- Joined
- Jul 25, 2019
How do you prove you donated? I've probably put $30 in BAT into this place, so I kinda want the silly internet sticker next time I donate.
(Can't find a good place to post and you were talking about it here.)
Post Ratings Discussion
- Thread starter Null
- Start date
(Can't find a good place to post and you were talking about it here.)
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2019
As far as I’m aware BAT doesn’t count and you have to message Null if you want to donate for the tag.
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2019
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2019
- Joined
- May 17, 2017
I dislike the lunacy rating. In my opinion it means what the poster is saying is lunacy. Like here's thisbecause you're talking like a crazy person, or some shit. Or you're a lunatic for talking about/bring up this topic/person/whatever. But I see most people, if not all, using it to rate who or what you're posting about is crazy, if that makes sense... I think it's a negative rating, like rating someone dumb or autistic. I just, really don't like it, but not enough to even care that much even though I wrote this all out, lol
tl;drgbq Stop calling me a lunatic!!! I'm not crazy - I'm not!!!!!!!
You need to talk to Zed about the "lunatic" rating, he knows all about it. And he's just adorable, especially with ironic "lol" usage!!!!!!!!!
(@zedkissed60 I'm really sorry. You can kick me next time you see me.)
We....twitch....have something in common. Tic. Besides the straightjacket....ticticgraunch....and huge doses of Thorazine. Take my advice...bangbangbangthud.....it's not worth it just for two stickers......aaaarghhhhshuddernoooooooooooo.
Edit: Devious? Eh?
(@zedkissed60 it's me, isn't it? Please to kick me right now)
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2017
I never got the point of the Lunacy rating. It's supposed to negrate what the poster has said directly because it is insane, but it's being used to denote third-party information that is insane. Frankly we have Dumb for the former and Horrifying for the latter and I've almost never had cause to use it. It doesn't do anything that the others don't already do.
Whereas an "X to doubt" or "F to pay respects" rating would at least say something new and save someone a post just saying "Sure, buddy" or "F", and get rid of low-content posts.
Whereas an "X to doubt" or "F to pay respects" rating would at least say something new and save someone a post just saying "Sure, buddy" or "F", and get rid of low-content posts.
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2019
I think it would help if it was more obvious what each of the ratings did. For example have it say "Winner (+1)" or "Lunacy (-1)" when you hover over the different Ratings that change your Reaction Score. In most cases people aren't trying to ruin one's precious "Reaction Score" by giving a post a lunacy rating because some of the crazed ramblings of a lolcow, they just want to point out the lunacy of one being loony. On a side note, I think Islamic Content has this issue too, where it's used to describe a third party as opposed to the original poster being Islamic in nature.
So I think having it be obvious would mitigate this issue. But like I said in my previous post:
So I think having it be obvious would mitigate this issue. But like I said in my previous post:
- Joined
- Mar 29, 2018
Can we get a fat/gunt rating for the deathfats and jannies who are fatties?
some Sketchy dude
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2020
I believe that was already addressed in another thread, with the consensus being no. Original suggestion was a corn rating, but the gunt was also suggested at some point too iircCan we get a fat/gunt rating for the deathfats and jannies who are fatties?
Solar plexus clown glider
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- May 10, 2020
Retard question here but I didn't want to look through 112 pages for the answer.
Do negative ratings still affect your ability to post/whether or not you get banned? I generally just post content and leave so most of my awards are lunacy/Islamic content/horrifying.
Do negative ratings still affect your ability to post/whether or not you get banned? I generally just post content and leave so most of my awards are lunacy/Islamic content/horrifying.
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2019
Negative ratings do literally nothing except encourage reddit trash to out themselves by crying about them. They have never affected your ability to post or triggered any kind of ban or mod review.
Μusk
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2020
There should be an "Archive your links faggot" reaction that only shows up for posts that have links in them. Too many newfags and regular posters on some occasions that don't archive shit, and it either ends up never archived or DFE'd and lost forever.
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2019
Takes to much effort for little reward. As long as you have the screenshot who cares
Μusk
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 23, 2020
Because screenshots can be faked by autistic illuminati retards.
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
Is there a guide for the meaning of each rating? I've been here a little while but I can't work out what DRINK! means.
Also, how do you get the stickers to show up on TOR? Only the thunk-provoking and lunacy show up. It baffles me that only those specific two work while all the others show up as gray circles.
Also, how do you get the stickers to show up on TOR? Only the thunk-provoking and lunacy show up. It baffles me that only those specific two work while all the others show up as gray circles.
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2019
they work for me but sometimes it is slow and they take a while to show them all
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2018
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2020
I get the concept. I just don't know what DRINK! means.
Locomotive meat
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 9, 2020
sometimes people will downvote a post not because they don’t agree with what’s being said, but because of the info/ pic they post is retarded. Like if someone shares a pic of a new CWC pic, people downvote the retarded art but not the person who’s sharing it
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2019
I used to think this site needed a "based" reacc, but now I think it needs a "weeb" reacc.
World War II ended too soon.
World War II ended too soon.