Lolcow Melinda Leigh Scott & Marshall Castersen - Sue-happy couple. Flat earth conspiracists. Pretending to be Jewish. Believe Kiwi Farms is protected by the Masonic Order. 0-6 on lawsuits. Marshall is dead.

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

Also, it's been scientifically proven that pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood changes a woman's brain. Increases her intelligence.

SO there's that.

I found no scientific proof of this after a cowering about 10 pages of Google and duckduckgo, only thing of significance was a wall street journal article. In which case that's what you're alluding to, the WSJ isn't science.

Also, take a mental health exam. Bring back the results.
I fucking dare you.

 

[LoverofPi]

You tried to place the entire value of Netzarim Judaism upon one person

Oh, no, all of "Netzarim Judaism" is equally worthless.

That's not a FACT. That's an accusation. Strike two.

Again, this is an accusation not based upon facts.

They are based on your own self reported history. I guess we can conclude you don't speak facts, then.
And there's another strike. Got us quakin' in our boots ye do.

A fool, according to Hebraic Scriptures, is someone who won't follow The Torah. You have failed to define "fool" correctly

Pssst! Mel! There are other sources for things besides the torah. You can be a fool any number of ways. For example, heavily participating in a discussion about yourself that you want gone, thus perpetuating it.

Exactly. Because you are a morally degenerate person who believes that Happiness is the ultimate good and that Benevolent Evil is justified. It doesn't even occur to you that just because an evil person treats you well doesn't justify your being with them in a marriage.

That is a theological and moral error on your part, but you are a Christian, so I am not surprised by your lack of morality.

Here's a saying for you: "you don't know what goes on behind closed doors".
IE--some women think they are being treated well, you won't know what really goes on in their house because they want to save face. Or they say they are being treated well but can't even recognize their injury because they dont even know what a good man is. They think behaviors that are abusive are actually "normal"

You could open a 12 screen IMAX with that level of projection, Mel.

This is called Narration. You are trying to tell me how I feel instead of letting me speak for myself, the number 1 trait of Narcissists!

Okay, even if it were the number one trait of narcs, it is not, you do this exact same thing all the time, Mel.

For the record, NPD's primary traits are a pattern of self centered and arrogant thinking and behavior, lack of empathy and consideration of others, and excessive need for admiration or validation.

According to who? You? The uneducated, Christian who can't make a single logical argument??

According to everyone. Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Hindu, Atheist, educated, uneducated, everyone can see your lack of redeeming qualities, and your plethora of undesirable ones.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

I found no scientific proof of this after a cowering about 10 pages of Google and duckduckgo, only thing of significance was a wall street journal article. In which case that's what you're alluding to, the WSJ isn't science.

The Mommy Brain: How Motherhood Makes Us Smarter
jarm.journals.yorku.ca › jarm › article › download

workshop for women writers of colour where the presenter mistook her for white ... In The Mommy Brain: How Motherhood Makes Us Smarter, Katherine Ellison.
by C Brannen

Are 'Mommy Brains' Smarter?

Certainly, New Book Contends; Author Speaks To <b>Harry Smith</b>

www.cbsnews.com

How Motherhood Makes You Smarter

New studies on rats show that being a mom does more than change her body, it may maximize her brainpower too

www.smithsonianmag.com

.

Also, take a mental health exam. Bring back the results.
I fucking dare you.

I don't need to. I care more about what The Torah says about my behavior.

lack of empathy

Incorrect. It's lack of empathy WHEN empathy would be the appropriate response. NOT universal empathy in all situations

everyone can see your lack of redeeming qualities, and your plethora of undesirable ones.

You don't speak for everyone

534 pages and you still have yet to adequately prove I have committed any sin for every accusation you have put me on trial for here. You Goy are so foolish!

Congrats Tamar

 

[LoverofPi]

Incorrect. It's lack of empathy WHEN empathy would be the appropriate response. NOT universal empathy in all situations

Okay, you still show that and all the other symptoms.

You don't speak for everyone

I speak for everyone else here on this particular matter, I'll wager, and most people that meet you.

534 pages and you still have yet to adequately prove I have committed any sin for every accusation you have put me on trial for here. You Goy are so foolish!

Congrats Tamar

Mel, you are hilariously mistaken if you think that's the purpose of the thread or if you think you haven't handily proven every accusation against you even without our help.

 

[Sir Dank-a-Lot]

It's a folly to think that way. Truth is truth, regardless of anyone's free will. You cannot judge Truth by the actions of others. Truth is found by logic, reason and study.

