U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
See this just proves BLM and Antifa are right. If only nobody tried to call the police and instead sat down and had a heart to heart discussion with volunteer social workers assisting, that would have stopped those bullets. Those bullets would have turned around and everyone would be at home safe with their mothers.

Also I say we can now refer to BLM as simply Blam!
 
I personally think sometime after 2016 the Libertarians had an Atheism+ style schism. The ones who are left are Reddit-tier fags.
every libertarian with a brain in his head realized that libertarianism (a mix of individualism and liberalism) is not a viable position to take when faced with threats of totalitarian marxism from the left
most of them have by now recognized that hardline authoritarian right wing positions are the only thing that has ever been successful at fighting marxism, so that's where they are now
 
Yeah, but these are riots, not military operations (no matter whatr /pol/ says), so the Geneva Convention doesn't apply.
We're not going to see "uniforms" outside the uniform of the self-declared non-conformists: wearing all black as part of the Antifa black block.

I mean neither to indicate that they do nor should, I'm simply noting that uniforms really help sort out who is on what side, and I expect that they will start showing up though sheer practicality if nothing else if this keeps up.

I'm not an expert, not by any means, but when you put a sling around a limb to stop a wound from bleeding, chances are that the person is going to lose that limb.
In case of a really bad wound that might make someone bleed to death, it's necessary, but for anything that's not gushing blood like a faucet, it is better to put a compressor on the wound and stem the bloodflow that way. But there's a giant chunk of arm missing, so that might not be an option.

This is still prevailing knowledge, but the last couple decades in Iraq and Afghanistan have led to a lot of tourniquets being applied, and what the US Military has found is that they aren't nearly as dangerous as previously thought. As of 2016, the Army's policy was to slap one on damn near anything worse than a scrape. Wither he loses the arm or not is likely going to come down to bone and nerve damage, I doubt they're going to take so long to get him to safety that it starts to go necrotic.

Who the fuck chases a man that is holding a rifle? Who runs toward gunfire?
These are some literal brainlets
Answer: the man with the rifle. He was out there with a long gun and the stated intent of keeping things safe for the "protesters". That means that when the shooting started, it was his job to run towards it and keep people safe. He handled himself well when it came to self-defense, but he failed his stated objective when he ran from a situation where his rifle could have saved a life.
 
>Think you can overthrow the state
>Get BTFO in a fire fight verses a chubby Midwestern nerd


Ya winnin' the revolution son?

Also guy who got his arm blown off is a Satanist lol
amr man.jpg
 
Last edited:
So after reading through the pages I get the feeling that we have reached the next escalation phase (or as Yuri puts it "normalization"): the Antifaggots have established the casual violence but now they hit the wall of normal citizens who have enough. I guess no one will talk anymore About simple property damage (I think that point wasn't even mentioned anymore in the media). So will we have shootouts in the streets? If Trump Plays it Right this will be a huge boost for him since only he is talking about restoring law and order. Do you think he will use the Insurrection act? Or would that be a bar too high?
 
Last edited:
>Think you can overthrow the state
>Get BTFO in a fire fight verses a chubby Midwestern nerd


Ya winnin' the revolution son?

Also guy who got his arm blown off is a Satanist lol
View attachment 1548595

Should have made a better deal with the Devil than that lifetime supply of soy he got.
 
Every new tweet I see about this adds more crazy, stupid shit.
Because its -bad-. its pure, distilled, "Everything bad about the riots". And its not the Right who is at the end of the barrel of this going wrong. The riots have long been a persistent downward trend on the left ever since their plan of "Get trump to act like the nazi we TOTALLY KNOW HE IS" failed. But they kinda reached peak bad with it as the status quo lay.

"Oh yay, more riots in more hard blue areas. Yaaay".

But this? Riots in a swing state which leans red is bad enough, but now add a body count with CLEAR self defense on the shooters side? 2A issues raise up, it looks just awful, and no one who was injured is usable as a quick "SEE THE INNOCENT PERSON". Its bad all around, and there's no way to spin it.
 
I'm not an expert, not by any means, but when you put a sling around a limb to stop a wound from bleeding, chances are that the person is going to lose that limb.
In case of a really bad wound that might make someone bleed to death, it's necessary, but for anything that's not gushing blood like a faucet, it is better to put a compressor on the wound and stem the bloodflow that way. But there's a giant chunk of arm missing, so that might not be an option.

I really hope medical professionals took care of the wound quickly, so maybe he doesn't lose his arm, but I think even the best doctor can't make you regrow that muscle tissue, so this guy is most likely going to lose a lot of strength and control for that arm.
This is still prevailing knowledge, but the last couple decades in Iraq and Afghanistan have led to a lot of tourniquets being applied, and what the US Military has found is that they aren't nearly as dangerous as previously thought. As of 2016, the Army's policy was to slap one on damn near anything worse than a scrape. Wither he loses the arm or not is likely going to come down to bone and nerve damage, I doubt they're going to take so long to get him to safety that it starts to go necrotic.

To prevent power leveling, let's just say that I have army paramedical experience. Applying a tourniquet to any gunshot wound is standard procedure. Afterwards you can try to stop the bloodflow by other means, but stopping the bleeding as soon as possible is critical. You can even keep a tourniquet attached up to 1 hour and remove it yourself without medical supervision (though when training we did max 30 minutes). If I remember right nerve damage starts occurring after 4 hours. Also if you have a good army standard tourniquet, you can't get them too tight, so it's hard to misuse them in other ways than having them too loose. Improvised tourniquets you can get too tight. When it comes to losing that limb, all it comes to the damage done by the gunshot and what the surgeon can salvage.
 
I mean neither to indicate that they do nor should, I'm simply noting that uniforms really help sort out who is on what side, and I expect that they will start showing up though sheer practicality if nothing else if this keeps up.
Problem is: What kind of uniform would that be? And who are their opponents? Say they adopt rainbow flags that they wrap around their bodies, what stops anyone with bad intentions from simply wrapping himself up in such a flag to "infiltrate" their ranks?

The problem isn't so much that they can't adopt a uniform, the problem is more about them using a uniform that is unique to them. You can regulate this for war and national armies, but it's impossible to do the same with civilians. Everyone would have to adopt an honor system where they wear insignia to identify themselves (rainbow-coats vs. recaps maybe?), but why should anyone do that.

Most likely, they'll just deck themselves out in Portland haberdashery (ie: Black everything, maybe some pieces of equippement from MilSup stores in camo-patterns).

the tl;dr: version is this:
It's a bunch of random people wearing random clothes and mingling on the streets at night. The moment anyone hears a gunshot, this turns into a free-for-all like it did in Kenosha. Technically, all you'd have to do is shoot in the air and watch the rioters start taking potshots at one another. This is yet another reason why this style of protest is a stupid idea. Instead of wandering the streets and loitering around at night (which also gave looters a flakscreen to operate under in the past), they should go back to regular protests. Walking the streets as a big group with signs is a better, more effective and infinitely more safe way to make your political voice be heard. And it's not like this is Russia or china, they can vote people into and out of offices, so it's not like they need to roam the streets with large calibre guns.
 
Looks like the narrative they are going to run with is starting to form.

View attachment 1548585

It wouldn't have mattered who or what happened. They've been calling the police white supremacists. They've been calling anyone defending themselves that. This isn't a new narrative, it's been their narrative period. They haven't been honest once.
I mean they are still clinging to the "white supremacists" narrative from CHAZ. This is all much in the same.

No. People are seeing it's not "white supremacists" and they're sick of having their lives ruined. This ungassed jew here is just talking the same shit they have since day one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back