U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Rittenhouse Effect is maybe what Kyle will be famous for? Who fucking knows.

"Rittenhouse effect", that would be a good entry for KnowYourMeme, Encyclopedia Dramatica, Wikipedia,... ;-)
It has brought even more attention to the fact that BLAntifa is full of felons and perverts. Has there yet been an arrest/death, of a good and honest /mentally healthy/not depraved protestor ? . There probably
has but the high profile ones are all scum and the black martyrs are no better. They are all literally the scum of the earth and hated by eveyone who is not like them.

We got to give a big thanks and kudos to the guys who discovered the criminal past of these losers, otherwise we wouldn't have known then Joseph Rosenbaum was a pedo.
 
This is pretty much on point.
The obvious endgame for deconstructionism is the deconstruction of itself. Nobody in the field wants to do that, though because then the party's over.

Not yet, at least. When existing power structures are destroyed then Critical Theory is allowed to go critical (forgive me) and meltdown completely. At that point it has done its job and further allowing it would be counter-productive to you building your own new power structures.

It is a very dangerous game - unable to take power through conventional means (either democratically or direct military strength), the revolutionary force attempts to weaken and destroy the existing power structure from within. Like termites. They combine this with trying to position themselves to fill the vacuum in place of the old power-holders.

Positioning yourself to take power can be done either through massing your own insurgency forces or through politically being in place to take over the now decapitated power structure simply becoming the new king. (Pelosi method if Trump and Pence were removed from office). Either route usually results in huge collateral damage for the ordinary citizens. And in the "seize existing power structures" method also usually results in killing off the revolutionaries who put you there because you told them they were fighting to change things for themselves and they'll get angry when you appear not to do that. I'd use the Brownshirts in Nazi Germany as an example of that but @Evo would probably correct me on it somehow. ;)
 
People keep telling me to stop bringing up their criminal records because they're irrelevant and no reason to kill them.

Kyle also had no right to carry a gun and play hero.
Wrong and clearly not someone from the Midwest or Wisconsin. Long guns are legally allowed to be open carried by anyone who’s 16-17. Kyle was a gun owner for years, and gun owners have to know the law. If Kyle had no right to play hero, couldn’t you say the same for Skate or die and the manlet pedo even if you accept the bs narrative the left is peddling? Ask yourself why you need to smear Rittenhouse if he’s as heinous as you claim. No one was defending Nicholas Cruz when he gunned down those kids in Parkland, so obviously there’s a reason that the right is so energized over this.
 
and you better not make a post about cannons being spiked
but spiking the cannons is a specific process that involves "spiking" the fuse/flash/percussion hole with an iron nail and smacking it with a sledge hammer to prevent firing :^)

Of course with time this proscess is usually reversible, its just to prevent quick and immidiate use of your artillery by the enemy when youve been BTFO and cant take it with you.
 
What really gets me is the fact that "intersectionalism" is SO FUCKING CLOSE but just barely misses the mark. Concepts like power and privilege can be explored in the context of overlapping identities like race and gender. But they overlook the context in which these general principles apply. A black man has a great degree of power when discussing racial politics due to cognitive biases (ie. "He's black so he totally knows more about racism than whitey over there."). Position in society also provides benefits regardless of the aforementioned traits as well. This is something intersectionality is perfectly capable of studying, but doesn't.

Yeah, the logical conclusion of intersectionality should be "people have different life experiences, advantages, and disadvantages, so it's important to have empathy for everyone and consider their individual circumstances before making judgements". Instead it gets used as a bludgeon by people who claim victimhood along a certain axis (generally race or gender) to establish moral superiority, despite often having a ton of other socioeconomic or inherited advantages. Want to see what real lack of privilege looks like? It's the media turning "incels" into a domestic terrorist punching bag, as they're a group of depressed, low-iq, unattractive men who can't claim victim status on any basis that woke society cares about.
 
Intelligence doesn't always correspond to pragmatism. A lot of SJW types are actually quite intelligent, perhaps to a fault. The problem is that they are so good at grasping abstract concepts that they lose their grip on reality.
I feel like people are being too generous with the term "intelligent" here. If someone ignores their own senses in favor of propaganda, they are not intelligent. If someone favors feelings over facts, they are not intelligent. If someone continues to trust the media after decades of being provably, objectively lied to, they are not intelligent.

