Crime Officer-involved shooting under investigation in Kenosha - Get ready for more riots... there's video

Officer-involved shooting under investigation in Kenosha

KENOSHA, Wis. (CBS 58 ) -- An officer-involved shooting investigation is underway in Kenosha on Sunday, Aug. 23.

The shooting happened near 28th Avenue and 40th Street around 5:11 p.m., after officers were called for a "domestic incident."

According to police, officers provided immediate aid to the person. They were transported via Flight for Life to Froedtert in Milwaukee for treatment. The person is in serious condition.

A large crowd gathered near the scene following the shooting.

Kenosha Sheriff’s Department and Wisconsin State Patrol were requested immediately so that the scene could be turned over to an agency other than Kenosha police.

The Wisconsin Department of Justice (DOJ), Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI) will handle the investigation.

 
Even the (((ADL))) couldn't find evidence that Kyle was tied to any kind of extremists
Holy shit. I'm legitimately stunned the ADL of all people would actually step forward and say this. They're absolutely desperate for evidence of white supremacists and hate groups and this could have been a grand opportunity for them to wrap it up in a little bullshit and cry "nazi!"

This should immediately perk up the ears of the journalists and shit-stirrers beating the "nazi" drum on this one. The cynic in me says this is a signal to the media to cool it and back off.
 
If even an absolute piece of shit tankie like vaush admits that there is a possibility that Kenosha Kyle acted in self defence, then I have no doubt the boy will walk
also fuck slate and their pearlcluthing, "It is almost dizzying to count all the ways Rittenhouse appears to have broken the law on Tuesday" fucking dizzying? really?mayhaps try huffing less of own farts, you wont get dizzy so much, and won't write such garbage
 
Watching the footage, I gotta wonder how dumb the third guy was. He literally watches Kyle blast two dumbasses, hesitates for a second then just runs at the guy who still has the gun. What did he think was gonna happen?

I know there's some who would say he didn't deserve to get shot, even though he was aiming his own gun at Kyle, but if you metaphorically kick a bear, is it really the bear's fault when you get mauled?

Also for the twit who got shot in the heart, I wanna hear this at his funeral

 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pocket Dragoon
I like how the fake paramedic (guy who got his arm blown off) said he regrets hesitating and not shooting rittenhouse.

No hesitation, ya know, like the cops he was protesting against. The cops he called for once he got shot. Thats why cops pull the trigger, so they dont get shot.
 
I like how the fake paramedic (guy who got his arm blown off) said he regrets hesitating and not shooting rittenhouse.

No hesitation, ya know, like the cops he was protesting against. The cops he called for once he got shot. Thats why cops pull the trigger, so they dont get shot.
And you just know if that guy had actually managed to shoot and kill Rittenhouse he'd be celebrated by the woke as the One True Good Guy With A Gun, taking down those nasty white supremacists. Ironically, they'd be all for the second amendment then.

Ignoring the fact the guy was a convicted felon and therefore was committing a crime by having a gun in the first place. I wonder if he'll see any sort of prosecution for that tiny little fucky-wucky...
 
One of the guys who got shot(the wife beater) is now being posthumously metooed.

FB_IMG_1598619340799.jpg
 

The Conservative Defense of Kyle Rittenhouse Is Dangerous Nonsense


On Tuesday night, 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse allegedly shot three people in Kenosha, Wisconsin, with an AR-15-style rifle, killing two. Videos of the event tell us an incomplete story of what, exactly, happened that night. But they appear to clearly show this much: Rittenhouse traveled to the protests in illegal possession of an assault weapon to act as a vigilante. He placed himself at the center of the violence, then escalated it by shooting a man in the head. Minutes later, he shot two more people who appeared to be trying to disarm him, then fled across state lines. For this bloody spree, prosecutors charged Rittenhouse with first-degree intentional homicide. In short, a teenager obsessed with law enforcement decided to play the role of a cop and wound up, according to law enforcement, committing murder.


Some on the right, however, sees Rittenhouse differently. As footage of the incident emerged, conservative media figures began crafting a counternarrative in which the teenager is not a delusional vigilante but a well-intentioned if overzealous patriot who shot two violent assailants in self-defense. Rittenhouse, they suggest, is essentially a martyr who took action because Democrats would not let police do their jobs. This narrative rests on a racist belief, deeply rooted in American history, that white people must sometimes break the law to enforce it. The near-instant rehabilitation of Rittenhouse on the right should remind us that white Americans’ most heinous acts of violence can always be justified by their ideological allies.

