JohnnyG
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2020
They've invested too much in Wokeism to back away from it now. Even if Trump wins (as I said in my edit that I didn't think of till later), they can't flipflop on Wokeism because it means admitting they were wrong and (an even more heinous heresy) Trump was right.
For the Democrats to turn on the Bernie/BLM faction as a major scapegoat, they would have to completely throw them under the bus in a way the Republicans never did to the Ron Paul libertarians. They would have to build a conspiracy theory the size of Russiagate collusion to make it stick on their own side; normies and Republicans already blame the radicals.
Blaming BLM would be an outright rejection of the woke narrative. If the liberals were already laying groundwork to push back on the radical progressive/woke ideology, I could see it happening. But they're kneeling in Congress and excusing every excess of the riots. Instead, I think the Democrats view BLM as a useful street army, a pseudo-military wing of the Party that can be useful while maintaining plausible deniability for the political wing.
They don't have to literally give a speech saying "We hereby renounce Woke Troonyism", they just stop funding, hosting, and amplifying the troublesome elements. Most are not self-sufficient or coherent so without establishment infrastructure provided they're impotent.
How effective will your average TransFluid or obese Dinduisha be without corporate sponsorship? They'll keep tweeting and that's about it
Don't know if this was mentioned but they raised all three bridges in Chicago last night. Which is DEFCON 1 for Chicago, from what I've been told.
Edit: Got order wrong, thanks for the fix
Looks like Chicongo has about a dozen bridges, and they pulled all but one which police/fire/medical were using