Debate user BoxerShorts47 on "strawmans" and logical fallacies, definitions of ephebophilia, how to MAGA, religion, Sailor Moon and more

I don't care about following lame MLA rulez. Think outside the box. You people sound like fucking robots. This is another reason we need to defund public education. It just makes you people into mindless drones, afraid that your teachers will attack you if you say or do the wrong thing.

I'm not even talking about MLA dumbass, which is more about documentation style and report writing such as knowing how to cite things or page margins which is not applicable in this forum discussion. This is why when you're given reports use a format style such as MLA or Chicago style for example because how you cite matters to properly convey your sources.

Irregardless of which report style you use English grammar such as using a periods to end a sentence, knowing how commas work, or using the proper "your" or "there" are fundamental grammar rules that are applied in every form of written English communication this includes knowing how to spell words in English.

You've expanded "MLA rulez" to basically mean the entire English language by how you're talking right now, which is just fucking retarded. If everyone just "free thinks" how they think the English language should work then it becomes confusing because not everyone is going to think the same.

Edit: Regarding your correction of my writing I openly admit that my writing isn't very good at all unless I get it proof read by someone with better writing then me (like English major people that I know). So you got me now you're 2/1002. You're slowly climbing. Also I used "too" as in "too much" instead of "to" as in "I'm going to the store.".
 
Last edited:
I don't care about following lame MLA rulez. Think outside the box. You people sound like fucking robots. This is another reason we need to defund public education. It just makes you people into mindless drones, afraid that your teachers will attack you if you say or do the wrong thing.


Yet, you complied with the rules, like a normie, to get a degree. If the system is so bad, why did you not adhere to your cause's beliefs? You're a sell out.

And Boxcar, you cried for a teacher to bail you out of trouble, when you were sperging on campus.

Finally, if you defund and dismantle the system, two things happen:

1) Your degree is now useless in your Boxtopia.

2) You wasted more years of your life, adding to the current years.

Like, God damn, do you get off on cucking yourself?
 
Stop dodging the interesting questions with this pretend intellectual bullshit. You couldn’t even get two sentences done before fucking up your grammar on your grammar Nazi post. Congratulations.

"Your question is a shitpost troll and dumb, so I'm not answering it. Now rate my posts informative."~Boxy
 
I'm not even talking about MLA dumbass, which is more about documentation style and report writing such as knowing how to cite things or page margins which is not applicable in this forum discussion. This is why when you're given reports use a format style such as MLA or Chicago style for example because how you cite matters to properly convey your sources.

Irregardless of which report style you use English grammar such as using a periods to end a sentence, knowing how commas work, or using the proper "your" or "there" are fundamental grammar rules that are applied in every form of written English communication this includes knowing how to spell words in English.

You've expanded "MLA rulez" to basically mean the entire English language by how you're talking right now, which is just fucking retarded. If everyone just "free thinks" how they think the English language should work then it becomes confusing because not everyone is going to think the same.

1. If I pronounce words the same than I spell them the same. Their and There are pronounced the same. The different in spelling is an archaic holdover.
2. I know the difference between your and you're but again they are said the same so see #1.
3. You don't know basic grammar. You don't understand the concept of a verb or accusative vs instrumental case.

Let me help you out
so it *(grammatically correct but ambiguous, replace with these rules, noun instead of pronoun) might have gone (have and gone are both verbs, have means possess or own, you cannot posses "gone" correct verb is went ) (through) one ear and out the other when he got too involved (again double verbs, better verb is learned) with (replace with instrumental case with on locative case) /pol/ shitposting.

So proper grammer, "so these rules might went through one ear and out the other when he learned on /pol/ shitposting" and this is 100% correct grammer but it's not standard junk you would learn in school. In fact you would probably be marked wrong for writing like this because most English speakers don't understand basic grammar, which is why they used to force students to learn Greek and Latin in school.
 
1. If I pronounce words the same than I spell them the same. Their and There are pronounced the same. The different in spelling is an archaic holdover.
2. I know the difference between your and you're but again they are said the same so see #1.
3. You don't know basic grammar. You don't understand the concept of a verb or accusative vs instrumental case.

Let me help you out


So proper grammer, "so these rules might went through one ear and out the other when he learned on /pol/ shitposting" and this is 100% correct grammer but it's not standard junk you would learn in school. In fact you would probably be marked wrong for writing like this because most English speakers don't understand basic grammar, which is why they used to force students to learn Greek and Latin in school.
They’re spelled different cause they mean different things you absolute fucking moron.
 
i didn't say they mean the same thing , i said they are said the same way.
Boxy, how do you intend to change the English language in your revolution?
I can’t be assed to go back and find it, but he’s already sworn to change dictionary definitions to suit his goals. So I assume the sky is the limit. One day he will change the meaning of “faggot” to “wise great leader” and then he will be able to be proud of his work here.
 
Boxy, how do you intend to change the English language in your revolution?
At the very minimum we need to purge english of many of the latin and french words. One of the liberals greatest tools is language manipulation. They use latin words to trick you. e.g.

they attack racism (latin construct) instead of kinship (english word)
or
they conflate equality (sameness) with fairness.
 
I can’t be assed to go back and find it, but he’s already sworn to change dictionary definitions to suit his goals. So I assume the sky is the limit. One day he will change the meaning of “faggot” to “wise great leader” and then he will be able to be proud of his work here.

Pedo removed from the dictionary because it takes agency away from 10 year old women.
 
1598076613810.jpeg
You’re right, Garcia. It’s pretty optimistic that you’ll feel pride in anything some day.
 
At the very minimum we need to purge english of many of the latin and french words. One of the liberals greatest tools is language manipulation. They use latin words to trick you. e.g.

they attack racism (latin construct) instead of kinship (english word)
or
they conflate equality (sameness) with fairness.

Does racism exist at all in your mind? Not even that it is bad or good, but that it exists period.
 
Back