Trump Enslavement Syndrome - Orange man good. /r/The_Donald and any public demonstration of rabid pro-Trump enthusiasm in spite of all reason.

[JaneThough]

Well I mean if your best dig against Trump is "haha he's almost as bad as the guy before him" then I guess we're on the same page there.

The feds went to protect federal property, such as a federal courthouse. The building has been damaged with fire and explosives.

The state legislature building is not federal property. Plus, those "storming anti maskers with guns" broke no laws and damaged no property. In fact, they called ahead and made an appointment. They set no fires and no explosions.

Trump offering a smaller bailout than the congressional Dems isn't defunding no matter how many times you say it. I understand "he's giving them less extra money above and beyond their normal funding" isn't as exciting, but it's good to be accurate, especially if you're struggling to understand why people don't see it your way.

Btw the post office is currently funded to 2021, so even without the bailout they won't be "defunded" until after the election anyway.

Next, please ask me about the Russian Bounties, it's not another embarrassing Democrat misfire at all!

LOL no, our dig is "he's 100000 times worse than literally anyone who came before him."

I love these guys. "Give up all my liberties to own the libs"

 

[BaldDwight]

Why are you making shit up?
Most people on that thread were telling null to calm down due to him being an overreacting bitch sometimes

forcing a communication platform to stop censoring people isn't censorship. telephone companies aren't allowed to ban people for saying the N-word over the phone and twitter shouldn't be allowed to either.

I don't see how asking for a law that's already on the books to be enforced is asking for it to get repealed.

I’d be against more government regulations over the Internet if the alternative was a completely free net, but social media is a one-sided hellscape entirely controlled by high-and-mighty Silicon Valley fucktards high on their own farts and their Chinese masters.

If I had to choose between giving control to the government or to corporations, I’d choose the government any day. The government at least has to PRETEND that they have our best interest at heart, while corporations have made it readily clear that they care for nothing but their own agenda.

Trump will say things for leverage, but the EO is about defining what "online platform" means.

I'm pretty sure it's going to be defined in a way that screws Twitter / Facebook without affecting the rest of the Internet. And that's a good thing.

E-Commerce accounts for more than $2 T of the US GDP. I'm pretty sure no one is going to take away the central provision that allows businesses to operate.

I would hold that Twitter, insofar as it censors political viewpoints at the behest of political parties (and in some cases, foreign sovereigns), acts as an “information content provider” to whom the provision you mentioned does not apply. I would hold this for several reasons:

(a) Twitter’s conduct contravenes the expressly stated purposes of the statute. In fact, it frustrates those purposes.

(b) Twitter actively promotes opposing political content that is “objectionable” for the same reasons (according to the TOS), showing that their objection is not genuine.

(c) Twitter is acting against a broad class of persons, encompassing roughly half the country. The sheer numbers warrant exacting scrutiny.

(d) Twitter’s actions could affect our elections (and indeed appear tailored to that objective), and thus implicate interests beyond “constitutionally protected” speech. In that capacity, Twitter purports to flex not just statutory rights, but political power. To that end, it affects the sovereign interests of the USA, and the integrity of our processes.

(e) Twitter’s behavior is oppressive. They’re a gigantic corporation, and they’re censoring political speech of natural people, for no reason other than the fact that they disagree.

(f) To the extent section 230 burdens “constitutionally protected” First Amendment rights of natural persons for the benefit of corporate citizens, it is unconstitutional. As the EO says, the internet is the new public square, and we have a right to speak, regardless if Twitter arbitrarily deems our speech “objectionable.” Because, as a corporation, Twitter’s speech is fundamentally commercial, it is afforded less protection under the First Amendment, and it must yield to our superior First Amendment interests.

I can respect a difference of opinion. But tell me... do you not find Twitter’s conduct reprehensible? And if § 230 protects that conduct, why would you want it to persist? If Twitter wants to hold that kind of power, they need to at least win an election. It cannot be acquired by way of gift from the legislature.

 

[TaimuRadiu]

LOL no, our dig is "he's 100000 times worse than literally anyone who came before him."

I love these guys. "Give up all my liberties to own the libs"

yeah, he can't possibly be worse than the man who targeted American citizens with drones, stirred up armed revolt in Syria, Libya and Mexico, stirred up race riots by saying a thug who got shot while smashing a man's head up against the pavement would have been like his son, and had the IRS deliberately target organizations that were against his administration

if your reply to this is "muh covid" keep in mind that when Trump tried to shut down flights from China and try to find out what the hell was going on with China he was called racist and accused of trying to deflect from the impeachment circus, while Democrat politicians kept saying it was ok to go out to restaurants and gyms and celebrate the Lunar New Year

 

[big ups liquid richard]

Remember the time the people on A&H pushed for removing Section 230 even though many, even our dear leader himself, told them that removing 230 is just going to tighten the censoring on social media platforms even more?

