U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

View attachment 1551187

HEY! Cut the crap, cocksucker. 2 kills does not a Ganowicz make.

 

[Ponderous Pillock]

Man, reading about St Kyle has been a wild one.

Fuck the guy who fake-surrendered, seriously. Asshole's lucky to be alive after pulling a stunt like that.

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

Does anybody know what happened with the Minneapolis shooting? Youtube disabled the vid. Any baddies slotted?

 

[⠠⠠⠅⠑⠋⠋⠁⠇⠎ ⠠⠠⠊⠎ ⠠⠠⠁ ⠠⠠⠋⠁⠛]

Exception to the Hearsay Rule (Federal Rules of Evidence) (3) Then-Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition. A statement of the declarant’s then-existing state of mind (such as motive, intent, or plan) or emotional, sensory, or physical condition (such as mental feeling, pain, or bodily health), but not including a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered or believed unless it relates to the validity or terms of the declarant’s will.

Grosskreutz commie larper BTFO

This particular rule of evidence is actually really very fascinating, and I'm reading this legal review article about it right now. The case that led to it actually has a good Wikipedia article- it probably was stolen from some other public domain source.

Would this be relevant to the situation in question? I don't pretend to fully understand it, but 803(3) codified a exception to prohibitions on hearsay in a case where one man was said to have died and another- who had written a letter in which he stated he was going to go into partnership with the 'dead' man- disappeared, and an insurance company contested paying out a policy on the man who was said to have died on the basis of a theory that the decedent had not, in fact, died, but had killed the missing man and conspired to have him buried in his place.

The Supreme Court found in Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hillmon that the missing man's letter in which he described his intention to go into partnership with Hillmon could be taken into account.

Now.. I believe this has been extended somewhat, in terms that more modern documentation of how a person felt about some matter at a point in the past that they can no longer testify to can be accepted (not just letters obv), and that it could also be applied in regards someone who simply has no recollection of a previous event, as well as someone who is dead and unavailable. I don't believe that it would be applied to claims made by someone else about how a person involved felt, especially after the actual event in question when the two stupid faggots in question were talking themselves up.

Now, I hope Rittenhouse gets a semi-fair trial. I hope he can pay for a decent attorney with a bit of political pull, and a great jury consultant, and PR consultants and private detectives to intimidate his enemies into behaving honestly.

But we can look at a similar case, involving evidence of the state of mind of antifa terrorists, in the case of a man who was attacked by antifa and tried to flee, only injuring others in the course of escaping from their violent terrorist attacks.

UNC Professor Dwayne Dixon allowed himself to be recorded boasting that he chased James Alex Fields with a rifle, barely failing to kill him, before Fields was physically attacked by Dixon's fellow terrorists and was involved in a car accident.

This wasn't even his friend's testimony over his state of mind- it was his own testimony. He described his own intention to attack someone for peacefully protesting.

Dixon was called to the stand at Fields's trial and denied this. The attorney assigned to defend Fields declined to question his lies on the stand. Fields received a sentence of over 400 years for being victimized by antifa terrorists.

Fuck the guy who fake-surrendered, seriously.

I enjoy the meme, but the Geneva Conventions are not, as far as I know, incorporated into US case law around self-defence.

 

[bippu_as_fuck_ls400]

https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1298934544305917957 (https://archive.vn/CP49A)

They know exactly what they're doing by calling it a "death" instead of suicide and what picture that paints.

 

[deeplyhigh]

Does anybody know what happened with the Minneapolis shooting? Youtube disabled the vid. Any baddies slotted?

The one during looting? Unicorn Riot caught it on video and their stream is still up. It seemed like it was a looter who had the gun, so jogger on jogger is more likely, but I haven’t seen anything further.

If you meant the suicide, I posted archives of those here.

View attachment 1551227
https://twitter.com/Reuters/status/1298934544305917957 (https://archive.vn/CP49A)

They know exactly what they're doing by calling it a "death" instead of suicide and what picture that paints.

In the replies:

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

The one during looting? Unicorn Riot caught it on video and their stream is still up. It seemed like it was a looter who had the gun, so jogger on jogger is more likely, but I haven’t seen anything further.

If you meant the suicide, I posted archives of those here.

Thx. Hope somecommie died.

 

[Women should die]

probably late but LMFAO

https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1298833015548739587

 

[trent]

So, this Kyle guy shot 3 random protesters and every single one of them had prior convictions? And they are protesting police shooting a child rapist who pulled a knife on cops?

These people are utter scum, any time any info comes out about them they are always turn out to be criminals. That kid did society a favour.

 

[Women should die]

So, this Kyle guy shot 3 random protesters and every single one of them had prior convictions? And they are protesting police killing a child rapist who pulled a knife on cops?

These people are utter scum, any time any info comes out about them they are always turn out to be criminals. That kid did society a favour.

The left will not bring this up btw. They will keep on protesting on how blacks are somehow oppressed meanwhile these three race traitors will be forgotten by history.

