Science Girl who made headlines when her surrogate mother refused $10,000 from the biological family to have her aborted dies just two weeks after her eighth


A young girl who made headlines when her surrogate mother refused $10,000 from her biological family to have an abortion has died aged eight.

Seraphina Nayleigh Harrell died on July 15 at Boston Children's Hospital from complications related to an infection and needed surgery. She and her family who had adopted her had celebrated her eight birthday just two weeks earlier on June 25.

'Still can't believe I have to talk about my baby in the past tense,' wrote Rene Harrell, the Seraphina's adoptive mother, on Facebook.

'Still trying to figure out how daily life is supposed to work without her in it.'

Thomas Harrell, her adoptive father, said: 'For the eight years she lived, she had a full life.'

'She had a lot of joy in her life and gave a lot of other people joy in ways that sometimes weren't expected.'

In 2011, a couple, whose identity has not been revealed, hired Crystal Kelley, then 29, to be a surrogate after they had trouble conceiving children.

1597335109745.png


A playground meeting in Vernon, Connecticut, saw Kelley agree to carry their fourth child for next nine months.

Doctor's thawed out two frozen embryos left over from the couple's past in-vitro fertilization procedures and put them in Kelley's uterus in October 8, 2011.

But in 2012 when Kelley underwent a routine ultrasound when she was five months pregnant, it showed that Seraphina suffered from a cleft lip and palate, a cyst in her brain and severe heart defects.

Serpahina had holoprosencephaly, a birth defect where the brain does not fully divide into separate hemispheres.

She also had heteotaxy, which meant several of her internal organs were in the wrong place. She had at least two spleens.

1597335127706.png

1597335143843.png



Previous ultrasound technicians had noted that Seraphina's stomach or spleen were hard to see.

A panicked phone call from the the couple then sparked a landmark abortion case that captivated America.

Holoprosencephaly and Heteotaxy
Holoprosencephaly (HPE) is a somewhat common birth defect that happens when the brain does not completely divide into the two lobes of the cerebral hemisphere.
As a result, there is a single-lobed brain structure that is coupled with skull and facial defects.
‘[HPE]often can also affect facial features, including closely spaced eyes, small head size, and sometimes clefts of the lip and roof of the mouth, as well as other birth defects.’
In most instances, the malformation is so severe that babies die before birth.
‘In less severe cases, babies are born with normal or near-normal brain development and facial deformities that may affect the eyes, nose and upper lip.’
‘This birth defect occurs soon after conception. It has a prevelance of 1 in 250 during early embryo development, and 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 20,000 at term.’
The best way to diagnose HPE Is with a CT or MRI brain scan. Molecular testing for a number of HPE genes. Treatment for children is individualized.
Heterotaxy occurs when a person’s internal organs are not arranged correctly in the chest or abdomen.
Subsequently, the most common complications affect the lungs, heart, liver, spleen and intestines.
‘Specific symptoms include not getting enough oxygen throughout the body, breathing difficulties, increased risk for infection, and problems digesting food.’
It may be caused by genetic changes, exposure to toxins when a woman in pregnant or the condition can happen sporadically.
Heterotaxy is estimated to affect one in 10,000 people across the globe, but scientists believe the condition is under diagnosed.
Diagnosis’ are typically done with images taken during a CT scan or an MRI. Other tests, including blood tests, can check the organs’ function levels. Treatment depends on the specific organs affected.
Sources: National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences and National Human Genome Research Institute



'She kept saying, 'There's something wrong with the baby. There's something wrong with the baby. What are we going to do?'' Kelley told CNN in March 2013. 'She was frantic. She was panicking.'

Doctors explained that little Seraphina would likely survive the pregnancy, but would only have a 25 percent chance at a 'normal life' and would need to undergo several heart surgeries. The biological couple wanted Kelley to terminate the pregnancy.

But Kelley disagreed and wanted to keep the child alive. Kelley did not want to raise a child, but was morally and religiously against abortions.

A letter written by Kelley's midwife and a genetic counselor read: 'Given the ultrasound findings, (the parents) feel that the interventions required to manage (the baby's medical problems) are overwhelming for an infant, and that it is a more humane option to consider pregnancy termination.

