Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Trigger warning: H*rry P*tter.
View attachment 1532849
(x)

This delectable trans girl:
View attachment 1532850
(x)
His lewd account is... special. (His "sex work" account is even worse, but I'm not posting any shit from there. x)

Now for some weird genders. If you've ever wanted to bang a comic book villain, then villaingender might be just the thing for you!
View attachment 1532871
(x)

Froyogender, for anyone who enjoys eating- you guessed it!- froyo:
View attachment 1532880
(x)

And last, MCRgender, in case slitting your wrists to pop punk didn't make you feel edgy enough:
View attachment 1532881
(x)
Do older LGBT people just never interact with these children directly or what? Someone needs to verbally humiliate them.
 
Come one, come all, to the academic event of the century! Study at the feet of the world's foremost authorities on why women TERFs are total cunts!
terfindustrial2.jpgterfindustrial1.PNGterfindustrial3.PNG
[Editor's note: Are TERFs immensely influential? First I've heard of it.]

To educate you on why these TERF bitches need a dickslap to the face, here are your hosts: a couple of lads (Joe Lavery and Julian Gill-Peterson) and an FTM:
terfjoe.PNGterfjules.jpgterfmarquis.jpg

Meanwhile, Joe Lavery's wife has written a fairly successful memoir. Natalie Portman even interviewed her about it! Obviously, Joe cannot tolerate that. He's gonna write a bigger, better memoir of his own, goddammit, and get even MORE attention!
memoir1.PNGmemoir2.PNG
[Editor's note: I initially thought Joe was just joking around with these tweets, but he is 100% earnest. Just like the demented "recipes" he posts on Twitter, he has no idea that this memoir is anything other than God's gift to literature. Elsewhere, he said he was considering a "Big 5" publisher...he genuinely thinks publishing houses will be clamoring for the privilege of printing this book. This is pure narc grandiosity. Quite interesting to see.]

But who is Joe's market? What is his "brand"? He explores this in a blog entry [Archive]. Recommended reading for all fans. Excerpts posted below:
I am on the cusp—the very cusp!—of attempting to sell a commercial book for the first time. How I want my book to sell; I want it, do you hear?...Give, for I want. To sell something you need to know what the brand is. And I do not know what my brand is.

Some—perhaps most—[of my readers] are women in straight relationships, feeling for themselves the shittiness of straight relationships. OK: I am pitching to a successful, straight, busy young professional who kind of loathes or resents straightness as a structure of feeling. But why would such a reader give a hoot about [me]? Perhaps they were English majors and don’t get to use their undergraduate passions often enough in their day to day life. Do we have a brand yet?

[My brand] is a model of you, not of me...starting with where you live (one of the fifteen American metro areas with a subway system), what kind of job you have (clerical; hence “commuting”—traveling during rush hour), how you fuck (str8ly and unsatisfactorily).

So what do you think, all you witless str8 "clerical" women who are just so bored with your boyfriend's hetero dong? How many times a day are you currently escaping into a fantasy of Lavery's luscious lady dong? I thought so. Preorder his book today and spend the rest of the year masturbating to it!

Or better yet, accept Lavery's invitation to contact him through Instagram directly. You could probably be giving him a blowjob within the hour! Lucky you!
queermoc.PNG
(moc = "masculine of center," aka butch women. I'm not sure if Lavery would go for an actual male twink or if he's only into women).
 
Last edited:
Now for some weird genders. If you've ever wanted to bang a comic book villain, then villaingender might be just the thing for you!
View attachment 1532871
(x)

Froyogender, for anyone who enjoys eating- you guessed it!- froyo:
View attachment 1532880
(x)

And last, MCRgender, in case slitting your wrists to pop punk didn't make you feel edgy enough:
View attachment 1532881
(x)
Gender= liking pop culture trash and identifying with it. This shit gets more and more autistic.
 
Trannies are, objectively, incredibly fucking ugly. Even the best looking trannies of the bunch look like uncanny valley blowup dolls or something out of a horror story comic book. Every time I see a tranny I genuinely wonder how the fuck tranny chasers exist. And the fact that they demand that normal people date them when they are objectively the ugliest things in creation is even more insulting.

I was just forced to look at images of trannies and I was reminded, yet again, of how fucking ugly they all are. I’m so glad I’m a normal person who’s only attracted to other normal people so I can laugh at retards who try to be the opposite sex and end up looking like someone put a wig on a horse, or who look a five year old little girl who grew a mustache.
 
Come one, come all, to the academic event of the century! Study at the feet of the world's foremost authorities on why women TERFs are total cunts!
View attachment 1532855View attachment 1532856View attachment 1532854
[Editor's note: Are TERFs immensely influential? First I've heard of it.]