Kenosha’s protests began on Sunday after Officer Rusten Sheskey, who is white, repeatedly shot Jacob Blake, who is Black, in the back in front of his children. Video indicates that Blake was walking away from Sheskey when the officer began shooting. He appeared to pose no threat. Blake is alive, but is reportedly paralyzed from the waist down. A mix of peaceful protests and riots broke out across the city, which is majority white but has a sizable Black community. By Tuesday, men carrying firearms who identified as members of a private militia stood outside local businesses, allegedly to protect them. A videoshows Kenosha police handing water to these gunmen—including Rittenhouse—telling them: “We appreciate you guys, we really do.”


Rittenhouse, who traveled to Kenosha from Illinois, initially joined this putative militia but later peeled off. A video later in the evening showed him being chased by a group of Black and white protesters into a parking lot. Someone else fired a gun into the air, and Joseph Rosenbaum lunged at the armed teenager. Rittenhouse responded by firing four times, shooting Rosenbaum in the head and killing him. He then fled the scene. Protesters pursued him as one shouted, “That’s the shooter!” Rittenhouse tripped, and multiple people made an apparent attempt to disarm him. He fired four shots. One bullet hit Anthony Huber in the chest, killing him; he was wielding a skateboard, which he seemed to use to try to subdue Rittenhouse. The other bullet hit Gaige Grosskreutz in the arm; he was holding a handgun, though not aiming it at anyone. Rittenhouse then walked past a group of police officers—the beginning of his flight back to Illinois. They did not stop him.


It is almost dizzying to count all the ways Rittenhouse appears to have broken the law on Tuesday. He allegedly twice drove across state lines carrying a firearm he was not legally permitted to possess. He then illegally brandished this firearm in the streets. He violated the Kenosha curfew that provided the basis for police to arrest protesters. He fled out of state after shooting three people. And, most obviously, he killed two protesters. The footage indicates that two—and possibly all three—of Rittenhouse’s victims were trying to disarm him.

And yet, almost as soon as video of the shootings emerged, conservative media began to defend Rittenhouse. They mockedHuber for using a skateboard to “attack a man packing a rifle.” Erick Erickson saidRittenhouse was “not the bad guy” because he “was firing on people who were attacking him.” Fox News guests asserted that Rittenhouse effected “vigilante justice” because he filled “a void” left by police. And all these claims built toward the inevitable conclusion: Rittenhouse didn’t commit first-degree intentional homicide; he didn’t even commit murder at all. He was merely defending himself against a pack of thugs hellbent on beating him, possibly to death, because he tried to keep the peace. In Tucker Carlson’s words: “How shocked are we that 17-year-olds with rifles decided they had to maintain order when no one else would?”


This narrative transforms Rittenhouse from an unstable killer to a Second Amendment hero. And you need only accept a few fictions to buy into it. First, you must believe that the protesters chasing down Rittenhouse and attempting to wrest his gun away were not trying to prevent further bloodshed, but simply to brutalize him. Second, you must agree that even if these protesters were trying to confiscate Rittenhouse’s gun, they were wrong to do so, because they were the vicious lawbreakers and he was the vulnerable peacekeeper. Third, you must embrace a definition of self-defense so capacious that it allows a gunman to legally shoot a civilian dead when that civilian is trying to seize a weapon the gunman has used to kill someone. Or, as the New York Times’ Jamelle Bouie put it, “if someone is trying to stop you after you killed someone, you can continue shooting and killing in ‘self-defense.’ ”


It is much easier to accept the first two propositions if you are predisposed to believe that white people are more likely to uphold the law and Black people are more likely to break it. Like many protesters in Kenosha, Rittenhouse’s victims were white. But they were part of a diverse group that pursued the 17-year-old in an apparent effort to stop him from shooting more people. That group included many Black people, who were also imperiled when Rittenhouse tripped and fired his weapon indiscriminately. The claim that these protesters had a malign plan to assault or kill Rittenhouse, rather than disarm him, rests on the racist assumption that a white vigilante’s motives must be purer than a racially diverse group of demonstrators.