'Ms. Kelley feels that all efforts should be made to 'give the baby a chance' and seems adamantly opposed to termination.'

The couple's first three children were all born prematurely, with two of them spending months in the hospital.

The two sides were caught in a standoff that ended with Kelley moving states after the couple offered to pay her $10,000 to have an abortion.

Both sides lawyered up and argued over what was the best course of action for Seraphina.

Eventually the couple changed their minds about the abortion and instead wanted to exercise their legal right to take custody of the child - but would enter her into Connecticut's foster care system immediately afterwards.

But Kelley moved to Michigan, where state laws allowed her to be the legal parent and not the couple who hired her.

'Once I realized that I was going to be the only person really fighting for her, that Mama bear instinct kicked in, and there was no way I was giving up without a fight,' said Kelley at the time.

On June 25, Seraphina was born at full-term at 6lbs and 9 ozs.

Kelley gave Serpahina up for adoption and she was taken in by the Harrell family in Massachusetts.

The impasse between the couple and Kelley helped surrogacy agencies change the protocols they follow when making such arrangements.

'People heard about this case, and they got scared about skipping steps. That's good for the industry,' attorney Melissa Brisman told CNN this week.

Now, couples and surrogates take much more precautions and make sure they're on the same page about important issues.



A memorial service for Seraphina was held on Sunday afternoon in Andover, Massachusetts, at a field adjacent to Chapel at West Parish.

Rene asked that guests to wear face masks in honor of the young girl.

'COVID-19 has interrupted a lot over the past few months, and it wouldn't be very honoring of Seraphina's memory to put people at risk of contracting it,' wrote Rene on Facebook.

'Because the Commonwealth considers this a large 'unenclosed outdoor area' with enough space to practice social distancing, there are no regulations limiting attendance or requiring mask usage, but we are requesting that everyone planning to come wear a mask and will provide them for anyone who doesn't have one.'

In Massachusetts, there are more than 120,000 confirmed cases and nearly 9,000 deaths.

1597335187711.png



Seraphina will be remembered for living a full and joyous life in spite of her medical conditions.

'What I heard over and over from so many of her doctors was they could never imagine that someone with Seraphina's level of need could do as well as she did or be as joyful as she was,' Rene told CNN.

Rene added that the life Seraphina led in Massachusetts, surrounded by friends and loved ones, proved she was worth saving.

'What drove the conflict when Crystal was pregnant with her, was whether or not she'd have a meaningful life,' said Rene.

'And I think without hesitation, the answer to that question is yes, she did. Seraphina had a very, very meaningful and happy life.'

Seraphina could only speak a few words, but learned American Sign Language to communicate. She also could not walk, but was constantly moving around in her wheelchair.

1597335208710.png

Seraphina grew up in a loving Massachusetts home with seven other siblings, some of which also had medical issues and disabilities


'She could get herself around in a power wheelchair like nobody's business,' said Rene.

Seraphina's favorite words, according to Rene, was 'I love you.'

'She'd sign it and always add a little kissing sound. She was so loving. If you looked sad, she would comfort you,' said Rene.

'If you got even the slightest little poke, she would sign 'sorry' and then kiss your boo-boo.

'When her baby cousin cried, she would sign 'Baby, cry, Mama, milk.'

During Halloween 2018, Seraphina's seven older siblings masqueraded as the seven dwarves and gave her a special name: Bossy Dwarf.

'She had the most confident, self-assured personality, and she told everyone what to do,' said Rene.

1597335262905.png

For Halloween 2018, the Harrell children dressed up as the seven dwarves and called Seraphina (far left) Bossy Dwarf
Serpahina shared a remarkable bond with her siblings and enjoyed doing different activities with each.

'Nora and Nathan read to her. Laney painted her nails. Derecc played Darth Vader wars. She fought with the nine-year-old twins. Clare was her true playmate, because even though she is 18, in practice she and Seraphina were both around three, so they liked the same things,' said Rene.

It wasn't unusual for Seraphina to order Nathan, her 10-year old brother, to read Little Critter books to her.

Nathan would say he was the big brother character and Seraphina was the little sister.

After Seraphina died, Nathan requested a Little Critters book be placed insider her casket.

