Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

They're already trying Russia again. This time another Anonymous Whistleblower complaint claiming DHS covering for Trump is why the Russiagate probe failed.

Guess that thing about the CIA or FBI or whatever having a secret anti-Trump project pissed them off a bit. Or maybe it was them revealing it was that fat fucking faggot in the military that faked records was the primary push for it all.

View attachment 1583980

If i could only throw one person into the volcano, Schiff is a serious contender. A real unethical, power-abusing, grudge-holding lowlife.
 
Incel similarly originally meant the Stonetoss/Fuentes type far right loser
I wouldn't say Stonetoss is "far-right". The best descriptor for him would be "civic nationalist who opposes multiculturalism and professes of pro-white ideas [in response to all the anti-white activism going on lately] with a distinct satirical edge". While that certainly makes him "non-establishment" politically, it doesn't make him "far-right", unless we define "far-right" as anyone further to the right of any given Conservative Inc. talking head.
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't say "Stormtoss" is far-right. The best descriptor for him would be "civic nationalist who opposes multiculturalism and professes of pro-white ideas [in response to all the anti-white activism going on lately] with a distinct satirical edge". While that certainly makes him "non-establishment" politically, it doesn't make him "far-right", unless we define "far-right" as anyone further to the right of any given Conservative Inc. talking head.
According to the internet, “far-right” is “anything that does not identify with the most extreme leftist views”.
 
I wouldn't say "Stormtoss" is far-right. The best descriptor for him would be "civic nationalist who opposes multiculturalism and professes of pro-white ideas [in response to all the anti-white activism going on lately] with a distinct satirical edge". While that certainly makes him "non-establishment" politically, it doesn't make him "far-right", unless we define "far-right" as anyone further to the right of any given Conservative Inc. talking head.
Considering most of his talking points involves eugenics, Jew conspiracy, anti-abortion and misogyny, it's not far fetched to conclude that Stonetoss is right-wing. Alt-right maybe, but not far right.
 
I wouldn't say "Stormtoss" is far-right. The best descriptor for him would be "civic nationalist who opposes multiculturalism

>civic nationalist
>opposes multiculturalism
pick one

(Ok, you can theoretically believe that different races can be unified by a single shared culture/national identity, but as somebody who expresses a lot of 'race-realist' views, that probably doesn't apply to Stonetoss)

His anonymity does give him license to play with ideas he might not be fully committed to, which makes things murky.
Taking his comics at face value though, they do have a white nationalist angle.
 
Considering most of his talking points involves eugenics, Jew conspiracy, anti-abortion and misogyny, it's not far fetched to conclude that Stonetoss is right-wing. Alt-right maybe, but not far right.
I never argued against him being right-wing in general. However, the "eugenics and misogyny" stuff either don't really exist (I never read a comic where Stonetoss said anything about eugenics or misogyny in general, let alone anything particularly pro-eugenics or pro-misogyny), and the "Jew conspiracy" and "anti-abortion" stuff has a satirical edge to them so I wouldn't suggest taking them to seriously.
 
I never argued against him being right-wing in general. However, the "eugenics and misogyny" stuff either don't really exist (I never read a comic where Stonetoss said anything about eugenics or misogyny in general, let alone anything particularly pro-eugenics or pro-misogyny), and the "Jew conspiracy" and "anti-abortion" stuff has a satirical edge to them so I wouldn't suggest taking them to seriously.

The Jewspiracy stuff, while its hard to tell, always smacked of Poe's Law to me. The stuff that doesn't was just the usually calling out of ADL-ism.
 
and the "Jew conspiracy" and "anti-abortion" stuff has a satirical edge to them so I wouldn't suggest taking them to seriously.
With that, he DOES attract an audience that DOES believe in radical positions. Just take a look at his comments section. Which a few of them don't like Trump's position on Israel or him having Jewish family (you could argue that's TDS in and of itself, so I'm not going off topic.)

Having said that, I DO recognize that he has poked fun of the alt-right or MAGA crowd a couple times so he's not completely alt-right, but for the most part, he does resonate that hostile right wing atmosphere in his subject matter,
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Iwasamwillbe
Women don't actually find fascists attractive though, certainly not the vocally online ones. It wouldn't surprise me if people like Stonetoss were virgins.
Well.... of course we know that everything on the internet is true - which is my way of saying, I can't verify this, but here is one testimonial from back in 2017.

