Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

I’m I love with this idea because people are going to royally pissed when they realize how much they’ve been ripped off without ever knowing it and even more pissed when they try to bring the tax back.

I’m not gonna lie, I’m rocking a semi right now.
Trump even suggested if re-elected that he’d make the tax cut permanent. Probably not realistic but I’ll laugh at Democrats having to argue against it regardless.
 
Well that didn’t take long, did it?
06B07370-7BD5-43AE-A8EF-291296B48914.jpeg
 
Yeah they wanted to attach kickbacks to weed companies and ban voter IDs for states along with other bullshit. Trump just screwed them over by continuing on the core components (unemployment and loan deferrals) without congress so Pelosi and others are fucked. They've no bargaining chips now for getting all they wanted and Pelosi's reaction wasn't even to say Trump COULDN'T move this money around, but that he couldn't move around THIS MUCH. They know they can't stop the process and are flabbergasted this has happened.

Probably take a few days for Democrats to figure out how they need to brand this.
I live in a state where we have legalized weed and the problem with the weed stores isn't that they're not getting enough government subsidies. Their problem is you can't drive down a city block without passing at least three of them. Everyone capable of getting a loan and a license bought up every shitty convenience store they could find and turned them into dispensaries. I'm glad Trump did this because giving those stores tax money would have only delayed the inevitable market correction that industry needs.
 
I live in a state where we have legalized weed and the problem with the weed stores isn't that they're not getting enough government subsidies. Their problem is you can't drive down a city block without passing at least three of them. Everyone capable of getting a loan and a license bought up every shitty convenience store they could find and turned them into dispensaries. I'm glad Trump did this because giving those stores tax money would have only delayed the inevitable market correction that industry needs.
Really makes you wonder why they want to have so much freely available weed...
 
I live in a state where we have legalized weed and the problem with the weed stores isn't that they're not getting enough government subsidies. Their problem is you can't drive down a city block without passing at least three of them. Everyone capable of getting a loan and a license bought up every shitty convenience store they could find and turned them into dispensaries. I'm glad Trump did this because giving those stores tax money would have only delayed the inevitable market correction that industry needs.
But dude weed lmao

I honestly don't get all this autism about weed, and I'm almost ready to support a complete ban just to spite potspeds. Almost.
 
I love how they try to make it out like this big, progressive act for the Democratic party, who are finally accepting women as running mates on Presidential election tickets after almost four decades. Those sexist Republicans would never--

Ee6IhxrWsAE-YDb.jpg
McCain's one of the good Republicans now. Although to be fair, Palin isn't the brightest tool in the shed.
 
Really makes you wonder why they want to have so much freely available weed...
But dude weed lmao

I honestly don't get all this autism about weed, and I'm almost ready to support a complete ban just to spite potspeds. Almost.
My guess is because these cities want their people to be too high to care about what's changing around them.

I wouldn't have a problem with legal weed if that's where it stopped. But cities like Seattle, Portland, and San Francisco shows you what happens when that shit doesn't stop. First they hooked their people with legal weed. Then they inched things a little further by saying "While we're at it, let's de-criminalize non-violent crimes." Everyone thought that was great because our jails are over-crowded and who wants to see the police harass someone for having a few pills in their pockets? But none of them took the time to ask themselves "Wait, what exactly does constitute a non-violent crime?" For example, if I pull down my pants and take a shit in the produce section of a supermarket, does that constitute a non-violent crime? Turns out, yes it does! How about if me and every homeless bum in eyesight shoplift from a store until it goes out of business because they can't cover the cost of those stolen goods? It's their livelihood, not mine.

All I wanted to do was light a bowl and watch Scooby Doo reruns in peace. Fuck these assholes for turning me into the fucking boomers I grew up hating.
 
Whatever makes you feel better about yourself, I guess.

View attachment 1506198

You know who else can't ride a bike? Cripples and dogs.
Stupid takes can only be countered using their own stupid tactics. Or just laughing at them.

McCain's one of the good Republicans now. Although to be fair, Palin isn't the brightest tool in the shed.

Are you saying the only good Republican is a DEAD REPUBLICAN?! :mad:
You're right about Palin though. To this day I fully believe that crow cost McCain the election. Everybody knew Mccain was old and a veteran so topping that with presidential stress he would've been dead in a year. Nobody wanted her as president (she couldn't keep her whore daughter under control let alone a whole country) and it was this weird "you're not voting for this, you're voting for that one next to it" situation that we're in now with Biden (and doesn't matter who he picks, they're all terrible).

All I wanted to do was light a bowl and watch Scooby Doo reruns in peace. Fuck these assholes for turning me into the fucking boomers I grew up hating.

Circle of life. 🚬
 
Then they inched things a little further by saying "While we're at it, let's de-criminalize non-violent crimes." Everyone thought that was great because our jails are over-crowded and who wants to see the police harass someone for having a few pills in their pockets? But none of them took the time to ask themselves "Wait, what exactly does constitute a non-violent crime?" For example, if I pull down my pants and take a shit in the produce section of a supermarket, does that constitute a non-violent crime? Turns out, yes it does! How about if me and every homeless bum in eyesight shoplift from a store until it goes out of business because they can't cover the cost of those stolen goods? It's their livelihood, not mine.
Also what a lot of people fail to realize is that the "non-violent crime" people are sometimes locked up for are:
1) Repeat offenders (seriously, you have to commit a REALLY horrendous crime to be locked up on your first offense)
2) It's also very common for those offenders to have actually committed a more severe crime which can be violent, but then it gets plead down by the prosecution to a non-violent offense in the interest of getting the case through the system faster.

You can actually go a bit nuts in researching this stuff as the stats may seem perfectly clear at first glance, then you start looking into the individual cases and find massive complications throwing everything into question.

Though I am generally in favor of reducing laws. Legalize all the drugs you want - as long as you still have to pay for your healthcare. (especially murdering humans)

You're right about Palin though. To this day I fully believe that crow cost McCain the election. Everybody knew Mccain was old and a veteran so topping that with presidential stress he would've been dead in a year. Nobody wanted her as president (she couldn't keep her whore daughter under control let alone a whole country) and it was this weird "you're not voting for this, you're voting for that one next to it" situation that we're in now with Biden (and doesn't matter who he picks, they're all terrible).

LOL if it wasn't for Palin, McCain would have lost worst. There were plenty of folks who liked her a whole lot more than him.

Heh, I just realized, McCain died in 2018. If he had been elected, he would have made it through both terms. :optimistic:
 
This has been on my YouTube feed all day. It's like, this guy is on everyone's pulse 24/7.
View attachment 1506272
It's because they're all absolutely furious over his newest Executive Orders, but he warned them. He fuckin' warned them that after the Supreme Court refused to take a stand against the DACA EO, this was going to give him the sort of political power that they were going to regret, and it was going to be completely legal.

When the judicial branch failed to rule DACA unconstitutional, they left the door wide-open and Trump kicked it off the hinges anyways, just for good measure. If Obama's EO can't be undone by his successor, then neither can Trump's. Either what he signs into an EO is permanent, or Obama's EOs are allowed to be unwritten. Chose whichever road you like, he wins either way.
 
Back