U.S. Riots of May 2020 over George Floyd and others - ITT: a bunch of faggots butthurt about worthless internet stickers

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pokemonquistador2 said:
Shoe on Head turned Commie? I guess she wasn't getting enough attention in the Men's movement.

Can any of these tankies point to a Communist regime that's actually worked? I mean, one where the government centrally plans the economy, not one where a wealthy Eurotrash country decides to use its excess money to import and/or support a perpetual underclass.
Click to expand...
Zimbabwe worked: killed a lot more niggers than Rhodesia.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Allakazam223, Justa Grata Honoria, spiritofamermaid and 5 others
all of this bitching about IQ scores is counter productive. Even if black people are inferior to white people they are still human. I think the main takeaway from all of this is that handholding black people and giving them free stuff the way BLM wants is not what is best for them. We need to adopt a libertarian system so the actually smart people of all races get to make money and pass on there genes so that natrual selection can run its course.
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Winner
Reactions: Eidman, Allakazam223, Livecorpse and 19 others
Evilronald said:
Everytime I see something as cringe as this I know exactly the kind of people that Biden has working for him and would put in his administration. It’s honestly impressive just how out-of-touch people in Washington are with regular people. Like who reviewed this and thought “yea this will really resonate with the young people!”
Click to expand...
I wonder how many handlers Biden has to have to not grope and molest Kamala. Given the recent outing of the secret service/navy incidents. No wonder she keeps her distance.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Allakazam223, Constellationzero and spiritofamermaid
kuniqsX said:
Who said voting preference has any connection to IQ?
Cambodia's intellectual elite (not liberal big-brains, legit smart young people) cheered the Khmer Rouge which tortured them to death, the same with Tsarist Russia and Bolsheviks. You can be smart but innocent (gullible) at the same time y'know.
Click to expand...
Are the elites smart or just wealthy enough to be allowed into the social circles that lets them i to better schools and opportunities? I’ve met some elites that don’t know the difference between a carburetor and a fuel injector. Are they really high IQ? Looking at the requirements from Harvard, I doubt it. If you’re white, you’ll need god tier IQ and work ethic to be allowed in. If you’re a nigger, stringing words together will do.

pwnest injun said:
Additionally, they're a bunch of woman-beating pedophiles and The Community fucking hates them.
Click to expand...
You make it seem like beating women is a bad thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allakazam223, Justa Grata Honoria, spiritofamermaid and 3 others
I hope Trump brings this up during the debate and makes fun of Joe for it. Like Joe is all talk and no action. He’s even worse than Hillary. The things he does get done, his own supporters hate. He wants to take away your guns, despite the most civil unrest in decades. He might say he’s going to do things, but it’s pretty obvious that if the government isn’t expecting a riot you’re on your own. And even if they are expecting a riot they’ll either do nothing or not have enough support. Guns is the big issue Trump needs to attack that retard Joe on.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Justa Grata Honoria, spiritofamermaid, murgatroid and 3 others
Neanderthal Guru said:
Almost every poll has Trump losing the battleground states. I know polls got it wrong it 2016, but they still all gave Trump a decent chance to win. Biden is likely the next president, as much as people would like to believe otherwise. Maybe lightning strikes twice, but anyone who isn't completely dominated by TES should acknowledge that Trump is likely out give current polling. Polls have very high accuracy. That they were wrong in one case is not indicative of a very flawed methodology. I would prefer Trump win, even though I think he's bottom-feeding trash, but it's unlikely.
Click to expand...

No they really don’t. If you actually look into said polls, they all show the Battlegrounds results to be well within the margin of error using the pollsters own methodology. If you look at their samples and apply proper methodology . here’s a hint Democrats don’t enjoy a 70% advantage in “Battleground” States. If they did they would not be battleground states. So weighting polls 36% Dem 26% GOP is crooked as shit. If Biden is ahead but within the margin of error within the battleground states, with the 70% Dem oversample, Then he is losing catastrophically.

