I have a separate explanation, but its about equally as callous. "Kill enough of them, and they'll stop resisting". Effectively, "We are supposedly aiming at specific targets, but in reality are just blowing up randos because we believe that if enough of them die they'll all eventually stop fighting".
That only works if you kill everyone, or over 10% of people. Just popping one or two people randomly doesn't do that, it makes them angrier.
I never said it was a good plan. But it fits depressingly well with Obama's entire... dare I even use the term "Foreign policy".
I'm not sure it wasn't intentional. His whole plan seemed to be to fuck up the region as much as possible to cause mass migration into Europe. They specifically targeted all the countries that were stopping migrants from going across the Mediterranean.
Then to respond, if it were Obama alone making the decisions I think you'd have a good point. But he isn't, his desires are filtered through several layers of military bureaucracy. And, as you put it, the mans a charismatic sociopath. They don't tend to care much for delayed gratification. So, seeing no way to get immediate results when his staff tell him "We don't know their locations exactly enough to kill them right off the bat", he just goes "Eh bomb them, we'll hit one of them eventually".
The buried lede there is that 1/3 of all Green Party voters are voting Trump.
It's not surprising the level of projection they have, blaming Trump for pantifa violence. After all, there are two flavors of lefty memes, wall of text, and taking a right wing meme, scribbling out party references, and swapping them.
Saved. Dunno if it's the preferred tool, but a quick google search led me to Twitter Video Downloader. I may be new, but I've lurked long enough to see tweets get nuked between the "lol, don't know how to archive" post and the first person to try, so please bookmark that link if you can't remember it.
