Furry Fandom and Drama General

[Claude Speed]

View attachment 1579592

I want an ipad and a pen to use for drawing, would anyone be willing to be suckered in to trading one for shit I probably will never do?

edit: I found the retard.
View attachment 1579600

Hey I want a free iPad too.
*jewishtricks.mp4*

 

[billydero]

View attachment 1579592

I want an ipad and a pen to use for drawing, would anyone be willing to be suckered in to trading one for shit I probably will never do?

edit: I found the retard.
View attachment 1579600

someone I know, who is familiar with this fandom, consistently refers to the furries as “snake oil salesmen.” Probably one of the best and most apt description I’ve ever heard.

although if you get into a detailed conversation with them, they usually will clarify that by saying that it is a “fandom of sociopaths“. Also a very apt description.

 

[Uncle Warren]

someone I know, who is familiar with this fandom, consistently refers to the furries as “snake oil salesmen.”

More like snake cum salesmen.

 

[YayLasagna]

It started with Furry Life Online hosting a poll on whether they should make NSFW feral art. There's a generally even split of furries taking both sides, but all the secret-zoophiles are either staying silent or backing the "feral porn is fine" stance.

I've been keeping tabs and building archives on a few. Sparx_x_x, who had a SWAT raid done on her home because her roommate / partner / EX was a pedophile trying to groom kids, came out in favor of feral porn because "it's my sparkledog and she can have a dick bigger than a human's if I want".

The only thing I've ever noticed furries are more loudly split on is the cub shit. I'm still sometimes scratching my head when the argue over the feral shit cause you're a fucking furry, you're already halfway there why you acting like you have a moral high ground?

I checked that site out. Jesus fuck I hate their layout.

 

[Lou’s Biggest Fan]

The only thing I've ever noticed furries are more loudly split on is the cub shit. I'm still sometimes scratching my head when the argue over the feral shit cause you're a fucking furry, you're already halfway there why you acting like you have a moral high ground?

To play devil’s advocate I guess it could be said that it’s along the same lines as BDSM. Yeah you’re half way to tying somebody up and raping them but it’s the nuance of consent and setting boundaries and respecting them that differentiates bondage kinks from criminal acts. Furries trying to oust feral shit is at the very least trying to set standards for their weird kink with a line drawn at “we’re jacking off to humanoid animals and fur suits, not blatant zoophilia drawings and family pets”.

Maybe I’m just giving them too much credit but I’ve never been a fan of the “you’re already half way there might as well go all the way” argument.

Doesn’t change the fact that they’re degenerate freaks but it’s nice to see at least some vague attempt at implementing standards every once in a while whenever critical mass is achieved and furries begin to have a tiny glimpse of what could be considered self awareness.

It’s a shame it never fucking works because for every self aware furry there’s several dozen puppyfuckers, half of which are in positions of influence

 

[Just Another Furgag Alog]

It’s a shame it never fucking works because for every self aware furry there’s several dozen puppyfuckers, half most of which are in positions of influence

Most of which. Dragoneer's habit of protecting, even promoting, dogfuckers just as one example.

 

[Corn Flakes]

It’s a shame it never fucking works because for every self aware furry there’s several dozen puppyfuckers, half of which are in positions of influence

There's something interesting about how furries like to claim they're progressive and anti-establishment, yet their community has such a well-entrenched political class it's an establishment in and of itself. You have creeps, grifters, pedos, dogfuckers and dogfucker-adjacents in influential positions in the fandom for over ten years, despite periodic call-outs, evidence leaks and even full-on police investigations and/or convictions, all because they keep covering up for one another.

Our political parties wish they could protect their seedy underbelly so cheaply.

 

[Kane Lives]

There's something interesting about how furries like to claim they're progressive and anti-establishment, yet their community has such a well-entrenched political class it's an establishment in and of itself. You have creeps, grifters, pedos, dogfuckers and dogfucker-adjacents in influential positions in the fandom for over ten years, despite periodic call-outs, evidence leaks and even full-on police investigations and/or convictions, all because they keep covering up for one another.

Our political parties wish they could protect their seedy underbelly so cheaply.

To play the devil's advocate, I'd argue that it's not hard to protect the entrenched class in the furry "fandom". Especially when furries start from a morally compromised position to begin with, and more likely than not, maladjusted socially that is more than easy to manipulate or deflect. Politicians, furries do not make.

 

[Corn Flakes]

To play the devil's advocate, I'd argue that it's not hard to protect the entrenched class in the furry "fandom". Especially when furries start from a morally compromised position to begin with, and more likely than not, maladjusted socially that is more than easy to manipulate or deflect. Politicians, furries do not make.

It really tells you something about how fucked up their fandom is, doesn't it?

 

[eternal dog mongler]

Most of which. Dragoneer's habit of protecting, even promoting, dogfuckers just as one example.

Remember when FA made a policy about banning actual real-life dogfuckers, then Barkwoof got her account hacked by an angry ex who posted a journal linking a video where she tried to fuck her dog (with no success) and then Chase (another dogfucker) just came in and deleted everything and nobody spoke about it anymore?

'cause I remember.