Other presenting evidence seems to back this up. Biden has lost the unions in the Battleground states. They’ve heavily backed Trump (because their members swung Trump last time in spite of their Hillary endorsements.) Trump delivered heavily for the rust belt unions. Joe Biden spent decades selling them out. Trump seems to be polling up to and even in some cases above 30% with black voters. Especially Black males. There is virtually no set of circumstances where Joe Biden loses 30 percent of Black Voters and is legitimately polling above Trump in those states. At the point where the Dems lose 30% of the Black vote they become the Whigs.

Now as to how and why the pollsters are doing this and maintaining (badly) the aura of legitimacy. Presidential Polling generally uses the turnout for the previous two Presidential elections to calculate weighting and likely voters. But they also will often drop an outlier or Black Swan event election. This is letting them cheat badly. They leftist media pollsters claim 2016 was the Black Swan event, and calculate based on 2008 and 2012. Years that experienced grossly disproportionate black voter turnout and a general apathy among GOP voters. The real truth is 2016 turnout was in line with historical norms. 2008 and 2012 were the actual outliers. The literal Black Swan event the disproportionately altered the normal voting patterns was the Obama candidacy , not Trump. If when looking at 2016 polling you drop 2008 as the outlier and use 2004 instead, even leaving 2012, you can clearly see the Trump victory looming in the polls. Similarly this year if you keep 2016 and drop 2008, as honest polling would do, you see a clear Trump victory, probably not far removed from Reagan’s 1980 map. Not quite the complete blowouts of 1972 or 1984, but a clear sweep. With Trump taking 45-47 States.

While Trump won’t take California, he has a good chance of seeing better numbers in the popular vote this year. With all the rioting do you think more people in Cali and the Pacific Northwest will vote Dem than did last time? Safety is the single biggest driver of voting. If you don’t feel safe you don’t vote for the people making you feel unsafe. Joe Biden’s “Vote for me or my minions will burn your cities“ approach really doesn’t work. They won’t vote for the guy more likely to appease the rioters and give them your stuff. They vote for whoever promises to shoot the rioters. (Heck even the Nazi’s understood this, they somehow managed to both be the violent thugs, and campaign as the people who would shoot the violent thugs.)
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Useless Magost Berry, Christ on a crutch, Spergoy of Cuckkad and 48 others
Jub-Jub said:
View attachment 1575513
Click to expand...

I know it's a meme, but reality isn't far from it. Before I went to sleep last night, I was reading an AP article titled:

Unruly Portland protests not abating after 100 straight days

Let's see how they describe these "unruly protests"

Molotov cocktails thrown in the street during a march sparked a large fire and prompted police to declare a riot. Video posted online appeared to show tear gas being deployed to clear protesters from what police said was an unpermitted demonstration. Arrests were made, but it wasn’t immediately clear how many.

At least one community member was injured, police said. People were “engaging in tumultuous and violent conduct thereby intentionally or recklessly creating a grave risk of causing public alarm,” the department tweeted. “Fire bombs were thrown at officers.”
Click to expand...

They've since updated the title:
Dozens arrested as violent Portland protests continue
https://apnews.com/8ff3c46d2ae53c6cd6d82e889790b3cb (https://archive.vn/PFzaY)

I'm guessing an editor told them that although the redefinition of language is coming along nicely, describing the throwing of Molotov cocktails as "unruly" is taking things a bit too far.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Coal Burner Account, Bungus Scrungus, sKr0n and 11 others
Simpadoo said:
Are the elites smart or just wealthy enough to be allowed into the social circles that lets them i to better schools and opportunities? I’ve met some elites that don’t know the difference between a carburetor and a fuel injector. Are they really high IQ? Looking at the requirements from Harvard, I doubt it. If you’re white, you’ll need god tier IQ and work ethic to be allowed in. If you’re a nigger, stringing words together will do.
Click to expand...
You can be smart but not know what grass is. Knowledge =/= intelligence.
Also intelligence =/= wisdom.
Aristotle thought slavery wasn't a bad thing and that women are animals. Despite that, I doubt I'd win a debate against him or con him.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Coal Burner Account, lolwut, Allakazam223 and 9 others
HTTP Error 404 said:
View attachment 1574415

Paul Krugman would like you to know that the 100 days of Antifa rioting you've been watching on livestream did not, in fact, occur.