Keep appealing to blacks in these protests however you want, they wont care and you will be forgotten. Imagine the last thing you do on earth is try to look cool with niggers for attention lmfao

 

[heathercho]

Archived for posterity. Rioters in Kenosha beating up a 70 year old man after setting his mattress shop on fire. He was treated at a local hospital for a broken jaw and a black eye.

Kenosha Sue and Keith relocate and Bobs medicaI, organized by Yvonne Rich

Monday August 24, 2020 protesters and looters set fire to Sue and Keith’s … Yvonne Rich needs your support for Kenosha Sue and Keith relocate and Bobs medicaI

www.gofundme.com

View attachment 1551215
View attachment 1551216

I don't know if people remember the Kenneka Jenkins death in 2017, but basically a black 19 year old girl got drunk, stumbled into a freezer in the Crowne Plaza Chicago O'Hare Hotel and froze to death.

When that happened, it was clearly and logically a death by misadventure case, however ; the family, friends and "community" of Kenneka's decided to have a hard protest at the hotel.

Eventually a community leader had to ask Kenneka's mother to tell the community to knock it off, because it was fucking up the hotel's business.

They were literally chanting JUSTICE FOR KENNEKA. During an open investigation. For a clear cut case of death by misadventure.

(This isn't even to go into, until this day, you have blacks on YT swearing up and down that Kenneka was murdered by some unseen force and that the hotel is responsible.)

Point being - DB Hat wearing guy here says he doesn't mind protests about the "injustice". That's all good and well, but the black community is too stupid to protest for legit things. They protest for shit like the above. They don't protest about gang violence in their own community and they SHOULD. No, they only protest when their simian brains a) think whitey did it or b) when they think there's a pay day a-comin'.

DB Hat here is stupid, I'll give him a pass but seriously people need to get educated and realise the above.

 

[Meriasek]

At least the angry manlet finally got those fabled 6', and Stumpy gets to keep his arm for now.
As for Skaterboy, well, heaven is a halfpipe. I'm sure your partner and your stepchild will fondly remember you for about a month.

 

[Ethan Ralphs Micro Penis]

If I had a business in Kenosha I would have been up at the rooftop armed like a Los Angeles Korean and I'd have had signs written saying "All Trespassers will be shot." I don't blame Kyle for protecting his own life at those moments, Mr. Chomo Rosenbaum, Skaterboy Anthony Huber, and the newly made one-armed man got what they fucking deserve. But he broke the law as he wasn't legally permitted to be open carrying at the age of 17.

I truly hope Wisconsin isn't so cucked as to convict him of murder as it was all in self defense, but he deserves whatever punishment he will receive for carrying. The kid should have stayed home and it's without a doubt a failure of Wisconsin's government to not stop these riots in the first place. In my eyes there is no such thing as a "night protest", especially when your protest involves wanton destruction.

PS: I love that GoFundMe apparently has the right to ban fundraising for Kyle but they'll allow them to raise funds for the dirt nap of a guy who was so stupid to assault an armed teenager.

If GoFundMe were real allies, they'd realize Rosenbaum would WANT his funds going to the black and brown bodies that have to live with his privilege #SayTheirNAME

 

[YarrBlueballs]

So, this Kyle guy shot 3 random protesters and every single one of them had prior convictions? And they are protesting police shooting a child rapist who pulled a knife on cops?

These people are utter scum, any time any info comes out about them they are always turn out to be criminals. That kid did society a favour.

A pack of rabid cannibals have more human decency and less crimes against humanity than the average Antifa.

Never underestimate who's invested in ANTIFA/BLM. They're the worst of animals supporting the worst of animals, and should be recognized as the animals they are. We must remember, of course, that wild animals are prone to violence and aggression, and those that care for domestic tranquility have the duty to inform them of their place.

 

[stupidpieceofshit]

Nope. It is flat out illegal to invoke the insurrection act without the consent of the state in question see for yourself

No it doesn't, it literally proves everything I said. Do I need to repeat myself? The only reason that it was ever done without the states consent is because the states didn't make a legal issue of it. They had every legal right to stop it, they chose not to

Wrong that is only 10 USC § 251. (The Insurrection Act is 10 USC §§251-255)

Federal aid for State governments
"Whenever there is an insurrection in any State against its government, the President may, upon the request of its legislature or of its governor if the legislature cannot be convened, call into Federal service such of the militia of the other States, in the number requested by that State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to suppress the insurrection."

The President has the authority to do it with out the state's request under 252 and 253
10 USC § 252
"Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion."

10 USC § 253
"The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—

(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws."

In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

Never underestimate who's invested in ANTIFA/BLM. They're the worst of animals supporting the worst of animals, and should be recognized as the animals they are. We must remember, of course, that wild animals are prone to violence and aggression, and those that care for domestic tranquility have the duty to inform them of their place.

