average IQ of 100 just like White children born and raised in their own families. If poverty had that much of an effect on IQ among Americans we would see such a gap with White children too, but we don't.
Click to expand...

There's still epigenetic factors at work, they just happen to be "eating constant garbage food", "consistent diagnoses of saline hypertension", and "piss-poor gestational nutrition", instead of "iodine deficiencies", "parasite-laden water", and "piss-poor gestational nutrition." I don't recall any studies that factor in any consideration of those kinds of factors, or that use cohorts with similar nutritional intakes, all the ones I've seen compare inner-city joggers with country-living trailer trash, and the latter get a lot more veggies than the former. Shit like that makes a difference.
 
TerribleIdeas™ said:
There's still epigenetic factors at work, they just happen to be "eating constant garbage food", "consistent diagnoses of saline hypertension", and "piss-poor gestational nutrition", instead of "iodine deficiencies", "parasite-laden water", and "piss-poor gestational nutrition." I don't recall any studies that factor in any consideration of those kinds of factors, or that use cohorts with similar nutritional intakes, all the ones I've seen compare inner-city joggers with country-living trailer trash, and the latter get a lot more veggies than the former. Shit like that makes a difference.
Click to expand...
If it were that easy to dismiss the gap someone would do it. The reality is that you can't make those assumptions about black or white nutrition (because the data is anonymized for patient privacy), and even if you could the lag in IQ from prenatal health seems to disappear in adulthood except in the case of Fetal Alcohol Syndrome and other drug-related diseases, which are screened out of these studies.
 
Outback Wanderer said:
That putting of "American law" above the the law of the Church is Americanism and a heresy denounced by by the Church. Further more, the divorcing of church and state is why SJWs have made such great inroads in the state, because it becomes clear that men lack the spiritual courage to endure the SJW verbal beatings and harassment without God. Whereas the SJWs have their anti-church of "oppression" and "privilege", and they will draw upon the success and martyrdom of other members to continue the advancing of their goals. So until America and Western society puts God and His Church first in their societies and lives, SJWs and other such groups will continue to win, because the good guys are united under nothing but some "nice" ideas, and will continue to fold when pressed.
Click to expand...
Every so often I come onto a thread and suddenly get a bona-fied sermon. While I disagree with you based on the United States' existing just fine without church and state before sjwism and that you sound like you want the US to model themselves after the Middle East, I do appreciate the good old does of ridiculousness.
Yaoi Huntress Earth said:
View attachment 1496392
View attachment 1496394
Click to expand...
Where does she live? Most of the black customers at my old job here in Florida were politer than white people. What the fuck am I reading?
 
  • Like
Reactions: boroque, Maiden Astraea, Jhonson Jhonson and 2 others
Further on the '2 + 2 = 4 is white colonising supremacy' concept...
Edit: The linked thread is worth reading for a proper exploration of just what the educators trying to push this sort of stuff believe, and what they get away with publishing.
2 + 2 = 5.jpg

Tl;dr: The usual destructive attempts to redefine meaning out of existence, including 'if you don't get why 2 + 2 doesn't have to equal 4 then you're transphobic' as well.
 
Last edited:
  • Horrifying
Reactions: ExciteDyke, madethistocomment, Gutpuke and 2 others
JambledUpWords said:
AA03D74D-2022-45DA-97DB-7492A1314DF5.jpeg
Click to expand...
There's an interesting thread to be pulled on about how being 'performative', like acting 'in bad faith', are such horrible concepts to SJWs. How much of their time is spent on questioning motives, doubting behaviours, requiring conditions for acceptability from 'allies' that are impossible. How, because they demand knowledge of the thoughts and feelings of a person, but don't trust the words of the person themselves, they give themselves carte blanche to decide how everybody else really feels, in effect giving themselves the power to define someone else's thoughts and emotions for them.

How the power they want to have over other people is not just in their actions and words, but in deciding what they really mean, how they really feel, they want the power to redefine any other person in whatever manner they choose. How closely that aligns with certain very negative personality disorders and ways of seeing the world.

This could be a source of a @Jaimas-style essay about the sociopathy of the indignant left. Or I could just have a headache and be annoyed at all the REEEEEEing. But I still think it's extremely telling that the worst crime for them is thoughtcrime, and how much that is because they can accuse anything of being a thoughtcrime and it can't be disproved.
 
  • Agree
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Cardef1121, Kinnie, UnsufficentBoobage and 10 others
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Optimistic
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage, TerribleIdeas™, Next Task and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back