Dax Herrera / Dick Masterson / Daxipad / Juju The Cow / Wolfie / The Dick Show (TDS), The Biggest Problem in the Universe (TBPITU) / New Project 2 - Balding least funny contrarian paedophile defender in the universe, "women are fat" jokes virtuoso, e-daddy of Sektards, chaser and cross-species roleplay sodomy enthusiast. Roleplays as a cow named Juju while he gets fucked in the anus by women. Fat.

How many pushups can Juju do?

  • 0

    Votes: 65 51.2%
  • 1

    Votes: 34 26.8%
  • >1

    Votes: 28 22.0%

  • Total voters
    127
twit.jpg
Maybe, like neflix he is just respecting the 'religion' of paedophilia and it's cultures, traditions and values?
 
Living under a rock for the last 3 weeks, only just listened to dick sperg on the dick show on my drive home, check out his Twitter, Now he's defending child exploitation and pedo-guarding... THE FUCK DID I MISS!?
ah, now we get the first time reactions at last

View attachment 1534994
Maybe, like neflix he is just respecting the 'religion' of paedophilia and it's cultures, traditions and values?
this is going to be my whydigitalpiracyismorallyjustified.png
 
View attachment 1534994
Maybe, like neflix he is just respecting the 'religion' of paedophilia and it's cultures, traditions and values?
"We cannot really comment on that"

Who are they scared of offending? I thought Cuties was just a cautionary tale. Why aren't they saying what Dax said? Why can't Netflix say it's about showing the DANGERS of kids being sexualized, and totally not pedophilic?
:thinking:
 
Tell that to TonkaSaw.

I'm more or less over this drama, but if Dick and Null make contact again over this shit it could get new legs so I hope it happens. As of right now it's just Dick spiraling into lunacy giving horrible takes on twitter, followed by people here completely jumping the gun and coming to the conclusion that Dick is a pedophile, as opposed to just an autistic retard.

I don't think that will happen, because I think Nick still holds some hope that Dick will stop being a retard. It's certainly within his character to pull a tonka-style ambush again though if he's thoroughly convinced Dick is a POS. The only real question there is what Nick's current views on dick are.
 
My guess is its either nick turning on dick, or nick will have dick on to ambush josh and talk about how it was ALL just pretending to be retarded and such epic trolling.
Having listened to dick for a couple of years now, I doubt he's going to go for the trolling out.
He's gonna keep riding this bus 'til he runs out of gas or the wheels fall of.
 
I cant cap or archive or even visit dicks twitter anymore, his self immolation is funny but with all the shit hes showing it feels like im on some shitshole cp site and i feel gross screenshotting around his cp or archiving pages that include those images. maybe hell keep the karens from hounding him by making his twitter a cesspool of cp
 
Here's the thing, Josh said that pedophilia doesn't mean child molestation, and that's 100% true. But i think he should have hammered Dick on that point because I think Dick is too exceptional to understand it. And he should have framed it in a way that Dick can relate to. What i mean by that is to apply same logic to straight and gay people and see if Dick can explain his way out of it. Straight people are straight, whether they have sex or not, gay people are gay whether they have sex or not. Pedophiles are only pedophiles if they rape a kid????? I don't think so.

There can be a person that in their teens didn't molest a child, nor in their 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, and then one day in their mid 60s they do. That person was still a pedo long before they touched a kid. And out of courtesy i'm going to add a possibility that a pedophile may not ever commit sexual offense. Just like a straight guy was heterosexual long before he lost his virginity in his 40s for example. There is no difference here and pedos don't get to have a different standard.

Test is god damn simple. There is not a single non pedophile that is lusting over children in any form: drawn, animated, filmed, real, photos, IMAGINED! WTF! Dick's "they can imagine it" is self-defeating argument. Yes they can. and they will, because they are pedophiles. Just like a straight guy will imagine sex with women. And ONLY pedophiles imagine children. There may not be a victim, but to my knowledge Josh never accused Digi of victimizing anybody. He merely pointed out the fact that the guy is jerking off to kids. (or i'm missing something???)

Now I know that in this forum (formerly known as incel farms) there are in fact people who have had sex. If you are one of them, you tell me, were you not heterosexual (or gay w/e) before you had sex? Let's say a person was a virgin for a long time, into their 20s, 30s even, and for the sake of the argument let's say a person is lifelong incel and dies a virgin.

The fact that somebody doesn't have a sex with a child doesn't mean they are not a pedophile.

I rest my case, now, welcome me~~
 
Probably because most people just know there's a pedo in the book.
And now I’m thinking about Dick’s awful poetry to Jamie in relation to Humbert’s purple prose. I really didn’t need that. I imagine if Dax has read it he doesn’t realize that Humbert is trying to downplay his transgressions the entire time.
 
Here's the thing, Josh said that pedophilia doesn't mean child molestation, and that's 100% true. But i think he should have hammered Dick on that point because I think Dick is too exceptional to understand it. And he should have framed it in a way that Dick can relate to. What i mean by that is to apply same logic to straight and gay people and see if Dick can explain his way out of it. Straight people are straight, whether they have sex or not, gay people are gay whether they have sex or not. Pedophiles are only pedophiles if they rape a kid????? I don't think so.

There can be a person that in their teens didn't molest a child, nor in their 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, and then one day in their mid 60s they do. That person was still a pedo long before they touched a kid. And out of courtesy i'm going to add a possibility that a pedophile may not ever commit sexual offense. Just like a straight guy was heterosexual long before he lost his virginity in his 40s for example. There is no difference here and pedos don't get to have a different standard.

Test is god damn simple. There is not a single non pedophile that is lusting over children in any form: drawn, animated, filmed, real, photos, IMAGINED! WTF! Dick's "they can imagine it" is self-defeating argument. Yes they can. and they will, because they are pedophiles. Just like a straight guy will imagine sex with women. And ONLY pedophiles imagine children. There may not be a victim, but to my knowledge Josh never accused Digi of victimizing anybody. He merely pointed out the fact that the guy is jerking off to kids. (or i'm missing something???)

Now I know that in this forum (formerly known as incel farms) there are in fact people who have had sex. If you are one of them, you tell me, were you not heterosexual (or gay w/e) before you had sex? Let's say a person was a virgin for a long time, into their 20s, 30s even, and for the sake of the argument let's say a person is lifelong incel and dies a virgin.

The fact that somebody doesn't have a sex with a child doesn't mean they are not a pedophile.

I rest my case, now, welcome me~~

If you're new, why'd you call Dick "exceptional?"
 
Back