I suspect then one of these SOBs who invested in Antifa/BLM might be some Soros.

Styx is on the roll today, vlogging about Kyle Rittenhouse and Jacob Blake.

 

[Rafal Gan Ganowicz]

View attachment 1551219

Time to start spraying these scum with coax.

 

[Feline Supremacist]

This particular rule of evidence is actually really very fascinating, and I'm reading this legal review article about it right now. The case that led to it actually has a good Wikipedia article- it probably was stolen from some other public domain source.

Would this be relevant to the situation in question? I don't pretend to fully understand it, but 803(3) codified a exception to prohibitions on hearsay in a case where one man was said to have died and another- who had written a letter in which he stated he was going to go into partnership with the 'dead' man- disappeared, and an insurance company contested paying out a policy on the man who was said to have died on the basis of a theory that the decedent had not, in fact, died, but had killed the missing man and conspired to have him buried in his place.

The Supreme Court found in Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hillmon that the missing man's letter in which he described his intention to go into partnership with Hillmon could be taken into account.

Now.. I believe this has been extended somewhat, in terms that more modern documentation of how a person felt about some matter at a point in the past that they can no longer testify to can be accepted (not just letters obv), and that it could also be applied in regards someone who simply has no recollection of a previous event, as well as someone who is dead and unavailable. I don't believe that it would be applied to claims made by someone else about how a person involved felt, especially after the actual event in question when the two stupid faggots in question were talking themselves up.

Now, I hope Rittenhouse gets a semi-fair trial. I hope he can pay for a decent attorney with a bit of political pull, and a great jury consultant, and PR consultants and private detectives to intimidate his enemies into behaving honestly.

But we can look at a similar case, involving evidence of the state of mind of antifa terrorists, in the case of a man who was attacked by antifa and tried to flee, only injuring others in the course of escaping from their violent terrorist attacks.

UNC Professor Dwayne Dixon allowed himself to be recorded boasting that he chased James Alex Fields with a rifle, barely failing to kill him, before Fields was physically attacked by Dixon's fellow terrorists and was involved in a car accident.

This wasn't even his friend's testimony over his state of mind- it was his own testimony. He described has own intention to attack someone for peacefully protesting.

Dixon was called to the stand at Fields's trial and denied this. The attorney assigned to defend Fields declined to question his lies on the stand. Fields received a sentence of over 400 years for being victimized by antifa terrorists.

I enjoy the meme, but the Geneva Conventions are not, as far as I know, incorporated into US case law around self-defence.

If you ever find yourself in a situation like Kyle's, this is my advice. You find a lawyer who has worked and has networked in the court where you are going to be tried. This lawyer must also have tried at least one case similar to yours and won. Such lawyers don't come cheap.

This lawyer will have enough familiarity and relationships within the legal jurisdiction you are in to make sure your case is calendared before a judge he/she is familiar with, has appeared before and is well acquainted with the judge's legal rulings. Most of all this judge must be sympathetic to your predicament.

However, a lawyer you have retained, for various reasons, may not be effective. You must be prepared to fire and hire another. You must also be able to read and understand criminal law to at least get a handle on what a good strategy for you is. Many people simply don't have the ability to do this but you should at least try.

If you are in jail due to high bail being set there are always jailhouse lawyers, ie prisoners who actually know how the system and law work. You must be able to talk to them about the court and ts practices, which they are meticulously familiar with. This will keep you occupied and out trouble while enabling you to work with your attorney.

If you have the funds you must be prepared to pay out for all kinds of pre-trial services, such as consultants that advise and prep you for depositions and testimony as well as private investigators, labs, expert witnesses, etc. Like I said, none of this is cheap and costs a lot of money.

You have to be absolutely cognizant of what your real odds on prevailing are based on reliable knowledge of the court and the prosecutor's behavior. This entails some familiarity with the prosecutor and staff, which is where your experienced lawyer's expertise comes in (recent former ADA's in private practice are usually very good at this) . At some point you will be presented with a plea bargain. If you reject it and the case is calendared for trial, then that's when the real work begins.

The actual, legal arguments are almost always irrelevant until you get to this point. I'm not going to speculate because I don't know criminal procedure well, let alone the local rules of court practice and procedure in Kenosha, Wisconsin. If the locals lean conservative then Kyle has a good chance of prevailing if he can snag a local, experienced attorney who's handled similar cases before. Looking at the funds already raised via gunslingers.com I say it's looking good.

This reminds me of the Zimmerman trial. We're in for a long ride.

 

[pot of sneed]

Time to start spraying these scum with coax.

I honestly cannot wait for civilian backlash against these communistic cunts. Every last one of these vile cunts needs to get ventiliated like those three who tried killing Kyle.

 

[Super-Chevy454]

Andy Ngo posted a interesting tweet about the hidden skeletons in the closets of the 2 antifa losers. https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1298833015548739587

As we thought, one of the disposables antifa isn't white as snow. https://archive.is/R2JYm