Trainwreck Anisa Riyadh Jomha / @anisajomha & iDubbbz / Ian Kane Jomha / Ian Kane Washburn / "Anisa's husband" / "Poo-Pants Swastika Boy" - Anisa posting her bald nudes on OnlyFans even when married to Ian and thirsting over Hasan while her husband iDubbbz the Content Cuck/Simp/THE RAPED/ etc. watches

[Bad Take Crucifier]

Anisa is saying that she tends towards being the submissive one in a relationship.

She couldn't call herself "submissive" because Idubbbz is the submissive one in the relationship.

Spoiler: obligatory

 

[One Fist Man]

Speaking Anisa on couches, she really just let her pussy juices loose on her sister's couch.
Does her sister know Anisa used her apartment as a backdrop?
View attachment 1568016

That’s so strange to think about Anisa just causally taking some inappropriate pics of herself at her sister’s place.

“Hey sis, I’m gonna take some pics of my pussy lips hanging out for my onlyfans on your pouch. Is that cool? Great, thanks sis, you’re the best haha”

 

[Jann_Hörn]

“Hey sis, I’m gonna take some pics of my pussy lips hanging out for my onlyfans on your pouch. Is that cool? Great, thanks sis, you’re the best haha”

I would hope she would at least compensate her sister with a free subscription to her only fans.

That or actually help her father like she originally stated as the reason for doing this.

 

[longjohn]

Ian supports Chin's ban. The host even leads with "you got a video removed about him and now he's been removed".

Right out of the gate, his sneering take is: "Yeah, turns out Youtube doesn't like, sort of, uhh-vitriolic content on their website. That's a big surprise. It's not like they haven't been telling us that for years and years. It's uh, I tend to like these sort of uh...what do you call it..."wild west content", sort of like "anarchy, post-whatever-you-want", kind of; no repercussions. It's really cool, but not super realistic when it comes to a...you know, big business like Youtube whose primary goal is to make money"

-Says the guy who unloaded a shotgun into an effigy of Keemstar.

Ian talks about the video where he mocks the YT policies, which he would mention was "very reminiscent" of his own video on Leafy in its wording and how it wasn't a "fair criticism" of Leafy to make fun of his chin as it was an attribute he couldn't help, missing the point and context of his own video. They refer to John Swan's Suzy Lu debacle where all he had to do was take out a line about her forehead and his video was accepted back, though, that might be an unintentionally bad faith take, as if all creators have to do is scrub the naughty words and they're a-ok. That didn't really help Gokanaru who did just that, for example.

Ian then says his other CCs didn't get removed because he didn't make fun of their appearances mostly. Somewhat debatable and he did worse shit, like the shotgun stuff with Keem and following after Tana in person, which could have been construed as physically threatening, in their respective CCs. In Idubbbz' defense, he says he "wouldn't be surprised if other CCs got removed in the future" but doesn't bank on that content anymore so whatever. In the H3 pod he said he hasn't even conceptualized a new CC, despite having hinted at one being in the works for a while, apparently jokingly, and that's a point that's supported again in this interview. Just btw.

He makes a point about "society" deeming appearance-based comments and critiques of another person "stupid" and other commentators are going to focus on the actions of others because "we/society" decided that's fine to do because it's fair. He says it's pretty funny the Leafy video of his went down before all his videos with the "N-word", too. He mocks people who make the argument of a "precedent being set" or a "slippery slope" and claims it's "exactly what's expected (Youtube sanitizing the platform)" and if you want to make that content just go to Patreon or platforms that support your work.

He mentions later he's passionate about TikTok and wants to post there, his game Pocket Squirrels is done and how he'll "make a million" off that, and how maybe he and George will release the cake footage and send it off to the highest bidder. Half jokingly, but it sounds like he's setting up to retire imo and basically fuck you guys. This is Anisa's "Free Speech Coomer" and the same type of "free speech" person I myself mock. He had a lot to say when he was smaller and scrappier, rationalizing calling people niggers when it got him clout and money. Now who cares, he might chime in if it benefits him at some point again but he made his bank and doesn't give a shit about anyone else. Very Filthy Frank imo, I get mad FF vibes off him setting up an unceremonious "fuck you".

