Official Physical Health Speculation & Cancer Discussion - hulthy just big

Nicotine Fetish said:
Really, I can only assume none of us are doctors. And Amber is not a doctor. So what would an actual weight loss doctor say? You know, somebody with a medical degree and years upon years of knowledge and practice in this field. Somebody who literally dedicated a large chunk of their life learning the science. What would that doctor say about restriction? Oh, wait. She did go to a weight loss doctor and he told her to restrict. Yikes. But I forget. Amber, who is infamous on YouTube for gaining weight, and 500 plus pounds. Knows better how to treat an eating disorder cause she - read google? I guess. Or she just knows what works for her? Nah, that doctor was wrong about restriction. She’s right. :)
Click to expand...
Dr. Google is the most popular doctor because if you search well enough you'll find what you wanna hear
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin's Side Piece, repentance and Mesh Gear Fox
Nicotine Fetish said:
Really, I can only assume none of us are doctors. And Amber is not a doctor. So what would an actual weight loss doctor say? You know, somebody with a medical degree and years upon years of knowledge and practice in this field. Somebody who literally dedicated a large chunk of their life learning the science. What would that doctor say about restriction? Oh, wait. She did go to a weight loss doctor and he told her to restrict. Yikes. But I forget. Amber, who is infamous on YouTube for gaining weight, and 500 plus pounds. Knows better how to treat an eating disorder cause she - read google? I guess. Or she just knows what works for her? Nah, that doctor was wrong about restriction. She’s right. :)
Click to expand...

I actually really believe that you can find better advice outside of the doctor's office. Because no matter how many years of experience most of them are obliged to follow the guidelines in regards of what to recommend to an obese or diabetic patient. And these guidelines are outdated at least if not even intentional misinformation. I actually do not agree that restriction is the key, at least not in the "mainstream sense" like living in a caloric deficit every day and I hope it is not too much PL when I say I had to find it out myself that a calorie is NOT a like any other calorie and that you CAN lose your excess weight without restricting yourself to the result that you feel hungry all of the time. And you also do not have to become a slave to the gym either. It helps of course but you truly cannot out-exercise your bad diet. It is 90% what and when you eat. However, Amber neither listens to doctors nor to the right advice outside the doctor's office. It is just another excuse to remain in her current comfort zone, a comfort zone that actually still earns her the most coin, so the discussion is futile anyway.
 
  • Autistic
  • Disagree
  • Like
Reactions: Carlos the Scientist, EvaBraunsGhost, Bees and 6 others
SnarlieNarlie said:
I actually really believe that you can find better advice outside of the doctor's office. Because no matter how many years of experience most of them are obliged to follow the guidelines in regards of what to recommend to an obese or diabetic patient. And these guidelines are outdated at least if not even intentional misinformation. I actually do not agree that restriction is the key, at least not in the "mainstream sense" like living in a caloric deficit every day and I hope it is not too much PL when I say I had to find it out myself that a calorie is NOT a like any other calorie and that you CAN lose your excess weight without restricting yourself to the result that you feel hungry all of the time. And you also do not have to become a slave to the gym either. It helps of course but you truly cannot out-exercise your bad diet. It is 90% what and when you eat. However, Amber neither listens to doctors nor to the right advice outside the doctor's office. It is just another excuse to remain in her current comfort zone, a comfort zone that actually still earns her the most coin, so the discussion is futile anyway.
Click to expand...

