U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
This is what these hippies mean when they talk about "self-care". Clown World gets to them, too, even if they're creating it. We all need respite. Get off the farms/4chan/social media once a week; go for a walk in the park, hang out with friends or family IRL (lol), play a vidya game, watch anime, go to church... do something else for a change.

It's not healthy to always be in a fever-pitched outrage over Clown World. Why do you think SJWs are such miserable people? Because they're obsessed with every change in the wind of politics.


I can remember as early as freshman year in my high school advisory class, they were haranguing us with a message of "You need to know EXACTLY what you're gonna do for the rest of your life RIGHT THIS INSTANT, or you're gonna be a FAILURE FOREVER!" Conspicuously absent was talk of considering trade school or the military. It was always "college or you're a stupid stupidhead loser!"
That's an artifact from 100 years ago, when college was the priviledge of the rich, and you could get the least useful degree in the world which would be worth more than a trade because college was a proof of being in nobility. In Europe it's the same thing, in my country parents told me and my pals 20 years ago to get whatever college degree because during Communism, ironically, college degree was a pass to better work. Now, plumbers and masons earn 2-3x as much as college graduates which I find pretty funny in a bitter way. And don't get me started on programmers.
 
People should 100% be in the streets right now, but not over the death of a black criminal who fought the police. Instead we should protest the lies about covid and the rampant corruption and lack of accountability in our government and institutions.

What would protesting in the streets achieve, even if it were for different purposes? I'm inclined to think nothing.
 
Uh oh, Biden stepped in it on this one. Big tech has made the definition of “wrong-think” so expansive that it’s made it so very few places allow legitimate discussion anymore. He’s messing with the people who memed Donald Trump into the White House, found the Portland executioner in less than a day, and tormented Shia Labouef. Now he’s threatening to take away the last forums of free discussion left on the Internet, which will make even some of his supporters on these sites want to mobilize against him. Democrats aren’t just planning to seize power, they’re going to make sure that nothing exists to challenge the establishment.
View attachment 1575721
But was KF one of the "Other Hate Sites"?

Actually I can't find that article at all to archive; did they already nuke it?
 
Social Sciences are actually quite useful. And no, I don't mean "Gender Studies" or something like that. Pyschology, political science, sociology all uncover and root through what makes up humanity. Things which can't be tested and quantified as readily or easily as the STEM degrees.

Edit: Also, ironic that someone would invoke IQ, then say the social sciences are bullshit. IQ.... comes from the social sciences. Its a product of them.
Interesting.
I'd like to point out that there's a positive correlation between high IQ score and high personal income. IQ tests test your capacity for abstract thinking. Y'know, things like math, philosophy, analytical skills, pattern recognition...
I agree there are "different types of intelligence". You can be an intelligent shoemaker, fencer, bridge builder but be a stupid doctor, geologist or parent at the same time. There are no "different types of IQ" however, because IQ is an approximation of a person's ability for abstract thinking. Intelligent abstract thinkers tend to be, most of the time, intelligent businessmen, mathematicians, analysts and philosophers.
To be a good doctor you don't really need to be good at thinking on your feet. You only need a great memory to remember biology and drug details. I saw many doctors who, while knowing a lot about their field, were rather rock-headed when it came to thinking outside the box.
Intelligence in general IMO is the ability to think outside the box and come up with ideas that no one could come up with.
 
Uh oh, Biden stepped in it on this one. Big tech has made the definition of “wrong-think” so expansive that it’s made it so very few places allow legitimate discussion anymore. He’s messing with the people who memed Donald Trump into the White House, found the Portland executioner in less than a day, and tormented Shia Labouef. Now he’s threatening to take away the last forums of free discussion left on the Internet, which will make even some of his supporters on these sites want to mobilize against him. Democrats aren’t just planning to seize power, they’re going to make sure that nothing exists to challenge the establishment.
View attachment 1575721
I'm surprised they hadn't done it earlier considering the banning of Alex Jones, the purging of the problematic subreddits, the sale of 4chan by moot. The crusade against "hate speech" by Facebook. The banning of "conspiracy theories" by Youtube. If I wanted a groupthink internet and media, you'd think 4chan would be the first on the chopping block really.
 
