US Trump orders $400-per-week unemployment payments amid COVID crisis, hits Dems for stonewalling - Trump takes action after congressional stalemate

When will it be "safe" to finally reopen the economy?


President Trump signed four executive orders Saturday aimed at delivering relief to Americans struggling with the economic fallout of the coronavirus while accusing Democrats of stonewalling greater aid efforts.

Trump announced a $400-per-week supplemental unemployment payment to out-of-work Americans -- short of the $600 weekly benefit that expired at the end of July. He unveiled an extension of student loan relief and protections from evictions for renters and homeowners. Trump also signed a payroll tax holiday to Americans earning less than $100,000 through the end of the year, while promising more relief if he wins a second term.

The president signed the executive actions from his Trump National Golf Club Bedminster, as club members cheered him on. He blamed Democrats for the coronavirus deal stalemate in Congress and said he'd take matters into his own hands.

"Democrats are obstructing all of it," Trump said. "Therefore I'm taking executive action ... and we're going to save American jobs and provide relief to the American workers."

For the new $400 per week benefit, states would be on the hook for funding 25 percent to the millions of jobless Americans, while the federal government would pick up 75 percent of the benefit, Trump said. Asked when the jobless would see the money, Trump said it would be “rapidly distributed.”

TRUMP SAYS CORONAVIRUS RELIEF EXECUTIVE ORDER COULD COME BY THE END OF THE WEEK 'IF DEMOCRATS CONTINUE TO HOLD RELIEF HOSTAGE'

Acting unilaterally has its limits and could prompt legal challenges. Trump's orders are narrower in scope than the trillions Congress is mulling for a massive stimulus to the virus-damaged economy. Congress controls new federal spending. Trump already predicted sidestepping lawmakers will have lawsuit consequences but dared opponents to deprive Americans of relief.

"If we get sued, it's [from] somebody that doesn't want people to get money," Trump said. "And that's not going to be a very popular thing."

House Democrats already passed their $3 trillion coronavirus relief bill in May. The Senate GOP last month proposed a $1 trillion plan, though didn't bring the measure to a vote as Republicans were divided on whether more aid is even needed.

DESPITE POLLS AND PANDEMIC, TRUMP CAMPAIGN ARGUES CANDIDATE BETTER POSITIONED THAN IN 2016

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer have been in talks all week with White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, but the two sides couldn't strike a deal.

Democrats blamed the GOP for failing to understand the gravity of the crisis and for trying to "nickel and dime" struggling Americans, while the White House accused Democrats of not willing to compromise.

Trump blasted the Democrats' $3 trillion HEROES Act as a “radical left policy” that includes bailouts to states, sending stimulus help to undocumented immigrants and funding for mail-in voting and other election provisions.

“They want to steal the election," Trump said of Democrats.

Trump's actions didn't address some of the big issues that Congressional proposals sought to tackle, including another round of $1,200 stimulus checks, aid to schools to reopen safely, an infusion of cash to revenue-strapped state and local governments, food assistance, new lawsuit protections for businesses and money for mail-in voting for the 2020 elections.

Because of provisions in the Constitution that grant the legislative branch spending power, the White House can't just pull hundreds of billions out of the ether without Congressional approval.

PELOSI SAYS DEMOCRATS WILLING TO COMPROMISE AT $2T FOR CORONAVIRUS BILL, REJECTED BY TRUMP ADMIN

But the Trump administration believes it has access to $140 billion which it can “reprogram.” That includes $80 billion in untapped money from the big coronavirus bill signed into law in March and $40 billion from the Disaster Relief Fund.

The White House believes it can divert some of this funding, similar to how Trump in 2019 declared a national emergency at the border with Mexico to shift billions of dollars from the Pentagon budget to help pay for a border wall.

Pelosi and Schumer earlier this week expressed skepticism about Trump's executive powers.

"You can't move that much money," Pelosi said. "We're talking about a major investment."

GOP OFFICIALS PREVIEW ‘EPIC’ TRUMP ADDRESS, FIRST FAMILY ROLE IN EVOLVING CONVENTION PROGRAM

The Democrats want the White House to continue negotiating with Congress on a big package.