In my DJ career, I have spent a great deal of time in communities and scenes that normal folks would regard as underground. For many years, I DJed BDSM parties, Fetish events, and the like. I’ve DJed warehouses and clubs with no names, buried in the wreckage of abandoned industrial parks. The marketplace of sex is one which I know exceedingly well. I’ve been DJing these scenes for the better part of 20 years.​
To quote Blade Runner, I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe.​
As that commenter lamented, so I’ve seen first-hand. These SJWs, the radical feminists who spend their lives fighting the Patriarchy? They come to my clubs to be beaten senseless on crosses, chained to them by men dressed in uniforms very reminiscent of the Nazis. Yes, it’s a thing, as anybody who has ever been to a Goth club can attest. They demand to be tied up, burned, bruised, and battered.​
Go on social media, and you will see SJWs telling us that Nazis are everywhere, that they are evil, and foul, and legion. They are in the White House, they are on Youtube, they are on Twitter, they are in Video Games. Nazis, everywhere. And so they march out into the streets, the Black Bloc, Antifascists engaging in what Tom Kratman calls a bit of political theater (not unlike Fascists once did).​
But at the end of a long week of fighting the cisnormative heteropatriarchy, they come to be beaten by men dressed as Nazis, to the gritty beats of loud Industrial music in the depths of an Industrial park.​


Now if you want something more scientific, I suppose we could do some numbers check on nazi porn...

Any volunteers?
1599703880363.png


If i could only throw one person into the volcano, Schiff is a serious contender. A real unethical, power-abusing, grudge-holding lowlife.

He literally looks like a science experiment in transforming a rat into a human. He's like the platonic ideal of a shady accountant.

I wouldn't say Stonetoss is "far-right". The best descriptor for him would be "civic nationalist who opposes multiculturalism and professes of pro-white ideas [in response to all the anti-white activism going on lately] with a distinct satirical edge". While that certainly makes him "non-establishment" politically, it doesn't make him "far-right", unless we define "far-right" as anyone further to the right of any given Conservative Inc. talking head.

At a glance, I'd say he's "South Parkian" edgy boi - he rebels against whatever is the norm. Even he admits right now that it's against the left.

If he's still around when the pendulum starts to swing the other way, I wouldn't be shocked to see some pro-antifa comics.

Oh! Speaking of comics! Insanity I got emailed about the other day...
1599704464151.png

1599704491663.png

Seriously??? IDW???
 
According to the internet, “far-right” is “anything that does not identify with the most extreme leftist views”.

The left are approaching the Political Left Pole. A point on the political spectrum that all other views appear to be radically far to the right.

It doesn't help that they're being herded that way by Communist Insurrectionists intentionally trying to radicalize the left.
 
Apparently, people are now using Trump admitting to downplaying the COVID-19 threat as a way to smear him.

While desperately hoping no one remembers them calling Trump a racist for wanting to cut off travel to and from China, or deBlasio and Pelosi talking up going to Chinatown.

God, they lie and lie again and when you catch them at it you might as well not bother because it doesn't even faze them.
 
The difference was just that it happened much faster, whereas the other typical insults were worn out over decades of endless use.

This is something I've noticed in general, that slang, especially insults, cycles ridiculously fast in the last decade or more. I suppose the absolute overwhelming blitz of it on social media combined with a bunch of hyperactive juvenile minds spamming every new thing that sticks in their brain as much as they can is causing what used to happen over decades to happen in years or months.
 
The reason they lost in 2016 despite rigging the election was because they underestimated how much they needed in order to swing it. If Trump does nothing, and the thing I've criticized him about most is his utter lack of action on blatant voter fraud in both 2016 and the 2018 midterms, they will be able to see exactly how much they need to rig it once the votes are totaled on election night and then have weeks to fabricate as many semi trucks full of bins of straight ticket democrat ballots as they need.

Replying to an old post... it's likely the true reason they failed to rig it was Wikileaks. Wikileaks was still very active at the time and rigging a national election requires a lot of communication so you know how much of an edge to dial in in each state without making it clear that something fishy is happening.

With Wikileaks, there was a danger that an email or phone call audio could be leaked with Democrats discussing how to cheat. It would be the most destructive political document in US history and could end the Democratic party. So cheating went on but they weren't able to coordinate it well enough to win.

I wonder if they see much of a leak threat this year.
 
Back