'They all miss her terribly. She was the centering part of our family. She was our heart and soul,' said Rene.

Loved ones who knew Seraphina said her life wasn't defined by her illnesses - it was love.

'There is just no getting around acknowledging the heartache of those who love her the most, who truly weren't ready to see her go.' read the obituary.

'But truth is, sadness is not the defining sum of Seraphina's story...love is. Seraphina's larger than life personality only grew throughout her life, and you never had to guess what she was thinking or feeling.

'At least once a day, someone would snuggle up to her and repeat the Seraphina family motto: 'For a girl who can't talk, you sure are never quiet!'

She leaves behind four older brothers and three older sisters.
 
After the couple offered 10k for the surrogate to abort the pregnancy, the surrogate came back with a counter offer of 15k - which the couple rejected.

There was a clause in the contract that if there was a "severe fetus abnormality" then an abortion would be performed. The surrogate lawyered up and argued that "abnormality" wasn't defined.


You don't need four kids. If you can't get pregnant with a fourth, take that as a sign to stop bringing kids into this world.

Especially since all three of their previous children were born prematurely, with two of them spending months in the NICU.
Then they wanted to dump their child via surrogate into the foster care system.

The fact they met their surrogate at the playground makes me wonder they had been turned down by surrogacy agencies because of their previous issues.

They sound like the type of nutty breeders that absolutely would try surrogacy again to get their "perfect" family.
They want to play with lives like this, they shouldn't have a right to privacy.
 
See, unlike the hartleys, I can at least understand keeping this girl, from what the article said she actually could function. Even if her life was very short she was still about, playing with her siblings and happy.

She wasn't a potato and could get some enjoyment out of life. But I understand why the biological parents felt the way they did.
 
Rate me Mad at the Internet all you want, but fuck that surrogate for putting everyone through all this bullshit, only to turn around and hand the kid off to someone else. Her body, her choice, but put up or shut up.

Was there a problem in giving the child over to people who at least believed they'd be able to take care of her? Should she have abandoned the child in a trash bin instead?
 
Was there a problem in giving the child over to people who at least believed they'd be able to take care of her? Should she have abandoned the child in a trash bin instead?
If she wanted to carry the kid to term, then she should have kept it instead of putting the biological parents through a bullshit lawsuit and wasting money that could have been used to provide for the children that she already has moving to Michigan.
 
I think she should have aborted. The conditions the girl had were joke and had very poor quality of life prognosis. I get you get attached to what is inside you if you have any feeling at all, but you have to be realistic.

I remember in 8th grade, I had to go to the nurse's office to get something. There was the resident disabled kid there. He was 16, could not walk, talk, had no control of bowels, had a head four times normal size and could not hold it up, IQ probably like 15 being generous. I had seen this kid in the halls before screaming and moaning. When I went into the office, they were changing his diaper. For the first time, I got a good look at him. Looked into his eyes and saw the most terrifying thing of all - nothing. All of my gut basest instincts recoiled. There was nothing cute or romantic about it and I thought we are more humane to rats. He has no quality of life. Why are we doing this?

I am pro-choice in a limited fashion.
 
If she wanted to carry the kid to term, then she should have kept it instead of putting the biological parents through a bullshit lawsuit and wasting money that could have been used to provide for the children that she already has moving to Michigan.
So she should have gotten an abortion at the behest of other people. People who ended up changing their mind on the abortion only to flex their parental rights so they could put the child in foster care instead of doing what the mother did and personally arranging for her adoption.

Your logic would be hilarious if it wasn't completely fucked. What the woman did was the best that both pro-life and pro-choice positions have to offer-- she exercised her bodily autonomy in order to preserve a life and grant it quite possibly its best quality and attainable happiness. The child was able to communicate, meaningfully emote a broad range of emotion, desire simple things, and her parents loved her from the time they adopted her to the time she died.

On the other hand, what you advocate, in the scenario where she doesn't care for the child herself, the surrogate mother subjects herself to a procedure wherein a surgeon kills a child in her womb at the behest of other people, even though there's a non-insignificant chance that she'll live a normal life, or at least a happy life. And don't kid yourself-- that is the only other option you're advocating-- you're just somehow too much of a coward to come out and say it because you "need" to continue to pretend you're pro-choice as per its purported definition. That, or you're so far dug in you can't acknowledge an exercise of maternal choice that doesn't result in an abortion, and you're instead compelled to find fault where there ultimately is none.

