Interestingly, though, the judge's justification for the acquittal in that particular case essentially amounted to "yo, fuck that particular part of the conventions, we like being able to run around in enemy uniforms".
This happened post WW2, so the judge wasn't German. I have no clue where you take the "We like being able to run around in enemy uniforms" thing from.
I would disagree, they get enforced on the street level. Let's start by speculating for what purpose someone would attempt to infiltrate the other side. Intelligence gathering? They're a disorganized mob, they have no intelligence to gather. Optics smearing? The media opinion has already been firmly entrenched, and everyone either does or does not give a shit about what the media says, but he might get his ass beat for the trouble. To commit random acts of violence? His punishment will be delivered at muzzle velocity.
How do they get enforced? Will uniformed people ask other people with the same uniform politely and they'll be honor bound to name their correct affiliation? This can't be enforced at all is what I am saying.
Also, if wearing a uniform is important for the anti-rioters, it is also important for the rioters to wear the same uniforms, if only to cause confusion. Being able to cause trouble that gets attributed to the other side can be invaluable in itself, even if you think "optics smearing" is pointless. If there is a point in wearing a uniform, there is a point in wearing the uniform of the other side as well, this goes hand in hand.
This ability to smear the other side by donning their uniform alone is a pretty good reason not to adopt a uniform, tbh. It also allows for plausible deniablity on your own side.
To commit random acts of violence? His punishment will be delivered at muzzle velocity.
You mean like that guy that shot someone in the face and got away in his jeep, leading to some other guy being attacked, shooting someone in self-defense and being taken into custody? Yeah... what is your point again? That this thing can't happen when it literally happened within minutes twice and is the basis for this thread in the first place?
Being able to blend in with the crowd is an advantge precisely cause this isn't war, civil or otherwise. Being able to just duck down and get out of a bad situation without having to use lethal force is a good thing for both sides. You can just pretend to be a random person and haul ass.
This whole situation is way too chaotic, there are no clear frontlines, it's an ever-shifting zone of several conflicts, meaning that people will always move in group-bubbles within a larger gathering of people that stretches over several blocks. At best, you have a group of people standing in front of a store or memorial protecting it and by that point, you don't really need another sign to show off your affiliation.
The entire purpose is to stand out and be an obvious threat to the rioters, not to blend in with them. A month or two ago, just being armed was enough, but now that increasing numbers of armed rioters are showing up, it's getting harder to distinguish between the two, hence the value of uniforms.
Being able to identify someone as friend or foe is important, I agree, but uniforms do nothing to accomplish that here, since not everyone is going to wear them and wearing them is no guarantee that it is genuine.
All it takes is one guy with an idea, see any of /pol/'s projects in the last four years. It's not going to be as simple as they all show up with a uniform tomorrow night, it will be a mimetic spread, possibly of multiple different uniform ideas (vests, hats, etc) until it manages to reach ubiquity, at which point any kind of attempt to infiltrate will simply be lost in the noise.
I just doubt that the various groups involved here are coherent enough to establish some set of clothes as a uniform. A uniform is not necessary at this point anyway, it might be if this shitshow escalates to a point of genuine civil war, but as long as it's riots, not using a uniform is better for various reasons mentioned above.
The yellow vests are a good counterpoint, but I would argue that the situation with them is a bit different. They are a large group of people opposed to the government, here we have several groups of civilians fighting each other, much more chaotic.
>Cops murder in cold blood
>Leads to
>Cops getting bricked
>Leads to
>Cops letting right wing militia run wild
Gee, it almost seems like there's something in that chain of events that's entirely in your control. It's something that, should you remove it, would prevent the next event from happening. I can't for the life of me think of it though...
Clearly, the best way to stop this cycle of violence is to abolish cops. Without cops, black communities would be thriving hubs of peace and prosperity, right?