Should I stop believing in The Creator just because of what others who believe in The Creator have done to me?





According to what facts?





Where did I ever say that?




Of course, there are other compatibility issues at play. However, marijuana is clean, so if he doesn't accept it than he is not spiritually in line with The Torah. Also, men of YHWH don't believe women are the hunters, so that usually isn't an issue. The Sages of the Apocrypha say its a man's job to be the head provider.

If a man my age can't accept a woman with children his thinking is wrong. Because it's impossible to be in your 30s and not have children unless you did something evil like (a) take birth control (b) have abortions (c) tied her tubes/removed her uterus or (d) watch porn to get off.

So, either he has to get with a Virgin, who is many many years younger, which presents its own problems (with the age gap), but is ultimately better than accepting a woman who had an abortion....or he has to accept a woman with children. You can't be both Righteous and not accept a woman with children (because women with children are the Righteous ones who didn't kill their children or do other evil things to have children).

There is one exception to this, philosophically speaking. A woman may have taken birth control in the past and then repented of it. But she isn't going to be as wise as a woman who had children and never took birth control. The longer you follow The Torah in a state of cleanness (not having taken birth control), the more anointing you will have. A woman who has a history of taking birth control is not going to be as anointed. She lived most of her time in a state of uncleanness.

Also, it's been scientifically proven that pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood changes a woman's brain. Increases her intelligence.

SO there's that.

Wrong. It’s obvious that you don’t have much of an education.

PASS.

 

[redcent]

You tried to place the entire value of Netzarim Judaism upon one person

and what do you place the entire value of Christianity upon? The boo hooing that a Christian hubby won't let you play fake matriarch?

I guess if the next netzarim guy makes you call him master again you'd probably treat your current cult like you do Christianity now.

That's not a FACT. That's an accusation. Strike two.

facts and accusations aren't mutually exclusive. And seeing as how there's no dispute I guess my accusation is a fact

Again, this is an accusation not based upon facts.

it's based on observations. Want to prove me wrong? Quit looking around for another guy to use you as a wank tissue. Suck it up, get a job, be something else other than a sex object

A fool, according to Hebraic Scriptures, is someone who won't follow The Torah. You have failed to define "fool" correctly

you come here on an English speaking forum, use English definitions or get the fuck out. You want to use hebrew definitions go to israel see how they like you.

 

[White Baby]

534 pages and you still have yet to adequately prove I have committed any sin for every accusation you have put me on trial for here. You Goy are so foolish!

Congrats Tamar

534 pages and you're still wasting day after day after day clamoring for attention instead of improving your circumstances in any meaningful way.

That is a theological and moral error on your part, but you are a Christian, so I am not surprised by your lack of morality.

What makes you think I'm Christian?

Here's a saying for you: "you don't know what goes on behind closed doors".
IE--some women think they are being treated well, you won't know what really goes on in their house because they want to save face.

Like how Marshall mistreated you whenever you tried to hold him responsible for anything, and you insisted beyond all logic and reason that he was the most upstanding man you'd ever met? Including writing a cringe poem for him? Good job finding Netzarim dudes who treat you right.

Does it chafe you to see mixed faith couples loving one another and facing challenges as a team, when you've never been able to find stable happiness with a man?

This is called Narration. You are trying to tell me how I feel instead of letting me speak for myself, the number 1 trait of Narcissists!

Lindy, you can barely talk on a good day, of course we all have to speak for you. You've failed at putting together a lawsuit coming up on six times now. Your communication skills are only one point above an untreated schizophrenic.

And how did he do that?

We've had this discussion before. You know how, you just refuse to accept it because you get off on the idea of a big strong man whipping his tiny misbehaving wife into place with his fists. Case in point, your disgusting bdsm kink with Marshall.

I don't need to. I care more about what The Torah says about my behavior.

You do? Then why do you complain about "exegesis" when anyone tries to use the words of the Messiah to hold you accountable?

 

[Bloitzhole]

Man does everything in pursuit of the Vagina.

Weird statement, but if we assume this to be true for just a moment, let's continue that chain of thought (utterly dehumanizing about half the human population and regarding them as nothing but robots programmed to achieve poon).
"Vagina" isn't all that difficult to "achieve" for a man, provided you work out, eat a decent diet, aren't a complete mong of a person and, ideally, aren't short. Once you've found someone you click with, maybe even on multiple levels (but some people just compliment eachother in bed) - What then? Is the whole relationship thing, in your view, just a way to secure future access to poon?

Truth is found by logic, reason and study.

I always thought that the whole abrahamic religion thingamajig also (or mostly) required faith.
(Fun tidbit - my software is pointing out that abrahamic is a misspelling and suggests correcting it to "abracadabra")

some women think they are being treated well

Could you give me a reasonably realistic example where someone is thinking they are being treated well, but even though they themselves consider that to be the case, they are in fact, not?

I will never believe for a second that charming men do not hide evil behind closed doors.

Reason and logic would dictate that the variable "charisma" is not inexorably linked to "hiding evil behind closed doors"

So, either he has to get with a Virgin, who is many many years younger, which presents its own problems (with the age gap), but is ultimately better than accepting a woman who had an abortion...

This is the sort of statement that really makes people not want to take you serious. Just pointing that out.

Also, it's been scientifically proven that pregnancy, childbirth and motherhood changes a woman's brain. Increases her intelligence.

You cited a couple of (mostly tabloid) sources there that referenced studies done on rats. I put it to you that most people are not rats.

Congrats Tamar

Now that's just depressing

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

You rely heavily on The Talmud, not The Torah. So I just don't see any substance in what you are saying

I'm talking about the Tanakh, you know the Hebrew Holy Bible. It has more than just the Torah in it.

Were you always this retarded or did you become this stupid because of all the beatings from Marshall? I can still send you a copy since you don't seem to own one.

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

I'm talking about the Tanakh, you know the Hebrew Holy Bible. It has more than just the Torah in it.

Were you always this retarded or did you become this stupid because of all the beatings from Marshall? I can still send you a copy since you don't seem to own one.

I would prefer if you just didn't bring Marshall up anymore. I'm working on a 40 day process of healing and restoring myself right now from what I experienced in that relationship. Bringing him up is counter productive.
17 days done. 23 to go.

I bought a Masoretic Text and JP Green's Interlinear in 2008. You're welcome to send me a Samaritan Torah though. I've been waiting for some extra money to get one. They finally released an English translation in 2013.
My PO BOX is listed on page 40 of this thread. Thanks!

ou cited a couple of (mostly tabloid) sources there that referenced studies done on rats. I put it to you that most people are not rats.

Incorrect, look again. Especially the first link (a PDF)

Could you give me a reasonably realistic example where someone is thinking they are being treated well, but even though they themselves consider that to be the case, they are in fact, not?

Yes. The man who praises his wife for doing everything around the house, while having a job, and being pregnant at the same time. This is benevolent abuse: giving the person praise for something that is actually abusing them (overloading them with responsibility). This pattern also plays out in men who praise women for accepting submission doctrines or Polygyny. The woman is praised because she accepts the (mental) abuse.

you come here on an English speaking forum, use English definitions or get the fuck out. You want to use hebrew definitions go to israel see how they like you.

Correction. You put MY NAME - the name of a Hebraic minded woman - up on your site. I came here owning myself, owning my past and owning my sexuality. I am a Hebrew minded woman. I will be true to myself.

Mel, you are hilariously mistaken if you think that's the purpose of the thread or if you think you haven't handily proven every accusation against you even without our help.

Au contraire! The following moral judgments were made against me on this site on March 13, 2017 and the resulting comments on all threads:

1. I was called an Adultress
2. I was called a loon (my mental health was insulted)
3. I was cast in a negative light for engaging in Serial Monogamy
4. I was cast in a negative light for not submitting to Patriarchy
5. I was ridiculed for not being a Pacifist


So there you have it, THE FACTS

534 pages and you're still wasting day after day after day clamoring for attention instead of improving your circumstances in any meaningful way.

Look at your Narcissistic attempt at re-framing. PATHETIC

Does it chafe you to see mixed faith couples loving one another and facing challenges as a team, when you've never been able to find stable happiness with a man?

You still don't get it do you.

MORAL PRINCIPLE 1: Happiness does not validate a decision
MORAL PRINCIPLE 2: Happiness is not the goal, righteousness is
MORAL PRINCIPLE 3: Interfaith marriages are forbidden by The Torah

Do yourself a favor and get some education and actually read The Bible

We've had this discussion before. You know how, you just refuse to accept it because you get off on the idea of a big strong man whipping his tiny misbehaving wife into place with his fists. Case in point, your disgusting bdsm kink with Marshall.

Besides the fact that your details here are not factually correct, yoking someone up with a red mark does not threaten there life

ou do? Then why do you complain about "exegesis" when anyone tries to use the words of the Messiah to hold you accountable?

