Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.

Why would they bring guns if they didn't plan to use them? Or were they just trying to intimidate people? Your logic makes no sense. "They were there to protest the lockdowns. BUT THEY HAD THE GUNS BECAUSE OF 2A!!!!!" That's really stupid logic, even coming from an uneducated Trump supporter. So that's impressive, I will give you that.

For a guy who claims to not like Trump, you sure spend a lot of energy defending him. At least have the balls to admit you support him.
So then are all protests intimidation?

No, it was a demonstration. Nobody thought there any chance of violence. I am sorry it traumatized you, that wasn't their intent.

I support some of Trump's actions, but even if I hated Trump, it wouldn't make your claims true.

Trump didn't send feds to the 2a demonstration because he had no jurisdiction, and the locals weren't overwhelmed.

Trump sent feds to the federal courthouse that was in danger of destruction from arson and explosives, because the constitution requires him to do so.

The Russian bounty story was leaked raw Intel (aka a rumor) and the IC doesn't believe it.

I didn't vote for him in 2016, I will this time. Doesn't mean I like the dude, I just like him better than the alternatives. There is plenty of legit criticism, you just aren't making any.
 
Trump sent feds to the federal courthouse that was in danger of destruction from arson and explosives, because the constitution requires him to do so.

but the governers of the states told him to fuck off, and aren't there things such as states rights? i guess they only matter when they're convenient for your argument, i get it.

obviously, as you can clearly see, i am no constitutional scholar, so maybe you can point to me where in the constitution donald trump is allowed to send people in unmarked vehicles and no nametags or numbers out to "protect the courthouse".

(it's weird how people care more about replaceable, repairable buildings more than peoples' rights and lives, but i know peoples' rights and lives don't matter, unless they're white (and rich), of course.)
 
So then are all protests intimidation?

No, it was a demonstration. Nobody thought there any chance of violence. I am sorry it traumatized you, that wasn't their intent.

I support some of Trump's actions, but even if I hated Trump, it wouldn't make your claims true.

Trump didn't send feds to the 2a demonstration because he had no jurisdiction, and the locals weren't overwhelmed.

Trump sent feds to the federal courthouse that was in danger of destruction from arson and explosives, because the constitution requires him to do so.

The Russian bounty story was leaked raw Intel (aka a rumor) and the IC doesn't believe it.

I didn't vote for him in 2016, I will this time. Doesn't mean I like the dude, I just like him better than the alternatives. There is plenty of legit criticism, you just aren't making any.

Protests where the retards bring guns and storm the state legislature building are certainly doing it to intimidate people. If you think otherwise, you are even stupider than I thought. Trump did try to appeal to the uneducated simple-minded folks for a reason, and it sure worked on you

For a guy who supposedly doesn't support Trump and thinks he is awful, you sure do spend a lot of effort defending him. What does that say about you?

why is it that gun-totin', freedom-lovin' americans who love the second amendment are never the ones who form militias to fight against the very real tyranny that is occurring right now? don't you love freedom? don't you want to protect your country?

sure makes you wonder.

It's only tyranny when they won't be in any danger and can intimidate gays and other minorities. When it comes to actual tyranny, they shit their pants and do nothing because they're cowards (which is why they're so obsessed with guns).
 
but the governers of the states told him to fuck off, and aren't there things such as states rights? i guess they only matter when they're convenient for your argument, i get it.

obviously, as you can clearly see, i am no constitutional scholar, so maybe you can point to me where in the constitution donald trump is allowed to send people in unmarked vehicles and no nametags or numbers out to "protect the courthouse".

(it's weird how people care more about replaceable, repairable buildings more than peoples' rights and lives, but i know peoples' rights and lives don't matter, unless they're white (and rich), of course.)
The governors have no say over federal property. Supremecy clause. The federal gov is required to protect federal property.

Unmarked vehicles are used all the time in policing. The fed officers did have agency tags, as well as POLICE on their jackets.

The rioters are trying to burn down the courthouse with people in it. That's attempted murder.

And yeah, I would kill you to prevent you from burning down my house. I won't try to burn yours down. No need to choose between life and property, but if you force the issue, my property beats your life.
 
The governors have no say over federal property. Supremecy clause. The federal gov is required to protect federal property.

Unmarked vehicles are used all the time in policing. The fed officers did have agency tags, as well as POLICE on their jackets.

The rioters are trying to burn down the courthouse with people in it. That's attempted murder.

And yeah, I would kill you to prevent you from burning down my house. I won't try to burn yours down. No need to choose between life and property, but if you force the issue, my property beats your life.

it's a shame those weren't feds. donald trump may have made an order, but the people that were sent out were not feds. did they identify themselves? no, they didn't. and when you're dragging random people into unmarked vans without telling them you're a fucking officer, that sounds remarkably like kidnapping.

property is replaceable, human lives aren't. i realize it's instinct to protect your own family and property. i get that. admirable. however i'd like to think that we're above our most basic instincts to value life over objects. obviously, some of us are not.

edit: i must've missed the part of your post where they wore police vests and had an agency number displayed. it's not like you can buy police vests, right? who would do that? and an agency number. which agency? who the fuck were these people? i heard they were a combination of different letter agencies, but it's cool nbd
 
Last edited:
The rioters are trying to burn down the courthouse with people in it. That's attempted murder.

Yeah but storming a state legislature building, while session is going on, with guns is totally cool and 100% not trying to intimidate people.

Again, for a guy who claims not to support Trump, you sure spend a lot of effort defending him. What's something about him and that he's done that you don't like?
 
Yeah but storming a state legislature building, while session is going on, with guns is totally cool and 100% not trying to intimidate people.

Again, for a guy who claims not to support Trump, you sure spend a lot of effort defending him. What's something about him and that he's done that you don't like?

now we can apply the "both sides" argument here, and that's fair enough. i think it's interesting that the people who preach "both sides" tend to side with the right more. but that's just an aside, not directed at you.
 
now we can apply the "both sides" argument here, and that's fair enough. i think it's interesting that the people who preach "both sides" tend to side with the right more. but that's just an aside, not directed at you.

In my experiance it's pretty much the standard approach in debates especially when they're in power. muddy the water by talking shit about the democrats, usually hillary or another soft spot.
Their leadership cannot even really be defended from a conservative perspective so it's logical really. I recall a conservative forum I used to shit post on spent 8 years bitching about hillary clinton....those 8 years being the bush administration.
 
Remember the time the people on A&H pushed for removing Section 230 even though many, even our dear leader himself, told them that removing 230 is just going to tighten the censoring on social media platforms even more?
Why are you making shit up?
Most people on that thread were telling null to calm down due to him being an overreacting bitch sometimes
 
Why are you making shit up?
Most people on that thread were telling null to calm down due to him being an overreacting bitch sometimes

actually there were people who were genuinely happy about this because it would own the libs. there are people who are that thoughtless, unfortunately. and i don't necessarily consider what Null did overreacting when the site is kind of a big part of his life and to hear some dipshit boomer go "LET'S REMOVE SECTION 230 OF THE COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT TO SPITE TWITTER AND SILICON VALLEY" and that same dipshit boomer has the power to make that happen, would justify the reaction he had.
 
Jesus christ, your only defense of Trump is that "OBAMA IS BAD TOO!".

I am totally sure the storming anti-lockdowners only brought guns to show how nice they are. They certainly weren't trying to intimidate people. Oh no.

Also, lol that you are defending his Russian bounty ignoring. I bet you also think he responded well to covid.

You actually defend Trump's wanting fewer testing (because his inept response to covid makes him look bad) and his shutdown of the post office so he can't lose the election because of mail in voting. Lol jesus christ. Go back to the TDS thread where you can all jerk off to your cult leader some more and stop shitting up our threads. We don't go in there and break up your circlejerk
Was there any actual proof of this "Russian bounty" bullshit, because even the Taleban denied that.

but the governers of the states told him to fuck off, and aren't there things such as states rights? i guess they only matter when they're convenient for your argument, i get it.

obviously, as you can clearly see, i am no constitutional scholar, so maybe you can point to me where in the constitution donald trump is allowed to send people in unmarked vehicles and no nametags or numbers out to "protect the courthouse".

(it's weird how people care more about replaceable, repairable buildings more than peoples' rights and lives, but i know peoples' rights and lives don't matter, unless they're white (and rich), of course.)

"replaceable, repairable"

How's the 3rd district precinct in Seattle doing? A big fucking chunk of Minneapolis? If the Federal govt doesn't respond when its being fucked with, then it has no power.

edit: east precinct?
 
What will it take to get y'all to shut the fuck up? This isn't "Trump Slapfighting Arena"

1597705293175.png


1597705321044.png


Some lovely singing for dear leader:
https://twitter.com/songrich_/status/1273409533612883968?s=20
 
why is it that gun-totin', freedom-lovin' americans who love the second amendment are never the ones who form militias to fight against the very real tyranny that is occurring right now? don't you love freedom? don't you want to protect your country?

No that only applies to Jade Helm when our proud patriots yelled a lot about it on Facebook and successfully prevented Obama from declaring martial law in Texas.

Trump hiring PMCs to detain citizens on US soil is definitely not weird at all. It was probably Obama's fault anyway.
 
What will it take to get y'all to shut the fuck up? This isn't "Trump Slapfighting Arena"

View attachment 1527871

View attachment 1527872

Some lovely singing for dear leader:
https://twitter.com/songrich_/status/1273409533612883968?s=20

you're right, that's actually the Thunderdome in A&N, but i think these lovely quasi-debates give us insight into the minds of people who love Daddy Trump, against any and all reason or proof or facts, and in that way, they're an example of Trump Enslavement Syndrome
 
No that only applies to Jade Helm when our proud patriots yelled a lot about it on Facebook and successfully prevented Obama from declaring martial law in Texas.

Trump hiring PMCs to detain citizens on US soil is definitely not weird at all. It was probably Obama's fault anyway.
Daddy Trump has a dream.

 
Was there any actual proof of this "Russian bounty" bullshit, because even the Taleban denied that.

Well, it's not something that can easily be proven one way or the other given that it is (leaked) classified information.

"replaceable, repairable"

How's the 3rd district precinct in Seattle doing? A big fucking chunk of Minneapolis? If the Federal govt doesn't respond when its being fucked with, then it has no power.

edit: east precinct?
I know you're a troll, but what does it matter? Whatever happened to MAH STATES RIGHTS!

Covid killing hundreds of thousands: TRUMP ISN'T TO BLAME! HE LET THE STATES DO IT!
Governors say not to send unmarked federal police to kidnap protesters: MAH FEDERAL BUILDINGS! FEDERAL POWER!!!!~!!


Trumptards are only okay with it because BLM are protesting black people dying to police and Trumptards are okay with black people dying. Same thing with "ALL LIVES MATTER!" except high-risk covid people, who apparently don't matter because mouthbreathers can't breathe with masks on their faces
 
Well, it's not something that can easily be proven one way or the other given that it is (leaked) classified information.


I know you're a troll, but what does it matter? Whatever happened to MAH STATES RIGHTS!

Covid killing hundreds of thousands: TRUMP ISN'T TO BLAME! HE LET THE STATES DO IT!
Governors say not to send unmarked federal police to kidnap protesters: MAH FEDERAL BUILDINGS! FEDERAL POWER!!!!~!!
A Federal courthouse is not State property. I'm not a fucking neo Confederate.
 
Back