Culture Tranny News Megathread - Hot tranny newds
- Thread starter trannyfucker
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2018
Alright, now I wonder, is one of them bullshitting to keep the family together? Usually when an adult comes out, they have kids, an SO, and that all goes to complete shit. The SO feels betrayed/lied to for decades, the kids wonder if their parent even loved them/if they were their parent, then you have the separation and all the mess that comes with that.
The way the wife tells her story, about how she suspected her husband was transgender makes it seem like she planned to become a "lesbian" to keep them together? It's too convenient that a) both of them would be LGBT and b) that the consequence of this would be them sticking together. If an adult comes out as gay, that's often the cue for them to go find someone else to live their life with, not their transitioning SO.
Either a massive co-incidence, or someone tried to save the family.
The way the wife tells her story, about how she suspected her husband was transgender makes it seem like she planned to become a "lesbian" to keep them together? It's too convenient that a) both of them would be LGBT and b) that the consequence of this would be them sticking together. If an adult comes out as gay, that's often the cue for them to go find someone else to live their life with, not their transitioning SO.
Either a massive co-incidence, or someone tried to save the family.
The husband, who apparently was so obvious that his wife suspected that he was trans and started googling it...which leads to my above speculation.
So which one trooned out? They both look androgynous and hideous in that photo.
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2020
Maybe he's "gay" in the same way his parents are and will find a nice fakeboi girlfriend.
Prolego
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2020
Nicely played by the wife. He must be furious inside. He was going to be the special one in the family, the centre of all the attention at all the parties, the most oppressed ever, and now he's not. Lesbian wife matches tranny, and both are trumped by twelve year old gay son. Jenni and the boys have no intention of being his woke crutch, it's an equal marriage and he'll have to pull his weight all the way.
Oh God, these dreary cliches again. My mum liked musicals. I'd join in with her when I was little singing along to Judy Garland. It's just music. It doesn't turn you gay and it's not a secret sign you're gay.
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2016
"'We'd suspected Morgan was gay since he was about two,' said Jenni."
Who the hell sits around thinking about their TWO year olds sexuality?
Who the hell sits around thinking about their TWO year olds sexuality?
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
"'We wanted Morgan to be gay since he was about two,' said Jenni."
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2019
https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2020/09/...n-transgender-ban-scientific-evidence-letter/ (`https://archive.vn/IHbE9`)
World Rugby told its heinous ban on trans women ‘has no scientific basis’ and ‘will only hurt trans people’ by leading academics
A proposed World Rugby ban on trans women has been criticised by more than 80 leading academics, who say there is “no evidence” to support it.
In a wide-ranging letter, 84 leading academics working across sport, public health and sociology question the scientific justification for World Rugby’s reported proposal to ban trans women from competing on women’s teams.
“We are opposed to World Rugby’s proposed ban of an entire population group from playing women’s rugby: non-binary people assumed male at birth and transgender women,” said the letter, reported by The Guardian Tuesday (September 1).
“There is no peer-reviewed, scientific evidence to justify a ban which would only be harmful to trans and gender diverse people.
The group of academics goes on to say that the proposed policy would not just affect a “fringe population”, and cites data from the American Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that 3.4 per cent of American students are gender diverse.
“To develop appropriate guidelines requires ongoing work with transgender athletes and community representatives, and engagement with rigours, peer-reviewed evidence,” it adds.
“These guidelines fail on both accounts.”
A draft World Rugby document, leaked last month, argued that trans women should be prevented from playing alongside cis women because of their “significant” physical advantage. Trans men would still be allowed to play alongside cis men.
The proposed ban comes after the global governing body invited “expert voices”, including anti-trans campaign group Fair Play For Women, to participate in a forum about the role of trans people in the sport earlier this year.
The sports body defended its process while responding to the letter, insisting that it has only tried to balance “inclusion, safety and fairness”.
Speaking to PinkNews in July, LGBT+ sport group Athlete Ally urged World Rugby to “draw from already existing inclusion policies developed by medical experts and designed to promote safety and fairness for all, such as the IOC guidelines which have been in place for years without issue”.