The third proposition—that the gunman was merely defending himself—rests on a chilling vision of self-defense that would excuse homicide and limit civilians’ ability to forestall future shootings. Wisconsin law only licensed Rittenhouse to shoot his pursuers to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm. The video of the second shooting makes it quite clear this did not happen. While the circumstances surrounding the first shooting remain murky, it is evident from the footage that Rittenhouse ran away carrying his rifle, pursued by protesters who rightly believed he might shoot more people. When he tripped, his pursuers immediately tried to seize his gun. These are not the actions of thugs eager to inflict bodily harm, but of good Samaritans trying to stop what looked like the beginning of a mass shooting.


Indeed, the argument for self-defense boils down to this: If civilians try to seize a weapon from a gunman who just shot somebody in the head, that gunman has a right to shoot them. If this theory were legally correct—thankfully, it isn’t—then a person who tries to grab a mass shooter’s gun may be legally killed by the shooter himself. Rittenhouse ultimately proved to be a mass shooter, one in illegal possession of a firearm, a gun that police allowed him to carry even after he had apparently shot three people a block in front of their squad cars. The cops who ordered protesters to disperse for violating curfew did not order an obviously underage teen to put down his assault weapon. Tucker Carlson got it backward; the question here is why anyone is shocked that protesters tried to disarm a vigilante when law enforcement refused.


After all, as University of Washington professor Dan Berger pointed out after the Charlottesville, Virginia, catastrophe, police have a lengthy history of complicity with right-wing insurgents. American law enforcement have viewed far-right paramilitary groups as allies in the fight against true subversives and radicals, such as the civil rights demonstrators of the 1960s. They assume that white gunmen toting assault weapons who speak favorably of law enforcement are more trustworthy and peaceable than racially diverse protesters who criticize the cops.

When officers thanked Kenosha’s militia while threatening to arrest protesters—even though the militia and the protesters were both violating curfew—they carried on this tradition. When Kenosha Police Chief Daniel Miskinis blamed protesters for their own deaths because they broke curfew, he carried on this tradition. When officers let Rittenhouse walk past them, illegally armed with a gun he had just used to kill two men and injure another, and drive back to Illinois, they carried on this tradition, too. These officers perceived a racially diverse group of demonstrators to be more of a threat than a cadre of heavily armed white men. It is not difficult to guess why.

After Jacob Blake’s shooting, conservative media hunted for evidence that might exonerate the officer, fixating on the presence of a knife in Blake’s car. After Rittenhouse shot three protesters, the right hunted for evidence that might exonerate the shooter, settling on the fantasy that those protesters were the real vigilantes who got what was coming to them. The lesson here is simple: A white man with a gun is innocent until proved guilty; his victims are guilty until proved innocent. It is a lesson tragically embedded in American history, and one that racist far-right militias around the country will surely take to heart this week.
Tl;dr They want you dead.
lol every leftist martyr turns out to be a total scumbag
saint trayvon turned out to be a violent druggie
pink floyd assaulted preggo woman, and also was a druggie
now they have added a pedo to their panteon
every day left proves more to be the force of evil
I had this thought almost verbatim this morning.
 
Holy shit. I'm legitimately stunned the ADL of all people would actually step forward and say this. They're absolutely desperate for evidence of white supremacists and hate groups and this could have been a grand opportunity for them to wrap it up in a little bullshit and cry "nazi!"

This should immediately perk up the ears of the journalists and shit-stirrers beating the "nazi" drum on this one. The cynic in me says this is a signal to the media to cool it and back off.
So who has 'ADL defined as a hate group by SPLC' on their 2020 bingo card?
 
These are not the actions of thugs eager to inflict bodily harm, but of good Samaritans trying to stop what looked like the beginning of a mass shooting.

I love the "hE wAs A mAsS sHoOtEr!" claims. If he was intending to kill as many commies as possible, there would be 20+ bodies in the street. With his great aim and nerves of steel, the soyboy harvest would have been sudden and bloody.

I need to find that video of the guy in Texas that tried to protect his store with a bat or machete and got massively curbstomped. It'd be nice to show a side by side of what happens with or without the second amendment.
 
After Jacob Blake’s shooting, conservative media hunted for evidence [...] After Rittenhouse shot three protesters, the right hunted for evidence...
Ugh! Those damn right-wing conservatives looking for evidence! And what did that evidence show, perchance? That Blake, who had a warrant for rape, fought with the cops, ignored their warnings, and decided to reach into his car. That Rittenhouse was attacked by a mob and clearly acting in self defense. So, naturally, evidence = white supremacy. Or something.
 