"A better way to do this is [to] come to an agreement that meets the needs of the American people -- a much better way," Schumer said.

The need for relief is pressing as millions of Americans lost out on the $600-per-week federal unemployment benefit that expired at the end of July. A partial moratorium on evictions on properties with government-backed mortgages also expired at the end of last month.

There are some 110 million Americans living in rental households; up to 23 million renters – or 20 percent – are at risk of eviction by Sept. 30, according to an analysis by the COVID-19 Eviction Defense Project.

With the supplemental $600 in unemployment benefits now officially lapsed, about 24 million Americans say they have little to no chance of being able to pay next month's rent, according to a survey by the U.S. Census Bureau.

Rent and mortgage payments are typically the largest monthly expense for Americans: One in four tenant families pays more than half of its income for rent, a rate that’s even higher in cities like San Francisco and New York, according to Harvard’s Joint Center for Housing Studies.

New jobless figures from the Labor Department, which cover the week ending August 1, show that more than 1.18 million workers sought aid last week, the lowest since March 14. The latest figures bring the total number of unemployment claims since the shutdown began to more than 55 million.

The unemployment rate fell to 10.2%, down from 11.1% in June.
 
If even that. Most libertarians I encounter are lower middle class at best. It's more like "fuck you, I don't have anything, but i know I'll be rich someday"

I don't get it. Their positions on controlled substances and gun laws make sense, but their positions on wealth taxation and public services are fucking baffling.
I disagree with their position on substances. Certain addicting substances inherently take away your right to choose through addiction. As well, the many many documented cases of things like heroin ruining the relationships of people who use it kind of breaks the libertarian view of "if its not hurting others it's okay". Having to deal with a son whirled out on cocaine is mentally exhausting.
 
Because you should strive to earn more than $400/week.
Think of it this way.
You're a student working a part-time shitty job while you take your classes for something that is actually useful. You have some money saved up, then the COVID hits.
The choices you now have are, one, continue working but now in masks and with a bunch of annoying and arbitrary polices set up with little to no compensation. Because you're "essential". Lord forbid you work customer service, because now it'll be even worse.
Or, here's the second deal, the one that the Government is offering you. You get paid comparable, depending on where you are and some other stuff, wages. Your classes are all online now anyways. There's nowhere to spend expend your income anymore besides the necessities. You don't have the stress of a shit job anymore. If you're lucky enough to have a home gym, you are being paid to pump iron and indulge in your hobbies whenever you're not doing schoolwork.
For some people, they'd start to wonder why the hell they are doing anything anymore.
 
Last edited:
I wish more people would shake the Stockholm Syndrome of it all. The state-wide lockdowns can stop at any time, but no, it's the fault of the citizenry. Us darn dirty commoners just can't be trusted to keep the numbers down enough to pass through phase two of step three of event nine of subsection A of the "reopen to the new normal" plan.

Just a few more weeks and we'll all be OK. The governor says so!

Have you been paying attention to states that have reopened? The rates have skyrocketed because people are idiots and think wearing masks are "taking away their rights" or some stupid shit like that
 
I don't get it. Their positions on controlled substances and gun laws make sense, but their positions on wealth taxation and public services are fucking baffling.
It is called a Principle, The DNC and the GOP utterly lack them so they get to be hypocrites.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Shield Breaker
If even that. Most libertarians I encounter are lower middle class at best. It's more like "fuck you, I don't have anything, but i know I'll be rich someday"

I don't get it. Their positions on controlled substances and gun laws make sense, but their positions on wealth taxation and public services are fucking baffling.

Libertarians are just white people who are too scared to think difficult thoughts like "What do they mean by slippery slope?" and "What kind of idiot would put wooden doors on gas chamber?"
 