Seriously, the best concern you can bring up is... "wasted money and time"?

Maybe the parents shouldn't have fought over a child that they were never going to keep under any circumstance in the first place, and maybe you should reconsider what your actual positions are.

There was nothing cute or romantic about it and I thought we are more humane to rats.

We deliberately infect rats with a host of diseases, wound their brains and other organs, and feed them all manner of experimental drugs for the sake of approximating human research. We do that specifically because we do not regard them as human.
 
I think she should have aborted. The conditions the girl had were joke and had very poor quality of life prognosis. I get you get attached to what is inside you if you have any feeling at all, but you have to be realistic.

I remember in 8th grade, I had to go to the nurse's office to get something. There was the resident disabled kid there. He was 16, could not walk, talk, had no control of bowels, had a head four times normal size and could not hold it up, IQ probably like 15 being generous. I had seen this kid in the halls before screaming and moaning. When I went into the office, they were changing his diaper. For the first time, I got a good look at him. Looked into his eyes and saw the most terrifying thing of all - nothing. All of my gut basest instincts recoiled. There was nothing cute or romantic about it and I thought we are more humane to rats. He has no quality of life. Why are we doing this?

I am pro-choice in a limited fashion.
People that make you feel uncomfortable are obviously miserable and don't deserve to live.

EDIT to avoid doublepost. It's interesting, so many of these surrogate contracts have abortion clauses, but there has never been a case where a US surrogate has actually been forced to have an abortion. They may lose the money they were supposed to be paid, or have to cover their own medical expenses, but they can't actually force the surrogate onto the table.
 
So she should have gotten an abortion at the behest of other people. People who ended up changing their mind on the abortion only to flex their parental rights so they could put the child in foster care instead of doing what the mother did and personally arranging for her adoption.

Your logic would be hilarious if it wasn't completely fucked. What the woman did was the best that both pro-life and pro-choice positions have to offer-- she exercised her bodily autonomy in order to preserve a life and grant it quite possibly its best quality and attainable happiness. The child was able to communicate, meaningfully emote a broad range of emotion, desire simple things, and her parents loved her from the time they adopted her to the time she died.

On the other hand, what you advocate, in the scenario where she doesn't care for the child herself, the surrogate mother subjects herself to a procedure wherein a surgeon kills a child in her womb at the behest of other people, even though there's a non-insignificant chance that she'll live a normal life, or at least a happy life. And don't kid yourself-- that is the only other option you're advocating-- you're just somehow too much of a coward to come out and say it because you "need" to continue to pretend you're pro-choice as per its purported definition. That, or you're so far dug in you can't acknowledge an exercise of maternal choice that doesn't result in an abortion, and you're instead compelled to find fault where there ultimately is none.

Seriously, the best concern you can bring up is... "wasted money and time"?

Maybe the parents shouldn't have fought over a child that they were never going to keep under any circumstance in the first place, and maybe you should reconsider what your actual positions are.
I really don't have the strength to deal with your pro-life sperging right now, but I clearly said her body, her choice. That being said, I think it's cruel to bring someone into the world who will be in agony for their entire life. I'm not looking for a debate here, because it always devolves into an autistic mess.

You're a member of a forum that's all about mocking the failed abortions that we call lolcows, dude. Get off your high horse already.
 
I really don't have the strength to deal with your pro-life sperging right now, but I clearly said her body, her choice.

I'm aware you wrote "her body, her choice".

I'm also aware of you blaming her in such a way where the argument you made was effectively that the "sensible" options she had were to either take care of the child herself or allow other people to insist on her getting an abortion. She didn't want to take care of a child, herself, so the only other acceptable option (for you) would be to submit to the abortion the biological parents insisted on.

So it frankly doesn't matter whether you wrote "her body, her choice". It's lipservice because you don't provide an alternative that doesn't blatantly violate her bodily autonomy. That's what I meant when I said that you were too much of a coward to come out and say that she should have submitted to the abortion like the bio parents wanted: it was the only remaining option but you don't bother to address that.