They're all far more addicted to twitter than they are to the farms. They wouldn't mind if the farms went away forever, but twitter? No way, they need twitter daily. The problem is twitter doesn't want them, so they want Trump/Big Daddy Gov to come in and fix it so twitter has to allow them.

If they really just wanted their free speech platform, they have Gab. But they're bored with Gab because its just all them jerking each other off. There's no satisfaction in "owning the libs"

 

[JaneThough]

yeah, he can't possibly be worse than the man who targeted American citizens with drones, stirred up armed revolt in Syria, Libya and Mexico, stirred up race riots by saying a thug who got shot while smashing a man's head up against the pavement would have been like his son, and had the IRS deliberately target organizations that were against his administration

if your reply to this is "muh covid" keep in mind that when Trump tried to shut down flights from China and try to find out what the hell was going on with China he was called racist and accused of trying to deflect from the impeachment circus, while Democrat politicians kept saying it was ok to go out to restaurants and gyms and celebrate the Lunar New Year

Dude, if you truly believe George Zimmerman is innocent, you're a fucking moron.

 

[big ups liquid richard]

I don't understand. WHERE'S THE LOL?

tends to get sidetracked as trump voters can't help themselves but come in and play spin doctors.

 

[TaimuRadiu]

Dude, if you truly believe George Zimmerman is innocent, you're a fucking moron.

Yes, he deserved to have his head bashed in on the pavement. Not his fault he attracted Trayvon's attn while Trayvon was acting suspiciously and peeking into people's windows.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

Dude, if you truly believe George Zimmerman is innocent, you're a fucking moron.

He's a troll. Hence why he goes back and forth between laughing at Trump and calling him stupid and then doing a 180 and defending him. He did the same thing in the covid thread.

yeah, he can't possibly be worse than the man who targeted American citizens with drones, stirred up armed revolt in Syria, Libya and Mexico, stirred up race riots by saying a thug who got shot while smashing a man's head up against the pavement would have been like his son, and had the IRS deliberately target organizations that were against his administration

if your reply to this is "muh covid" keep in mind that when Trump tried to shut down flights from China and try to find out what the hell was going on with China he was called racist and accused of trying to deflect from the impeachment circus, while Democrat politicians kept saying it was ok to go out to restaurants and gyms and celebrate the Lunar New Year

I'd take Obama over a man who is trying to defund the post office because he wants to be a dictator and rig the election. And yeah, your Dear Leader fucked up the covid response, despite how much you and your fellow cult members try to put your head in the sand and deny it.

 

[The Last Stand]

Dismantling the post office to own the libs

Don't boomers complain on FB about people not sending mail anymore? Now they're okay with the post office being dismantled?

Okay.

 

[AnOminous]

Don't boomers complain on FB about people not sending mail anymore? Now they're okay with the post office being dismantled?

Okay.

Orange Man says it, so it must be so.

 

[Jimmy Durante's Ballsack]

I'd take Obama over a man who is trying to defund the post office because he wants to be a dictator and rig the election.

The Uniparty has been trying to kill the United States Postal Service for decades. It is arguably the most powerful arm of the government, it is in every single town no matter the size; so it stands to reason why Congress hates it.

 

[AnOminous]

The Uniparty has been trying to kill the United States Postal Service for decades. It is arguably the most powerful arm of the government, it is in every single town no matter the size; so it stands to reason why Congress hates it.

The Framers also cared about it enough that it is one of the few executive agencies directly authorized by the Constitution, with Congress delegated the authority to "establish Post Offices and post Roads" but hey, some dumbfuck is worried he might lose power. So fuck the Constitution.

 

[Hollywood Hulk Hogan]

The Framers also cared about it enough that it is one of the few executive agencies directly authorized by the Constitution, with Congress delegated the authority to "establish Post Offices and post Roads" but hey, some dumbfuck is worried he might lose power. So fuck the Constitution.

His supporters seem to be against "MAH CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!" about this because Orange Man wants to rig the vote and they're fine with it. It's disgusting.

The boomers will not like it when they don't get their meds through the mail

 

[TaimuRadiu]

The Uniparty has been trying to kill the United States Postal Service for decades. It is arguably the most powerful arm of the government, it is in every single town no matter the size; so it stands to reason why Congress hates it.

member when the democrats had a supermajority and the presidency and they still didn't repeal the dumbass pension obligations imposed on the usps

He's a troll. Hence why he goes back and forth between laughing at Trump and calling him stupid and then doing a 180 and defending him. He did the same thing in the covid thread.

everyone's a troll when you don't agree with them and am I supposed to believe trump hasn't done some monumentally stupid things here

 

[c-no]

They're all far more addicted to twitter than they are to the farms. They wouldn't mind if the farms went away forever, but twitter? No way, they need twitter daily. The problem is twitter doesn't want them, so they want Trump/Big Daddy Gov to come in and fix it so twitter has to allow them.