You saw nothing and there was no violence. Antifa never spent 3 months trying to burn down a courthouse with people in it. Antifa didn't do a targeted revenge killing of a Trump supporter in retaliation for a 17 year old boy BTFO'ing their goons in Kenosha. Kenosha wasn't burned down, and Seattle didn't have Marxist insurrectionists take over a 6 city block neighborhood and terrorize them for weeks.

None of that happened. Krugman has spoken.

I don't remember this guy, other than he was a pretty big name in the bubble back in the day.
Click to expand...

"Central Park was full of joggers and cyclists"

Can we start using "cyclist" as a stand in for upper middle class baizuo communist scum? It's perfect on so many levels.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Christ on a crutch, CashMoney!, Coal Burner Account and 31 others
wopirish said:
I wonder how many handlers Biden has to have to not grope and molest Kamala. Given the recent outing of the secret service/navy incidents. No wonder she keeps her distance.
Click to expand...

Kamala is the one politician known for trading sex for political opportunity. She literally fucked her way up the ladder. Biden chose the Veep candidate with the history of being perfectly fine with taking it up the ass from old men in exchange for power. Why would you assume any of his handlers are trying to prevent it?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Winner
  • Agree
Reactions: Christ on a crutch, CashMoney!, Coal Burner Account and 17 others
Simpadoo said:
Are the elites smart or just wealthy enough to be allowed into the social circles that lets them i to better schools and opportunities? I’ve met some elites that don’t know the difference between a carburetor and a fuel injector. Are they really high IQ? Looking at the requirements from Harvard, I doubt it. If you’re white, you’ll need god tier IQ and work ethic to be allowed in. If you’re a nigger, stringing words together will do.


You make it seem like beating women is a bad thing.
Click to expand...
You seem to forget that bribing your way into and through Ivies has been commonplace for decades, if not centuries. Also being smart and knowing things are different. The politicians have been training to deal with people and only people. Not things. Even the smart ones know little to nothing of real-world stuff unless it falls into one of their hobbies.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Allakazam223, spiritofamermaid, Fangsofjeff and 6 others
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Useless Magost Berry, Spergoy of Cuckkad, CivilianOfTheFandomWars and 143 others
Random Internet Person said:
Is this a real thing? It feels like something some conspiracy guys and the ACAB crowd would come up with. Or gangbangers who see cops as rivals encroaching on turf instead of as...cops.
Click to expand...
Someone posted an article about a cop whistleblower trying to expose the "executioner gang" a few weeks ago.

https://www.the-sun.com/news/1254411/cop-department-executioners-nazi-tattoos-illegal-arrests/

Fangsofjeff said:
View attachment 1575518
View attachment 1575520
Click to expand...
Why does the wife sound like a spastic?

"We don't have maAHSks, this is a neighborhoOOAHD"
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Allakazam223, spiritofamermaid and Lissamine Green
RodgerDodger said:
2008 and 2012 were the actual outliers.
Click to expand...
I don't really think 08 and 12 were outliers, speaking in general historical trends, 8 years of GOP normally follows a DNC election and vice versa, and 2012 was a re-election, historically incumbents win re-election.
If you want an outlier 1992, when Bush Sr. lost his re-election campaign. Only happens 5 times in the 20th century. (Taft, Hoover, Ford, Carter, Bush Sr). There have been 25 to 26 elections in the 20th century depending if you count the 2000 election cycle as "20th century" (since it started in '99)
So just looking at the 1900s there is about a 95% 80% chance of an incumbent president winning re-election.

edit: Math is not my strong suite.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Allakazam223, spiritofamermaid, SuiSui1 and 4 others
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Allakazam223, spiritofamermaid, Doctor Ivo Robotnik Sr. and 5 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back