All exegesis must start at The Torah (the foundation/the beginning)

Like how Marshall mistreated you whenever you tried to hold him responsible for anything, and you insisted beyond all logic and reason that he was the most upstanding man you'd ever met? Including writing a cringe poem for him?

My poem was written before I met him

Just because a man does something wrong doesn't mean he isn't righteous. Means he is not TAMIYM. (A righteous person who keeps falling though a doesn't repent doesn't necessarily go to the New Jerusalem either. Look at Lot, for example. He was saved once because he was Righteous. But then afterward, he became evil)

"Don’t lurk like an outlaw near the home of the righteous,
don’t raid the place where he lives.
For though he falls seven times, he will get up again;
it’s the wicked who fail under stress." (Prov. 24:15-16)

"“On the other hand, when the righteous person turns away from his righteousness and commits wickedness by acting in accordance with all the disgusting practices that the wicked person does, will he live? None of the righteous deeds he has done will be remembered; for the trespasses and sins he has committed, he will die." Ezekiel 18:24

Good job finding Netzarim dudes who treat you right.

Victim blaming right here

Hun, AT LEAST I WENT LOOKING for Netzarim. How many people can say they even seek? It's better to seek and not find then to be complacent and lukewarm.

I gave you 4 sects of Christianity that teaches that women are spiritual equals.

So, I looked up the doctrinal statements of Methodist, Quakers, and Nazarene and each of them claims that Paul's writings are Scripture. Therefore, they are all inherently sexist. Any religion that accepts the writings of Rabbi Paul of Tarsus, is SEXIST. Paul teaches that women are second rate creations, so any scholar or church that accepts his writings is EVIL

Also, I do not see any scholastic consensus that Cathars are Christians. One scholar even thinks they never existed. That they are just a legend.

 

[Spergichu]

Marshall.

 

[redcent]

I would prefer if you just didn't bring Marshall up anymore. I'm working on a 40 day process of healing and restoring myself right now from what I experienced in that relationship. Bringing him up is counter productive.
17 days done. 23 to go.

I bought a Masoretic Text and JP Green's Interlinear in 2008. You're welcome to send me a Samaritan Torah though. I've been waiting for some extra money to get one. They finally released an English translation in 2013.
My PO BOX is listed on page 40 of this thread. Thanks!






Incorrect, look again. Especially the first link (a PDF)





Yes. The man who praises his wife for doing everything around the house, while having a job, and being pregnant at the same time. This is benevolent abuse: giving the person praise for something that is actually abusing them (overloading them with responsibility). This pattern also plays out in men who praise women for accepting submission doctrines or Polygyny. The woman is praised because she accepts the (mental) abuse.





Correction. You put MY NAME - the name of a Hebraic minded woman - up on your site. I came here owning myself, owning my past and owning my sexuality. I am a Hebrew minded woman. I will be true to myself.

Oh....?

Au contraire! The following moral judgments were made against me on this site on March 13, 2017 and the resulting comments on all threads:

1. I was called an Adultress
2. I was called a loon (my mental health was insulted)
3. I was cast in a negative light for engaging in Serial Monogamy
4. I was cast in a negative light for not submitting to Patriarchy
5. I was ridiculed for not being a Pacifist


So there you have it, THE FACTS

534 pages and you haven't disputed any of those facts that you are a whore, a loon, a tart, a patriarchy lovng bitch or a violent psychopath

534 pages and people still don't like you.

You are not owning yourself. You are failing yourself. Who are you trying to convince? Yourself?

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

Oh....?
534 pages and you haven't disputed any of those facts that you are a whore, a loon, a tart, a patriarchy lovng bitch or a violent psychopath

534 pages and people still don't like you.

You are not owning yourself. You are failing yourself. Who are you trying to convince? Yourself?

You're just trying to piss me off saying this. You know I think the exact opposite of everything you just wrote. I'm not even going to let you push my buttons with this comment!

 

[Toasty]

You're just trying to piss me off saying this. You know I think the exact opposite of everything you just wrote. I'm not even going to let you push my buttons with this comment!

And yet she still got a reaction out of you. Top kek.