 

[Spoonomancer]

Chase (another dogfucker) just came in and deleted everything and nobody spoke about it anymore?

and now Chase is back at being an admin, despite saying that zoophilia isn't that bad?

 

[YayLasagna]

"Yeah my dog has anal fissures that have gone septic but it's fiiiiiiinnnneeeee."

 

[JethroTullamore]

Remember when FA made a policy about banning actual real-life dogfuckers, then Barkwoof got her account hacked by an angry ex who posted a journal linking a video where she tried to fuck her dog (with no success) and then Chase (another dogfucker) just came in and deleted everything and nobody spoke about it anymore?

'cause I remember.

Pepperidge farm remembers.

 

[Wheezy Asthmatic]

Remember when FA made a policy about banning actual real-life dogfuckers, then Barkwoof got her account hacked by an angry ex who posted a journal linking a video where she tried to fuck her dog (with no success) and then Chase (another dogfucker) just came in and deleted everything and nobody spoke about it anymore?

'cause I remember.

Don't suppose there's an archive of the journal?
Or even the FA account
Is she still active?

 

[Just Another Furgag Alog]

Don't suppose there's an archive of the journal?
Or even the FA account
Is she still active?

Seconded. I would fucking love to know about this.

Edit: She moved to InkBunny because it doesn't have draconian restrictions on how sheath = mature for ferals. That's literally her problem with FA. She's such a fucking dogfucker.

 

[alternaive66]

Wow! You know this post (https://kiwifarms.net/threads/furry-fandom-and-drama-general.1102/post-4350869)? Well, let me clarify why you are wrong:
First, the proceeding against DHS was in relation to a request for status (from originally diplomatic channels (“consulate”)) and for freedom of information approval from the previous agencies. My requests were also for information that may be subject to restrictions by intelligence law in the US. The other information I requested was because of a reason to believe at the time of child trafficking done by child protection agencies. This was theorized by several advocates in Ontario. I also don’t have a criminal record and the charge that I was tried for was dropped by the prosecutor.
Second, I brought a claim against my former group homes, which the only pursuant issues which my mother consented to being a plaintiff on, were against a children’s aid society (CPS) for breach of child protection laws.
Third, my LinkedIn articles are based on what I decide to write. I don’t expect people to believe everything they read. Also, most articles are law or arts industry related.
But what does not fact-checking and spreading rumours do exactly? NOTHING!
You all are being fucking morons!

 

[Ledian]

Wow! You know this post (https://kiwifarms.net/threads/furry-fandom-and-drama-general.1102/post-4350869)? Well, let me clarify why you are wrong:
First, the proceeding against DHS was in relation to a request for status (from originally diplomatic channels (“consulate”)) and for freedom of information approval from the previous agencies. My requests were also for information that may be subject to restrictions by intelligence law in the US. The other information I requested was because of a reason to believe at the time of child trafficking done by child protection agencies. This was theorized by several advocates in Ontario. I also don’t have a criminal record and the charge that I was tried for was dropped by the prosecutor.
Second, I brought a claim against my former group homes, which the only pursuant issues which my mother consented to being a plaintiff on, were against a children’s aid society (CPS) for breach of child protection laws.
Third, my LinkedIn articles are based on what I decide to write. I don’t expect people to believe everything they read. Also, most articles are law or arts industry related.
But what does not fact-checking and spreading rumours do exactly? NOTHING!
You all are being fucking morons!

First you linked that post incorrectly, that's impressive.
Second, considering that was more than a year and a half ago, why would you bring it back up to try and debunk it? No one remembered all that info and it's been a year and half.
Third, were you just googling your name, say that post, and just had to do something about it?

 

[alternaive66]

First you linked that post incorrectly, that's impressive.
Second, considering that was more than a year and a half ago, why would you bring it back up to try and debunk it? No one remembered all that info and it's been a year and half.
Third, were you just googling your name, say that post, and just had to do something about it?

Out of curiousity and second, I didn’t know it was here. Oops! Also, I copied the link from the relevant post. If it’s incorrect, sorry!

 

[Uncle Warren]

Out of curiousity and second, I didn’t know it was here. Oops! Also, I copied the link from the relevant post. If it’s incorrect, sorry!

Who the fuck are you

 

[Lou’s Biggest Fan]

Wow! You know this post (https://kiwifarms.net/threads/furry-fandom-and-drama-general.1102/post-4350869)? Well, let me clarify why you are wrong:
First, the proceeding against DHS was in relation to a request for status (from originally diplomatic channels (“consulate”)) and for freedom of information approval from the previous agencies. My requests were also for information that may be subject to restrictions by intelligence law in the US. The other information I requested was because of a reason to believe at the time of child trafficking done by child protection agencies. This was theorized by several advocates in Ontario. I also don’t have a criminal record and the charge that I was tried for was dropped by the prosecutor.
Second, I brought a claim against my former group homes, which the only pursuant issues which my mother consented to being a plaintiff on, were against a children’s aid society (CPS) for breach of child protection laws.
Third, my LinkedIn articles are based on what I decide to write. I don’t expect people to believe everything they read. Also, most articles are law or arts industry related.
But what does not fact-checking and spreading rumours do exactly? NOTHING!
You all are being fucking morons!

I’d tell you to kill yourself but I want to see where this goes.