- Joined
- Oct 21, 2019
You're discounting the tunnel vision aspects of the Internet. You can pick exactly which sites cater to your point of view, and never see the bad news that disproves what you want to believe. Hell, even if everyone uses the same social media site, you can still isolate yourself from the other side.
View attachment 1537286
My anecdote: I showed an acquaintance the head-kicking video and said "BLM is not a peaceful movement". The response was a video of an actual peaceful protest, saying "it has two sides and you're just focusing on the part you want to, you refuse to acknowledge the peaceful parts". They refused to believe that BLM has any culpability in any violence because "a protest can't control what everybody does".
There is a real problem with explaining the violence of BLM to people who protested immediately after the George Floyd video.
They think, "well I protested, and I was peaceful, and everyone around me that day was peaceful". They refuse to think that violent people under the same banner on a different day have anything to do with their beliefs. It's agitators, invisible boogaloo boys, or white people causing trouble. It's not them, and it's certainly not the movement they experienced.
Accepting today's riots are bad means that their protests were bad. But they know their own intentions were good, so the movement which channeled those intentions couldn't be bad. You aren't going to solve that contradiction with a video of riots in a different city.
These are people who value "lived experience" above facts or data; the peaceful protest is their lived experience. You won't invalidate their emotional attachment to the memory with just some conflicting data.
You won't get them to give up their badge of honor. They are desperate to claim nobility and rightness for themselves--as we all are, to a degree; but their source of goodness is their politics.
This is anecdotal, but I have seen both sides of it when keeping an eye on my old neighborhood‘s Nextdoor. The neighborhood itself was unique because it had young, more radical lefties, older hippie liberals, and then going west, there were wealthy people with seven figure homes. The most entrenched lefties/liberals seem more likely to say they went to protests and they were peaceful. I encountered one of these people on a thread this week (a professor, no less). But on the same thread, several others jumped in to back up my points and told her she is a biased idiot who should not be teaching young people. She eventually turned off her notifications because she could not handle the normie storm. I think what is happening is people who are the “just wanna grill” types and do not usually care about politics are being activated. They are the ones who are less likely to be brainwashed by mainstream media too because they are not paying attention to it.
suggestions for my first conceal carry gun? im almost ready to get one
yes this is related
If you are planning on buying at a gun shop, you probably will not be able to be picky. Check Armslist and Gunbroker instead and get something shipped to a FFL if you want more options.
Shoot some stuff. Go to a range that rents guns and shoot a few handguns. Figure out what you like to control and what not. After that, buy which ever one was most comfortable. Its different per person just like preference in food or cars. I like a hefty heavy bang, so I prefer 1911. Most people I know go with a 9mm and I even know a guy who just likes how intimidating a six shooter is so he's got a dirty harry style revolver. But if its conceal I'd suggest against a revolver.
This.
I like 9mm, but am also a smol lady, so I have to go with subcompacts. Can’t go wrong with a Glock imo. They are not exciting but I tend to be most accurate with them.
Last edited: