Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

jonathan yaniv is $42000 in debt (CC/LOC, as of 11 August 2020) no wonder he's desperately looking for that £35,000 small claims jackpot (or two)...he only has to win one to reduce that debt considerably and the waxers would be much-needed pocket money.

Just curious..."LOC"? Is that a bank loan? Mind you, he should be able to clear wherever that debt lies as in the space of 22 days our Captain of Industry was back "earning" ("a modest amount of") $200 per day (6th Aug - 31st Aug - as per case filed re Phillip Choo).


1599109924022.png

So effectively his court fee waivers show that he's been "earning" 2.5 days paid employment per month, however, he's suing Phillip Choo for 25 days of actual lost "earnings" between 6th - 31st Aug 2020.

1599114015801.png


Looking forward to the evidence of lost work. Especially as he claimed this on his court fee waiver (re waxers) dated 11 August 2020. No mention of sprinkler damage etc. Covid-19 is to blame.
1599114840469.png


and this ( re Donald Smith) dated 19th August 2020. Covid-19 again.
1599115377957.png


edited to insert dates.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: thermocline, New & Improved Username, Astyanax Skamandrios and 10 others
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: MadameMidlifeCrisis, Beluga, Rokko and 4 others
pr3nt177 said:
jonathan yaniv is $42000 in debt (CC/LOC, as of 11 August 2020) no wonder he's desperately looking for that £35,000 small claims jackpot (or two)...he only has to win one to reduce that debt considerably and the waxers would be much-needed pocket money.

Just curious..."LOC"? Is that a bank loan? Mind you, he should be able to clear wherever that debt lies as in the space of 22 days our Captain of Industry was back "earning" ("a modest amount of") $200 per day (6th Aug - 31st Aug - as per case filed re Phillip Choo).


View attachment 1568266
Click to expand...
LOC is a line of credit, often called home equity line of credit in the US. In reality it is a mortgage. If you don't pay they can take your property.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: New & Improved Username, MadameMidlifeCrisis, ConSluttant and 6 others
Cynically Insane said:
LOC is a line of credit, often called home equity line of credit in the US. In reality it is a mortgage. If you don't pay they can take your property.
Click to expand...
Ah right, I wasn't 100% whether it was solely a bank loan (ie cash credited to his bank account) or a loan taken out against his mortgage - in the UK it's called a 2nd mortgage.

LOL so this cabbage not only has credit card debts but a second mortgage...and no employment. Life is sweet.
 
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: MadameMidlifeCrisis and KiwiFuzz
pr3nt177 said:
Ah right, I wasn't 100% whether it was solely a bank loan (ie cash credited to his bank account) or a loan taken out against his mortgage - in the UK it's called a 2nd mortgage.

LOL so this cabbage not only has credit card debts but a second mortgage...and no employment. Life is sweet.
Click to expand...

I think its either a second mortgage or some other credit that is secured on your property as collateral
 
  • Like
Reactions: MadameMidlifeCrisis
bluegenius8585 said:
I think its either a second mortgage or some other credit that is secured on your property as collateral
Click to expand...

It's not a mortgage - it's more like a credit-card. Some can be secured, some are unsecured. The latter (unsecured) really requires you to have savings and a provable means of repayment. There's a monthly minimum payment (just like a CC), and it can be repeatedly dipped into up to the maximum of the LOC. The interest rate is usually far lower than a CC. My bank permits interest-only payments with a secured LOC, and the loan is interest-free if it's repaid within two weeks. It's a great way to gain quick temporary access to $30k.

If hambeast has one, it's most assuredly secured against the condo as any banker worth his/her salt would recognize the financial risk of an unsecured LOC.
 
  • Informative
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: MadameMidlifeCrisis, valis, Picklechu and 2 others
Regarding having Yaniv Simpson declared a vexatious litigant A few findings by a NOT Canadian lawyer hopefully not too autistic. Strictly for those interested in this kind of thing.

Did a bit of online poking around just for fun and hit upon a couple of good summaries of the procedure for getting someone declared a vexatious litigant in Canada/B.C. Links posted for those interested. I also read a couple of what I believe are governing cases that enthusiaticly encourage BC lawyers (I think) to file such motions or applications.




Here is a very interesting and highly relevant (I think!) Canadian case wherein the court encourages parties to file more of these types of applications: https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/fca/doc/2017/2017fca42/2017fca42.html

I"m thinking maybe Section 18 of the Supreme Court Act of British Columbia and Section 29 of the Court of Appeal Act of British Columbia would apply (see second link above) in which case seems quite straghtforward to file? That's the good news.

On the other hand if this this "Section 40 of the Federal Courts Act" applies one has to get the pre-approval of the Attorney General of Canada before one can file the application to have the jackass declared vexatious:

"40 (1) If the Federal Court of Appeal or the Federal Court is satisfied, on application, that a person has persistently instituted vexatious proceedings or has conducted a proceeding in a vexatious manner, it may order that no further proceedings be instituted by the person in that court or that a proceeding previously instituted by the person in that court not be continued, except by leave of that court. Attorney General of Canada

(2) An application under subsection (1) may be made only with the consent of the Attorney General of Canada, who is entitled to be heard on the application and on any application made under subsection (3)."

So if Section 40 applies one has some very friendly caselaw one could cite in support of one's application, but one would have to get Mr. AGC to sign off.

No idea how difficult that would be but it could discourage the casual applicant.

Thanks.

EDIT: It occurs to me that the Township of Langley would get the Attorney General's approval probably pretty much automatically. However the Korean woman (latest victim as I understand it) could equally well file it. One would support the motion with certified printouts of all the cases dumbshit has filed along with the BCHRT rulings along with all (or at least sufficient) of the inconsistent i.e. perjurious declarations and affidavits he has filed in re e.g. his income and expenses, poverty, "lost business income": on and on. Much of the work here has already been done by Meow Mix.