None of that is "pro-life sperging". Above all else, you're a hypocrite, and you think you can paper over that with empty slogans.

You're a member of a forum that's all about mocking the failed abortions that we call lolcows, dude. Get off your high horse already.

I suppose it's vaguely possible to mistake someone for being on any kind of horse when you're in a ditch.
 
People that make you feel uncomfortable are obviously miserable and don't deserve to live.

EDIT to avoid doublepost. It's interesting, so many of these surrogate contracts have abortion clauses, but there has never been a case where a US surrogate has actually been forced to have an abortion. They may lose the money they were supposed to be paid, or have to cover their own medical expenses, but they can't actually force the surrogate onto the table.
No, people with absolutely no quality of life to the point you would say a cockroach is more self-aware, why?
 
No, people with absolutely no quality of life to the point you would say a cockroach is more self-aware, why?
Just pointing out that you didn't actually know his IQ. You guessed because he couldn't talk. Kids with cerebal palsy, or REAL autists may shout, scream and otherwise be nonverbal. It doesn't mean there absolutely nothing going on upstairs. And you were grossed out that he was incontinent, as if all pants shitters would be better off dead. Stephen Hawking was a pants shitter, so obviously he didn't deserve to live either.

Your basic argument is that his IQ was subhuman, and you think that there should be and IQ threshold for prolonging life, fine. But then you added as 'evidence' to it emotional appeals that would apply to people with appreciable IQ's and arguable quality of life.
 
Just pointing out that you didn't actually know his IQ. You guessed because he couldn't talk. Kids with cerebal palsy, or REAL autists may shout, scream and otherwise be nonverbal. It doesn't mean there absolutely nothing going on upstairs. And you were grossed out that he was incontinent, as if all pants shitters would be better off dead. Stephen Hawking was a pants shitter, so obviously he didn't deserve to live either.

Your basic argument is that his IQ was subhuman, and you think that there should be and IQ threshold for prolonging life, fine. But then you added as 'evidence' to it emotional appeals that would apply to people with appreciable IQ's and arguable quality of life.
Emotion is a large part of it, but also cold logic. I just do not see how it serves the interest of the child to damn him or her to a life where they have no idea what is going on, why, how to communicate need effectively, to ever hope to be even a marginally functional part of society...just...why?
 
surrogate mom is a doula/surrogate/freak/hippy who wrote a book.

I'm not sure what's going on with the adoptive parents

View attachment 1517404

I'm not sure where the Asian girl came from.

Siblings are called

Elijah, Sevano, Nathan, and Derecc (boys) and Clare, Nora and Laney (girls)

Surrogate's other kids are Auria, Irelyn and Orrin

Oh no they look like those fundamental cult ppl
 
Both sides lawyered up and argued over what was the best course of action for Seraphina.
This is insanity (and more proof surrogacy is slavery and organ trade by another name), forcing a mentally sound woman to abort OR not abort her pregnancy should be a fucking crime.

For-profit surrogacy should be banned. There should be no contracts attached to surrogacy pregnancy with donor material except medical consent forms ("I, the undersigned, agree to get impregnated with this particular embryo").

The birth mother (and her husband, if any) should have full parental rights by default, and the genetic parents (except anonymous donors) should owe her (and her husband) child support by default. With the birth mother's (parents') consent, genetic parents should have priority in adoption.
Anything less is slavery.
 
You're a member of a forum that's all about mocking the failed abortions that we call lolcows, dude. Get off your high horse already.

Literally every single time I have seen somebody say something like this on the forum, it's been a tacit admission that they've realized their original point was completely indefensible and stupid and are now just trying to argue that nobody here should be allowed to think too hard about it 'because we're just here to laugh at people.'

Go get a post-term abortion for yourself, you coward.
 
Literally every single time I have seen somebody say something like this on the forum, it's been a tacit admission that they've realized their original point was completely indefensible and stupid and are now just trying to argue that nobody here should be allowed to think too hard about it 'because we're just here to laugh at people.'

Go get a post-term abortion for yourself, you coward.
Well I'm here due to bitterness and a fucked sense of humor, but your point stands.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: FrownyFace
Back