 

[LoverofPi]

Au contraire! The following moral judgments were made against me on this site on March 13, 2017 and the resulting comments on all threads:

1. I was called an Adultress
2. I was called a loon (my mental health was insulted)
3. I was cast in a negative light for engaging in Serial Monogamy
4. I was cast in a negative light for not submitting to Patriarchy
5. I was ridiculed for not being a Pacifist


So there you have it, THE FACTS

Yes, people have made fun of you. Gotten you riled up. Whether or not the mockery is proven is secondary to the thrust of the thread, which is to rile you up for amusing content.
Also if those are the things you "stand accused of" then you are demonstrably guilty of three of them by your own direct assertions, and the other two by analysis of your own statements.

I'm not sure you've thought this through, Lindy.

You still don't get it do you.

MORAL PRINCIPLE 1: Happiness does not validate a decision
MORAL PRINCIPLE 2: Happiness is not the goal, righteousness is
MORAL PRINCIPLE 3: Interfaith marriages are forbidden by The Torah

Do yourself a favor and get some education and actually read The Bible

Those are YOUR moral principles, Lindy. And even then they're not really principles you adhere to. Just loudly proclaim to.

Besides the fact that your details here are not factually correct, yoking someone up with a red mark does not threaten there life

All exegesis must start at The Torah (the foundation/the beginning)

And when that is quoted to you, you refuse it unless it fits your very narrow interpretation of it.

Hun, AT LEAST I WENT LOOKING for Netzarim. How many people can say they even seek? It's better to seek and not find then to be complacent and lukewarm.

Most people aren't looking for someone that belongs to a certain club, rather someone that has positive qualities they want in a partner. Maybe that's your mistake.

Also, I do not see any scholastic consensus that Cathars are Christians. One scholar even thinks they never existed. That they are just a legend.

Coming from a Netzarim, that is quite hilarious.

You're just trying to piss me off saying this. You know I think the exact opposite of everything you just wrote. I'm not even going to let you push my buttons with this comment!

She cried, buttons thoroughly pressed.

 

[redcent]

You're just trying to piss me off saying this. You know I think the exact opposite of everything you just wrote.

I know that's what you believe, the lolcows mocked in this forum tend to lack self awareness.

I'm not even going to let you push my buttons with this comment!

And yet you still replied, proving the contrary

534 pages of you being pissed off. You want another 534 pages?

 

[Toasty]

Coming from a Netzarim, that is quite hilarious.

My heart is full of joy at this observation.

 

[obliviousbeard]

You know, I was writing a long post about Evangelic Lutherans in Nordic and Baltic countries as an example of christians who don't put up with idea that men are somehow higher in totem pole, and how they regard morals and ethics coming from inside, not scripture (which is polar opposite of what Tamar here seems to suggest) while asking her opinions. But then I figured out that it'd be waste of time, since she'd probably just skip that or post "but they're not x because I didn't find anything that support my views".

Correction. You put MY NAME - the name of a Hebraic minded woman - up on your site. I came here owning myself, owning my past and owning my sexuality. I am a Hebrew minded woman. I will be true to myself.

Does this mean if I stand in front of my mirror during midnight and say your name out loud three times, you appear? Since good part of what we call 'people of interest' don't even bother coming here (you know what they say about wrestling hog in the mud).

 

[TamarYaelBatYah]

You know, I was writing a long post about Evangelic Lutherans in Nordic and Baltic countries as an example of christians who don't put up with idea that men are somehow higher in totem pole, and how they regard morals and ethics coming from inside, not scripture (which is polar opposite of what Tamar here seems to suggest) while asking her opinions. But then I figured out that it'd be waste of time, since she'd probably just skip that or post "but they're not x because I didn't find anything that support my views".

If they don't put up with the idea, then why do they still adhere to the Protestant Canon? Can't have it both ways!

Coming from a Netzarim, that is quite hilarious.

Hey, all I'm saying is that Carboard Box Boy over there needs to demonstrate that they can even be classified as Christians. Otherwise, it's a shaky foundational statement to debate

Most people aren't looking for someone that belongs to a certain club, rather someone that has positive qualities they want in a partner. Maybe that's your mistake.

No, I find that morally degenerate: the idea that one would marry another person simply because of what that person can give them (emotional, financial, mental, sexual etc), rather than on the basis of whether or not that person is holistically good or righteous.

A man of YHWH should be able to treat a woman righteously. Whether or not he reaches that potential is up to him. But I think it's more of a gamble to marry someone who is not a truth seeker, even if he does have "positive qualities".

 

[Burmese Rice Farmer]

You're just trying to piss me off saying this. You know I think the exact opposite of everything you just wrote. I'm not even going to let you push my buttons with this comment!

If you aren't letting it push your buttons then why did you feel the need to respond saying that this totally doesn't piss you off and affect you then