“Trans women play sports for the same reason cisgender women do: for the love of the game, and the love of the lifelong community it brings,” the organisation added.
“No one should be denied the lifesaving power of sport.”
Speaking at the World Rugby London forum earlier this year, rugby player and trans man Verity Smith said changes to the current policy – which is based on the rules introduced by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in 2003 – would risk shutting trans players out of the sport altogether.
“I don’t think it”s dangerous,” Smith told Sky News at the time.
“Sport is for everybody, I’ve had to play women over a foot taller than me. I’ve had to play women a lot bigger size-wise than me. So why would it be a danger?”
“We all go into sport, rugby especially, knowing that it’s a contact sport. When you go into international games, look at your scrum half, look at your front row, over a foot and a half difference sometimes.”
PinkNews has contacted World Rugby for comment.
World Rugby told its heinous ban on trans women ‘has no scientific basis’ and ‘will only hurt trans people’ by leading academics
A proposed World Rugby ban on trans women has been criticised by more than 80 leading academics, who say there is “no evidence” to support it.
In a wide-ranging letter, 84 leading academics working across sport, public health and sociology question the scientific justification for World Rugby’s reported proposal to ban trans women from competing on women’s teams.
“We are opposed to World Rugby’s proposed ban of an entire population group from playing women’s rugby: non-binary people assumed male at birth and transgender women,” said the letter, reported by The Guardian Tuesday (September 1).
“There is no peer-reviewed, scientific evidence to justify a ban which would only be harmful to trans and gender diverse people.
The group of academics goes on to say that the proposed policy would not just affect a “fringe population”, and cites data from the American Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that 3.4 per cent of American students are gender diverse.
“To develop appropriate guidelines requires ongoing work with transgender athletes and community representatives, and engagement with rigours, peer-reviewed evidence,” it adds.
“These guidelines fail on both accounts.”
A draft World Rugby document, leaked last month, argued that trans women should be prevented from playing alongside cis women because of their “significant” physical advantage. Trans men would still be allowed to play alongside cis men.
The proposed ban comes after the global governing body invited “expert voices”, including anti-trans campaign group Fair Play For Women, to participate in a forum about the role of trans people in the sport earlier this year.
The sports body defended its process while responding to the letter, insisting that it has only tried to balance “inclusion, safety and fairness”.
Speaking to PinkNews in July, LGBT+ sport group Athlete Ally urged World Rugby to “draw from already existing inclusion policies developed by medical experts and designed to promote safety and fairness for all, such as the IOC guidelines which have been in place for years without issue”.
“Trans women play sports for the same reason cisgender women do: for the love of the game, and the love of the lifelong community it brings,” the organisation added.
“No one should be denied the lifesaving power of sport.”
Speaking at the World Rugby London forum earlier this year, rugby player and trans man Verity Smith said changes to the current policy – which is based on the rules introduced by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) in 2003 – would risk shutting trans players out of the sport altogether.
“I don’t think it”s dangerous,” Smith told Sky News at the time.
“Sport is for everybody, I’ve had to play women over a foot taller than me. I’ve had to play women a lot bigger size-wise than me. So why would it be a danger?”
“We all go into sport, rugby especially, knowing that it’s a contact sport. When you go into international games, look at your scrum half, look at your front row, over a foot and a half difference sometimes.”
PinkNews has contacted World Rugby for comment.
Calculus
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2018
No biology though hmmm...
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2015
GOOD! Troon cheaters should be excluded from all sports.
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2020
This is written by our lolcow Katelyn Burns.
TL;DR When bottom surgery is botched, surgeon blames everyone and everything except themselves, and will essentially ignore the patients complaints.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Well, good. Based World Rugby.