To educate you on why these TERF bitches need a dickslap to the face, here are your hosts: a couple of lads (Joe Lavery and Julian Gill-Peterson) and an FTM:
View attachment 1532853View attachment 1532852View attachment 1532851

Meanwhile, Joe Lavery's wife has written a fairly successful memoir. Natalie Portman even interviewed her about it! Obviously, Joe cannot tolerate that. He's gonna write a bigger, better memoir of his own, goddammit, and get even MORE attention!
View attachment 1532888View attachment 1532887
[Editor's note: I initially thought Joe was just joking around with these tweets, but he is 100% earnest. Just like the demented "recipes" he posts on Twitter, he has no idea that this memoir is anything other than God's gift to literature. Elsewhere, he said he was considering a "Big 5" publisher...he genuinely thinks publishing houses will be clamoring for the privilege of printing this book. This is pure narc grandiosity. Quite interesting to see.]

But who is Joe's market? What is his "brand"? He explores this in a blog entry [Archive]. Recommended reading for all fans. Excerpts posted below:


So what do you think, all you witless str8 "clerical" women who are just so bored with your boyfriend's hetero dong? How many times a day are you currently escaping into a fantasy of Lavery's luscious lady dong? I thought so. Preorder his book today and spend the rest of the year masturbating to it!

Or better yet, accept Lavery's invitation to contact him through Instagram directly. You could probably be giving him a blowjob within the hour! Lucky you!
View attachment 1532972
(moc = "masculine of center," aka butch women. I'm not sure if Lavery would go for an actual male twink or if he's only into women).

The influence they’re referring to is probably JK Rowling, tbh.

Funny enough, they don’t understand that TERFs don’t hate all trannies. So long as you acknowledge your biological sex and aren’t trying to get into women’s spaces with your greasy-ass self, they won’t have a problem with you. They don’t agree with surgery or “gender“, but as long as they don’t outright deny biology and leave women alone, TERFs will 9 times out of 10, leave them alone in return. (See: Dragqueens, and old-school transsexuals/ HSTS)

The thing with TERFs is that the only thing they’re trying to do is protect what little rights and spaces they have from being invaded by biological men. That’s it.

You can argue that women have the same rights as men, especially in the Us, but there’s statistically, undoubtedly a bias for men in certain areas, such as labor, for example. However, this is simply due to social conditioning as we’re raised to believe all women are fragile and dainty while all men are typically faster and stronger. This is another reason why “gender” and troons exist, They believe these stereotypes so strongly that if they aren’t what society deems manly (for men) or girly (for women) then something must be wrong with them. Surely, this must mean they’re in the wrong body. (This goes for those who don’t see it as a fetish, and are simply severely confused. OR are homosexual and are told they’re really the opposite sex in order for the Christian parent to avoid embarrassment. See: I am Jazz)

As for women’s spaces, it is instinctual that women will see men as a threat when they’re (men) in a place a woman had thought to be for them alone. This is not because they hate men, like I said, it’s instinctual. Whereas men likely wouldn’t give a shit if a woman walked into their restroom, because they have nothing to fear. This is why “TERF influence“ has gained so much traction. Women are afraid, and share a hivemind (I kid). Of course, troons think “TERFs” are telling these normie women lies, when in actuality it is common sense to keep men out of women’s spaces. Not to mention, a huge chunk of troons are perverted and predatorial. I see you, Yaniv, and your bathroom camera.

Thats all. TERFs hate trannies, and would like them to stay in their lane. They just want to protect what rights and spaces they have. They’re not a group based around hate, they're based around protecting, specifically each other/ other women.

Edit: Please, excuse my ramblings.


Im not sure what this is supposed to mean. Are they having problems getting it in...? All I know is that dilation is extremely painful for them since they’re sticking a skinny-ass dildo in their open wound. Imagine having had your arm cut off, and you have to shove a stick inside the gaping wound. Sounds fun, right?
 
I fucking love how this little idiot says "gender is complicated" when every fucking gender they based these on revolves around "male" or "female". It claims to be so fluid, but creates even stricter binaries DESPITE saying that there's no one way to be male or female. If there's no one way to be male or female, then why have different "genders" at all??

So many words....so little actual meaning.

You can literally just sum up that entire mess of "information " by saying "Gender non-conforming" hell if that's too damn long you can just say GNC, that's literally all that shit is with extra gaudy ribbons and bells glued onto it

Hell GNC has been a thing way before all this xenogender, agender, nullgender bullshit
I miss those days
 
You can argue that women have the same rights as men, especially in the Us, but there’s statistically, undoubtedly a bias for men in certain areas, such as labor, for example. However, this is simply due to social conditioning as we’re raised to believe all women are fragile and dainty while all men are typically faster and stronger.

