Dax Herrera / Dick Masterson / Daxipad / Juju The Cow / Wolfie / The Dick Show (TDS), The Biggest Problem in the Universe (TBPITU) / New Project 2 - Balding least funny contrarian paedophile defender in the universe, "women are fat" jokes virtuoso, e-daddy of Sektards, chaser and cross-species roleplay sodomy enthusiast. Roleplays as a cow named Juju while he gets fucked in the anus by women. Fat.

How many pushups can Juju do?

  • 0

    Votes: 64 50.8%
  • 1

    Votes: 34 27.0%
  • >1

    Votes: 28 22.2%

  • Total voters
    126
I’m sure Maddax tells Xian that his pedo shielding is just a bit. If Shawan is like most people, he’s got too much cost sunk into the status quo to do more than shrug and keep doing his thing. These people are profoundly pathetic.
 
These people are profoundly pathetic.
lmao yeah Sean is totally pathetic for not quitting a gravy job he works for his lifelong friend because he hangs out with an autistic lolicon on occasion. Fuck paying your bills and living comfortably when your boss embarrasses himself online and associates with scumbags, right? I completely agree that Dick's constant shielding of digi is humiliating and probably terrible for the show's longevity, but if you've ever had a job, chances are you've worked for a couple of guys who do a lot of shit you would never consider doing.
 
lmao yeah Sean is totally pathetic for not quitting a gravy job he works for his lifelong friend because he hangs out with an autistic lolicon on occasion. Fuck paying your bills and living comfortably when your boss embarrasses himself online and associates with scumbags, right? I completely agree that Dick's constant shielding of digi is humiliating and probably terrible for the show's longevity, but if you've ever had a job, chances are you've worked for a couple of guys who do a lot of shit you would never consider doing.
If my boss was defending pedophiles and I was his de facto co-host with my legal name and physical likeness attached to that, yeah, I’d look for a new job. Not because I’m some moralfag but because I wouldn’t want to be associated with someone so gross and, let’s face it, embarrassing. Not to mention that it’s strategically retarded to rely on such a volatile, ethically bankrupt POS to keep a roof over your head. Dude has technical skills for which there is market demand. He’s not being forced to soil himself by co-signing Dax’s bullshit. He’s doing it willingly, and I judge him accordingly. YMMV.
 
The Dick Show patreon has been stable for years. I find it less surprising that Sean, who probably doesn't even use twitter, doesn't leave, than that Dick's not losing more fans over pedo shit.
I'd be curious to know how many people are in a position with TDS to be able to give a shit about that. I imagine the majority of listeners don't know and therefore can't care, considering he does all of his shielding on twitter, and primarily in replies that won't show up on his timeline. I listen to the show because it's entertaining, my thoughts on Dick's twitter activity and his moral compass don't really hold much bearing on my enjoyment. I have no way of knowing how common that sentiment is, but I imagine it has to make up at least some non-insignificant amount of listeners. I imagine the rest of his audience was some sort of split between people who looked up to him as a person and either left out of shame/disgust, or fail/refuse to see him in any negative light whatsoever.

As an aside, I remember early on in the show's lifespan that he was shitting on Maddox for being supportive of non-offending pedophiles back in the TBITU days, and going on about how gross it was. I don't remember what episode it was, nor can I be assed to look it up. I never really thought the dichotomy between him shitting on Tito and his association with best debate vs. his defense of Digi was that big of a deal as Tito was an offending pedophile and a registered sex offender whereas Digi is just a creepy neckbeard who jerks off to degenerate drawings, but that speech he gave early on in the show AGAINST non-offending pedophiles seems more or less incompatible with his current stance.
 
I think there's a difference between "redemption arcs" and being treacherous snitches

No, no there isn't. Maybe for normal people, but these are e-celeb grifters we're talking about.

The only "redemption arc" any of these people would be capable of, that would be genuine, would be getting the fuck off of the internet and getting an actual job rather than grifting. You cannot trust someone who makes their money through charming money right out of other people's wallets.

Also, people don't need a "redemption arc" to make it okay to like them. Kraut's a piece of shit, and what he did was really fucked up, but I do appreciate and enjoy the content he's put out in collaboration with PPP and Godwinson, for instance. This "muh internet personality needs to be redeemed for me to laugh with them" horseshit is childish and autistic. Mind you, I'm not saying that you're doing that, just saying in general from what I've seen lately in this subforum.
 
Maddax shielding pedos isn’t the most repugnant thing about him tbh. I just wouldn’t want to be associated with him publicly for that reason — but it’s not the only reason. Again, YMMV.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ped Xing
You cannot trust someone who makes their money through charming money right out of other people's wallets.