Ian now supports the "community" policing content and says how "society" dictates what's okay, to which the host smartly asks (paraphrase): "If society dictates what's watchable and this stuff is frowned on and thus shouldn't pull views, why do they need to make these rules to discourage the content from being made and viewed". Ian says Youtube doesn't have to make those ToS rules but they want to be "ahead of the curve" because people would phase out that content eventually on their own anyway. That's a sketchy line of thought, but ok.

Ian, who loves tiktok now for some reason, tangentially cites his friend William Osman (mostly to seem consistent imo) getting a tiktok removed for a very obvious cheap gag where he "kicks" his "cat" (he clipped a video where he kicked a sweater to look like his cat), but Ian claims tiktok isn't run by morons and that they "know what they're doing". They know "most people won't find it offensive" but they take it down for the chance it might "disturb" someone. They allow a fuck ton of other arguably more offensive content though so no point made.

Spoiler: As an aside

I think it's pretty obvious William wants to be more edgy or creative if you watch some of his stuff especially recently. "Edgy" might be a push, but his tone is shifting imo. Imagine your professionally edgy friend, who probably was just as inspirational and influential to you as someone like Ethan, justifying the removal of your content on a platform with a) worse content than what you're getting removed and b) a platform that he himself lauds as the future as an ex-successful edgy creative. Kind of sad, tbh. I was peeved when Anisa tossed Ian under the bus, but now I'm legit kind of MOTI. William, while I don't always like him as a creator, really gets shafted and I can only be so upset when he allows himself to be. It's still really sucky though. Ethan did treat him like shit and so too has Ian. Ian hung him out to dry in my eyes. If Pear is a disloyal hussy, Ian is too. Terrible friend. Even if it's a joke you can rationalize why it went down and it's as open for critique as anything else, sure, him saying it's a shit joke is not my gripe. It's that it was a joke and an obvious one, the same argument Ian and his base has used to defend his own much edgier content in the past-he's clearly just fucking around and so was William. William wasn't advocating kicking cats or going off on the nature of cat-kicking, something someone could argue is pretty disturbing and potentially worth removing. He told a joke, dude, and not even one that was all that edgy.

Anyway, Ian supports "vanilla content" because big businesses can't have bad videos upsetting their status quo and he praises that business practice. Even says the cake vids will get removed (LOL Kevin/the host legit frantically cuts him off: "Why?! Because why? What's wrong with the cake videos? Come on..."). Ian says if there's a chance someone would get disturbed, it's gotta go.

So the better question is finally posed, it's the free speech/free expression argument even if they don't call it that: Kevin asks what about non-broadly offensive content. What about niche offenses, if someone complained to Youtube over seeing Donald Trump ads and even refers to Lily Singh (Ian's ex-love interest; she was the Leafy to his Anisa as it were in 2015) who makes vids that rip on aspects of his life that, while inoffensive to him, would very well offend others. Plenty of other videos-social and political-are made to "call swathes of people 'human garbage'" Kevin claims and that'd "disrupt the loop" referring to the prior question about status quo content. Ian calls that the "straight white male" content, not even shitting you, and that those are the demographic being offended by having that content made, says Youtube is a progressive company, but he doesn't think they care too much about that and are actually pretty "cool" with that stuff (with him adding that "in the future, they'll be more partisan"), despite a lot of evidence to the contrary and he himself saying they go for Alex Jones. They wouldn't go for Lily though, he literally laughs at the thought of her being removed by YT. That fact too that he calls it "straight white male content" is pointedly woke...and pointedly disturbing.

The time stamp at this point is exactly 15 minutes and you can choose to watch the rest. The CreateUnknown isn't bad though, and they do intellectually challenge him more than I thought they might while keeping things relaxed. My takeaway is that Ian is a fake fuck. I get people's opinions evolve, sometimes rapidly and often times people have nuanced opinions regardless, but imagine doing this 180 once being edgy stopped being profitable for you and having the nuts to be smug about it.