Restriction sounds like a scary word - but it’s just another word for eat less. And yes, if amber is going to lose weight - she has to eat less. She has to restrict. There is no way around it. That’s just fact. I don’t really know what you mean like “a mainstream sense being in a caloric deficit everyday” - that’s exactly what amber needs. And she needs it immediately. She is not simply overweight. She is morbidly obese to the point she is immobile. She needs a caloric deficit and probably a pretty heavy one. I hope this didn’t come across as hostile. But I strongly disagree. Amber needs to eat less, a lot less, if she wants to lose weight. And that’s something any doctor worth his salt would recommend to her.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Carlos the Scientist, Thumbsballs, Battlecruiser3000ad and 10 others
SnarlieNarlie said:
I actually really believe that you can find better advice outside of the doctor's office. Because no matter how many years of experience most of them are obliged to follow the guidelines in regards of what to recommend to an obese or diabetic patient. And these guidelines are outdated at least if not even intentional misinformation. I actually do not agree that restriction is the key, at least not in the "mainstream sense" like living in a caloric deficit every day and I hope it is not too much PL when I say I had to find it out myself that a calorie is NOT a like any other calorie and that you CAN lose your excess weight without restricting yourself to the result that you feel hungry all of the time. And you also do not have to become a slave to the gym either. It helps of course but you truly cannot out-exercise your bad diet. It is 90% what and when you eat. However, Amber neither listens to doctors nor to the right advice outside the doctor's office. It is just another excuse to remain in her current comfort zone, a comfort zone that actually still earns her the most coin, so the discussion is futile anyway.
Click to expand...

No amount of intuitive eating is going to help her without counselling - Maybe 'restriction' is not the answer but any eating plan has to co-exist with counselling or a sponsor, Amber has a distorted view of what a portion is, of what is healthy and and what hunger is.

The weight is going to pile back on, it is an inevitability and that will coincide with more excuses. more hopelessness and more illness
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Mesh Gear Fox, dingobaby, Vladimir Fupatin and 2 others
Nicotine Fetish said:
Restriction sounds like a scary word - but it’s just another word for eat less. And yes, if amber is going to lose weight - she has to eat less. She has to restrict. There is no way around it. That’s just fact. I don’t really know what you mean like “a mainstream sense being in a caloric deficit everyday” - that’s exactly what amber needs. And she needs it immediately. She is not simply overweight. She is morbidly obese to the point she is immobile. She needs a caloric deficit and probably a pretty heavy one. I hope this didn’t come across as hostile. But I strongly disagree. Amber needs to eat less, a lot less, if she wants to lose weight. And that’s something any doctor worth his salt would recommend to her.
Click to expand...
When I stated my opinion of course I had somewhat moderate overweight people in mind. Of course morbidly obese people are another kind of story. But still, Amberlynn does not really need to "restrict" in the sense of restricting that she would not be giving her body the calories it needs to function on a normal level. She would start losing weight consistently if she only ate what a normal weight person would eat to feel satiated, for most females this would range somewhere in between 1800-2300 calories a day and you can easily make three big satiating meals from this caloric allowance. She often spoke about aiming at somewhat like 1500 calories max when she was on the calorie counting train again. I meant to say it wouldn't even be necessary to aim at that (fairly low) number. Someone like Amber to admit that she is currently maintaining her whatever 480-500 lbs (if you were to believe this number in the first place) must be eating three times that amount of a normal female person's daily caloric allowance of weight maintenance. I cannot fathom how this is even possible but it has to be and this is the food addiction part. Because normal stomaches can barely hold so much food. She really must be stuffing herself 24/7.

She could just eat a normal weight maintanance caloric intake and would not need to feel hungry and would still be losing weight. She would not have to bother about upping up the game before reaching the last 100lbs of excess weight.

Fascist Ferret said:
If she is ordering things too small for this reason, so that they arent so long on her, it wouldnt be that hard to learn to hem the sleeves etc. She's so fucking dumb and helpless...


You're trying to dance around the word restriction, but the alternative you described is also a form of restriction. 😒 why do people who need to lose weight prefer to play these dumb mind games?
Click to expand...
My definition of "restriction" in regard of diet is when I start to feel hungry. Why is it dumb when someone who lost the weight she needed to lose is just sharing the advice that this kind of restriction does not work longterm. I have no need to dance around anything. Just sharing what I learned from my own experience in this regard. And it explains why a lot of people fail , see Amber and her numerous WW attempts and calorie counting because they always try that "I have to be hungry to lose the weight" approach. Not really true and actually counter-productive. Just wanted to share, nothing else.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Autistic
Reactions: PYSMA, EvaBraunsGhost, Fir-Ganoth and 5 others
DefCon Dumb said:
"The only way to beat an eating disorder is no restrictions."

