Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

I'm curious on what lie they're going to try in October, since I don't think they'll be able to hold onto anything. I fully expect they'll just make something up and blare it on the news really hard.
At this rate? A full on porn parody of the Russian peepee tapes directed by Tom Arnold that the entire media complex plays completely straight and acts as if they were 100% authentic found footage.
 
At this rate? A full on porn parody of the Russian peepee tapes directed by Tom Arnold that the entire media complex plays completely straight and acts as if they were 100% authentic found footage.
Oh look! I used the time travel code on Fry's ass to check the future and find out the plan.
blame trump.jpg


(I don't think that's a metaphor, I think they'll literally try to kill someone and blame it on Trump.)
 
Posted this in the 2020 election thread, will post here:

Anon on /pol/ makes an interesting point about the recent controversies and older ones being drudged back up.

View attachment 1583855

I actually agree with 4chan on this for once. Democrats know that another 2016 is possible (popular vote win but narrow loss by electoral college) so they're desperately trying to do anything to stop that. I doubt it will have much effect since people are desensitised at this point.
 
Also think about it, statistically most people will at some point in their lives find themselves in a long term relationship. Incel as an insult is a particularly weak one, which probably only work on internet forums populated by young adults who realistically are on both the left and right virgins. I think it's not a controversial statement that the terminally online have sex at much later points than the regular person. So Incel as a term was made up by self professed incels on places like reddit who complained about not having sex, then other users on the site who probably were also virgins started using incel as an insult.

Which makes it all ridiculous when you have journalists accusing married men of being incels. I don't think these people realize that calling 50 year old Republicans virgins doesn't work as well as calling your regular 4chan user a virign.

The people decrying "incels" are also the ones screaming about rape culture. Maybe tying ones worth in society to their ability to put thier dick into something isn't a great idea if you believe there is an epidemic of women being forced into having sex?
 
The people decrying "incels" are also the ones screaming about rape culture. Maybe tying ones worth in society to their ability to put thier dick into something isn't a great idea if you believe there is an epidemic of women being forced into having sex?

There is. Sex trafficking is a major problem. Simultaneously, Nick Fuentes is also a pathetic loser. Both things can be true at once.
 
It's telling it's pretty much all of their previous debunked "scandals" being thrown back in desperately interspersed with occasional desperate new attempts. They even drug out that thing that wanted Trump to rape her.

I'm curious on what lie they're going to try in October, since I don't think they'll be able to hold onto anything. I fully expect they'll just make something up and blare it on the news really hard.

They're already trying Russia again. This time another Anonymous Whistleblower complaint claiming DHS covering for Trump is why the Russiagate probe failed.

Guess that thing about the CIA or FBI or whatever having a secret anti-Trump project pissed them off a bit. Or maybe it was them revealing it was that fat fucking faggot in the military that faked records was the primary push for it all.

1599694804496.png

 
Same thing with Trump. Like you can call them scumbags - you can call them cads (why does no one seem to use that word any more) - but incels? Literally not true.

I think at this point it's signaling. The main point isn't to insult the person, the point is to signal to women that "you should not hang around this person, have a relationship, or sleep with them".

(The assumption is that their side has a monopoly on promiscuous women, which is... well, a topic on its own.)

If you call someone a racist or fascist, you make them "the bad boy", and potentially attractive. If you call them an anti-woman creep who isn't a good lay, you're trying to counter-act that effect. And if you call a celebrity an incel, you're really calling their fanbase incels, hoping it scares away women and the men who want to sleep with them.

It's a decent branding attempt, as far as it goes, but it got overused too fast.
 
I think at this point it's signaling. The main point isn't to insult the person, the point is to signal to women that "you should not hang around this person, have a relationship, or sleep with them".

(The assumption is that their side has a monopoly on promiscuous women, which is... well, a topic on its own.)

If you call someone a racist or fascist, you make them "the bad boy", and potentially attractive. If you call them an anti-woman creep who isn't a good lay, you're trying to counter-act that effect. And if you call a celebrity an incel, you're really calling their fanbase incels, hoping it scares away women and the men who want to sleep with them.

It's a decent branding attempt, as far as it goes, but it got overused too fast.

Women don't actually find fascists attractive though, certainly not the vocally online ones. It wouldn't surprise me if people like Stonetoss were virgins.

The issue is that "fascist" has been used for anyone vaguely conservative since the 1940s and as a result is meaningless. Incel similarly originally meant the Stonetoss/Fuentes type far right loser but now just gets thrown around to the point of complete meaninglessness.

In Rogan's case he's not even conservative, he's basically a moderate Democrat who can just see that Biden isn't fit for office. It shows how meaningless all these terms have become.
 
Women don't actually find fascists attractive though, certainly not the vocally online ones. It wouldn't surprise me if people like Stonetoss were virgins.

The issue is that "fascist" has been used for anyone vaguely conservative since the 1940s and as a result is meaningless. Incel similarly originally meant the Stonetoss/Fuentes type far right loser but now just gets thrown around to the point of complete meaninglessness.

In Rogan's case he's not even conservative, he's basically a moderate Democrat who can just see that Biden isn't fit for office. It shows how meaningless all these terms have become.
Did Fuentes shit on one of your super chats or something recently? :story:
 
Women don't actually find fascists attractive though, certainly not the vocally online ones. It wouldn't surprise me if people like Stonetoss were virgins.