It's not social conditiong. It's biolgical fact. We've made that point in the thread multiple times that there are distinct biological difference between the sexes and it dosen't matter whose spouting off the gender rhetoric be it troons or feminists- those biological differences are real and palpable not socially invented.

I am a woman and am all for equality to an extent but it's stupid and dangerous to make it out like the average women can be faster and stronger or even equal too the average man and it's not something we should be pushing for. I've been in and witness too instances where having a female in the role hindered the process- paramedic and police- because the woman just did not have the physical strength needed.

Troons cannot change their biology but neither can normal people change their own biological reality. You have to know and accept that you have limitations and weak areas depending on your sex because that is just how it is.
 
It's not social conditiong. It's biolgical fact. We've made that point in the thread multiple times that there are distinct biological difference between the sexes and it dosen't matter whose spouting off the gender rhetoric be it troons or feminists- those biological differences are real and palpable not socially invented.

I am a woman and am all for equality to an extent but it's stupid and dangerous to make it out like the average women can be faster and stronger or even equal too the average man and it's not something we should be pushing for. I've been in and witness too instances where having a female in the role hindered the process- paramedic and police- because the woman just did not have the physical strength needed.

Troons cannot change their biology but neither can normal people change their own biological reality. You have to know and accept that you have limitations and weak areas depending on your sex because that is just how it is.

Of course, by default men are biologically stronger/ faster/ whathaveyou. I'm not claiming men and women are biologically the same.

If physical strength is vital (in areas such as the police force), then they need to do physical evaluations in the sense of testing said strength. There is a bar that needs to be met. I'm just saying it's not impossible for some women to reach that. Personally, I'm against lowering said bar just for women, because they're deemed more fragile. If they're going to get involved in an occupation such as that, they need to be held to the same standards as men.

This example is closer to the point I was trying to make, I believe. Excuse the confusion.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 1533176
ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME ME

There's something about watching troons beg celebrities for attention that just really tickles me. Like watching Zach desperately trying to get JKR's attention for weeks. Seethe into the void, Joe. Natalie doesn't care about you.
 
Of course, by default men are biologically stronger/ faster/ whathaveyou. I'm not claiming men and women are biologically the same.

If physical strength is vital (in areas such as the police force), then they need to do physical evaluations in the sense of testing said strength. There is a bar that needs to be met. I'm just saying it's not impossible for some women to reach that. Personally, I'm against lowering said bar just for women, because they're deemed more fragile. If they're going to get involved in an occupation such as that, they need to be held to the same standards as men.

This example is closer to the point I was trying to make, I believe. Excuse the confusion.
Part of the misunderstanding here is that we have been (ironically) socially conditioned to think of anything that comes with the term "social" attached to it as "not real". But that's BS. "Social conditioning" is just knowledge we acquired by watching and interacting with people. Sometimes it's passed down to us by our education and upbringing, sometimes we learn it ourselves. And the TRAs and SJWs and other three-letter acronyms out there try to make us go against basic human nature by trying to discredit these things.

We learn by recognizing patterns. Let's use a really simple example: say you live in a place with a lot of fair-skinned people. Everybody is white as a sheet and no one pays it any mind. No one told you how or why, but you know you and everybody around you sunburn very easily. I'm talking full boiled lobster red within 15 minutes of going to the beach. Therefore, it's very reasonable to accept the consensus that chalky-white people sunburn easily. It's perfectly valid information for your "lived experience". Say one day someone shows up who tans instead of getting sunburnt. What do you do then? You amend the consensus: most chalky-white people sunburn, but some (for reasons not yet defined) tan instead.

And that's how things go. We recognize patterns, and the exceptions add caveats that may either reinforce or weaken the pattern. And while stereotypes have a kernel of truth, even if only historically, sometimes the pattern is wrong. Thankfully, that tends to be self-correcting. If you think a group of people is [adjective], being exposed to a large enough sample of people from that group who are not [adjective] will in time bring the pattern back closer to reality. For a good example of that, look up Daryl Davis.

The problem is that the current political climate is one that attempts to outright deny people's own knowledge by calling it "social conditioning" (and therefore "not real"), because clearly the We The People are wrong about everything. Everybody with a functioning pair of eyeballs can tell men and women are different. And yet they screech into our ears that "trans women are real women". It's never "treat trans women with the same respect as women". They never try to show us what's wrong. They tell us what's wrong. It's always "fuck you and your entire lifetime of understanding the world around you! We are right and you WILL think what we tell you to think!".
 
Back