I think this is an interesting take because the "grifters" run a multitude of business models. I'm inclined to agree that the explicit para-social manipulation of "pay me money to read your comment, and add a completely genuine and not at all throwaway line about how you're a great friend of the show" that someone like Ralph runs is unscrupulous, but the line between something like a patreon with paywalled content and the shwarma place down the street I go to is a lot less clear. Both of the proprietors are creating something I may want to buy, and both of them treat me as though I'm a valued friend of theirs despite the obvious transactional nature of our relationship. I'm curious how you delineate the two, if at all.


Also, people don't need a "redemption arc" to make it okay to like them. Kraut's a piece of shit, and what he did was really fucked up, but I do appreciate and enjoy the content he's put out in collaboration with PPP and Godwinson, for instance. This "muh internet personality needs to be redeemed for me to laugh with them" horseshit is childish and autistic. Mind you, I'm not saying that you're doing that, just saying in general from what I've seen lately in this subforum.
Agreed wholeheartedly. Mundane Matt is one of the most boring, uncharismatic dorks to have ever achieved notoriety as a "content creator", but his mere presence with the anti-gunters magnified the effect of their ribbing exponentially. When Matt shows up to dunk on Ralph, it's a clear sign that whatever grip he may have had on the sperg-sphere is long gone. The guys were having fun shitting on idiots just like the rest of us and that's fun internet.
 
I think this is an interesting take because the "grifters" run a multitude of business models. I'm inclined to agree that the explicit para-social manipulation of "pay me money to read your comment, and add a completely genuine and not at all throwaway line about how you're a great friend of the show" that someone like Ralph runs is unscrupulous, but the line between something like a patreon with paywalled content and the shwarma place down the street I go to is a lot less clear. Both of the proprietors are creating something I may want to buy, and both of them treat me as though I'm a valued friend of theirs despite the obvious transactional nature of our relationship. I'm curious how you delineate the two, if at all.

If you can't discern the difference between a grifter and the proprietor of a business, then I guess it's something we'll never be able to see eye-to-eye on, and I'm sorry, but if you have to grind it down to the base level of "they provide product that people exchange money for" to make the comparison it's a shitty comparison.

These are people for whom their entire business model is "get people to like me enough that they give me money". Whether it be through goofy videos, dunking on other people, whatever. The key point is that the people who buy into their content (give them money), do so not because the content itself is so great that it's worthy of money, but that the personality behind it is worth supporting. Do you think people like Dame Pesos' videos because it's great stuff, or because it's a "Dame Pesos video"? Same with Memology. Same with Sargon. Same with all of these people.

When Matt shows up to dunk on Ralph, it's a clear sign that whatever grip he may have had on the sperg-sphere is long gone. The guys were having fun shitting on idiots just like the rest of us and that's fun internet.

Lmao that's not what I was saying at all. These motherfuckers are very obviously still holding a grudge elsewise they wouldn't be so eager and practically giddy to run a train on Ralph. Which is pretty disgusting behavior in and of itself, given that all Ralph and company ever did was expose these assholes for the faggots they are behind the scenes.

No, they're not "just like the rest of us having fun on the internet", but that doesn't mean I can't enjoy and laugh at the shit with them. They're eternally asshurt that they were exposed and are just happy that they finally get to see the man that brought them down falling down past the level they all landed on, though as you rightfully pointed out and I said earlier it doesn't and shouldn't keep people who are on the sidelines from enjoying the spectacle.
 
I'm sorry, but if you have to grind it down to the base level of "they provide product that people exchange money for" to make the comparison it's a shitty comparison.

It really isn't. If someone is offering a product that I want and will deliver it as advertised I have no issue with them doing so. I'm under no illusion that I've been anything more than a customer to either of the 2 patreon pages I've given money to.

That aside, I'll fully cede the fact that the language used in advertising said product is wholly consistent with that of a grift, so I generally agree with your point. TDS specifically is laden with platitudes of how grateful he is for all of the wonderful support he receives and how none of this would be possible etc. etc. It is quite clearly designed to take advantage of suckers much in the same way as a donation box on a stream.
 
Sean seems like a ride or die friend. He just sits there, does his thing, and goes home. I don't know if it's loyalty or what, but at face value he seems more than willing to ignore what Dax does,. Maybe justifying it to himself as it's 'all just a character', maybe it's that Dax doesn't have many friends so he doesn't want to abandon him. If none of this stuff has bothered Sean by now, I don't think much will.

Not to drag this on too long but Sean does have a legitimate career as an audio engineer. It’s one thing to be a part of a show of an irreverent free speech activist and it’s another to be part of a show that becomes a haven for pedophiles. Only Hollywood leftist elites are allowed to be pedophiles in the LA area.
 