A virus that killed 160k+ Americans is more than just a flu. Especially when a significant portion of those who recover have permanent (so far at least) organ damage

The damage that is being done to the American psyche by keeping everyone inside is going to be even more damaging. I have a sixteen year old brother who should be out and about enjoying the best year of his life, and he's stuck inside playing video games. This lockdown is driving people crazy. Look no further than the riots for proof of this.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin mother fucking Franklin
 
The damage that is being done to the American psyche by keeping everyone inside is going to be even more damaging. I have a sixteen year old brother who should be out and about enjoying the best year of his life, and he's stuck inside playing video games. This lockdown is driving people crazy. Look no further than the riots for proof of this.

"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin mother fucking Franklin

Yeah and without lockdowns, we'd probably have had over a million dead by November. We are already easily going to break 200k. We will probably hit 250k+. Covid is some serious shit, whether some guy in the 1700s made that quote or not doesn't matter. The anti-mask folks have shown why giving people the choice to help protect other people doesn't work.
 
Yeah and without lockdowns, we'd probably have had over a million dead by November. We are already easily going to break 200k. We will probably hit 250k+. Covid is some serious shit, whether some guy in the 1700s made that quote or not doesn't matter. The anti-mask folks have shown why giving people the choice to help protect other people doesn't work.

If you give them an inch they will take a mile. I have seen, in my life time, various freedoms get stripped away. I have only been alive for twenty years. Twenty fucking years. I should not be saying this, but I am. If you trust these people to do right by ANY of us you're going to get what you deserve.
 
Sorry to hear your grandma died, but the rest of us down here still gotta live.

My grandma died a long time ago, but my sister got covid and now has a permanent heart condition. Sorry you can't think of others, though. Like I said, the anti-maskers have shown why giving people a choice doesn't work.

If you give them an inch they will take a mile. I have seen, in my life time, various freedoms get stripped away. I have only been alive for twenty years. Twenty fucking years. I should not be saying this, but I am. If you trust these people to do right by ANY of us you're going to get what you deserve.

Uh huh. And what freedoms are those?
 
My grandma died a long time ago, but my sister got covid and now has a permanent heart condition. Sorry you can't think of others, though. Like I said, the anti-maskers have shown why giving people a choice doesn't work.



Uh huh. And what freedoms are those?

Like I dunno, the freedom to say what you want? The freedom to support a political candidate without being socially ostracized and fired from your job? How about things like the Patriot Act? Or the continual stripping of the Second Amendment? Time and time we've caved and if we keep doing it they're going to take it all. Everything is on the line now. We're staring Oblivion in the face now and it scares the ever loving shit out of me.

I was relatively well put together last year. I was starting college. I was optimistic. Now I'm posting on fucking Kiwifarms and supporting Donald fucking Trump. How did it come to this? It's simply really. We gave them an inch and they took a mile, and the only way things even have a chance of getting better is if we stand up and start fighting back.

I don't know. Maybe I'm crazy, but I can feel the dread in the air. It's so poignant where I live and amongst my friends that it is sickening, nauseating. Things are coming undone, and all we can do is stand up and try not to be scared into submission.
 
Have you been paying attention to states that have reopened? The rates have skyrocketed because people are idiots and think wearing masks are "taking away their rights" or some stupid shit like that

The "rates"? Which rates? Infection rates because those are incredibly dubious. Death rates? They have not skyrocketed and are also dubious at best.

Again I feel the need to stress that I do not believe WuFlu does not exist and is not a bad disease but the data is provably unreliable.

As far as rights:

Since the early 1900's the right to bear arms has been seriously reduced.

The right to be protected against unreasonable search and seizure has also been wildly eroded.

Due process has also been attacked.

Oh and freedom of speech is also being hacked up.
 
I question the legality of changes to tax policy coming via EO. Sets really bad precedent, same with stuff like the eviction ban. The horse race side of me is glad this take the wind out of the Democratic congress's sails though.

Technically speaking, he isn't actually getting rid of the taxes. He's ordering the deferral of the taxes for the months of Sept.-Dec. and basically hoping that congress will forgive the taxes afterward. It's dodgy, legally speaking, and who knows if it'll actually happen, but he's mostly gambling that it'll either: a) go through and he'll look good because he did something while the legislature are sniping at each other; or b) someone else will be the one that forced it to not happen, but he'll still get the credit for trying to help people.
 
Back