I don't care if someone can multiply six 5,000 digit numbers in their heads instantly. If they can't think for themselves, they're not intelligent. At best they're broken robots.
 
Yeah, the logical conclusion of intersectionality should be "people have different life experiences, advantages, and disadvantages, so it's important to have empathy for everyone and consider their individual circumstances before making judgements". Instead it gets used as a bludgeon by people who claim victimhood along a certain axis (generally race or gender) to establish moral superiority, despite often having a ton of other socioeconomic or inherited advantages. Want to see what real lack of privilege looks like? It's the media turning "incels" into a domestic terrorist punching bag, as they're a group of depressed, low-iq, unattractive men who can't claim victim status on any basis that woke society cares about.

The local conclusion of intersectionality is individualism. Which is something Americans figured out about 300 years ago.
 
What would you say to someone who thinks this kind of mentality is why the right lost the culture war and has found itself in this position? It's kinda a soft acquiescence. When you cede ground, that ground is taken, fortified, and used against you. Mind you, I'm definitely not saying people should OD on redpills and then vomit them up on whoever is unfortunate to lend them an ear. It's important to meet people where they are..

Phew sperging over

First Im not right wing. Nor am I left. Second I believe in getting people on my side via apolitical means. I have a neighbor who needs back surgery back lacks the money. If I had the money Id help in exchange for help for other favors. Like support for running for town council. Most people dont get abstract ideas. They just don't.

Could yo I clarify the question bit further? I believe in forming small tribes (no more then the Dunbar limit allows) as a mutal aid group. Anything beyond that isnt my concern.

Funny thing if everyone did this then many world views causing many issues in america will cease having power due to the fragmentation result from going tribal.
 
Yes, because we were all wondering why a dude in Texas didn't own a gun and had to settle for a sword.
Swords are more fun.

I nean, shooting a guy is shooting a guy but with a sword you can just cut off bits of your opponent that annoy you, as opposed to outright killing them.
 
Yeah, the logical conclusion of intersectionality should be "people have different life experiences, advantages, and disadvantages, so it's important to have empathy for everyone and consider their individual circumstances before making judgements". Instead it gets used as a bludgeon by people who claim victimhood along a certain axis (generally race or gender) to establish moral superiority, despite often having a ton of other socioeconomic or inherited advantages. Want to see what real lack of privilege looks like? It's the media turning "incels" into a domestic terrorist punching bag, as they're a group of depressed, low-iq, unattractive men who can't claim victim status on any basis that woke society cares about.
I always found the incel thing hilariously fucked up. Imagine being denied a basic emotional need, having that lack of experience receiving said need become yet another reason to have that need denied to you, your situation being used as a means to mock you, and then being treated as a danger to society, all while the whole issue is being framed as something trivial (a simple lack of sex) when the real problem is much deeper and intrinsic to the human condition (a lack of emotional connection).
 
First Im not right wing. Nor am I left. Second I believe in getting people on my side via apolitical means. I have a neighbor who needs back surgery back lacks the money. If I had the money Id help in exchange for help for other favors. Like support for running for town council. Most people dont get abstract ideas. They just don't.

Could yo I clarify the question bit further? I believe in forming small tribes (no more then the Dunbar limit allows) as a mutal aid group. Anything beyond that isnt my concern.

Funny thing if everyone did this then many world views causing many issues in america will cease having power due to the fragmentation result from going tribal.
Imagine Kiwi Farms as a tribe. We could sit around fire at night snapping on all the lolcows we meet while drinking homemade wine.
 
Swords are more fun.

I nean, shooting a guy is shooting a guy but with a sword you can just cut off bits of your opponent that annoy you, as opposed to outright killing them.
The guy who got beaten up was a bugman who was a BLM simp and didn't even know how to wield a sword.
I can bet you good money the katana he had was a mall sword that would break upon impact; probably didn't even bother sharpening the damn thing, he didn't even have a good fighting stance.
you're better off trying to fight with a polearm or a Kendo wooden sword lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back