I agree with most of this aside from the working class part. Most working class folks (people who work 40+ hours have family etc) are the ones who hate the welfare state the hardest. There is a subset of them however that usually work part time jobs, with just enough hours to keep their government benefits. This is why when that $15hr minimum wage BS happens the started streaking about wanting less hours. Suddenly they were making too much money to get gibs, because they are too stupid to understand that gibs isn’t based on hours it’s based on income.
Though It is nice working where I do and listening to working class blacks bitch about how these “worthless projects niggas” are ruining a good thing.
Anecdotally, I know people who, at times, found it easier to be on welfare than work, because they had X many kids and business was too slow. For me the argument there is to give working people better raises rather than cut welfare, but 100 years ago fucking off outta the picture would have been unthinkable to most because that would have left the very real chance that your children and lover would starve to death.
Allegedly, this is also a factor in why black parenthood dropped so fast after de-segregation. I don't know all the details on that but if your wages are crap and you work full-time, yet the baby-mama down the street gets everything paid for for no reason? The morals of your community get eroded in real time if hard work isn't seen to be rewarded, and you can look at various 'welfare scroungers' in many European countries for more.
I don't really see this race war/balkanization shit going anywhere because there's literally no real injustice being done. BLM is built on a bunch of lies when in reality America is the most progressive, cosmopolitan, and possibly the least racist country in the world. I think actual serious injustice has to exist before the likelihood of war is realized, and most people recognize what America truly is. These BLM/antifa people are, in the end, sociopaths, bored kids, and a few narcissists jockying for social power.
America's founding principle was a pile of Dutch, English, and Germans casting aside their ancestral loyalties and working together to build something new, based on values, ideals, and mutual respect. Over time, this expanded steadily to include anyone of any race or religion.
For more than half of the USA's existence, Catholics were maligned for their subversive influence, and after that Germans, Japanese, Eastern Europeans, Chinese, and later Arabs were treated with suspicion. Nonetheless, the USA persisted with the logic that background
shouldn't matter, even those coming over and making good lives for themselves at the same exact time that their homelands waged war against America.
No other nation has this. It would be considered suicidally forgiving. 100 years ago the WASPs ran the show, but now have resoundingly faded away into the background. No other ruling class would be so willingly supplanted, because almost every other society has its flag planted and defined by those ethnic and religious markers.
These '''''rebels''''' are so coddled they don't realise how generous America has been to so many. Most countries are just vehicles to advance the cause of its nation, its dominant ethnic group. And that nation existed long before the country (Ireland, Finland, Russia, Poland, France, China, Thailand, Ethiopia, Oman, etc) and will probably survive that country's future collapse. Some of those I listed had been conquered and subjugated plenty, but it was because the nations had a sense of self beyond the state that made those identities so robust.
Ethnic cleansing still happens today because nations feel threatened, and find if a minority group gets too big they may usurp the infrastructure out of said nation's hands. Look at Lebanon, or almost any sub-saharan african country. The nations within that state are always fighting over who controls the whole thing.
But for America? the country and the nation are one and the same. You cannot have a USA grounded in communist ideology, or monarchism, or fascism because then what is an American without those core founding principles? The term becomes meaningless-- and that's actually probably where you get these open borders fanatics from. They don't appreciate the US' ideological glue, so figure demography is nothing more than a cudgel with which to procure power.
Maybe you can argue white and black Americans who's ancestors settled before 1776 have no other stake by now, but there cannot be an American as we know it today without the USA as a country. This is why these revolutionaries are retarded and dangerous, because if they chip away at the foundations hard enough without having a cast-iron replacement which is as impossibly accomodating as the USA is (read: certainly not anarcho-communism) then the whole make-believe game implodes. This is what you're seeing with the rise of id-pol. Without the flag to rally around, Americans rally around their tribal status, but because America traditionally discouraged this, the tribes become warped; as a Latino, or a White, or a Black... none of which are viable identity markers in Africa or Latin America or Europe, but are as good as its gonna get in post-collapse America, certainly better than identifying first as a Feminist or a Sexual Minority.
TL;DR Antifa/BLM are retarded because they're condemning America for racism when its one of the few countries in history to at least TRY to leave tribal affiliation at the door for mutual benefit. The pseudo-intellectuals think they can use id-pol like a tool to further their agenda, thinking everybody else is too stupid not to think of it first, when in actuality, it's like a fish hammering at cracked glass on the tank, believing if the tank is smashed it can reform the shards into a more fashionable wall in the split seconds before all the water rushes out.