Der weiße Teufel
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 18, 2019
Nobody is stopping them from playing with the other men, or maybe they can just create their own tournaments or whatever. They always act as if they are BANNED forever from participating in ANY sport. Clearly this is not about them wanting to enjoy that sport, they just want to push normal women around without consequences (or rather, even getting praised for it).
mister butafuco
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2020
This is the problem. 'Research' and 'experts' in this field are psychologists and gender studies types. I had a spat with someone who reckoned that TW have no sporting advantage and pointed me towards some 'research'. It was in fact a review of 8 papers. A review of 8 papers in pretty much every other field of science would not get published. Of the 8 papers, 6 were about TW's experience and participation in sport. Only 2 were about whether TW retained male-advantage after taking T-blockers. Both papers concluded that T-blockade did not completely reverse male advantage, but the reviewers chose to brush over this and conclude that TW are good to go in women's sport.
People who actually research sports science know what causes injuries in rugby: big collisions. Big collisions are caused by big speeds and big mass. We know that TW retain their size and to some extent their muscle mass even with T-blockers. People who claim that there is 'no evidence' are just splitting hairs and claim that research on general TW will not apply to athletes and vice versa, the research in one sport will not apply to another sport, etc. They will not be happy until they see a woman killed on the field and then they will claim that it is a one-off and more research is needed.
Also, noone has told be where non-binary people are to play now that sex doesn't matter. Can they only play against other NBs or do they just pick a side?
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2020
How generous of PinkNews to take a brief respite from promoting pederasty to demand that TIMs be allowed to cripple and kill women on the field. They truly are the best allies troons could hope for.
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2019
Fractal Lifeform
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
Quiet based
. I hope feminists all get BTFO by Troons.
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2014
Neither Pinkfakenews nor The Guardian, which Pinkfakenews sourced from, links the letter or identify the 84 retards, I mean academics.
"The [butcher and the troon] had spoken on Skype a few months before the surgery but never had an in-person pre-op appointment. Carlie says she saw the doctor briefly before being wheeled into the operating room, but didn’t see Dr. Rumer again during her three days of recovery in the hospital. Her follow-up appointment, a week after the surgery, was administered by a nurse. "
Caveat Emptor. Troons are so colossally, suicidally stupid that any sympathy towards them is immoral.
The article also mentions Dr. Daniel Dugi in Portland, which Philip DeLici (ADF) claims to be the one who operated on him.
Last edited:
diroama
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2019
2000 comments (all positive thanks to moderation) and 5000 reactions for this brave and stunning woman's Facebook announcement.
The rest of the announcements for women being taken on in a similar role on the same page? About 20 and 50 each respectively.
TopCat
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2013
Superdrug has launched a new range of sanitary products "for people who menstruate".
The plant-based sanitary towels and tampons, marketed under the brand name Luna, aims "to be as inclusive as possible", the company said.
The back of the box reads: "A person who menstruates will on average have over 400 periods and use around 11,000 period products in a lifetime.
“However, we understand periods are never average, and so we have created Luna, a range of period products that suit you as an individual.”
Many approved of the transgender-inclusive stance.
Blogger Grace Latter said: "Oh my goodness. I am so, so impressed by Superdrug today; not only are their own brand LUNA pads are entirely plant-based, on the back it says ‘a person who menstruates’.
Another person added on Twitter: "Plant-based, inclusive menstrual products? I am here for this! Great work, Superdrug."
A Superdrug spokesperson said: “At Superdrug, we champion inclusivity and diversity, and are committed to ensuring all of our employees, communities and customers feel seen and included when visiting one of our stores or purchasing one of our products.
“Therefore, we wanted Luna to be as inclusive as possible.
“When writing the copy for the products we were aware that there could be customers of this range who are currently transitioning from one sex to another or who identify as Non-Binary but will still be menstruating, alongside the women that use the products.
“We therefore felt ‘person’ was a more inclusive noun to use than ‘woman’.
“We are continuing to review all new products and the language we use throughout the business, to ensure we are being as inclusive as possible.”
Superdrug launches new sanitary pads for 'people who menstruate'
Superdrug has launched a new range of sanitary products "for people who menstruate".
www.standard.co.uk
barbellister
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2020
>for people who menstruate
Finally, a pad for the average Englishman.
Finally, a pad for the average Englishman.