If they really just wanted their free speech platform, they have Gab. But they're bored with Gab because its just all them jerking each other off. There's no satisfaction in "owning the libs"

Of course they would be more addicted. Twitter allows them to try and engage people that range from not liking Trump to those with TDS. Twitter and the Farms can be a circlejerk for them but the former may as well allow them to try and own the libtards directly.

Don't boomers complain on FB about people not sending mail anymore? Now they're okay with the post office being dismantled?

Okay.

Cognitive dissonance or some shit. That and I can assume some fanboys of Trump could eat up the idea of mail-in votes leading to scandal or some shit.

 

[Emperor Julian]

"prepping for a tweet."

 

[ChikN10der]

Dude, if you truly believe George Zimmerman is innocent, you're a fucking moron.

That's why he was sent to prison right? That's why Holders investigation showed he murder trayvon right?

As Reagan said, the problem with our liberal friends isn't ignorance, it's that they know so much that isn't true.

Trump is not defunding the post office. Every post you guys make, you insist he's doing that, but he's not. You're uninformed or dishonest.

Which "muh constitutional rights" am I happy to give up for Trump? Please, be specific.

Again, I don't love Trump, but that doesn't make lies about him true, it doesn't make Joe Biden worth a vote. But my feelings about Trump are irrelevant to the facts. Your arguments are factually deficient, and extra emotion doesn't change that.

Yeah, Trump supporters don't fit your strange stereotypes, that's not because they're inconsistent, it's because you are wrong.

 

[Lurker]

That's why he was sent to prison right? That's why Holders investigation showed he murder trayvon right?

As Reagan said, the problem with our liberal friends isn't ignorance, it's that they know so much that isn't true.

Trump is not defunding the post office. Every post you guys make, you insist he's doing that, but he's not. You're uninformed or dishonest.

Which "muh constitutional rights" am I happy to give up for Trump? Please, be specific.

Again, I don't love Trump, but that doesn't make lies about him true, it doesn't make Joe Biden worth a vote. But my feelings about Trump are irrelevant to the facts. Your arguments are factually deficient, and extra emotion doesn't change that.

Yeah, Trump supporters don't fit your strange stereotypes, that's not because they're inconsistent, it's because you are wrong.

>calls Trayvon Martin a thug and frames the situation as though Trayvon was the aggressor when he was not, wonders why people think he thinks Zimmerman dindunuffin

lol quoting Reagan, who was fucking senile and was not a great president, unless you're fucking delusional, like you seem to be.

NO NO GUYS YOU SEE TRUMP ISN'T DEFUNDING THE USPS, HIS CRONY THAT HE PUT INTO THE POSITION OF POSTMASTER GENERAL IS. Oh you sure got us.

freedom to protest without being hauled away by the president's Gestapo, the freedom to have a fair trial (if you're black)... Oh but those don't personally affect YOU so I guess those rights don't matter.

"I don't love trump but I suck his dick every moment I can."

and no, the reality is that you, and people like you, are factually, objectively wrong. not that facts matter to you people, because facts are fake news if they don't match your idiotic narrative.

 

[eternal dog mongler]

member when the democrats had a supermajority and the presidency and they still didn't repeal the dumbass pension obligations imposed on the usps

They only had a supermajority for like, a month (thanks Ted Kennedy) but they probably should have done that, yes.

 

[ChikN10der]

>calls Trayvon Martin a thug and frames the situation as though Trayvon was the aggressor when he was not, wonders why people think he thinks Zimmerman dindunuffin

lol quoting Reagan, who was fucking senile and was not a great president, unless you're fucking delusional, like you seem to be.

NO NO GUYS YOU SEE TRUMP ISN'T DEFUNDING THE USPS, HIS CRONY THAT HE PUT INTO THE POSITION OF POSTMASTER GENERAL IS. Oh you sure got us.

freedom to protest without being hauled away by the president's Gestapo, the freedom to have a fair trial (if you're black)... Oh but those don't personally affect YOU so I guess those rights don't matter.

"I don't love trump but I suck his dick every moment I can."

and no, the reality is that you, and people like you, are factually, objectively wrong. not that facts matter to you people, because facts are fake news if they don't match your idiotic narrative.

Quote where I called trayvon a thug.

Reagan may have gone senile, but he was right about Democrats thinking they know things that aren't true.

Trump's "crony" who was unanimously approved for the job? By both Dems and Republicans? How is he defunding the post office? Did he give the post offices money back to Congress?

The people arrested by fed cops were wanted, same as anyone else who gets arrested. Are you saying arresting people is unconstitutional?

What are you talking about with fair trials for black people? Like seriously, what case are you talking about?

Correcting lies isn't sucking Trump's dick. I suck the dick of the truth gladly.

So let's see some facts, instead of wild accusations with no substance. So far you are doing miserably in that department.