I'll give points to her from it's not transphobic not date transpeople. It's honestly nice to see that in rant about being rejected over being trans and how much that hurts. It's not easy to remember to acknowledge other's agency when being hurt and she is consistent about that. This all about how to reject, not that rejection is wrong itself.
Still her point of not being a dick when rejecting isn't working. Sure making fun of or insulting someone who you rejected personally can be mean and even fall into bullying but this wasn't that. This wasn't even talking loudly about who you wouldn't fuck while people like that are in the same space. This was an internet conversation and/or rant (hard to say without the original text) about what some gays find and don't find attractive in general. People have right to talk about attraction even with harsh words and it's not dickish behavior as long as others can easily ingnore that conversation. No one is forsing her to read, she can just close the tab after noticing where the conversation is going.
Also making someone known why you rejected them specifically isn't inherently bad. Generic not my type or simple no can get the job of rejecting done but can lead lingering awkwardness. It's perfectly natural that people might linger over rejection especially if they don't why they were rejected and if there is change that answer might change in latter date. Giving the full reason can give closure and allow them to move forward with better tactics. It's not required, it's perfectly fine to reject without excuse, but it's honestly fine also get all the cards on a table.
She claims that it's rude for someone to openly say that they wouldn't date a person who smells bad. Maybe it's just my own personality here, but in several conversations IRL I've openly told people that bad hygiene is a deal breaker. Honestly, it's a good thing when people are up-front about their deal breakers. It saves everyone a lot of time and heartache, because you know not to even pursue someone who is turned off by one of your traits.
Regarding Spongebob's tranny chaser son, Mack:
View attachment 1553019 View attachment 1553021
Remember everyone, sexual harassment is okay if the victim doesn't share your views.
It's funny how they play the victim game like this.
It's not about who got harassed more, it's the fact that the harassment happened, numb-nuts.
Let us all ignore the fact that she never harassed anyone, never threatened anyone with physical harm, never told anyone to die.
We shall all respond to her right to disagree with harassment, threats and abuse. How dare she handle this in a civil manner.
Edit:
Also, watching this guy spit the truth at these people if fucking funny as shit. Seems to be a good friend of the victim.
View attachment 1553032
This fuckwit's argument is pure whataboutism. He's basically saying that because trannies get into slapfights online constantly, it's okay for a straight man to harass a lesbian for weeks on end. Did he forget that homophobia is a thing? Lesbians already get harassed-- they know what it feels like without some soy prick a-logging them on behalf of trannies.
Even if she wasn't a lesbian, the logic of "x group experiences [insert injustice] all the time, so it's 'fair' when it happens to anyone else," is patently retarded. It's like saying, "men get murdered more than women, therefore a person who murdered a woman isn't committing a crime, they're just making things even." What the hell is so hard about opposing bad shit regardless of who it happens to?
Furthermore, he clearly wasn't just "calling her out" because many of his comments had
nothing to do with trans rights. How is speculating on the health of her marriage, insulting her artwork, and saying misogynistic shit about her "yeasty snail trail" in
any way related to that? Also, aren't call-outs supposed to be public? Sure, his crazy tirade is public
now, but if his intention was to make an altruistic "call-out" why was he too chickenshit to tweet it?
This reads to me like he's either having a manic episode or jerking off to the thought of tormenting this woman, although the former is unlikely considering that this went on for
over two weeks. That would be an unusually long autistic temper tantrum.