It's ultra cringy how he doesn't get that meme but still constantly uses it.

You know what a Karen does? Whines to the manager. Like the manager of a website where people are hurting his fee-fees.

Yeah, in the context of the situation Ethan Ralph would be the Karen because he's always trying to get people banned from Dlive and complained to Null to have his thread taken down. I think in Dax's now boomerfied mind Karen just means "people who annoy me," when in reality it should be "term black people invented so it's okay to harass and abuse white women."

Also I don't know if this has been pointed out, but I think Dax's defense of Ralph and everyone else is due to the extreme version of "never have internet friends." See his problem is, he went beyond that and has met many of these people personally, and has hung out with them in real life. They're his real friends. Aside from Dame Pesos, who I believe is more of an idea than a human.
I actually think it's a point towards him being more normal than most because it's very hard to throw people under the bus you have an IRL rapport with and people where you have evidence they're an actual person. That's just how reasonable and relatively normal people are, and I think that's the main thing that anonymity works against people. It's also why he has such a good rapport with Sean, this is just how friends interact and not fuck each other over every 10 minutes like these other people.
 
Yeah, in the context of the situation Ethan Ralph would be the Karen because he's always trying to get people banned from Dlive and complained to Null to have his thread taken down. I think in Dax's now boomerfied mind Karen just means "people who annoy me," when in reality it should be "term black people invented so it's okay to harass and abuse white women."

Also I don't know if this has been pointed out, but I think Dax's defense of Ralph and everyone else is due to the extreme version of "never have internet friends." See his problem is, he went beyond that and has met many of these people personally, and has hung out with them in real life. They're his real friends. Aside from Dame Pesos, who I believe is more of an idea than a human.
I actually think it's a point towards him being more normal than most because it's very hard to throw people under the bus you have an IRL rapport with and people where you have evidence they're an actual person. That's just how reasonable and relatively normal people are, and I think that's the main thing that anonymity works against people. It's also why he has such a good rapport with Sean, this is just how friends interact and not fuck each other over every 10 minutes like these other people.
Dax isnt Jim, hes always believed in internet friends. His problem is hes taken it too far and turned internet friends into the internet mafia. Hes not even the Don, but more likely a consigliere to the real Don.
 
Dax isnt Jim, hes always believed in internet friends. His problem is hes taken it too far and turned internet friends into the internet mafia. Hes not even the Don, but more likely a consigliere to the real Don.

So instead of just agreeing Dax just sees these people as his real friends and doesn't want to throw them under the bus for meager clout, you're saying he is the second-in-command of some unidentified internet mafia don?
 
  • Feels
Reactions: soy_king
I'm afraid you're engaging in wishful thinking. Mr. Herrera does comedy rants. Shaun is his straight man. They seem to have a very good working relationship. Shaun would have to be nuts to burn the bridge without good reason. Herrera is unlikely to be dumb enough to break up a good thing, and while pedos may be monetarily generous, they're not that numerous. The thread on this very forum for people who want to complain about being called out for wanting to fuck twelve year old girls (who are actually 500 year old anime characters) is only 27 pages long.

I think you will see SHAUN THE RAM if you see Herrera doing relatively more shows where he rants about how wearing a mask is an imposition on his freedom to navigate his landyacht and talks to harmless sexually normal people like Chris the Kiwi, and relatively less where he talks to broken losers like Ralph and Digibro about why they aren't attracted to women with more than four inches of vaginal depth.
Yeah, he wont ever leave, you can tell theyre very good long time friends.

Also, Shaun, like most people, couldnt give less of a fuck about online shenanigans.
 
I dunno, man. I have good friends, but I'd be uncomfortable doing a pedo podcast with the best of them.

I think it's likely he has no idea what Dick is up to on twitter. We shall see his reaction if Dick brings his big brain takes on child porn to his show.

:popcorn:
 
  • Like
Reactions: John Andrews Stan
Not to drag this on too long but Sean does have a legitimate career as an audio engineer. It’s one thing to be a part of a show of an irreverent free speech activist and it’s another to be part of a show that becomes a haven for pedophiles. Only Hollywood leftist elites are allowed to be pedophiles in the LA area.
I dunno, man. I have good friends, but I'd be uncomfortable doing a pedo podcast with the best of them.

I think it's likely he has no idea what Dick is up to on twitter. We shall see his reaction if Dick brings his big brain takes on child porn to his show.

:popcorn:
I listen to the show, because I think its funny child porn is never brought up even if digi40% comes on, which is rare now. And yeah shaun repeatedly states he has absolutely no social media presence at all because he hates it.

Also Dick is just trolling to make people angry on twitter, its literally all he does on there.
 
Back