Way to take a stance, buddy. It'll be clipped into oblivion when you get deplatformed. As fucky as the state of things are, plenty of us aren't above laughing at fake woketards getting the boot for losing at their own stupid games if it's just deserts or just really, really funny. I never thought I'd care more about Leafy getting fucked over than Idubbbz being up for the chop. Been a crazy year. Imagine had Ian instead come out positively encouraging other creators to leave the platform instead of acting selfish from his position in the community and supporting Youtube itself over creator's expression. Maybe that's what's so irksome too: He supports the monopoly "being ahead of the curve" and dictating what people think and feel as a collective before people have the chance to decide for themselves what they deem acceptable as individuals. If he thought harder, maybe it would occur to him that his take is pro-social engineering. In that regard, his stance is infinitely worse than Anisa's take.

I kind of rolled my eyes at the cuck accusation early on, really only calling him one because I know it gets him ass blasted. Not anymore, I mean it: What a spineless cuck. Gives away his alleged beliefs, his alleged girlfriend (lol), and gives away his whole ass career willingly because he likes the shame probably. I'd apologize for autistic blogging, but I think it's important enough so I tried to bold the better takeaways and be extra quoty so it could be easier skimmed. Pear was just poorly regurgitating Ian's current year beliefs and I shouldn't be so surprised but oddly I am.

 

[Gay_Frog]

Anisa is saying that she tends towards being the submissive one in a relationship.

Doesn't mean Ian is a pimp?

 

[Bad Take Crucifier]

@longjohn GJ on the synopsis. It's so wild how completely fine Ian is with the changing landscape of YouTube. I doubt he'd ever be successful if he were just starting out today. Without the Content Cop series, and then crazy videos like he did with Filthy Frank and Max Mofo, where the hell would his audience come from? Everything he makes now is pretty basic shit.

Old news but I still can't get over Joji being a successful singer today while Ian is with an onlyfans thot and making some of the most boring videos ever.

Doesn't mean Ian is a pimp?

Either way, technically, Ian is pimping out his girlfriend. That's the "cool" thing all Internet famous people do in 2020 apparently. They sell their girlfriend's photos for weirdos to masturbate to.

 

[M0JY0]

@longjohn Thank you for your excellent summary.

In the H3 pod he said he hasn't even conceptualized a new CC, despite having hinted at one being in the works for a while, apparently jokingly, and that's a point that's supported again in this interview. Just btw.

I am not surprised, to be honest. I think he threw that in at the end of his video defending Anisa just to intrigue the audience members that might be on the fence about him. "Ooh, he's making a Content Cop!? Maybe Ian is still edgy. I'll stick around!"

Fuck this cuck.

 

[Bad Take Crucifier]

"Ooh, he's making a Content Cop!? Maybe Ian is still edgy. I'll stick around!"

His fandom and his subreddit have a circle jerk every day about NUU CONTENT CAWP.

For five years. Five years every day.

The rest just genuinely enjoy bland content because they are 12, or think shit like "bad unboxing" is comedy gold, for some god awful reason.

 

[JamusActimus]

The last ones to go in are the most eager to close the door.
Iddubz made himself famous by bullying peoples and by being offensive (by today's youtube's norm)
But now he says that you can't do edgy content anymore and that youtube has the right to censor and nuke.

Wonder how he would have felt his channel got nuked after the Leafy vid.

At least Joji/FilthyFrank understand that they should protect free speech and be against censorship because he was lucky not to be censored when he was beginning on yt

 

[Kup]

Sounds like Mr Dubbz rebuilt his confidence after having the scary chinless bullyjerk removed. What a bitch.
EDIT: Thanks for getting rid of the weird commie ranting.

 

[Marche]

tee hee you've only seen my outer labia and about 75% of my asshole that means I'm doing lewds, not nudes. I have modesty and dignity, tee hee

Howd that work out for MooMoo?