This is going to be hilarious and a never-ending rollercoaster of lulz until Biden drops dead, has a breakdown or loses (preferrably all three and on camera).

At this point, there’s a decent chance he actually will drop dead before the election, because he is more useful to his political handlers as a dead man. Think about it—no more gaffes, no more scandals, just sympathy votes for the dead liberal lion (and his beneficiaries on the Harris/Clinton ticket). It might sound like a crazy strategy, but it’s no crazier than burning every major American city to the ground.
 
View attachment 1574937
Nobel Prize winner, no less.

It's simple supply and demand:
There's a high demand for a credentialed economist who always tells the center-left establishment exactly what they want to hear.
Paul Krugman has made a living out of supplying that service.

Never mind that his Nobel Prize was for work in a highly technical and specialized sub-field of economics that has nothing to do with the bold macro-economic predictions he keeps making.
Never mind that his predictions have failed to come true, time after time.

NYT & co. keep paying him to publish his predictions and hot takes, because he tells them what they want to be true (while presenting himself as the scientific authority on it), so they can feel like they're on the side of The Science™ in all matters relating to the economy.
 
It is my understanding from following many evopsych types and a bit of reading that there is literally no actual consensus on inherent IQ differences between races, largely because it has not been properly studied (yeah I know Minnesota twin studies blah blah they're not enough). I have not been able to find any credible academic who is actually able to say outright 'yes, there are inherent differences in intelligence between races.' They all say, at most, 'there may be inherent differences in intelligence between races, but we haven't been able to, and may not be able to, properly study this to come to a concrete conclusion.' IQ as heritable is scientific consensus, for sure, but it's not enough to draw racial conclusions.

If somebody wants to convince me of a need for segregation, I'm amenable to cultural or aesthetic arguments, on which there are much better grounds to argue. I think anyone who asserts that races are inherently smarter/dumber is asserting something they wouldn't be able to prove if pushed. Emphasis on inherent is because it is obvious that on average different ethnic groups are smarter than others at any given time, but the question is one of potential.

-> not so deep thoughts
If you're talking US academics then I'm not suprised. Challenging anything about the IQ/race difference in US academia is a recipe for career suicide.
How IQ differences work: if you'd select individuals from both race A and race B by IQ score >110 and calculate percentage, you'd find x% members of race A have IQ>110 and y% members of race B have IQ>110. Thus, if x%>y%, you'd conclude that race A has, on average, higher IQ than race B (and vice versa).
Do you agree that intelligence is heritable? How come all those enlightened academics say "there may be inherent differences in intelligence between..." when shithead Medieval midwives already could note that smarter parents have, usually, smarter kids? If muscle/bone/face structure and height is heritable, how come brain structure/neural count isn't?
 
Its getting to the point where I wonder if Portland will turn red after all this

Probably not, but I think voting will be interesting this year.

If Portland turns red, I could imagine a flood of "It's happening" meme flooding the web.

That's an artifact from 100 years ago, when college was the priviledge of the rich, and you could get the least useful degree in the world which would be worth more than a trade because college was a proof of being in nobility. In Europe it's the same thing, in my country parents told me and my pals 20 years ago to get whatever college degree because during Communism, ironically, college degree was a pass to better work. Now, plumbers and masons earn 2-3x as much as college graduates which I find pretty funny in a bitter way. And don't get me started on programmers.

I got the feeling then some college memes have aged well.

889wkb95cbd41.jpg
2f8gmj.jpg
 
I'm not sure rolling would have much effect if one's shoes were on fire. My expert opinion is that the best thing to do would be to take one's shoes off.

Difficult if the shoes have immediately melted and are becoming one with his flesh.

The LASD deputy gangs were (are?) a real thing with the Lynwood Vikings being the most notorious one. They mostly amounted to basically frats with extra brutality suits attached to them, you see similar types of groups pop up in the military. While they probably weren't all out of Training Day they did and still do reinforce some of the more toxic aspects of police culture.

Can confirm, along with the military aspect The Army started coming down hard on gangs around '03, but CID really focused only on street sets initially. So a lot of those guys started their own, especially older ones that had reenlisted indef.
 
They seriously, unironically want gang warfare.
View attachment 1575500

Lol at the jogger with the Nike headband. Every other dude represents an ideology but the black guy? He's just black. His ideology is looting shoe stores. This is how antifas think.

Actually, what's the guy with the blue hair and a beard supposed to be? Does that symbol represent gender confusion or some actual school of thought?
The joke is that they'll end up killing themselves more than the cops would or will at that point.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Spiteful Crow
Uh oh, Biden stepped in it on this one. Big tech has made the definition of “wrong-think” so expansive that it’s made it so very few places allow legitimate discussion anymore. He’s messing with the people who memed Donald Trump into the White House, found the Portland executioner in less than a day, and tormented Shia Labouef. Now he’s threatening to take away the last forums of free discussion left on the Internet, which will make even some of his supporters on these sites want to mobilize against him. Democrats aren’t just planning to seize power, they’re going to make sure that nothing exists to challenge the establishment.
View attachment 1575721

At this point, Biden trying to push for a 4chan ban is just pandering to the Democrat base since if the bigwigs were going to shut down 4chan, it would've already happened by now.

8chan was more or less a dead man walking the moment it was de-listed from Google and I'm surprised they waited until after Christchurch for it to be purged. 4chan is no longer owned by moot and while it's not a total normie site like Reddit, Facebook, or Twitter, it's also not the crazy "Wild West of the internet" it was in the 2000's. It's very popular and the only boards that could be considered a threat by the bigwigs also happen to be the boards where the jannies all glow in the dark.

I'm surprised they hadn't done it earlier considering the banning of Alex Jones, the purging of the problematic subreddits, the sale of 4chan by moot. The crusade against "hate speech" by Facebook. The banning of "conspiracy theories" by Youtube. If I wanted a groupthink internet and media, you'd think 4chan would be the first on the chopping block really.

Oddly enough, moot becoming cucked and selling off 4chan might've saved the site in the long run considering it's now owned by some Japanese company or something.

I think 4chan is safe so long as /pol/ and /b/ are kept as containment boards and honeypots for the glow spooks to use. It's a borderline normie site that's only slightly more "edgy" than Reddit and a few boards like /co/ are actually downright woke.
 
Legitimate question regarding the whole "Blacks and low IQ" sediment here: the Black Trump supporters, do they automatically have a higher IQ? Even if they also originated in said urban communities? With the "overfunded" public schooling, low income and single parent housing?
Who said voting preference has any connection to IQ?
Cambodia's intellectual elite (not liberal big-brains, legit smart young people) cheered the Khmer Rouge which tortured them to death, the same with Tsarist Russia and Bolsheviks. You can be smart but innocent (gullible) at the same time y'know.
 
I can remember as early as freshman year in my high school advisory class, they were haranguing us with a message of "You need to know EXACTLY what you're gonna do for the rest of your life RIGHT THIS INSTANT, or you're gonna be a FAILURE FOREVER!" Conspicuously absent was talk of considering trade school or the military. It was always "college or you're a stupid stupidhead loser!"
I used to work in a public school system as a System Administrator. They were shoving not just the idea of college down 1st grader's throats, but which specific universities were the most optimal.
 
Uh oh, Biden stepped in it on this one. Big tech has made the definition of “wrong-think” so expansive that it’s made it so very few places allow legitimate discussion anymore. He’s messing with the people who memed Donald Trump into the White House, found the Portland executioner in less than a day, and tormented Shia Labouef. Now he’s threatening to take away the last forums of free discussion left on the Internet, which will make even some of his supporters on these sites want to mobilize against him. Democrats aren’t just planning to seize power, they’re going to make sure that nothing exists to challenge the establishment.
View attachment 1575721
Link for this? I don't doubt that this is something Democrats would want to do of course (banning "hate" sites that is, not specifically 4chan), but I can't find any article like this, and frankly I find it hard to believe Biden even knows what 4chan is, let alone actually mention it.
I think 4chan is safe so long as /pol/ and /b/ are kept as containment boards and honeypots for the glow spooks to use. It's a borderline normie site that's only slightly more "edgy" than Reddit and a few boards like /co/ are actually downright woke.
Most of the threads that gain traction on /pol/ are bait threads, it's sad how compromised 4chan is in general. I prefer anonymity generally, but at least this thread isn't filled with misinformation and shit-flinging... most of the time.
 
At this point, Biden trying to push for a 4chan ban is just pandering to the Democrat base since if the bigwigs were going to shut down 4chan, it would've already happened by now.

8chan was more or less a dead man walking the moment it was de-listed from Google and I'm surprised they waited until after Christchurch for it to be purged. 4chan is no longer owned by moot and while it's not a total normie site like Reddit, Facebook, or Twitter, it's also not the crazy "Wild West of the internet" it was in the 2000's. It's very popular and the only boards that could be considered a threat by the bigwigs also happen to be the boards where the jannies all glow in the dark.



Oddly enough, moot becoming cucked and selling off 4chan might've saved the site in the long run considering it's now owned by some Japanese company or something.

I think 4chan is safe so long as /pol/ and /b/ are kept as containment boards and honeypots for the glow spooks to use. It's a borderline normie site that's only slightly more "edgy" than Reddit and a few boards like /co/ are actually downright woke.
If you recall the Janitor logs and the public statements. You can't simply say whatever you want on 4chan. Sure it's not illegal but, you just can't say that. Just because.

1f2.png
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Allakazam223
Is it a worthless venture to make/buy other weapons?

Get some metal bats, knives, set up some alarms and traps around your house. Fight commies with a rake and shovel if you have to.
Good morning all, just catching up. May I make a suggestion for your metal bats? Place a tube sock on the end of it, that way if someone tries to get hold of it, the sock will slide off in their hands.
 
This is the thing that pisses me off the most about all this bullshit. On one hand, they say white people are so racist and awful and brutally oppressing minorities all day every day and on the other hand they demand to live with us.

I can't find the source anymore but in 1964 Stockholm did not have a single murder the entire year, despite having a population of a million at the time. Now Stockholm is the grenade attack capital of the world. I wonder what has changed?

I have never heard a good reason why white people should be forced to live with people who hate them.

In keeping with the Warhammer references in the thread, I believe the West is truly under siege by the Ruinous Powers.

Khorne: BLM/antifa burning everything down, plus all the violent jogging from future doctors and engineers.

Tzeentch: The legacy media and social media running interference for BLM and fully controlling the narrative of their march on the Right Side of History.

Nurgle: Global pandemic caused by corrupt government lab workers who couldn't stop eating raw fucking bats.

Slaanesh: Cutting off your son's dick and turning him into a girl for asspats on Facebook.

GOP wants a return to the 1950's, but we need to return to the 1550's and start burning these people at the stake.

They demand to live with us because they are objectively less intelligent and unwilling to work or take responsibility for themselves.

N I G G E R S covet our stores, our houses, our women, and just about everything else. Saying whites stole from KANGZZ is just a pathetic cope...just look at the entirety of Africa. They want to colonize and enslave and rape whites. They want to subjugate whites into building, inventing, and MAINTAINING everything at a grossly higher standard of living than any Blackamoor should ever think about.

This is why I won't forgive any leftist reetard from this point going forward. They won't stand up--and they're actively trying to stop the rest of us from standing up. Every fucking white race traitor should be dog walked to a slave market when this is all over for the rest of US to purchase. Shit, I'll collect cans to earn a few female traitors...for entertainment in minecraft.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back