Dont think this was posted yet. Some additional analysis of the first incident. Long video so just posting the link.

Goes into a little bit more detail of that first handgun shot from an unknown protestor as rittenhouse is running from the "shoot me nigga" guy. Adds a little bit more to the self defense case of the first shooting.

Perhaps I missed it, but it is still unknown why the "shoot me nigga" guy was chasing rittenhouse in the first place?

 
One of the best things to come out of this is all the meme edits.

1598628708726.png


EgZ-8sCWsAIzweg.jpeg


20200827_211949.jpg


1598532417929.png

image0.png


Also I like how advocates for police reform are using examples like the original shooting that started this off. Instead of Breonna Taylor (police no knock raided, the husband thought it was robbery and responded as such the cops open fire and killed Breonna a Black EMT worker), or that guy that got shot in Reno on the ground. If you want examples of police abuse and fuck ups it is out there. Like shit there are plenty of examples of flash-banged babies n such.
 
Last edited:
So, we all saw the Kenosha Kid copy/paste, right? The Internet delivers the follow-up:
EDIT: Can I get a recap of who got shot where and who lived and died? Its hard to keep criminal scum like this straight.
Downloaded it in case the commies try to strike and flag the video.
















Lyrics for the thread sing along.
lyrics.PNG
Really hope this kid beats the charges.

Kyle "don't touch my" Rittenhouse has provided some of the best memes this year, single handedly killed two commies (one a chosen pedophile) and probably permanently crippled a third. Not to go all boomer on you all but this kid has almost restored my faith in the youth of today. The future might be brighter than I previously thought, if for every 3 socialist genderqueer libshits we have 1 Kyle Rittenhouse
 
Also I like how advocates for police reform are using examples like the original shooting that started this off. Instead of Breonna Taylor (police no knock raided, the husband thought it was robbery and responded as such the chops open fire and killed Breonna a Black EMT worker), or that guy that got shot in Reno on the ground. If you want examples of police abuse and fuck ups its out there. Like shit there are plenty of examples of flashbanged babies n such.

This has crossed my mind as well. All I can think is that if they pick something actually horrifying and unambiguous everyone on the right will be on the same side, whereas if they focus on something ambiguous they'll be able to draw the other side out to oppose them, and then they can have the fight they want where they can use their control of institutions and the media to paint conservatives as pure evil.
 
Last edited:
Also I like how advocates for police reform are using examples like the original shooting that started this off. Instead of Breonna Taylor (police no knock raided, the husband thought it was robbery and responded as such the chops open fire and killed Breonna a Black EMT worker), or that guy that got shot in Reno on the ground. If you want examples of police abuse and fuck ups its out there. Like shit there are plenty of examples of flashbanged babies n such.
This sentiment and the fact that they even attempted to make Rayshard Brooks a martyr is what leads me to believe none of these people, whether in leadership among the protesters or shilling for them in the media, actually want any kind of reform, and this is all about pushing a narrative that makes the black vote feel super persecuted and extra-threatened so they'll show up for Democrats this November.
 
lol they fucking charged him with premeditated murder. This is clearly intended to make him walk because after seeing video there's no fucking way this was premeditated. Either that or the prosecutor is a fucking retard. Zimmerman was charged with 1st Degree Murder and he went out with a gun and ignored the 911 callers directions.

This was during a violent riot peaceful protest and he killed a pedophile, a domestic abuser and shot a burglar in the arm. Yeah, the jury is going to be REAL sympathetic.
 
lol they fucking charged him with premeditated murder. This is clearly intended to make him walk because after seeing video there's no fucking way this was premeditated. Either that or the prosecutor is a fucking retard. Zimmerman was charged with 1st Degree Murder and he went out with a gun and ignored the 911 callers directions.

This was during a violent riot peaceful protest and he killed a pedophile, a domestic abuser and shot a burglar in the arm. Yeah, the jury is going to be REAL sympathetic.
They're overcharging Chauvin & his accomplices too, I dunno what it is about media fluffing that leads prosecutors to think they'll be the first one ever to come out ahead by turning a murder case into a scalp-hunting contest/public spectacle. Sucks for Minneapolis and Kenosha when there's an inevitable 2nd round of rioting when the not guilty verdict comes in.
 
Back