I didn't see this earlier, but
YES, FUCKING YES
This is the mistake I see all too often not just when people choose to critique Jerry, but when people critique lolcows or certain figures in general. You can't just throw random points at people about someone, especially like Jerry, and expect them all to hold water just because you hate them and you're right for doing so. That is what Jerry does.
That's why I get kinda booty-blasted whenever people bring up that Laptop CP thing to incriminate, because there's literally nothing out there to prove it, and as far as I can tell, it originated from ED. Because of this very fact and the fact that intellectuals like those who take Atrocious Youtubers seriously believe it's an undeniably true story, this gives Jerry and his fans not only an out, but also a counter for all criticism that exists ever.
Even for points that are supported by fact, you can't just bring them up haphazardly without confirming them to be true. You need to support them, make sure they can stand on their own two feet. After presenting a solid argument, all you need to do is wait and watch Jerry's defenders slip and fall overthemselves. I specifically remember one instance on Twitter where Patch (before Mod Ebara) got backed into a corner trying to dispute the validity of Stockholm, going from "that's not real" to "okay it's real, so what?"
Happy 800 pages, Jerry. Look up DARVO. It's common in troony fuckboys like you.
