There are so many tools you can use to satisfy a woman (hell, far more than there are for men) that still allow for mutually pleasurable lovemaking, I fail to see how avoiding a few particular positions during certain time periods can be considered sexually repressing. Same reasoning can be applied to the use of condoms.
And just in case this will devolve into "but they can't cum into a vag, it's not the same" - shockingly enough, yes,
quite a few of them can nowadays (though they seem like a hard to justify expense to most I reckon)
First, thank you from one woman to another for being able to discuss this issue maturely, respectfully and with dignity.
(Squirting dildos, nice! Never knew they existed! This might change my plans to order from EdenFantasys.com!)
The issue I see is that "during certain time periods" can be a window of almost 2 weeks. Can a healthy couple really go 2 weeks every month with no vaginal sex? I don't think so. That's a long time when you sleep next to each other every night.
The other issue I see is that although the ovulation is only 7 days of "high risk" of pregnancy, the ovum still can be fertilized on these blue days (see below). Not so clean cut and dry as science might think. I've heard all sorts of stories of people getting pregnant all sorts of ways out of the "scientific theory".
The other issue is when you don't have a period at all. Each time I have breastfed my children, I don't get my period for about 18 months - 24 months after birth. So I can't even chart ovulation very well, except by vaginal fluids. In 15 years, I've only had 5 periods because breastfeeding (using ecological breastfeeding) has put my in Amenorrhea (other than pregnancy).
I'm not saying all this to be TMI, just from a philosophical POV, that you can't always control fertility charting.
Zucc didn't actually go back to uni, he was awarded an honorary degree from Harvard, I recommend checking your sources more often
I looked it up again. Can't figure out what an "honorary degree" is. They gave him college credits for hands on stuff/independent study?
They gave it to him on their 366th Anniversary. Interesting. Is he a Free Mason?
I wonder if Melinda might rethink her feelings about Marshall's ex wife, now that she has " seen the light " about him. She now claims he is a narcissist, who emotionally abandons people, who refuses to acknowledge and support his children, who is controlling...
I still don't respect her choice to collect child support from Marshall despite the fact that her new husband has spiritually adopted Marshall's biological daughter. That looks bad for all women, all single moms. And I still don't believe she didn't contribute to deep psychological stress in Marshall, because of her addictions. I've had exes with addictions and my mother was a drug addict, so I'm somewhat biased
against addicts. They cause a lot of stress
Ultimately, she's still not a Torah follower and I won't hold a trial here between her and Marshall. I can't judge her against The Torah, she isn't an Israelite. Elohim judges those outside of The Torah.
Marshall was open and honest about lots of fights he had with his ex-wife and the woman he lived with for 3 1/2 years before that (another "ex-wife", technically, because they shared a house together). He didn't hide his part personally with me about the conflicts with them. He shared with me the anger he felt at their unrighteous choices. "I got angry because they did A, B or C". My brain registered that as "I would appreciate having a woman who makes righteous choices".
But I do think I see something different now: he doesn't get angry with a woman only because of their evil actions, he just gets angry at a Covenant partner for no damn good reason too!
Idealize, devalue, discard...
That's all I'm going to say about that!
I'll save the rest for therapy!
Every time you claim you're better than us and how all your little accomplishments in your life is better than anyone here.
But you aren't "everyone". You're a group of Goy coming at me with spears!