But in her video, she talks about first calories counting, (cancelled that because it's 'triggering'), then doing WW, which is also restrictive. She has not recently mentioned being in therapy for whatever eating disorder she may genuinely have been diagnosed with.

Serious question for anyone with an eating disorder who's in therapy or who knows someone who is well enough to be up on the details... If your health is at risk because of already unrestricted eating but therapy requires "no restrictions" - what therapy would you be getting to start seeing food realistically?

MOST people I know trying to lose weight or maintain a healthy weight DO restrict themselves in some way, even if it's as mundane as cutting a smaller slice of cake or opting for a less calorie packed snack or dessert. Is restriction forever off limits for those with eating disorders? If so, how do you get to a healthier weight.

I'm unironically asking these questions because I simply can't find any logic in her statement.
Click to expand...

I don’t know if this will help.....but just not having any restrictions won’t cut it. You have to work on the WHY of binge eating.
It would depend on what your triggers are, and what would help for you.

Say....you realize that you tend to binge when you come home from work and you just had a bad shift, so you bury your feelings in food.

First, you have to realize this is what you are doing, then realize the WHY, then....what can you do instead?
So, at FIRST you’d be told not to restrict, but acknowledge what you are doing, then work on the WHY.

If you don’t work all of this out, the therapy is pretty much useless....and it’s something you will work on as long as you live.

It’s much more complex, but that’s kind of the idea, hope that helps, or makes any sense.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Carlos the Scientist, Jizzrag, SassyAndMorbidlyObese and 2 others
mekalekahi said:
So it wasnt a bellybutton infection ( it was)
View attachment 1505887
View attachment 1505888
Click to expand...
I doubt she would be too embarrassed to talk about a belly button infection. Maybe a flea burrowed through the filth and made a home in her dainty naval until it fed one time too many and caused some bleeding. That's my theory anyway. If she's going to post about problems and then refuse to say what the cause was, I think we're free to make up our own theories.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Jizzrag, Turd Blossom, itresignateswithme and 5 others
Xenomorph said:
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaait a min, LAP SURGERIES ARE THROUGH THE BELLY BUTTON...LEMME FIND OUT. This could be why she was discharged so fast tbh I was stunned she was discharged from a complete open hyst, now if it was a lap then i can see why she was
Click to expand...
i see it coming ...the Cancer was just a Scam thing and she had
mekalekahi said:
So it wasnt a bellybutton infection ( it was)
View attachment 1505887
View attachment 1505888
Click to expand...
make s you wonder, if she got a weird tick to go with her Finger into her Belly Button , rubs around in it to sniff the Finger O.o or maybe she collects Dust Bunnys in there o.o ...wet...cheesy Dust Bunnys >.># ...
 
  • Autistic
  • Islamic Content
Reactions: 女鬼 and ADHD
I am getting suspicious about this “cancer journey” from some of the information that has been presented in a few sub-forums.
1. Laparoscopy.It is very unlikely that a surgeon would do laparoscopic procedure on someone with cancer. especially if the cancer was not staged. In laparoscopic surgery, the tissues are cut so to allow the parts to be extracted From the small hole. Cutting cancerous tissues might lead to seeding of cancerous cells in adjacent structures. The choice of laparoscopy leads me to believe that she may not have cancer.
2. Estrogen. If we assume that she had cancer and they remove it through laparoscopy, the last thing an oncologist would do is to give her estrogen. If there were residual cancers cell, this would make them grow as these tumours are hormonally driven.
3. Ovaries. Why would the surgeon removes the ovaries if the cancer staging is only 1B. Ovaries involvement would mean at least a staging of 3A. If, instead she had endometriosis, there might be a reason to remove the ovaries.
4. Staging. Amber claimed a staging of 1B. However, she also mentioned that she is waiting for the results of her lymph nodes biopsies. The oncologist would not have provided her with a staging of her cancer before the results of the biopsies. She said previously that the surgeon did not want to biopsy her lymph nodes, which is suspicious since you always want to know if the nodes are involved.