The issue is that "fascist" has been used for anyone vaguely conservative since the 1940s and as a result is meaningless. Incel similarly originally meant the Stonetoss/Fuentes type far right loser but now just gets thrown around to the point of complete meaninglessness.

In Rogan's case he's not even conservative, he's basically a moderate Democrat who can just see that Biden isn't fit for office. It shows how meaningless all these terms have become.

The fact that Nazi-themed porn is crazy popular in Israel says you're wrong, buddy.
 
Did Fuentes shit on one of your super chats or something recently? :story:

No, I'm just pointing out the sort of person that people were originally referring to, before the usual massive overuse that also happened to "racist", "worse than Hitler", and so on. The difference was just that it happened much faster, whereas the other typical insults were worn out over decades of endless use. I'd never call someone an incel on Twitter either, the word's been run into the ground.
 
Women don't actually find fascists attractive though, certainly not the vocally online ones. It wouldn't surprise me if people like Stonetoss were virgins.

It's not the fascism itself that is attractive, it's the taboo. The societal disapproval gives the aura of danger or mystery. Some eras it's greasers, some eras it's mopey unemployed musicians, some eras it's Vanilla Ice on a motorcycle.

Right now the "dangerous" side is the counter-culture right. Even Antifa isn't edgy and dangerous, after getting their butts kicked by every PD across the nation. So you have to make a label that doesn't just say "dangerous", it also says "unattractive".
 
It's not the fascism itself that is attractive, it's the taboo. The societal disapproval gives the aura of danger or mystery. Some eras it's greasers, some eras it's mopey unemployed musicians, some eras it's Vanilla Ice on a motorcycle.

Right now the "dangerous" side is the counter-culture right. Even Antifa isn't edgy and dangerous, after getting their butts kicked by every PD across the nation. So you have to make a label that doesn't just say "dangerous", it also says "unattractive".

Maybe, but I don't really see that many women being drawn to neo-fascists, or Antifa for that matter. The general public sees radical political groups like that as nuts, not alluring.

The extreme left is no more attractive, most people would think people like Vaush are absolutely disgusting.
 
Maybe, but I don't really see many women being drawn to neo-fascists, or Antifa for that matter. The general public sees radical political groups like that as nuts, not alluring.

Have you actually met any women, or are you just going off what your Imam told you they were like?

less unserious answer:
I think what you're trying to say is the most self-identifying Neo-facists are greasy sperglord blowhards, and most Antifa are obsequious castrati soy boys. The fact what they are doing "dangerous" things DOES give them pull - its just for those specimens of humanity "pulling pussy way out of their league" means 3-4s.

Without turning this into the Penthouse Powerlevel forum, before the 2016 elections I was out with a couple's birthday group of extended friends. I was with a group and we were discussing the candidates, and I (having had few so not thinking better of it) wanted them to shut up about Trump said something to the effect that any charge you level against Trump went double for Hilary and (again, I was about 6 or 7 in at this point, and this is my perspective) went through and broke down all their Orange Man Worse arguments - without excusing Trump. Everyone just sort sat there thinking about about it, except for one girl who lost her shit at me for being "an ignorant sexist because its time we had a woman president" or something. I just sort of stood there a little shocked for a minute because I didn't think I'd done anything meltdown worthy, but just sort of shrugged and changed the conversation with everyone who didn't storm off.
I think that's the end of it, but midway through the night, she comes over and apologies, I say its not a big deal.
I think that's the end it, but end of the night she jumps into my uber after me to "apologize" some more.
I do not think my white guy dance moves, ravishing KWF poster good looks, nor witty repertoire was what made her catapult herself into the uber of someone she just met a few hours ago instead of going home with one of the other guys who were actually chatting her up and presumably did not tell her that Hilary Clinton was a garbage presidential candidate.
 
Last edited:
Wilmington women indicted on hate crime charges after viral MAGA hat theft

You know, out of principle, I need to note they are both being over charged.

Out of pragmatism, I also need to note that for once that's likely to not matter. Any jury in America will tie themselves into knots to make even the most egregious overcharge make sense to them when the victim is a -child-. If the prosecutor came out and said "I want the death penalty", while a jury would likely end up saying no they'd spend a reeeeeal long time trying to think of how to say yes.
 
I think at this point it's signaling. The main point isn't to insult the person, the point is to signal to women that "you should not hang around this person, have a relationship, or sleep with them".

It's a decent branding attempt, as far as it goes, but it got overused too fast.
I think you're more right than you may realize, it's essentially just trying to weaponize calling someone a Creep. That's a label you don't want being tossed at you though I know some who will absolutely drop it when mildly irritated. It's a shame because there are actual, genuinely creepy people who sometimes deserve some social backlash but it has gone the way of calling someone a 'neckbeard'.

Now that is has been used too heavily that it lost most meaning or value, the label no longer serves any real warning.
 
Same thing with Trump. Like you can call them scumbags - you can call them cads (why does no one seem to use that word any more) - but incels? Literally not true.
Most Trump supporters I've seen have children or married. So that incel argument has no weight. Ironically, the far left have more sex deviants than Trump could EVER do.
 
They're already trying Russia again. This time another Anonymous Whistleblower complaint claiming DHS covering for Trump is why the Russiagate probe failed.

Guess that thing about the CIA or FBI or whatever having a secret anti-Trump project pissed them off a bit. Or maybe it was them revealing it was that fat fucking faggot in the military that faked records was the primary push for it all.

View attachment 1583980
This is such a national security risk, I tweeted out about it immediately assuming it’s real instead of actually investigating.

i am good at my job.
 
Back