Would be pretty cool if someone could persuade one of these victims to file an application perhaps somebody could whip up a draft for the bastards if they're too indifferent to do it themselves!

Sorry for the length!
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Optimistic
  • Like
Reactions: thermocline, Red Sun, Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL and 9 others
Short Stack said:
I haven't finished reading his whole claim yet....He's desperate for cash.
Correct me if I'm wrong...In the States....his homeowners ins would cover the damages, then they sue the one responsible.
I hope to hell our legal eagle added exhibits with this?
Where are any receipts? Any documentation? statements from this phoenix whatever?
He doesn't even list their contact info.
Any letters from the insurance? statements from the STRATA?

I really do think he's lost it now...& I expect him to get even more desperate
Click to expand...
He claimed that his airways closed down for a full 12 minutes & then claimed this has now been put down to water in the carpet and the ceiling from the sprinklers. If this was the case then wouldn't your airways shut down too if you were in a bath, a shower or a pool?

How did he not breath for a full 12 minutes, surely that would cause brain damage?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: thermocline, LilNuTTz, Chicken Picnic and 9 others
trustedherd said:
How did he not breath for a full 12 minutes, surely that would cause brain damage?
Click to expand...
It would. Any defence lawyer could prove it easily. Also, refer back to his cases regarding the 'smoking ceremony' and also the other of 'cleaning products used in a common area'.

I don't care to try and find them, but they were filed in a similar vein.

A pattern of opportunistic behaviour, filed with no evidence of harm.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: LilNuTTz, MadameMidlifeCrisis, The Un-Clit and 4 others
So, just to make sure that I'm reading this correctly - he's suing the person that accidentally set off the fire alarm with steam? I've lived in buildings where opening the bathroom door after a hot shower will set the fire alarm off.

Will the defendant incur any legal costs because of this lolsuit? I hope the court throws this trash out, or awards this person legal damages stemming from harassment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LilNuTTz, Chicken Picnic, MadameMidlifeCrisis and 4 others
JY's Tampon said:
3rd new lawsuit in less than a week was filed today. Jonathan the neighbors from where the fire originated. BTW Choo is a Korean name.
View attachment 1567168View attachment 1567169View attachment 1567171View attachment 1567172
I"m probably going to roll some of these smaller ongoing suits into one thread.
Click to expand...

What a scam artist. He clearly put the water in the closet to inflate his claim.

Cynically Insane said:
After he reported to the court that he makes $500 per month to avoid filing fees for his vexatious lawsuits, this tard now has the audacity to apply to the court for business losses of $200 per day.
Click to expand...

I like the way he claims $200 a day is 'modest'. The defense lawyer for the Korean couple needs to ask him to provide evidence of his average daily income. Also, they should dispute that the water in the closet is due to their clients. And then there's the issue that the people he's suing probably just set off a fire alarm with steam.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: LilNuTTz, MadameMidlifeCrisis, LollyPop! and 2 others
Am I seeing this correctly?
Value 280K
Mortgage 260K?
Screenshot_2020-09-03 UPDATE Jessica Yaniv Simpson Sues Aestheticians For $6K + Interest + Har...png

He has it mortaged to the hilt if I read this correctly... 20K equity?
And this is listed as an asset? 8K?
Screenshot_2020-09-03 UPDATE Jessica Yaniv Simpson Sues Aestheticians For $6K + Interest + Har...png

Also, in the total of his expenses, I see nothing for servicing his CC debt.

$950 a month in food? Has he EVER mentioned cooking?
30 bucks a day? Cooking for myself, I could be eating prime rib & lobster daily with that money.

It would be nice to see all of his financials side by side. He can't even keep his lies straight.

Then there's this from the Bailey thread.
Screenshot_2020-09-03 Baileyleaks Part 2 - Watch as Teenagers Roast Jessica Yaniv aka Jessica...png

"I'm beautiful & popular as fuck"
Does he REALLY believe this?
There's the TV preachers (grifters) who know they're just spreading bullshit
& the ones who actually believe the bullshit they spread (Mormons & special underwear come to mind)
Which one does jonny fit in?

On the bright side? his $3,000.00 dress wasn't damaged
 
  • Like
  • Lunacy
  • Informative
Reactions: thermocline, MadameMidlifeCrisis, The Un-Clit and 6 others
So a few things:

1) These water damage claims in strata properties are very common in B.C. On it’s face it presents a serious issue to be tried even though it’s all actually nuttiness.
2) Our favourite law student filed the action in the wrong forum - strata is all dealt wit’s by the Civil Resolution Tribunal at first instance. Sadly poor Mr. Choo will get no costs there.
3) Those financial lies are going to bite him in the ass in the defamation suit.
4) Based on his equity in his home, he’s not eligible for a HELOC in the first place.
5) He is claiming a malicious act, having crossed of negligence, when this is in fact a claim for negligence.
6) He’s suing the wrong people. Most of his issues were with the restoration company and the Choo’s insurers should be brought in.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: thermocline, LilNuTTz, MadameMidlifeCrisis and 10 others
To clear up questions about the fire - it was in 401. Cooking set off a sprinkler. Fire department that day confirmed to strata there was a small fire the sprinkler put out. Not sure where Yaniv got the idea it's just steam from?

The cop lives in 302 down one floor and accross one floor from the choo's. Yaniv lives in 203 down two and accross 2. But also the building curves 90°. There are quite a few closer units including those accross the hall that had no damage.

At one point JY claimed water damage was caused by them repressuring fire suppression system but they never cut pressure to his floor, just the 4th.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: thermocline, chroma, Safir and 22 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back