It is very hard to believe everything she is saying about her condition and there are a lot of red flags. I might be all wrong about it but with Amber we never know if she is telling the truth.
 
  • Like
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: EvaBraunsGhost, Dorsia.Reservation, SassyAndMorbidlyObese and 6 others
Turd Fergusson said:
I am getting suspicious about this “cancer journey” from some of the information that has been presented in a few sub-forums.
1. Laparoscopy.It is very unlikely that a surgeon would do laparoscopic procedure on someone with cancer. especially if the cancer was not staged. In laparoscopic surgery, the tissues are cut so to allow the parts to be extracted From the small hole. Cutting cancerous tissues might lead to seeding of cancerous cells in adjacent structures. The choice of laparoscopy leads me to believe that she may not have cancer.
2. Estrogen. If we assume that she had cancer and they remove it through laparoscopy, the last thing an oncologist would do is to give her estrogen. If there were residual cancers cell, this would make them grow as these tumours are hormonally driven.
3. Ovaries. Why would the surgeon removes the ovaries if the cancer staging is only 1B. Ovaries involvement would mean at least a staging of 3A. If, instead she had endometriosis, there might be a reason to remove the ovaries.
4. Staging. Amber claimed a staging of 1B. However, she also mentioned that she is waiting for the results of her lymph nodes biopsies. The oncologist would not have provided her with a staging of her cancer before the results of the biopsies. She said previously that the surgeon did not want to biopsy her lymph nodes, which is suspicious since you always want to know if the nodes are involved.

It is very hard to believe everything she is saying about her condition and there are a lot of red flags. I might be all wrong about it but with Amber we never know if she is telling the truth.
Click to expand...
I'm starting to think what @Moonpie ,said - she heard "pre cancerous", jumped the gun, and now cant admit that she made a mistake cause she would forever been known as a cancer faker.

Let's say she was pre cancerous, and they recommended removing the uterus via laparoscopic surgery prior to cancer development...

Would that make more sense?

mekalekahi said:
So it wasnt a bellybutton infection ( it was)
View attachment 1505887
View attachment 1505888
Click to expand...
Also, hasn't she said that washing her hair is difficult because it hurts to hold her arms up for so long? I thought that it was in her struggles of being me series, but that admission is not there. I hope I'm not thinking of chantal.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: EvaBraunsGhost
K. V. Bones said:
Why is there an entire thread on someone's health? I get this is a lol cow thread, but if you already know that someone's health is unbelievably bad why repeat it in an echo chamber saying the same thing for 80 pages?
Click to expand...
Did you lurk the thread...? We document health discussion here. She gaslight a lot, so its good to have a place with health related receipts. People are speculating that she is faking her cancer, so that discussion happens here too sometimes.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: EvaBraunsGhost, Behavioral Sink, ADHD and 6 others
K. V. Bones said:
Why is there an entire thread on someone's health? I get this is a lol cow thread, but if you already know that someone's health is unbelievably bad why repeat it in an echo chamber saying the same thing for 80 pages?
Click to expand...

it's a containment thread. Also what FF said
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moonpie
Fascist Ferret said:
Did you lurk the thread...? We document health discussion here. She gaslight a lot, so its good to have a place with health related receipts. People are speculating that she is faking her cancer, so that discussion happens here too sometimes.
Click to expand...
Thats reasonable, I was unaware, I skim most threads, so I must have missed the greater purpose. It was a genuine question no need to escalate anything.

Twinkie said:
it's a containment thread. Also what FF said
Click to expand...
This also makes sense thank you.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: hourglass figure, Mesh Gear Fox, Masta and 3 others
K. V. Bones said:
Thats reasonable, I was unaware, I skim most threads, so I must have missed the greater purpose. It was a genuine question no need to escalate anything.


This also makes sense thank you.
Click to expand...
Crikey, when Kiwi farms is more respectful, tolerant and agreeable than Twitter..... people need to come here to learn some humanity
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Carlos the Scientist, PYSMA, Picaroon and 15 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back