 

[Bad Take Crucifier]

Howd that work out for MooMoo?

She's just doing full on sex porn now so... literally the opposite of all that "asexual" "modest" shit she was talking about years ago.

 

[Jar-Jar Fanboy]

@longjohn GJ on the synopsis. It's so wild how completely fine Ian is with the changing landscape of YouTube. I doubt he'd ever be successful if he were just starting out today. Without the Content Cop series, and then crazy videos like he did with Filthy Frank and Max Mofo, where the hell would his audience come from? Everything he makes now is pretty basic shit.

Old news but I still can't get over Joji being a successful singer today while Ian is with an onlyfans thot and making some of the most boring videos ever.

Joji was always the most talented out of the bunch. If you watch the videos of the entire Cancer Crew, Idubbbz always seemed somewhat awkward, and Joji/Frank seemed to take the lead, or just be the most entertaining, and was generally more creative, with the FF "lore" he did. He also went way further over the line than Idubbbz. "Whoa, Idubbbz said nigger? That's crazy, but Filthy Frank just made a burrito out of dead rats and tried to feed it to a midget!" If you told me I could either watch a guy unbox random shit his audience sent him, or a guy walk up to strangers and offer them ravioli out of his pocket, I know which one I'd pick. And with Joji's musical talent, which was evident as far back as Pink Guy, it's no wonder he could pivot to a more mainstream sound. What could Idubbbz possibly pivot to? Maybe cameo as a rapist on Law and Order? idk, this comment is longer than I expected, I just started thinking about it when the Joji comparison was made

 

[The Pink Panther]

Idubbbz is the Sacha Baron Cohen of YT.

Made his dough by being as offensive as possible to get a point across and then when the rules of the game change, he simps to them so that no one can do what he did anymore and thus in turn invalidating himself as a pioneer for that sort of content.

 

[CDWLTY]

That interview is loathesome. He needs to fuck his own dick with some rebar.

 

[M0JY0]

Thank you for moving Commie Cuntman's rant to Spergatory, mod.

Sounds like Mr Dubbz rebuilt his confidence after having the scary chinless bullyjerk removed. What a bitch.

And his fans will still conveniently ignore that and shit on Leafy for troll shielding. Ever since Leafy came back he has been laying low outside of the Ice Cream Man video. He has truly been reduced to 'cuck' in the simplest, most pathetic form.

 

[Xerxes IX]

Thank you for moving Commie Cuntman's rant to Spergatory, mod.

And his fans will still conveniently ignore that and shit on Leafy for troll shielding. Ever since Leafy came back he has been laying low outside of the Ice Cream Man video. He has truly been reduced to 'cuck' in the simplest, most pathetic form.

If he had any balls left he would have made Content Cop Leafy V2 while Leafy was putting out videos and shit on Leafy for trollshielding himself. But classic Idubbbz is gone, he's a cuck, and he'd probably use BLM as an excuse as to why no Content Cop (which is also cucked).

 

[Jack Awful]

An entertainer with principles getting big and then immediately abandoning them to stay big and eliminate competition is unfortunately common.

Look at comedians like Sarah Silverman and Jimmy Kimmel getting big by doing edgy stuff like doing blackface before going woke and criticizing people for doing less.

 

[Jonah Hill poster]

Idubbbz is the Sacha Baron Cohen of YT.

Made his dough by being as offensive as possible to get a point across and then when the rules of the game change, he simps to them so that no one can do what he did anymore and thus in turn invalidating himself as a pioneer for that sort of content.

I wouldn’t be shocked if it turned out that iDubbbz slowly gravitated to h3h3, “stop doxing my mansion even though it’s public property”, soon. At least he didn’t go down the Mumkey Jones route.

 

[Kup]

I wouldn’t be shocked if it turned out that iDubbbz slowly gravitated to h3h3, “stop doxing my mansion even though it’s public property”, soon. At least he didn’t go down the Mumkey Jones route.

There’s still time for him to go full Mumkey..... I hope.