- Joined
- Jun 3, 2018
You know, I don't discount that as a possibility. As much as Shmorky is a highly private man, he's not that good at it. It would have been a bit dickish on Lowtax's part, but had he just looked through Shmorky's room in the office he'd have probably found desk drawers full of the same kind of notebooks I found in his bedroom. I'm usually fervently against that sort of thing, I don't snoop on partners, I don't rifle through their personal items or look at phones. I always felt Shmorky was entitled to his privacy. But there are certain circumstances where you get an honorary search warrant, such as if a person that looks and acts like Shmorky is babysitting your children. Lowtax could've easily just looked through his desk when he stepped out to the store and in all likelihood he would have found the same kind of notebooks full of hand-drawn Klurf dipe piss and scat porn I did.His pining for Shmorky is weird and unsettling, especially since Lowtax just keeps on framing their falling out as “Shmorky got annoying about gender shit” instead of, you know, bringing up that he was a pedophile furry with a diaper fetish.
It’s almost like Lowtax knew about the diaperfur stuff all along and didn’t care, and that his real crime, for Lowtax, was being irritating.
Shmorky was the same way with his office as he was with his room. He'd keep the door shut unless we were voice acting one of his cartoons together in there, and if you walked by the door when he wasn't expecting you he'd twitch out and slam it. Again - extenuating circumstances. Ladies, heed my advice: If there's a room in your man's house that you share that you are not allowed to enter under any circumstances - leave him. There is never anything good in the forbidden room. I only went in his bedroom just to make sure there wasn't an Ed Gein or John Wayne Gacy's basement situation in there or a Tony Montana sized pile of meth. Given the notebooks full of said Klurf porn I found in the closet, I would have preferred it to be meth.
Thinking back to if Lowtax knew or not, I know there was the Aatrek situation that could have been avoided with a simple google search, but it's a different story when this is a man you're spending 9 hours a day with, taking on trips, allowing in your home, around your children, and for God knows what reason allowing to record your preteen daughters on his phone. There's only so much plausible deniability Lowtax can claim here.