U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
I haven't seen that yet, I don't think they've quite evolved their tear gas mitigation tactics to that level. Hong Kong had that shit figured out in a day or two, had it down to a science.

View attachment 1575138
This is the last use of a traffic cone I saw, and I find his response fucking hilarious.
The difference is that the HK protesters actually have a reason to fear for their lives, Antifa outside of banishing/aiming/using weapons in front of/on cops do not.
HK was/is real danger, USA 2020 is LARP danger.

Its cute they bitch about bruises, how about they see how long they last in a Chinese prison/black site as a political prisoner
 
So what comes next? We're definitely not getting a holocaust 2.0 since oppressed Jews can just run to Israel now.

Depends on how the November election goes down. History is going to pivot on it. Will there be a clear winner? Will there is be another split decision? How do the various political factions react? If Trump wins, does the institutional state stage a coup? If Biden wins does Trump refuse to concede?

Too many variables. The stage has unfortunately been set in such a manner that the bad outcomes are more likely then the two good outcomes, which is that either Biden or Trump wins decisively and beyond reproach.

In short we need to start praying.
 
Interesting. Antifa 'journalist' Robert Madison Evans admitting that after being injured while attacking a Proud Boy peacefully protesting in Portland some weeks ago, he's been focusing on attacking police and peaceful protesters rather than filming. It's almost like these 'journalists' are no different from any other antifa scum.
1599363338700.png

His fellow antifa journalist, Alexandra Zielinski, is pissed off that one reporter from the NYT actually talked to a human Oregonian outside the Portland bubble.
1599363539200.png

Other media scum trying to attack peaceful protesters too. Ryland Barton of Kentucky Public Radio trying to attack peaceful protestors in Louisville for carrying non-lethal implements to defend themselves against state-sponsored BLM violence.
1599363620600.png

 
So what comes next? We're definitely not getting a holocaust 2.0 since oppressed Jews can just run to Israel now.
People forget but if Israel existed there might not have been a holocaust. Hitler tried to get rid of the jews but no one wanted them.

The final solution only came about after they couldnt get them out of their country due to WW2

The Brits also refused to let them into Palestine.

 
People forget but if Israel existed there might not have been a holocaust. Hitler tried to get rid of the jews but no one wanted them.

The final solution only came about after they couldnt get them out of their country due to WW2

The Brits also refused to let them into Palestine.

It would be funny if all our power-wielding progressive Jews ran to Israel and proceeded to shit up the place like they've been doing to the USA.
 
Zimbardos can't be trusted on his own. His Prison experment he took an active roll in as the warden of the prison, he commanded the "guards" to how to treat prisoners and also to target certain prisoners to more abuse then others, and others to treat them nicely. For the "experiment" to have any validity he needed to be a neutral observer which he was not.
Admittedly my distrust/distaste for Zimbardos is the fact that my college psych class professor only taught via out of date VHS recordings from like the 80s that had him as the host.

I spent most of my time as a polisci major in college before moving on to Comp Sci, Social Sciences have their place, and people with actual polisci backgrounds (read not people who just take "Why communism is great 070" bullshit classes. If more people understood how politics of their country worked, AOC would have been blasted every fucking time she opened her fucking mouth. Everytime I hear AOC speak all I can think is "That is not how it fucking works you bitch".

The issue of social sciences even when done properly is that they at their core study humans in a non lets call it objective stance. Humans as individuals and as groups have a habit of saying "Hold my beer", even when you base your theories on past events and how people acted there is always the wild card of human nature. As one of my profs put it "You work hard on your theory on the German political system, you study its history, the philosophies that founded/guided it though the years, you gather tons of data on how people voted, and writings to suggest why, you think you have it all mastered then BOOM Hitler"

It was meant to describe how human nature is, but I strongly believe it also shows that polisci is better at looking at past events and deciphering what happened and why, as current issues can be dynamic and its easy to miss driving factors that pull things in ways you don't expect. As an example, 2016, I was expecting HRC to win, based on how hard the media was pushing her, and how much vocal support she got on media/the internet/et al (but I did note a true lack of "on the street support", along with how the DNC was corrupt, along with her political history and being essicentally an unofficial incumbent. Trump's win surprised me due to all the normal signs being wrong.

That said there are general useful things from polisci like 1) most incumbents will win an election and 2) the newest generation of voters always have the lowest turn out compared to the older generations. So although Bernie appealed massively to millennials (and older gen z), he was mostly doomed based on the major group he appealed to (That isn't to say the DNC wasn't cheating the system also).



I am not saying PoliSci or any other soft science is on the same level of hard science, hell when I was in college, most of the profs would even admit that we are not as hard as we want to be in terms of evidence/support, no one I knew who was actually interested in polisci (again not political/commie plants) would never imagine to say "My word/theory/etc is as sound as the laws of basic physics".
speaking of AOC i still fucking love this

 
I've actually heard higher IQ can be somewhat of a predicter of depression. The smarter you are, the more you recognize the patterns, the greater despair you can feel when you realize there's nothing you can do to overcome them.

Basically the smarter you are, the more likely you are to black pill yourself.
There's at least a casual link between high IQs, i'm talking upper tiered here, and mental illness in particular obsessive compulsive behaviors.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Reluctant MC
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back