Trump Derangement Syndrome - Orange man bad. Read the OP! (ᴛʜɪs ᴛʜʀᴇᴀᴅ ɪs ʟɪᴋᴇ ᴋɪᴡɪ ғᴀʀᴍs ʀᴇᴠɪᴇᴡs ɴᴏᴡ) 🗿🗿🗿🗿

Do people really think Stonetoss is serious? Folks here must be more autistic than I thought because five seconds spent reading his Twitter makes it abundantly clear he's trolling and being sarcastic.

He's what a regular cartoonist was 15 - 20 years ago.... poking fun at people who deserve to be poked. The fact both sides of the political spectrum today are twisting their brains into pretzels to find out which "side" he's on proves how fundamentally destroyed comedy was under the last 10 years of SJW rule.

People cannot recognize satire for satire's sake anymore.
 
These hacks have me questioning if Watergate 1.0 was even legit. Why would such a popular president who won in an overwhelming landslide need to get involved with a petty break-in? Feeling based and Nixonpilled..
Because Nixon was also a bit of a paranoid nutter. We have plenty of evidence during and after the fact to solidly say he was being nefarious. I would say there is a link between what the democrats have tried now and what happened with Nixon, but is causative not continuing. "We took down one president, we can take down another".
 
Because Nixon was also a bit of a paranoid nutter. We have plenty of evidence during and after the fact to solidly say he was being nefarious. I would say there is a link between what the democrats have tried now and what happened with Nixon, but is causative not continuing. "We took down one president, we can take down another".

I think part of it is they're projecting onto Trump what they want their own dictators to do, while also having this imaginary Trump that exists inside their bubbles that has nothing to do with actual-Trump, but they keep reacting to the former while the latter refuses to play ball.
 
Posted this in the 2020 election thread, will post here because it's relevant to both:

Anon on /pol/ makes an interesting point about the recent controversies and older ones being drudged back up.

View attachment 1583855
Speaking of throwing shit against the wall, let's see what sticks today...

trump impeachment sperging.PNG
trump impeachment sperging 2.PNG
 

I hate this argument from a purely mathematical point of view, 200k is less than 0.1% of the USA's total population. 200k would be a big deal in my country since its close to 10% but in America is a tiny number.

Even the global deaths of Corona is less than 1% of America's population. These people are acting like half the damn country has died from the wuflu
 
Trump's greatest accomplishment shall forever be revealing to the general public how blatantly biased and deceitful the media/entertainment industry really is.

They certainly haven't done themselves any favors what with things like "fiery but peaceful" and all the fake or easily debunked bookshilling garbage they've been pushing out to own the orange man.
 
Reporting from the normie sphere: pulled up the front page of Yahoo today to test something, and was greeted with this headline. It wasn't even in a rotating banner, just static.

Screenshot 2020-09-10 at 11.17.52 AM.png


Links to a NYT story embedded in Yahoo's template (archive), which isn't really worth reading. Just wanted to highlight the phrasing they're using to frame this stuff to low-information readers who don't look past the headline.

President Donald Trump mounted a public attack unusual even for him over the Labor Day weekend, accusing his military leadership of advocating war “so that all of those wonderful companies that make the bombs and make the planes and make everything else stay happy.”

Even for a president who has never hesitated to contradict himself for political advantage, it was a remarkable shift. His questioning the patriotism and judgment of America’s military leaders, even accusing them of pursuing global conflicts to profit the military-industrial complex, marked an election-year shift in which he has turned against two of the remaining institutions he spent most of his first term embracing as pillars of his “America First” policy.

I've seen a slight bit of "sticking" with the story, and I think it's because it's easy to understand attacks on veterans. I won't bother posting the usual social media takes, but it's worth looking for something to show up in the polling within a week.
 
Reporting from the normie sphere: pulled up the front page of Yahoo today to test something, and was greeted with this headline. It wasn't even in a rotating banner, just static.

View attachment 1585397

Links to a NYT story embedded in Yahoo's template, which isn't really worth reading. Just wanted to highlight the phrasing they're using to frame this stuff to low-information readers who don't look past the headline.



I've seen a slight bit of "sticking" with the story, and I think it's because it's an easy to understand attacks on veterans. I won't bother posting the usual social media takes, but it's worth looking for something to show up in the polling within a week.
21 different people, including John Bolton, BTFO'd that Atlantic article. But that doesn't matter, because the narrative is now out there. They know the military is overwhelmingly conservative, and are trying to drive a wedge between them and Trump.
 
Coolidge and Trump are the complete opposite personality-wise, but probably the closest in terms of policy.
For levity's sake, imagine Coolidge Derangement Syndrome: "This motherfucker won't open his mouth!"
Hell, I couldn't even imagine a taciturn president in this era, especially one who rolled on a "Where others do, don't. And if you have do, do less."

Trump's boisterous personality is definitely a boon in during these times, and despite the his "outsider" status slowly fading, he still shakes things up in politics. With the recent recession, the man BTFO'd Hoover, and made like FDR in quite a short time.
 
Then there are kids who just have to try touching it with their other hand. You feel bad for those kids because you know what's in store for them. No matter how long they live, no matter where life takes them, no matter what schools they go to, no matter what careers they end up pursuing, they have one inescapable fate that awaits them.

They're going to grow up to be stupid.

"It wasn't my fault I touched the stove, it was the stove's fault for being hot."

I thought the president was allowed to kill whoever he wanted as long as their name was on the official "presidential kill list." Is that not a thing anymore since Obama left?

Remember when Obama wanted the power to conduct domestic drone strikes and anyone who disagreed was a racist who wanted the terrorists to win?
 
So why is it every month we get some book being shilled that "this totally exposes drumpf goys"?

People trying to cash in on highly publicised events. This is especially true of Bolton, who isn't actually that interested in interfering with the election (as indicated by the fact he sided against the Atlantic article) but just wanted a comfortable retirement.
 
Back